pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.04232 · v2 · pith:OCPJUH5Jnew · submitted 2025-05-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Taking advantage of multiple scattering for Optical Reflection Tomography

Thomas Wasik , Victor Barolle , Alexandre Aubry , Josselin Garnier This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 13:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords optical diffraction tomographyreflection modemultiple scatteringrefractive index reconstructiontotal variation regularizationoptimization algorithmill-posed inverse problem
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new optimization algorithm uses multiply scattered waves from background structures to enable 3D refractive index reconstruction in reflection-mode optical tomography.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an optimization method for recovering three-dimensional refractive index maps from reflection-mode measurements in optical microscopy. It specifically harnesses multiply scattered light that reflects off uncontrolled background structures and reaches the foreground object from behind. This strategy counters the ill-posed character of reflection data by applying weighted time loss, positivity constraints, and total variation regularization. Validation relies on 2D and 3D simulations that test performance under weak scattering while employing simplified forward models to keep computations tractable. The results also underscore the value of multi-wavelength data and regularization for recovering the low spatial frequencies of the refractive index.

Core claim

Our method takes advantage of the multiply-scattered waves that are reflected by uncontrolled background structures and that illuminate the foreground RI from behind. It tackles the ill-posed nature of the problem using weighted time loss, positivity constraints and Total Variation regularization. We have validated our method with data generated by detailed 2D and 3D simulations, demonstrating its performance under weak scattering conditions and with simplified forward models used in the optimization routine for computational efficiency. In addition, we highlight the need for multi-wavelength analysis and the use of regularization to ensure the reconstruction of the low spatial frequencies.

What carries the argument

Multiply-scattered waves reflected by uncontrolled background structures that illuminate the foreground refractive index object from behind in the reflection configuration.

If this is right

  • Three-dimensional refractive index reconstruction becomes feasible in reflection mode under weak scattering conditions with simplified forward models.
  • Multi-wavelength measurements combined with regularization recover the low spatial frequencies of the refractive index.
  • Positivity constraints and total variation regularization stabilize solutions to the ill-posed reflection inverse problem.
  • Performance holds in detailed 2D and 3D simulations even when the optimization uses approximated scattering models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may support imaging in biological samples where natural scatterers already exist in the background.
  • Relaxing the weak-scattering limit could extend the approach to denser or thicker objects.
  • Testing with real optical setups would reveal how sensitive results are to the precise placement and strength of background reflectors.

Load-bearing premise

Uncontrolled background structures will reliably generate useful multiply-scattered illumination from behind the foreground object that remains adequately captured by simplified forward models.

What would settle it

Reconstruction on simulated data generated without background structures or without multiple scattering contributions, checking whether low spatial frequencies are lost or accuracy collapses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04232 by Alexandre Aubry, Josselin Garnier, Thomas Wasik, Victor Barolle.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the medium to be imaged and illustration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Decomposition of U according to the different possible light scattering paths under second Born approximation. (a) Representation of single scattering contributions. (b) Crossed terms U12 and U21 corresponding to successive interactions with the reflector and the target object. (c) Uncrossed double scattering contributions. The calculation of these cross terms is detailed in Appendix B. Assuming that the s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Support of the spatial frequency spectrum of the object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Reconstruction of sample composed of a cell and a reflector depending [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 2D reconstruction results for different configurations with order 5 Born forward model. Each column corresponds to an optimization algorithm. Row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Reconstruction of complex samples thanks to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 3D Reconstruction with the proposed method of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evolution of prediction depending as a function of the level of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optical Diffraction Tomography (ODT) is a powerful non-invasive imaging technique widely used in biological and medical applications. While significant progress has been made in transmission configuration, reflection ODT remains challenging due to the ill-posed nature of the inverse problem. We present a novel optimization algorithm for 3D refractive index (RI) reconstruction in reflection-mode microscopy. Our method takes advantage of the multiply-scattered waves that are reflected by uncontrolled background structures and that illuminate the foreground RI from behind. It tackles the ill-posed nature of the problem using weighted time loss, positivity constraints and Total Variation regularization. We have validated our method with data generated by detailed 2D and 3D simulations, demonstrating its performance under weak scattering conditions and with simplified forward models used in the optimization routine for computational efficiency. In addition, we highlight the need for multi-wavelength analysis and the use of regularization to ensure the reconstruction of the low spatial frequencies of the foreground RI.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an optimization algorithm for 3D refractive index reconstruction in reflection-mode optical diffraction tomography. It claims to exploit multiply-scattered waves reflected by uncontrolled background structures to provide illumination from behind the foreground object, addressing the ill-posed inverse problem via weighted time loss, positivity constraints, and total variation regularization. Validation is reported on data from detailed 2D and 3D simulations under weak scattering, using simplified forward models in the optimization for computational efficiency, with emphasis on multi-wavelength data and regularization for low spatial frequencies.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work could advance reflection ODT by turning uncontrolled background scattering into a usable illumination source, potentially improving reconstruction of low spatial frequencies without additional hardware. The simulation-based validation with detailed data generation but simplified inversion models demonstrates computational practicality, though the absence of experimental data or quantitative error analysis on real measurements limits the strength of the empirical support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the method 'takes advantage of the multiply-scattered waves that are reflected by uncontrolled background structures' is load-bearing, yet the validation explicitly uses 'simplified forward models used in the optimization routine for computational efficiency' while data comes from detailed simulations. This mismatch risks the simplified model omitting or approximating the background-induced multiple scattering, so that the reconstruction reverts to standard regularized inversion without genuine exploitation of the claimed 'illumination from behind'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No experimental data or error analysis on real measurements is described, leaving the performance claims under weak scattering without direct empirical support; the ill-posed reflection geometry and reliance on regularization then require stronger demonstration that the background mechanism survives the model simplifications.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the need for multi-wavelength analysis but does not specify how wavelengths are combined or selected in the optimization; a brief clarification would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and for recognizing the potential of the approach. We address each major comment below, clarifying the relationship between data generation and the inversion model while committing to revisions that strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the method 'takes advantage of the multiply-scattered waves that are reflected by uncontrolled background structures' is load-bearing, yet the validation explicitly uses 'simplified forward models used in the optimization routine for computational efficiency' while data comes from detailed simulations. This mismatch risks the simplified model omitting or approximating the background-induced multiple scattering, so that the reconstruction reverts to standard regularized inversion without genuine exploitation of the claimed 'illumination from behind'.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The data-generation simulations employ a detailed wave-propagation model that fully accounts for multiple scattering off the background structures, thereby supplying the additional illumination paths from behind the foreground object. The simplified forward model employed during optimization is a computationally efficient approximation (e.g., a single-scattering or Born-type operator) that nevertheless retains the known background geometry as a fixed scattering component; the optimization therefore continues to benefit from the effective back-illumination encoded in the measured data. We will revise the manuscript to provide an explicit description of how the background is represented inside the simplified operator and to include a supplementary analysis (e.g., comparison with and without background structures) demonstrating that the reconstruction quality improvement is attributable to these paths rather than regularization alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No experimental data or error analysis on real measurements is described, leaving the performance claims under weak scattering without direct empirical support; the ill-posed reflection geometry and reliance on regularization then require stronger demonstration that the background mechanism survives the model simplifications.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the present validation is performed exclusively on simulated data. Simulations with known ground truth and controlled weak-scattering conditions allow quantitative assessment of the algorithm’s ability to recover low spatial frequencies, which is difficult to obtain experimentally at this stage. We will expand the manuscript with additional quantitative error metrics (RMSE, structural similarity, and low-frequency Fourier error) computed on the 2-D and 3-D simulation suites, together with an ablation study isolating the contribution of the background-induced illumination. These additions will furnish stronger numerical evidence that the background mechanism remains effective under the simplified forward model. Experimental realization will be the subject of follow-on work once the algorithmic framework is further validated. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained without circular reductions

full rationale

The paper proposes an optimization algorithm for reflection ODT that leverages multiply-scattered waves from background structures. It uses standard techniques like weighted time loss, positivity constraints, and Total Variation regularization to handle the ill-posed problem. Validation is performed using simulations, with simplified forward models for efficiency. No steps in the described method reduce to self-definition or fitted inputs called predictions. The approach does not rely on self-citations for uniqueness or smuggle ansatzes. The derivation remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard assumptions about refractive index positivity and scattering physics, plus tunable regularization parameters whose specific values are not detailed in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • regularization weights and time-loss parameters
    Weighted time loss and Total Variation regularization require tunable parameters whose selection affects the reconstruction of low spatial frequencies.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Refractive index is positive and real-valued
    Invoked as a positivity constraint in the optimization routine.
  • domain assumption Simplified forward models approximate the true multiple-scattering physics sufficiently for optimization
    Used for computational efficiency in the reconstruction algorithm.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5694 in / 1412 out tokens · 58481 ms · 2026-05-22T13:58:13.807931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data,

    E. Wolf, “Three-dimensional structure determination of semi-transparent objects from holographic data,” Optics communications, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 153–156, 1969

    work page 1969

  2. [2]

    Tomographic phase microscopy,

    W. Choi, C. Fang-Yen, K. Badizadegan, S. Oh, N. Lue, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld, “Tomographic phase microscopy,” Nature methods, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 717–719, 2007

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Tomographic phase mi- croscopy: principles and applications in bioimaging,

    D. Jin, R. Zhou, Z. Yaqoob, and P. T. So, “Tomographic phase mi- croscopy: principles and applications in bioimaging,” JOSA B, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. B64–B77, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Cell refractive index for cell biology and disease diagnosis: past, present and future,

    P. Y . Liu, L. K. Chin, W. Ser, H. Chen, C.-M. Hsieh, C.-H. Lee, K.-B. Sung, T. Ayi, P. Yap, B. Liedberg et al., “Cell refractive index for cell biology and disease diagnosis: past, present and future,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 634–644, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine,

    Y . Park, C. Depeursinge, and G. Popescu, “Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine,” Nature photonics, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 578–589, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Principles and techniques of digital holographic mi- croscopy,

    M. K. Kim, “Principles and techniques of digital holographic mi- croscopy,” SPIE reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 018005, 2010

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Inverse-scattering theory within the rytov approximation,

    A. Devaney, “Inverse-scattering theory within the rytov approximation,” Optics letters, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 374–376, 1981

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    Holography, tomography and 3d microscopy as linear filtering operations,

    J. M. Coupland and J. Lobera, “Holography, tomography and 3d microscopy as linear filtering operations,” Measurement science and technology, vol. 19, no. 7, p. 074012, 2008

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Optical tomographic reconstruction based on multi-slice wave propagation method,

    X. Ma, W. Xiao, and F. Pan, “Optical tomographic reconstruction based on multi-slice wave propagation method,”Optics express, vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 22 595–22 607, 2017

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Multi-layer born multiple-scattering model for 3d phase microscopy,

    M. Chen, D. Ren, H.-Y . Liu, S. Chowdhury, and L. Waller, “Multi-layer born multiple-scattering model for 3d phase microscopy,” Optica, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 394–403, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Inverse problem solver for multiple light scattering using modified born series,

    M. Lee, H. Hugonnet, and Y . Park, “Inverse problem solver for multiple light scattering using modified born series,” Optica, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 177–182, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Three-dimensional optical diffraction tomography with lippmann- schwinger model,

    T.-a. Pham, E. Soubies, A. Ayoub, J. Lim, D. Psaltis, and M. Unser, “Three-dimensional optical diffraction tomography with lippmann- schwinger model,”IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 6, pp. 727–738, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    A plug-and-play priors approach for solving nonlinear imaging inverse problems,

    U. S. Kamilov, H. Mansour, and B. Wohlberg, “A plug-and-play priors approach for solving nonlinear imaging inverse problems,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1872–1876, 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    A clearer vision for in vivo imaging,

    R. Weissleder, “A clearer vision for in vivo imaging,” Nature biotechnology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 316–317, 2001

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 7th ed. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  16. [16]

    Reflection-mode optical diffraction tomography for label-free imaging of thick biological specimens,

    S. Kang, R. Zhou, M. Brelen, H. K. Mak, P. T. So, and Z. Yaqoob, “Reflection-mode optical diffraction tomography for label-free imaging of thick biological specimens,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13668, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Reflection-mode diffraction tomography of multiple-scattering samples on a reflective substrate from intensity images,

    T. Li, J. Zhu, Y . Shen, and L. Tian, “Reflection-mode diffraction tomography of multiple-scattering samples on a reflective substrate from intensity images,” Optica, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 406–417, Mar

    work page

  18. [18]

    Available: https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm? URI=optica-12-3-406

    [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm? URI=optica-12-3-406

    work page

  19. [19]

    Exploiting volumetric wave correlation for enhanced depth imaging in scattering medium,

    Y .-R. Lee, D.-Y . Kim, Y . Jo, M. Kim, and W. Choi, “Exploiting volumetric wave correlation for enhanced depth imaging in scattering medium,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, apr 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37467-z

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Adaptive Optical Multi-Spectral Matrix Approach for Label-free High-resolution Imaging through Complex Scattering Media

    Y . Zhang, D. Minh, Z. Wang, T. Zhang, T. Chen, and C. W. Hsu, “Deep imaging inside scattering media through virtual spatiotemporal wavefrontshaping,” arXiv:2306.08793, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2306.08793

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Multi-spectral reflection matrix for ultrafast 3d label-free microscopy,

    P. Balondrade, V . Barolle, N. Guigui, E. Auriant, N. Rougier, C. Boccara, M. Fink, and A. Aubry, “Multi-spectral reflection matrix for ultrafast 3d label-free microscopy,” Nature Photonics, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1097– 1104, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Optical tomographic image reconstruc- tion based on beam propagation and sparse regularization,

    U. S. Kamilov, I. N. Papadopoulos, M. H. Shoreh, A. Goy, C. V onesch, M. Unser, and D. Psaltis, “Optical tomographic image reconstruc- tion based on beam propagation and sparse regularization,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2016

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Tracing multiple scattering trajectories for deep optical imaging in scattering media,

    S. Kang, Y . Kwon, H. Lee, S. Kim, J. H. Hong, S. Yoon, and W. Choi, “Tracing multiple scattering trajectories for deep optical imaging in scattering media,” Nature communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 6871, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Ultrasound differential phase contrast using backscattering and the memory effect,

    T. D. Weber, N. Khetan, R. Yang, and J. Mertz, “Ultrasound differential phase contrast using backscattering and the memory effect,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 118, no. 12, Mar. 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Bayesian approach for a ro- bust speed-of-sound reconstruction using pulse-echo ultrasound,

    P. Stahli, M. Frenz, and M. Jaeger, “Bayesian approach for a ro- bust speed-of-sound reconstruction using pulse-echo ultrasound,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 457–467, Feb. 2021

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Mora, Inversion=migration+tomography

    P. Mora, Inversion=migration+tomography. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1989, pp. 78–101

    work page 1989

  27. [27]

    Seismic imaging and illumination with internal multiples,

    A. E. Malcolm, B. Ursin, and M. V . De Hoop, “Seismic imaging and illumination with internal multiples,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 847–864, 2009

    work page 2009

  28. [28]

    Reflection seismic waveform tomography,

    Y . Wang and Y . Rao, “Reflection seismic waveform tomography,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 114, no. B3, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1029/2008JB005916

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    The complex image method,

    G. Taraldsen, “The complex image method,” Wave Motion, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 2005

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    Efficient inversion of multiple- scattering model for optical diffraction tomography,

    E. Soubies, T.-A. Pham, and M. Unser, “Efficient inversion of multiple- scattering model for optical diffraction tomography,” Optics express, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 21 786–21 800, 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Fast convolution with free- space green’s functions,

    F. Vico, L. Greengard, and M. Ferrando, “Fast convolution with free- space green’s functions,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 323, pp. 191–203, 2016

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems,

    A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems,” SIAM Journal on Imaging 13 Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 183–202, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1137/080716542

    work page doi:10.1137/080716542 2009

  33. [33]

    Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,

    L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 259–268, 1992. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016727899290242F

    work page arXiv 1992

  34. [34]

    Adaptive proximal gradient methods for structured neural networks,

    J. Yun, A. C. Lozano, and E. Yang, “Adaptive proximal gradient methods for structured neural networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y . Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. W. Vaughan, Eds., vol. 34. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021, pp. 24 365– 24 378. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper files...

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Re- trieving time-dependent green’s functions in optics with low-coherence interferometry,

    A. Badon, G. Lerosey, A. C. Boccara, M. Fink, and A. Aubry, “Re- trieving time-dependent green’s functions in optics with low-coherence interferometry,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 2, Jan. 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Sensitivity advantage of swept source and fourier domain optical coherence tomography,

    M. Choma, M. Sarunic, C. Yang, and J. Izatt, “Sensitivity advantage of swept source and fourier domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 2183–2189, sep 2003

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    High-speed spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 1.3 µm wavelength,

    S. H. Yun, G. J. Tearney, B. E. Bouma, B. H. Park, and J. F. de Boer, “High-speed spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 1.3 µm wavelength,” Opt. Express, vol. 11, no. 26, pp. 3598–3604, Dec 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract. cfm?URI=oe-11-26-3598

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    Efficient holoscopy image reconstruction,

    D. Hillmann, G. Franke, C. L ¨uhrs, P. Koch, and G. H ¨uttmann, “Efficient holoscopy image reconstruction,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. 21 247–21 263, Sep. 2012. [Online]. Available: https: //opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-20-19-21247

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Full-field time-encoded frequency-domain optical coherence tomography,

    B. Pova ˇzay, A. Unterhuber, B. Hermann, H. Sattmann, H. Arthaber, and W. Drexler, “Full-field time-encoded frequency-domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 7661–7669, Aug. 2006. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm? uri=oe-14-17-7661

    work page 2006

  40. [40]

    Robust acoustic time reversal with high-order multiple scattering,

    A. Derode, P. Roux, and M. Fink, “Robust acoustic time reversal with high-order multiple scattering,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 23, pp. 4206–4209, Dec. 1995

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media,

    A. P. Mosk, A. Lagendijk, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, “Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 283–292, may 2012

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Signal degradation by multiple scattering in optical coherence tomography of dense tissue: a monte carlo study towards optical clearing of biotissues,

    R. K. Wang, “Signal degradation by multiple scattering in optical coherence tomography of dense tissue: a monte carlo study towards optical clearing of biotissues,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 47, no. 13, p. 2281, jun 2002. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/13/307

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-9155/47/13/307 2002

  43. [43]

    Parikh and S

    N. Parikh and S. Boyd, “Proximal algorithms,” Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 127–239, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2400000003

    work page doi:10.1561/2400000003 2014

  44. [44]

    Fast gradient-based algorithms for con- strained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems,

    A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “Fast gradient-based algorithms for con- strained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2419–2434, 2009

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Convergence guarantees for rmsprop and adam in non-convex optimization and an empirical com- parison to nesterov acceleration,

    S. De, A. Mukherjee, and E. Ullah, “Convergence guarantees for rmsprop and adam in non-convex optimization and an empirical com- parison to nesterov acceleration,” 2018

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Adaptive methods for nonconvex optimization,

    M. Zaheer, S. J. Reddi, D. Sachan, S. Kale, and S. Kumar, “Adaptive methods for nonconvex optimization,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 2018, vol. 31. [Online]. Available: https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2018/ hash/8186-adaptive-methods-for-nonconvex-optimization-8186.pdf

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Proximal adam: Robust adaptive update scheme for constrained optimization,

    P. Melchior, R. Joseph, and F. Moolekamp, “Proximal adam: Robust adaptive update scheme for constrained optimization,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10094

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Automatic differentiation in pytorch,

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, and A. Lerer, “Automatic differentiation in pytorch,” 2017

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    A recursive born approach to nonlinear inverse scattering,

    U. S. Kamilov, D. Liu, H. Mansour, and P. T. Boufounos, “A recursive born approach to nonlinear inverse scattering,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1052–1056, 2016

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    A convergent born series for solving the inhomogeneous helmholtz equation in arbitrarily large media,

    G. Osnabrugge, S. Leedumrongwatthanakun, and I. M. Vellekoop, “A convergent born series for solving the inhomogeneous helmholtz equation in arbitrarily large media,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 322, pp. 113–124, 2016. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999116302595

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Three-dimensional ultrasound matrix imaging,

    F. Bureau, J. Robin, A. Le Ber, W. Lambert, M. Fink, and A. Aubry, “Three-dimensional ultrasound matrix imaging,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, p. 6793, 2024

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Matrix imaging as a tool for high-resolution monitoring of deep volcanic plumbing systems with seismic noise,

    E. Giraudat, A. Burtin, A. L. Ber, M. Fink, J.-C. Komorowski, and A. Aubry, “Matrix imaging as a tool for high-resolution monitoring of deep volcanic plumbing systems with seismic noise,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 5, p. 509, 2024

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    First-in-human diagnostic study of hepatic steatosis with computed ultrasound tomography in echo mode,

    P. St ¨ahli, C. Becchetti, N. Korta Martiartu, A. Berzigotti, M. Frenz, and M. Jaeger, “First-in-human diagnostic study of hepatic steatosis with computed ultrasound tomography in echo mode,” Communications Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 176, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Seismic tomography reveals contrasting styles of subduction-channel and mantle-wedge exhumation controlled by upper plate divergent motion,

    S. Solarino, M. G. Malus `a, E. Eva, A. Paul, S. Guillot, S. Pondrelli, S. Salimbeni, and L. Zhao, “Seismic tomography reveals contrasting styles of subduction-channel and mantle-wedge exhumation controlled by upper plate divergent motion,” Gondwana Research, vol. 136, pp. 169–182, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Rapid magma ascent beneath la palma revealed by seismic tomography,

    L. D’Auria, I. Koulakov, J. Prudencio, I. Cabrera-P ´erez, J. M. Ib ´a˜nez, J. Barrancos, R. Garc ´ıa-Hern´andez, D. Mart ´ınez van Dorth, G. D. Padilla, M. Przeor, V . Ortega, P. Hern ´andez, and N. M. Per ´ez, “Rapid magma ascent beneath la palma revealed by seismic tomography,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Multiple scattering from icequakes at erebus volcano, antarctica: Implications for imaging at glaciated volcanoes,

    J. Chaput, M. Campillo, R. C. Aster, P. Roux, P. R. Kyle, H. Knox, and P. Czoski, “Multiple scattering from icequakes at erebus volcano, antarctica: Implications for imaging at glaciated volcanoes,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 1129–1141, Feb. 2015

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Reflection measurement of the scattering mean free path at the onset of multiple scattering,

    A. Go ¨ıcoechea, C. Br¨utt, A. Le Ber, F. Bureau, W. Lambert, C. Prada, A. Derode, and A. Aubry, “Reflection measurement of the scattering mean free path at the onset of multiple scattering,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 133, no. 17, p. 176301, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics,

    J. Virieux and S. Operto, “An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics,” GEOPHYSICS, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. WCC1– WCC26, Nov. 2009

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Ausbreitung elektromagnetischer wellen ¨uber einem ebenen leiter,

    H. Weyl, “Ausbreitung elektromagnetischer wellen ¨uber einem ebenen leiter,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 365, no. 21, pp. 481–500, 1919

    work page 1919