Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Mori-Zwanzig formalism: An existence proof for weak solutions of the orthogonal dynamics equation

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves existence of weak solutions to the orthogonal dynamics equation in the Mori–Zwanzig formalism for nonstationary, non-Hamiltonian systems governed by a quasicontraction semigroup, with growth bounds and uniqueness for regula

desk verdict The abstract existence theorem is solid, but the bridge to the Mori-Zwanzig setting (Lemma III.1) has a real, repairable gap; the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25855 v1 pith:OD3IHFUW submitted 2026-07-28 math-ph math.MP

Christoph Widder This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 47D0647B4447A12
keywords Mori–Zwanzigprojectionoperatorformalismorthogonaldynamicsequationweaksolutionsquasicontractionsemigroupinfinite-rankprojectionsabstractCauchyproblemgeneralizedLangevinnumericalrange
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper targets a long-standing gap in the Mori–Zwanzig projection-operator technique: the orthogonal dynamics equation, which textbook derivations routinely treat as well-posed, had previously been shown to have weak solutions only for stationary Hamiltonian systems. The author generalizes that result to any evolution given by a strongly continuous quasicontraction semigroup — covering many nonstationary and non-Hamiltonian processes — provided the projection's range contains a dense set of smooth test functions and the generator and its adjoint are densely defined on that range. The proof works directly with weak solutions defined by testing against smooth solutions of the adjoint equation, using an energy estimate controlled by the logarithmic norm of the adjoint operator. This gives the Mori–Zwanzig construction a legitimate mathematical footing for a broad class of dissipative and driven systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the orthogonal dynamics generator A = \overline{QL}|_X, the part of the closure of QL in the range of the projection Q. The machine that carries the argument is an adjoint-test-function weak formulation: instead of solving u' = Au + f directly, one tests against smooth functions v satisfying the adjoint equation, defines a Hilbert space via the energy estimate ∥v∥² + ∥v(0)∥² ≤ γ²(∥v(T)∥² + ∥E+v∥²), and obtains u from the Riesz representation theorem. The identity that transfers boundedness from the original generator to the projected problem is the numerical-range containment Num(A†) ⊆ Num((QLQ)†) ⊆ Num(QL†Q) ⊆ Num(L†). The smaller operator QL|X (restricted before closu

What would settle it

Compute the numerical range of A† for a small finite-dimensional quasicontraction example with the paper's projection structure; if any point has real part greater than sup Re Num(L†), the containment chain in the paper's Lemma III.1 is false and the existence claim for that class fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working in a Hilbert space, the paper defines weak solutions for u' = Au + f, u(0) = g via adjoint test operators. If the numerical range of A† lies in a left half-plane, an energy estimate produces a weak solution by the Riesz representation theorem. In the Mori–Zwanzig setting, with A the part of the closure of QL in X = range(Q), the numerical-range bound transfers from L† to A†, so weak solutions exist whenever the evolution is a quasicontraction semigroup and LQ, L†Q are densely defined. The same estimate gives growth bounds and uniqueness for regular solutions. The conditions are verified for Zwanzig's projection under a C¹ density, with the damped harmonic oscillator as example.

Load-bearing premise

The existence proof stands on an unproved numerical-range inheritance: that the adjoint of the projected generator has numerical range bounded above by that of the original generator's adjoint.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The orthogonal dynamics equation has a weak solution for infinite-rank projections in the non-Hamiltonian, nonstationary case, not just stationary Hamiltonian evolutions.
  • Any orthogonal projection whose range contains a dense set of compactly supported C¹ functions — including Zwanzig's projection with a C¹ density — falls under the theorem.
  • Regular weak solutions satisfy an explicit exponential growth bound, and two regular solutions with the same data and forcing must coincide.
  • The damped harmonic oscillator with bump-function density provides a concrete non-Hamiltonian system where the existence and uniqueness claims apply.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable next step is to check the numerical-range containment chain in finite-dimensional truncations; a counterexample there would force an extra hypothesis on the projection, since the paper's discussion already notes that simultaneous estimates on A and A† are difficult.
  • Because uniqueness is only proved for regular solutions, the memory kernel in the generalized Langevin equation derived from the weak solution may not be uniquely pinned down in L²; deciding whether weak solutions are unique in L² would resolve this.
  • The method needs only a finite logarithmic norm, so the same route should apply to other dissipative generators — e.g. Fokker–Planck operators with confining drift — beyond the damped-oscillator example.
  • The semigroup-generation lemma behind the damped-oscillator example is delegated to a companion article; if that lemma fails, the illustration loses its support, though the abstract existence theorem would remain intact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves an abstract weak-solution theorem for the Cauchy problem u' = Au + f on a Hilbert space, under a numerical-range (logarithmic norm) condition on A† (Theorem II.5), with a priori growth bounds and uniqueness for sufficiently regular solutions (Lemma II.6, Corollary II.7). It then applies this to the Mori–Zwanzig orthogonal dynamics by taking A to be the part of (the closure of) QL on X = R(Q) and claiming that the numerical-range condition follows from the quasicontraction property of the semigroup generated by L (Lemma III.1). A density lemma for Zwanzig's projection (Lemma III.3) and a generation lemma for Fokker–Planck-type operators (Lemma III.4) are used to exhibit the damped harmonic oscillator as an example. The abstract section is written carefully, and the limitations (uniqueness gap, regularity) are openly discussed.

Significance. If the application lemma were correct, this would be a meaningful generalization of Givon–Hald–Kupferman: it would replace the Hamiltonian/skew-symmetric hypothesis by quasicontractivity and thus cover non-Hamiltonian infinite-rank projection settings. The abstract existence result in Sec. II is valuable independently: the energy estimate (Lemma II.4) and the Riesz construction (Theorem II.5) appear correct, and the honest discussion of the existence/uniqueness gap is a positive feature. However, the bridge to the Mori–Zwanzig setup (Lemma III.1) contains a load-bearing operator-theoretic error, and the example depends on a proof delegated to the author's earlier paper. The central claim is plausible and likely repairable, but the present text is not correct in the application.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Lemma III.1] The proof that ω(A†) < ∞ rests on the chain Num(A†) ⊆ Num((QLQ)†) ⊆ Num(QL†Q) ⊆ Num(L†). Two steps are not valid as written. (i) If A is the part of \overline{QL} in X (as stated at the start of §III), then A extends QLQ|_X, so adjunction gives only D(A†) ⊆ D((QLQ|_X)†); the manuscript's D(A†) ⊆ D((QLQ)†) is not justified, and the text shifts between A = \overline{QL}|_X and 'the part of QLQ in X'. (ii) If (QLQ)† is identified with \overline{QL†Q}, the set inclusion Num((QLQ)†) ⊆ Num(QL†Q) is false; the valid statement Num(\overline{T}) ⊆ \overline{Num(T)} preserves sup Re but not the set. The conclusion can likely be repaired by a limiting argument using the fact that for x ∈ X, (QL†Qx, x) = (L†x, x), but that argument is absent. Since Lemma III.1 is the only connection between Theorem II.5 and the Mori–Zwanzig equation, the advertised generalization is not proved as written.
  2. [Appendix B / Lemma III.4] Lemma III.4 asserts that the closure of (F·∇, C^1_c) in L^2_ρ generates the quasicontraction semigroup U(t) with U(t)x = x∘φ_t. The proof in Appendix B verifies only the L^2 growth bound on C^1_c and then says that the extension to a semigroup and the generator identification 'suffices to repeat the line of argument in [52, Theorem 4.1]'. Because this lemma is the only source of the quasicontraction property in the worked example, the example is not self-contained and cannot be checked by the reader. Please include a full proof of the generation statement, or state it as a known theorem with a complete proof sketch. The same applies to the identification of the generator L as the closure of (F·∇, C^1_c), which is used to compute L† in §III.B.
  3. [§III, definition of A] The operator A is introduced as 'A := \overline{QL}|_X' and a few lines later as 'the part of QLQ in X'. These are different operators in general (the paper itself cites such an example in the discussion of QL|_X vs. \overline{QL}|_X). The proof of Lemma III.1 uses the identification as if the two definitions coincided. This ambiguity is not merely notational: the adjoint inclusions and the numerical-range transfer depend on which operator is meant. Please fix the definition and re-derive Lemma III.1 accordingly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§II, Lemma II.2] The notation s_ε is used both for the approximating simple functions and for the mollified function, which is confusing. Also, the statement that s_ε ∈ H^1_0 is correct only because the convolution with a mollifier supported on [−ε,ε] gives zero trace at the endpoints, despite being nonzero just inside the interval; a short explanation would help the reader.
  2. [§III.B] The abstract says 'using the bump function as initial distribution', but ρ is used as the weight in L^2_ρ and in the Zwanzig projection, not as an initial distribution for the dynamics. Rephrase as 'reference density' or 'phase-space density'.
  3. [General] There are several minor typographical issues: 'We only proof the first statement' should be 'We only prove'; 'the proof of the second statement is identical' should be 'similar'; and the introduction uses cP L for the continuous extension of P L without defining the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No substantive circularity: the weak-solution theorem is genuinely derived, and the Mori–Zwanzig application is not equivalent to its assumptions. Minor self-citation appears only in the example-generation lemma, and the main proof gap is a correctness issue, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. Theorem II.5 constructs weak solutions from the energy estimate (Lemma II.4) via Gronwall's inequality and the Riesz representation theorem; there is no fitted parameter, no quantity that is defined in terms of the predicted conclusion, and no reduction of the theorem to its own statement. The application in Section III defines A as the part of the closure of QL in X and then attempts to bound the logarithmic norm of A† by the numerical range of L† using operator-matrix inclusions. That numerical-range chain in Lemma III.1 contains a genuine mathematical gap: the asserted inclusion Num((QLQ)†) ⊆ Num(QL†Q), supported by 'Num(T-bar) ⊆ Num(T)', is not a valid general operator fact, and the domain nesting is questionable. However, this is a proof-correctness defect, not a circular one: the conclusion is not true by construction, and the paper does not rename an input as an output. The paper itself acknowledges the difficulty in Discussion Section IV: 'it can be challenging to obtain estimates on the logarithmic norms for A and A† simultaneously.' The only self-citation that is load-bearing in the example is the delegation of the generator-identification step in Lemma III.4 / Appendix B to the author's own prior paper [52]: 'To show this, it suffices to repeat the line of argument in the proof of [52, Theorem 4.1].' This is a minor self-citation and an omitted proof, but it is not circular: [52] is a published, parameter-free semigroup-generation result with stated assumptions, and the main existence theorem does not depend on it. The example is illustrative rather than the source of the claimed general result. No step in the paper reduces by construction to an input or fits a parameter and then presents it as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters; the paper's constants (γ² in the energy estimate, λ = γ in the example) are derived, not fit. The central theorems rely on standard functional analysis and explicitly stated domain assumptions. The numerical-range transfer is the ad hoc load-bearing premise: asserted in Lemma III.1 without proof, and its naive direction is opposite to the graph inclusion one obtains for closed QL. Lemma III.4 is imported from the author's own [52].

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard functional analysis bundle: Riesz representation, Gronwall inequality, Bochner-space density and mollification, double-adjoint/closure identities, adjoint rules for products of bounded and unbounded operators.
    Used throughout Sec. II and III (Lemmas II.1–II.4, II.6, Thm II.5, Lemma III.1).
  • standard math Davies' lemma as quoted: the optimal quasicontraction constant of a C₀ semigroup equals sup Re Num of its generator ([48, Lemma 2.2]).
    Invoked in Sec. III for L and L† to transfer quasicontraction to numerical-range bounds; also used in the Remark to Definition II.1.
  • domain assumption LQ and L†Q are densely defined (equivalently R(Q)∩D(L) and R(Q)∩D(L†) are dense in R(Q)).
    Assumed at the start of Sec. III; used to make QL closable and to apply Lemma III.1; verified for the Zwanzig example through Lemma III.3.
  • ad hoc to paper Numerical-range transfer for the part A of the closure of QL in R(Q): Num(A†) ⊆ Num((QLQ)†) ⊆ Num(QL†Q) ⊆ Num(L†), via D(A†) ⊆ D((QLQ)†).
    The load-bearing step of Lemma III.1, asserted 'by definition of the adjoint'. Not proven; for closed QL the graph inclusion A ⊆ QLQ gives the opposite nesting (QLQ)† ⊆ A†. Without it, the energy estimate of Theorem II.5 has no input in the Mori–Zwanzig setting.
  • domain assumption Lemma III.4 (from [52, Thm 4.1]): the closure of (F·∇, C¹_c) in L²_ρ generates a C₀ semigroup with bound e^{λt}, λ = sup{−div(ρF)/(2ρ)}.
    Used to obtain the quasicontraction generator for the damped oscillator; proof delegated to the author's own [52].
  • domain assumption Regularity of the example data: ρ ∈ C¹ nonnegative normalized with bump-function support and ρF ∈ W^{1,1}; F ∈ C¹ with bounded derivative.
    Conditions for Lemmas III.3 and III.4 in Sec. III.B.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mori-Zwanzig formalism: An existence proof for weak solutions of the orthogonal dynamics equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OD3IHFUW

@misc{pith2026260725855,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mori-Zwanzig formalism: An existence proof for weak solutions of the orthogonal dynamics equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OD3IHFUW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25855}
}
read the original abstract

In classical statistical physics, the Mori-Zwanzig projection operator technique is used to derive generalized Langevin equations for a random variable (observable). Standard derivations implicitly assume the existence of solutions to the so-called orthogonal dynamics equation as well as the validity of the variation of constants formula (Dyson identity). It was pointed out by Givon, Hald and Kupferman that the existence is a subtle issue for infinite-rank projections such as Zwanzig's projection [D. Givon, O. H. Hald, R. Kupferman, Israel Journal of Mathematics, 145 (221-241), 2005]. The authors proved the existence of weak solutions for Zwanzig's projection in the context of stationary Hamiltonian systems. To this date, this is the only existence proof that allows for an infinite-rank projection, whereas the uniqueness and regularity remain open problems. In this article, we generalize the existence proof by Givon et al. to nonstationary non-Hamiltonian systems whose time evolution is given by a quasicontraction semigroup. We establish growth bounds as well as the uniqueness for sufficiently regular solutions (if existent). Finally, we apply our results to Zwanzig's projection using the damped harmonic oscillator as an example.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Shared Observation Shields Collective Fluctuations while Preserving Local Independence

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Conditioning an exchangeable population on its own noisy collective record produces a rank-one, nonpositive Schur shield correction to collective fluctuations while keeping pair correlations at O(1/z), giving a calcul...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [52]

    On the generalized Langevin equation and the Mori projection operator technique.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 58(40):405001, sep 2025

    Christoph Widder, Johannes Zimmer, and Tanja Schilling. On the generalized Langevin equation and the Mori projection operator technique.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 58(40):405001, sep 2025

    2025

  2. [1]

    On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 20(6):948–959, 12 1958

    Sadao Nakajima. On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 20(6):948–959, 12 1958

    1958

  3. [2]

    Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 33(5):1338–1341, 11 1960

    Robert Zwanzig. Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 33(5):1338–1341, 11 1960

    1960

  4. [3]

    Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics.Phys

    Robert Zwanzig. Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics.Phys. Rev., 124:983–992, Nov 1961. 17

    1961

  5. [4]

    Transport, collective motion, and Brownian motion.Progress of theoretical physics, 33(3):423–455, 1965

    Hazime Mori. Transport, collective motion, and Brownian motion.Progress of theoretical physics, 33(3):423–455, 1965

    1965

  6. [5]

    Simple derivations of generalized linear and nonlinear Langevin equations.Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical, Nuclear and General, 6(9):1289, sep 1973

    K Kawasaki. Simple derivations of generalized linear and nonlinear Langevin equations.Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical, Nuclear and General, 6(9):1289, sep 1973

    1973

  7. [6]

    H. Grabert. Microdynamics and equations of motion for macrovariables.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter, 27(1):95–99, Mar 1977

    1977

  8. [7]

    Study of Langevin type equations by means of a new projection operator method in nonequilibrium states.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 62(1):70–90, 07 1979

    Hiroshi Furukawa. Study of Langevin type equations by means of a new projection operator method in nonequilibrium states.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 62(1):70–90, 07 1979

    1979

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Computing generalized Langevin equations and generalized Fokker–Planck equations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(27):10884–10889, 2009

    Eric Darve, Jose Solomon, and Amirali Kia. Computing generalized Langevin equations and generalized Fokker–Planck equations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(27):10884–10889, 2009

    2009

  2. [9]

    Derivation of the generalized Langevin equation in nonstationary environments.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(11):114523, 03 2011

    Shinnosuke Kawai and Tamiki Komatsuzaki. Derivation of the generalized Langevin equation in nonstationary environments.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(11):114523, 03 2011

    2011

  3. [10]

    Jianhua Xing and K. S. Kim. Application of the projection operator formalism to non- Hamiltonian dynamics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(4):044132, 01 2011

    2011

  4. [11]

    On the non-stationary generalized Langevin equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 147(21):214110, 12 2017

    Hugues Meyer, Thomas Voigtmann, and Tanja Schilling. On the non-stationary generalized Langevin equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 147(21):214110, 12 2017

    2017

  5. [12]

    Mori-Zwanzig projection operator formalism for far-from-equilibrium systems with time-dependent Hamiltonians.Phys

    Michael te Vrugt and Raphael Wittkowski. Mori-Zwanzig projection operator formalism for far-from-equilibrium systems with time-dependent Hamiltonians.Phys. Rev. E, 99:062118, Jun 2019

    2019

  6. [13]

    Microscopic derivation of coarse-grained, energy-conserving generalized Langevin dynamics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 151(10):104109, 09 2019

    Sergei Izvekov. Microscopic derivation of coarse-grained, energy-conserving generalized Langevin dynamics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 151(10):104109, 09 2019

    2019

  7. [14]

    Dalton, and Roland R

    Cihan Ayaz, Laura Scalfi, Benjamin A. Dalton, and Roland R. Netz. Generalized Langevin equation with a nonlinear potential of mean force and nonlinear memory friction from a hybrid projection scheme.Phys. Rev. E, 105:054138, May 2022

    2022

  8. [15]

    On the derivation of the generalized Langevin equation and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Europhysics Letters, 140(6):62003, dec 2022

    Hadrien Vroylandt. On the derivation of the generalized Langevin equation and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Europhysics Letters, 140(6):62003, dec 2022

    2022

  9. [16]

    Nonequilibrium solvent response force: What happens if you push a Brownian particle.Phys

    Fabian Koch, Jona Erle, and Tanja Schilling. Nonequilibrium solvent response force: What happens if you push a Brownian particle.Phys. Rev. Res., 6:L012032, Feb 2024

    2024

  10. [17]

    Roland R. Netz. Derivation of the nonequilibrium generalized Langevin equation from a time-dependent many-body Hamiltonian.Phys. Rev. E, 110:014123, Jul 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    Derivation of a generalized Langevin equation from a generic time-dependent Hamiltonian.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 57(50):505003, nov 2024

    Benjamin J A H´ ery and Roland R Netz. Derivation of a generalized Langevin equation from a generic time-dependent Hamiltonian.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 57(50):505003, nov 2024

    2024

  12. [19]

    Sergei Izvekov. Mori-Zwanzig projection operator formalism: Generalized Langevin equation dynamics of a classical system perturbed by an external generalized potential and far from equilibrium.Phys. Rev. E, 111:034130, Mar 2025

    2025

  13. [20]

    Berkowitz, J

    M. Berkowitz, J. D. Morgan, and J. Andrew McCammon. Generalized Langevin dynamics simulations with arbitrary time-dependent memory kernels.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 78(6):3256–3261, 03 1983

    1983

  14. [21]

    Incorporation of memory effects in coarse-grained modeling via the Mori-Zwanzig formalism.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(24):243128, 11 2015

    Zhen Li, Xin Bian, Xiantao Li, and George Em Karniadakis. Incorporation of memory effects in coarse-grained modeling via the Mori-Zwanzig formalism.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(24):243128, 11 2015

    2015

  15. [22]

    Introducing memory in coarse-grained molecular simulations.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 125(19):4931–4954, 2021

    Viktor Klippenstein, Madhusmita Tripathy, Gerhard Jung, Friederike Schmid, and Nico F A Van Der Vegt. Introducing memory in coarse-grained molecular simulations.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 125(19):4931–4954, 2021. 18

    2021

  16. [23]

    Elsevier, 2006

    Ian Snook.The Langevin and generalised Langevin approach to the dynamics of atomic, polymeric and colloidal systems. Elsevier, 2006

    2006

  17. [24]

    A coarse-grained molecular dynamics model for crystalline solids.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 83(8-9):986–997, 2010

    Xiantao Li. A coarse-grained molecular dynamics model for crystalline solids.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 83(8-9):986–997, 2010

    2010

  18. [25]

    Mode- coupling theory of the glass transition for a liquid in a periodic potential.Phys

    Abolfazl Ahmadirahmat, Michele Caraglio, Vincent Krakoviack, and Thomas Franosch. Mode- coupling theory of the glass transition for a liquid in a periodic potential.Phys. Rev. E, 112:015405, Jul 2025

    2025

  19. [26]

    Wolfgang G¨ otze.Complex dynamics of glass-forming liquids: A mode-coupling theory, volume

  20. [27]

    Hansen and I.R

    J.P. Hansen and I.R. McDonald.Theory of Simple Liquids: with Applications to Soft Matter. Academic Press, 2013

    2013

  21. [28]

    OUP Oxford, 2002

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione.The theory of open quantum systems. OUP Oxford, 2002

    2002

  22. [29]

    Anja Seegebrecht and Tanja Schilling. The concept of minimal dissipation and the identifi- cation of work in autonomous systems: a view from classical statistical physics.Journal of Statistical Physics, 192(10):133, 2025

    2025

  23. [30]

    Derivation of dynamical density functional theory using the projection operator technique.The Journal of chemical physics, 131(24), 2009

    Pep Espanol and Hartmut L¨ owen. Derivation of dynamical density functional theory using the projection operator technique.The Journal of chemical physics, 131(24), 2009

    2009

  24. [31]

    Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    Klaus-Jochen Engel and Rainer Nagel.One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equa- tions. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 2000. eBook 06 April 2006

    2000

  25. [32]

    Addendum: On the generalized Langevin equation and the Mori projection operator technique (2025 J

    Christoph Widder, Johannes Zimmer, and Tanja Schilling. Addendum: On the generalized Langevin equation and the Mori projection operator technique (2025 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58 405001).Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 59(22):229401, jun 2026

    2025

  26. [33]

    Dror Givon, Raz Kupferman, and Ole H. Hald. Existence proof for orthogonal dynamics and the Mori-Zwanzig formalism.Israel Journal of Mathematics, 145(1):221–241, Dec 2005

    2005

  27. [34]

    Dominy, and Daniele Venturi

    Yuanran Zhu, Jason M. Dominy, and Daniele Venturi. On the estimation of the Mori-Zwanzig memory integral.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(10):103501, 09 2018

    2018

  28. [35]

    Springer, 2006

    Hermann Grabert.Projection operator techniques in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, volume 95. Springer, 2006

    2006

  29. [36]

    Oxford University Press, 2001

    Robert Zwanzig.Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics. Oxford University Press, 2001

    2001

  30. [37]

    Coarse-grained modelling out of equilibrium.Physics Reports, 972:1–45, 2022

    Tanja Schilling. Coarse-grained modelling out of equilibrium.Physics Reports, 972:1–45, 2022

    2022

  31. [38]

    Optimal prediction and the Mori– Zwanzig representation of irreversible processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(7):2968–2973, 2000

    Alexandre J Chorin, Ole H Hald, and Raz Kupferman. Optimal prediction and the Mori– Zwanzig representation of irreversible processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(7):2968–2973, 2000

    2000

  32. [39]

    Generalised Langevin dynamics: Significance and limitations of the projection operator formalism, 2026

    Christoph Widder and Tanja Schilling. Generalised Langevin dynamics: Significance and limitations of the projection operator formalism, 2026

    2026

  33. [40]

    B. L. Holian and D. J. Evans. Classical response theory in the Heisenberg picture.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 83(7):3560–3566, 10 1985

    1985

  34. [41]

    Vector-valued Laplace transforms and Cauchy problems.Israel Journal of Mathematics, 59(3):327–352, Oct 1987

    Wolfgang Arendt. Vector-valued Laplace transforms and Cauchy problems.Israel Journal of Mathematics, 59(3):327–352, Oct 1987

    1987

  35. [42]

    Volterra integral equations in a Banach space.Funkcialaj Ekvacioj, 18(2):163–193, 1975

    K Richard Miller. Volterra integral equations in a Banach space.Funkcialaj Ekvacioj, 18(2):163–193, 1975

    1975

  36. [43]

    Grimmer and J

    R. Grimmer and J. Pr¨ uss. On linear Volterra equations in Banach spaces.Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 11(1):189–205, 1985

    1985

  37. [44]

    K. O. Friedrichs. Symmetric hyperbolic linear differential equations.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 7(2):345–392, 1954. 19

    1954

  38. [45]

    Evans.Partial Differential Equations

    L.C. Evans.Partial Differential Equations. Graduate studies in mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 2010

    2010

  39. [46]

    D. L. Cohn.Measure Theory. Birkh¨ auser New York, NY, 2013

    2013

  40. [47]

    Springer New York, New York, NY, 2011

    Haim Brezis.Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2011

    2011

  41. [48]

    E. B. Davies. Semigroup growth bounds.Journal of Operator Theory, 53(2):225–249, 2005

    2005

  42. [49]

    Rudin.Functional Analysis

    W. Rudin.Functional Analysis. McGraw-Hill, tmh edition edition, 1974

    1974

  43. [50]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.I: Functional Analysis. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. Academic Press, revised and enlarged edition edition, 1980

    1980

  44. [51]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992

    Jan van Neerven.The Adjoint of a Semigroup of Linear Operators. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992

    1992

  45. [53]

    Folland.Real Analysis - Modern Techniques and Their Applications - Second Edi- tion

    Gerald B. Folland.Real Analysis - Modern Techniques and Their Applications - Second Edi- tion. John Whiley and Sons, 1999. 20

    1999

  46. [143]

    Oxford University Press, 2009

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.