Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 51 references

Magneto-radiative modelling and artificial neural network optimization of biofluid flow in a stenosed arterial domain

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that, in a stenosed artery idealized as a stretching sheet, the Maxwell viscoelastic parameter is the dominant control on wall shear stress, reducing the skin-friction coefficient by 219% per unit increase while the…

desk verdict Routine Casson-Maxwell ternary nanofluid extension paper; the parameter trends are sound, but the headline 219% claim is a regression slope mislabeled as a percentage change, and the ANN/RSM is in-sample. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06273 v2 pith:OD4QPEA4 submitted 2025-07-08 physics.med-ph cs.AIcs.NAmath.NAphysics.bio-ph

S P Shivakumar , Gunisetty Ramasekhar , P Nimmy , Sujesh Areekara , L Thanuja , T V Smitha , S Devanathan , Ganesh R Naik
show 1 more author
K V Nagaraja
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-phcs.AIcs.NAmath.NAphysics.bio-ph MSC 76A0576W0576Z05
keywords stenosedarteryCasson-Maxwellnanofluidmagnetohydrodynamicsthermalradiationskinfrictioncoefficientartificialneuralnetworkresponsesurfacemethodologytargeteddrugdelivery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a blood-based Casson-Maxwell nanofluid model, in which the fluid has both yield stress and viscoelastic relaxation, captures the essential transport in a stenosed artery idealized as a stretching sheet, and that wall shear stress is governed mainly by the Maxwell parameter. A unit increase in that parameter is reported to reduce the skin-friction coefficient by 219%, whereas a unit increase in the Casson parameter raises it by 66.1%. The combined model also slows the flow relative to a pure Casson fluid, which the authors read as longer nanoparticle residence time for targeted drug delivery. Heat transfer rises with copper and alumina volume fractions but falls with silver, and a neural network trained on the numerical data predicts the heat-transfer rate with overall $R = 0.99457$. If the model holds, it offers a parameter-based route to tuning shear stress and temperature for magnetically guided, hyperthermia-assisted drug delivery.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the dimensionless skin-friction coefficient $C_{fx}Re_x^{1/2}$, which measures wall shear stress, and the local Nusselt number $Nu_xRe_x^{-1/2}$, which measures wall heat-transfer rate; both are extracted from wall gradients of the similarity-transformed boundary-layer solution. The physical model combines the Casson yield-stress constitutive law with the upper-convected Maxwell stress-relaxation equation, so the fluid has both a yield threshold and a relaxation time, and the resulting coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations are solved numerically by a boundary-value solver with adaptive mesh refinement. The parametric picture is then summarized by a response-surface quadratic model in the Maxwell, Casson, and magnetic parameters, and by a Levenberg-Marquardt trained artificial neural network whose input space includes radiation, heat source, rheological parameters, and the three nanoparticle volume fractions.

What would settle it

Measure wall shear stress in a constricted channel or in a three-dimensional pulsatile simulation using the same Casson-Maxwell blood model while varying the Maxwell parameter from 0.1 to 0.9; a unit increase should lower the skin-friction coefficient by about 219%, so a result much smaller or of opposite sign would falsify the stretching-sheet reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, under an applied magnetic field, thermal radiation, and a linear heat source, the steady boundary-layer flow of a blood-based Casson-Maxwell ternary nanofluid (copper, silver, alumina) over a stretching sheet that idealizes a stenosed artery has a lower velocity profile than a pure Casson fluid, and that the skin-friction coefficient $C_{fx}Re_x^{1/2}$ responds far more strongly to the Maxwell parameter than to the Casson or magnetic parameters: a unit increase in the Maxwell parameter reduces it by 219%, while a unit increase in the Casson parameter increases it by 66.1%. The authors interpret the reduced velocity as improved residence time for drug carriers at the stenosis, and they report that the Nusselt number increases with copper and alumina volume fractions but decreases with silver, making the metal choice relevant for heat-activated release. They further claim that a Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation neural network reproduces the numerically computed heat-transfer rate with an overall coefficient of determination $R = 0.99457$, and that response-surface sensitivity analysis confirms the drag coefficient is most sensitive to the Maxwell parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The whole quantitative picture rests on treating the stenosed artery as a steady two-dimensional stretching sheet; if pulsatility, curvature, wall compliance, or the three-dimensional shape of the stenosis matters, the predicted shear-stress and heat-transfer numbers do not automatically transfer to real arteries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A unit increase in the Maxwell parameter lowers the modeled skin-friction coefficient by 219%, making viscoelastic relaxation the strongest single lever for reducing wall shear stress in the stenosed domain.
  • Because the Casson-Maxwell fluid moves slower than a pure Casson fluid, the same flow conditions extend nanoparticle residence time near the stenosis, which the authors link to more efficient drug uptake.
  • Higher volume fractions of copper and alumina raise the heat-transfer rate while silver lowers it, so the metallic choice and loading fraction can be tuned for hyperthermia-triggered drug release.
  • A trained neural network reproduces the numerical Nusselt number with overall $R = 0.99457$, indicating that the heat-transfer response across the parameter ranges can be predicted without rerunning the boundary-value solver.
  • Response-surface sensitivity analysis shows the drag coefficient is most sensitive to the Maxwell parameter, making it the natural control variable for designing magnetically guided delivery.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 219% figure is a linear-regression slope over the Maxwell parameter range $0.1$ to $0.9$ reported in the paper's Table 3, so it is better read as a slope of about $-2.20$ in $C_{fx}Re_x^{1/2}$ per unit $\lambda$ rather than a literal 219% change relative to a baseline value.
  • If the stretching-sheet idealization is replaced by pulsatile flow, the Maxwell relaxation time may interact with the cardiac cycle, so the optimal parameter window for reducing wall shear could shift; this is a testable extension rather than a result claimed in the paper.
  • The opposite signs for copper and alumina versus silver suggest that thermal conductivity alone does not determine heat-transfer enhancement in this ternary nanofluid, so a nanoparticle-selection rule based on more than conductivity could be drawn and tested against mixture experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript models steady two-dimensional boundary-layer flow of a Casson-Maxwell ternary nanofluid over a stretching sheet, presented as an idealized stenosed artery, under the combined effects of a magnetic field, thermal radiation, and a linear heat source. The coupled nonlinear ODEs are solved with MATLAB's bvp4c, and the authors report parametric trends for velocity, temperature, skin friction, and Nusselt number. They also train a Levenberg-Marquardt artificial neural network to predict the Nusselt number and use response-surface methodology with ANOVA and sensitivity analysis to study the drag coefficient. The paper concludes that the Maxwell parameter is the dominant rheological control on wall shear stress and that the ANN predicts heat transfer with an overall R-value of 0.99457.

Significance. The qualitative parametric trends—such as velocity reduction with increasing Maxwell and Casson parameters, and heat-transfer enhancement with copper and alumina volume fractions—are plausible and could be of interest to the nanofluid and hemodynamics modeling community. The paper makes its numerical data available in tabulated form (Tables 2-4, 6) and provides detailed RSM/ANOVA diagnostics, which are useful for reproducibility. However, the headline quantitative claims are not supported as stated: the '219% decrease' in skin friction conflates a regression slope with a percentage change, and the ANN forecast accuracy is an in-sample fit without held-out validation. If these issues are corrected, the qualitative conclusions remain defensible, but the reported magnitudes and predictive claims require substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 2] The validation claim is contradicted by the Pr=6.13 row: the present result (1.8954005) differs from Yahya et al. (1.7597) by about 7.7%, whereas the other rows agree to within 0.01%. Because Table 2 is the sole validation of the numerical solver, this discrepancy must be explained (e.g., different base-fluid properties, boundary conditions, or model assumptions) or the computation re-checked; otherwise the solver's accuracy in this regime is not established.
  2. [Abstract; Section 4, Table 3; Conclusion] The statement that skin friction 'decreases by 219%' with a unit increase in the Maxwell parameter is not a valid percentage change. The tabulated values for λ=0.1, 0.5, 0.9 are -1.93244338, -2.77675870, -3.69025789, whose standard relative change over that range is about -91%, and the 219% figure is simply the linear-regression slope (-2.19769491) multiplied by 100. The same issue applies to the claimed 71.4% decrease with M (actual relative change ≈ -23% over the tabulated range) and the 66.1% increase with β (actual relative change ≈ +18%). Because these percentages are the paper's headline results and are repeated in the abstract and conclusion, they must be re-expressed as regression slopes with stated units or as percentage changes relative to an explicitly defined baseline.
  3. [Section 5, Eq. (21), Fig. 18, Table 4] The ANN 'forecast' is not demonstrated: the reported overall R-value of 0.99457 is computed on the same BVP4C data used for training, and Table 4 shows several non-negligible errors (e.g., error 0.442953 for Q=0.1 against a BVP4C value of 4.121, and error 0.134 for φ2=0.03). The paper should report test-set R and error metrics separately, or explicitly reframe the ANN as an in-sample interpolator rather than a predictive forecasting tool.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Equations (21) and (23)] Equation numbering is inconsistent: Eq. (21) is used for the ANN MSE and again for the RSM response model, and Eq. (23) appears both for the error-rate definition and for the fitted quadratic model. Renumber to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [References] Several in-text citations are duplicated: [20] is used for both Waqas et al. and Asha and Srivastava, and [21] is used for both Arif et al. and Alraddadi et al. The reference list should be checked and renumbered accordingly.
  3. [Figures] Figure 20 appears twice (autocorrelation error for Nusselt number and residual versus observation order for the RSM model); renumber the figures. Figure 13 ('AI brain') is not a scientific result and could be removed or replaced with the actual ANN architecture.
  4. [Abstract and Section 8] The abstract mentions SDGs 3 and 9, while Section 8 and the introduction also mention SDGs 4 and 17; these mentions should be reconciled or removed for consistency.
  5. [Section 2] The stretching-sheet idealization is acknowledged, but the manuscript should state explicitly that quantitative predictions of wall shear stress and Nusselt number are for this idealized geometry and do not directly transfer to realistic arterial geometries with pulsatility, curvature, wall compliance, and three-dimensional stenosis.
  6. [Table 4] The sign convention of the 'Error' column is not defined; state whether Error = BVP4C − ANN or ANN − BVP4C.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The abstract's 219%/66.1%/71.4% 'per unit rise' effects are the Table 3 linear-regression slopes multiplied by 100, and the ANN 'forecast' of heat flow is a fit to the same BVP4C outputs; the headline quantitative claims reduce to fitted quantities by construction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4 (Parametric analysis), Table 3; repeated in Abstract and Section 8 Conclusion]
    "From Table 3, it is observed that the Cf_x Re_x^(1/2) of C-M NF curtails with an increase in the volume fraction of nanoparticles. Per unit rise in M and λ, the Cf_x Re_x^(1/2) declines by 71.4% and 219%, respectively. Cf_x Re_x^(1/2) of C-M NF enhances by 66.1% with a per unit rise in β, respectively. Table 3: Slope of linear regression -2.19769491."

    The reported '219% decrease' is not a percent change relative to any stated baseline; it is exactly the slope of the linear regression through the three λ values in Table 3 multiplied by 100: -2.19769491 x 100 = -219.77%. Likewise, 71.4% = -0.71445319 x 100 and 66.1% = 0.66158934 x 100. These are fitted regression parameters renamed as percentages. Under the standard definition, the change over the tabulated λ range 0.1 to 0.9 is [(-3.69025789) - (-1.93244338)]/|-1.93244338| ≈ -90.9%, not -219%. Because the abstract and conclusion repeat this number as the central quantitative result, the headline claim reduces to the fitted slope by construction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 5 (ANN), Eq. (21), Fig. 17 discussion; Abstract]
    "To evaluate the efficacy of an artificial neural network model, we calculated its mean squared error (MSE) as follows. (Eq. 21) ... Xbvp4c, denotes the real numerical results, and XANN denotes predicted value produced by an ANN. ... the model's overall performance has an R value of 0.99457, which is close to 1, implying that the current model produces accurate results."

    The ANN 'forecast' of the rate of heat flow is trained, validated, and tested on outputs of the same bvp4c solver. Equation (21) defines the error as the difference between X_bvp4c and X_ANN on that same dataset, and R = 0.99457 measures agreement with those solver outputs. A high R therefore demonstrates that the network has interpolated the numerical solution, not that it independently predicted a physical quantity. The abstract's wording 'the rate of heat flow was forecasted' presents this self-fit as a prediction, so the claimed predictive accuracy is forced by the fitting construction.

full rationale

The governing ODEs are solved by bvp4c, and Table 2 provides some external benchmarking of the Nusselt number against published values, so the underlying numerical solutions are not derived from the ANN or RSM and are not circular. No load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem was found; the self-citations to Areekara et al. (refs. 48-49) are methodological. The circularity is partial and located in the presentation layer: the Table 3 'percentages' are the linear-regression slopes of the same three computed points, and the ANN 'forecast' is a surrogate fit to the bvp4c data. The RSM sensitivity analysis is an openly fitted quadratic response surface, so Table 8 and the 'most sensitive to λ' conclusion describe derivatives of that fitted polynomial rather than an independent first-principles result; I do not count that as a separate circular step because it is declared as a response-surface model, but it inherits the fitted character. Because the abstract's headline numbers (219%, 66.1%, 71.4%) and the 'forecasted' heat-flow claim reduce to fitted quantities by construction, while the rest of the computation has independent content, a score of 6 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard constitutive equations and a strong geometrical idealization. The quantitative claims, including percentages, RSM sensitivity, and ANN R-value, are produced by fitting to numerical outputs rather than derived from first principles; these fitted coefficients are listed as free parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • RSM regression coefficients (10 coefficients in Eq. 23) = intercept -2.2292, lambda coefficient -2.3280, beta coefficient 0.6863, M coefficient -0.7741, plus quadratic and…
    Fitted to 20 central composite design runs of the BVP4C skin friction values; used for sensitivity analysis and the claim that lambda is most influential.
  • Linear regression slope for Maxwell parameter = -2.19769491 (Table 3)
    Fit to three BVP4C solutions at lambda=0.1, 0.5, 0.9; basis for the 219% decrease claim.
  • Linear regression slope for Casson parameter = 0.66158934 (Table 3)
    Fit to three BVP4C solutions at beta=1, 2, 3; basis for the 66.1% increase claim.
  • ANN weights and biases = not provided
    Levenberg-Marquardt training on the same BVP4C Nusselt values; the R=0.99457 measures fit to these data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Boundary layer approximation for steady 2D incompressible flow
    The model reduces the Navier-Stokes-like equations to boundary layer equations; invoked when deriving the ODE system in Section 2.
  • ad hoc to paper Stenosed artery can be idealized as a stretching sheet with velocity U=ax
    Section 2 states this idealization; it ignores pulsatility, curvature, and wall compliance.
  • domain assumption Casson-Maxwell constitutive model with upper convected derivative
    Equations in Section 2 combine Casson yield stress and Maxwell relaxation time following references [37-39].
  • domain assumption Thermophysical properties of blood and nanoparticles from Table 1
    Density, specific heat, conductivity, and electrical conductivity values are taken from prior literature [43,44].
  • domain assumption Thermal radiation modeled by Rosseland approximation (implied by Rd parameter)
    The radiation parameter Rd enters the energy equation; the standard Rosseland approximation is used without derivation.
  • standard math Similarity transformations exist and reduce PDEs to ODEs
    The transformations are used in Section 3 without proof; this is standard for boundary layer flows over stretching sheets.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magneto-radiative modelling and artificial neural network optimization of biofluid flow in a stenosed arterial domain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OD4QPEA4

@misc{pith2026250706273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magneto-radiative modelling and artificial neural network optimization of biofluid flow in a stenosed arterial domain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OD4QPEA4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06273}
}
read the original abstract

The increasing complexity of cardiovascular diseases and limitations in traditional healing methods mandate the invention of new drug delivery systems that assure targeted, effective, and regulated treatments, contributing directly to UN SDGs 3 and 9, thereby encouraging the utilization of sustainable medical technologies in healthcare. This study investigates the flow of a Casson-Maxwell nanofluid through a stenosed arterial domain. The quantities, such as skin friction and heat transfer rate, are analysed in detail. The Casson-Maxwell fluid shows a lower velocity profile than the Casson fluids, which indicates the improved residence time for efficient drug delivery. The heat transfer rate shows an increase with higher volume fractions of copper and aluminium oxide nanoparticles and a decrease with higher volume fractions of silver nanoparticles. The skin friction coefficient decreases by 219% with a unit increase in the Maxwell parameter, whereas it increases by 66.1% with a unit rise in the Casson parameter. This work supports SDGs 4 and 17 by fostering interdisciplinary learning and collaboration in fluid dynamics and healthcare innovation. Additionally, the rate of heat flow was forecasted (with an overall R-value of 0.99457) using the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation training scheme under the influence of magneto-radiative, linear heat source and Casson-Maxwell parameters along with the tri-metallic nanoparticle volume fractions. It is also observed that the drag coefficient is most sensitive to the changes in the Maxwell parameter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Paul, N. Sarma, B. Patgiri, Mixed convection of shear-thinning hybrid nanofluid flow across a radiative unsteady cone with suction and slip effect, Materials Today Communications 37 (2023) 107522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107522

    work page arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Anthuvan Ezhilarasi P, D. Mohanavel, Heat transfer and sensitivity exploration of gyrotactic microorganisms suspended in a Casson hybrid nanofluid flow on a permeable stenosed artery, Physics of Fluids 37 (2025) 021925. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0254303

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0254303 2025

  3. [3]

    Ramasekhar, Shaik ,Jakeer, Reddisekhar Reddy ,Seethi Reddy, Divya ,A., Jawad ,Muhammad, B.A

    G. Ramasekhar, Shaik ,Jakeer, Reddisekhar Reddy ,Seethi Reddy, Divya ,A., Jawad ,Muhammad, B.A. and Ali Yousif, Numerical investigation of Casson fluid flow performance of blood containing gold and Fe3O4 nanofluid injected into a stenotic artery, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 0 (n.d.) 1 –17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2024.2372465

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Ausaru, P

    A. Ausaru, P. Nagarani, V.M. Job, Numerical investigation of solute dispersion in a non- Newtonian fluid flow through a catheterized artery with mild stenosis, Chinese Journal of Physics 89 (2024) 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2024.03.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2024.03.005 2024

  5. [5]

    Dompok, N.A

    D.E.M. Dompok, N.A. Jaafar, Solute Dispersion in Casson Flow of Blood through a Stenosed Artery with Rigid Permeable Wall, (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Khan, Hashim, H

    A. Khan, Hashim, H. Ahmad, S.U. Devi, M. Farooq, S. Batool, S.M. Hussain, Significance of melting heat transfer in maxwell nanofluid stagnation point flow across quadratic stratified riga surface, Results in Engineering 25 (2025) 104456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104456

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Faraz, J.M

    M. Faraz, J.M. Park, Thermal and MHD behavior of CNT Maxwell nanofluid over a stretchable cylinder, Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 18 (2025) 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101326

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    I.S.U. Din, I. Siddique, Z. Zahid, M. Nadeem, S. Islam, ANN-based analysis of thin film Maxwell fluid dynamics with electro -osmotic and nonlinear thermal effects, Alexandria Engineering Journal 127 (2025) 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.084

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.084 2025

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Alrihieli, M.S

    H. Alrihieli, M.S. Aldhabani, E. Alshaban, A. Alatawi, Thermal -hydrodynamic analysis of a Maxwell fluid with controlled heat/mass transfer over a Riga plate: A numerical study with engineering applications, Results in Engineering 26 (2025) 104801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ri...

    2025

  2. [10]

    Ahmad, M

    I. Ahmad, M. Waheed, M. Ahmad, S. Abbas, A. Alhushaybari, M. Norberdiyeva, E. A Az-Zo’bi, M.A.S. AL-Khasawneh, Exact solution of channelized flow of MHD Maxwell fluid with suction/injection, Mech Time -Depend Mater 29 (2025) 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-025-09768-x

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    Assiri, T

    T.A. Assiri, T. Gul, Z. Khan, T. Muhammad, S. Abdualziz Alhabeeb, I. Ali, Artificial neural networks strategy to analyze the magnetohydrodynamics Casson -Maxwell 41 nanofluid flow through the cone and disc system space, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 107 (2024) 1...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Shah, Dawar ,Abdullah, Islam ,Saeed, Alshehri ,Ahmed, H

    Z. Shah, Dawar ,Abdullah, Islam ,Saeed, Alshehri ,Ahmed, H. and Alrabaiah, A comparative analysis of MHD Casson and Maxwell flows past a stretching sheet with mixed convection and chemical reaction, Waves in Random and Complex Media 34 (2024) 5172–5187. https://doi.org/10.1080...

    2024

  5. [13]

    Srinivasa Rao, M

    T. Srinivasa Rao, M. Mohan Babu, R.R. Bojja, N.S. P., V.R.R. Gurrampati, THERMAL RADIATION EFFECTS ON MHD CASSON AND MAXWELL NANOFLUIDS OVER A POROUS STRETCHING SURFACE, PJBAS 6 (2024) 171 –178. https://doi.org/10.24271/psr.2024.416203.1389

    2024

  6. [14]

    Jayaprakash, V

    J. Jayaprakash, V. Govindan, H. Byeon, Effect of activation energy on Casson–Maxwell fluid via porous media including blowing and suction mechanisms, Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics 13 (2025) 101060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2024.101060

    2025

  7. [15]

    Islam, M.Y

    S. Islam, M.Y. Ali, S. Reza-E-Rabbi, Comparative simulation of nonlinear radiative nano casson and maxwell fluids with periodic magnetic force and sensitivity analysis, Heliyon 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29306

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Choi, Z.G

    S.U.S. Choi, Z.G. Zhang, W. Yu, F.E. Lockwood, E.A. Grulke, Anomalous thermal conductivity enhancement in nanotube suspensions, Applied Physics Letters 79 (2001) 2252–2254. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1408272

    2001 doi

  9. [17]

    Dolui, B

    S. Dolui, B. Bhaumik, S. De, S. Changdar, Biomedical simulations of hybrid nano fluid flow through a balloon catheterized stenotic artery with the effects of an inclined magnetic field and variable thermal conductivity, Chemical Physics Letters 829 (2023) 140756. https://doi.o...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Algehyne, N.A

    E.A. Algehyne, N.A. Ahammad, M.E. Elnair, M. Zidan, Y.Y. Alhusayni, B.O. El-Bashir, A. Saeed, A.S. Alshomrani, F. Alzahrani, Entropy optimization and response surface methodology of blood hybrid nanofluid flow through composite stenosis artery with magnetized nanoparticles (Au...

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Berkan, S.R

    S. Berkan, S.R. Hosseini, B. Jalili, A.A. Ranjbar, D.D. Ganji, A study on peristaltic flow and nanofluid in medication delivery systems considering heat transfer, Discov Appl Sci 6 (2024) 173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-05847-9

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    K.N. Asha, N. Srivastava, Analysis of blood flow features in the curved artery in the presence of differently shaped hybrid nanoparticles, Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics 13 (2025) 101117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101117

    2025

  13. [21]

    Alraddadi, A

    I. Alraddadi, A. Ayub, S.M. Hussain, U. Khan, S.Z. Hussain Shah, A.M. Hassan, The significance of ternary hybrid cross bio -nanofluid model in expanding/contracting cylinder with inclined magnetic field, Front. Mater. 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1242085. 42

    2023

  14. [22]

    Azmi, A.Q

    W.F.W. Azmi, A.Q. Mohamad, L.Y. Jiann, S. Shafie, Mathematical Modelling on Pulsative MHD Blood Casson Nanofluid in Slip and Porous Capillaries for Nano - cryosurgery with Caputo -Fabrizio Approach, Braz J Phys 55 (2025) 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-025-01701-4

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    Turabi, S

    Y.U.U.B. Turabi, S. Munir, S. Ahmad, M.M. Alam, FEM simulation to predict thermal enhancement mechanism in nanoparticles laden blood flow through an inflamed stenosis artery with magnetohydrodynamics effect, Multiscale and Multidiscip. Model. Exp. and Des. 8 (2025) 234. https:...

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    Noranuar, A.Q

    W.N.N. Noranuar, A.Q. Mohamad, S. Shafie, Heat and mass transfer on MHD rotating Casson Blood -CNTs nanofluid flow in porous channel for biomedical applications, Computers in Biology and Medicine 193 (2025) 110371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110371

    2025

  17. [25]

    Nazar, M.S

    T. Nazar, M.S. Shabbir, Electromagnetohydrodynamic flow of fractional Maxwell fluids through a stenosed artery: Caputo fractional derivatives approach, J Biol Phys 51 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-025-09684-8

    doi

  19. [27]

    Nagaraja, U

    K.V. Nagaraja, U. Khan, J.K. Madhukesh, A.M. Hassan, B.C. Prasannakumara, N. Ben Kahla, S. Elattar, J. Singh Chohan, Heat and mass transfer analysis of assisting and opposing radiative flow conveying ternary hybrid nanofluid over an exponentially stretching surface, Sci Rep 13...

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Kefene, E.H

    M.Z. Kefene, E.H. Rikitu, Magnetic and Thermal Radiation Effects on Hematocrit - Dependent Blood Nanofluid Flow in an Inclined Stenotic Artery with Heat Generation, Braz J Phys 55 (2025) 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-025-01770-5

    2025 doi

  21. [29]

    Imoro, C.J

    I. Imoro, C.J. Etwire, R. Musah, MHD flow of blood -based hybrid nanofluid through a stenosed artery with thermal radiation effect, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 59 (2024) 104418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.104418

    2024

  22. [30]

    Algehyne, N.A

    E.A. Algehyne, N.A. Ahammad, M.E. Elnair, M. Zidan, Y.Y. Alhusayni, B.O. El-Bashir, A. Saeed, A.S. Alshomrani, F. Alzahrani, Enhancing Heat Transfer in Blood Hybrid Nanofluid Flow with Ag–TiO2 Nanoparticles and Electrical Field in a Tilted Cylindrical W-Shape Stenosis Artery: ...

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Omama, A.A

    M. Omama, A.A. Arafa, A. Elsaid, W.K. Zahra, MHD flow of the novel quadruple hybrid nanofluid model in a stenosis artery with porous walls and thermal radiation: A Sisko model-based analysis, ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Math...

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Khaliq, M

    S. Khaliq, M. Younas, Z. Abbas, M.A. Aljohani, K.M. Abualnaja, Thermally radiative flow of non -Newtonian Rabinowitsch fluid through a permeable artery with multiple stenoses of varying shapes, Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 18 (2025) 101400. https://doi.or...

    2025

  25. [33]

    Ul-Haq, Tanveer ,Arooj, Ashraf ,Muhammad Bilal, R

    S. Ul-Haq, Tanveer ,Arooj, Ashraf ,Muhammad Bilal, R. and Nawaz, Artificial neural network (ANN) analysis of non -similar solution of MHD nanofluid flow past a curved stretching surface, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 86 (2025) 2399–2422. https://doi.org/10.1080...

    2025

  26. [34]

    Topal, B

    H.İ. Topal, B. Erdoğan, O. Koçar, T.Ö. Onur, H.F. Öztop, Dynamic viscosity prediction of nanofluids using artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA), J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46 (2024) 429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-05006-6

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    S.A. Khan, U. Farooq, M. Imran, H. Liu, T. Muhammad, M. Alghamdi, Mathematical and artificial neural network modeling to predict the heat transfer of mixed convective electroosmotic nanofluid flow with Helmholtz-Smoluchowski velocity and multiple slip effects: An application o...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Shafiq, A.B

    A. Shafiq, A.B. Çolak, T.N. Sindhu, Optimization of micro -rotation effect on magnetohydrodynamic nanofluid flow with artificial neural network, ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Mathematik Und Mechanik 104 (2024) e202300498. http...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    P. Paul, P. Karmakar, S. Das, S. Das, Demonstration of angioplasty using a balloon catheter in tetra -hybrid nano -bloodstream within an electrified stenotic arterial cavity under a magnetic field: Artificial neural network analysis, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 96...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Sharma, R

    B.K. Sharma, R. Gandhi, T. Abbas, M.M. Bhatti, Magnetohydrodynamics hemodynamics hybrid nanofluid flow through inclined stenotic artery, Appl. Math. Mech. -Engl. Ed. 44 (2023) 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-023-2961-7

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Gandhi, B.K

    R. Gandhi, B.K. Sharma, U. Khanduri, Electromagnetohydrodynamics Casson pulsatile nanofluid flow through a bifurcated stenosed artery: Magnetically targeted drug delivery, Journal of Applied Physics 134 (2023) 184701. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0172553

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Sadeghy, A.-H

    K. Sadeghy, A.-H. Najafi, M. Saffaripour, Sakiadis flow of an upper-convected Maxwell fluid, International Journal of Non -Linear Mechanics 40 (2005) 1220 –1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2005.05.006

    2005 doi

  33. [41]

    Rasool, A.J

    G. Rasool, A.J. Chamkha, T. Muhammad, A. Shafiq, I. Khan, Darcy-Forchheimer relation in Casson type MHD nanofluid flow over non -linear stretching surface, Propulsion and Power Research 9 (2020) 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jppr.2020.04.003

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Ramzan, F

    M. Ramzan, F. Ali, N. Akkurt, A. Saeed, P. Kumam, A.M. Galal, Computational assesment of Carreau ternary hybrid nanofluid influenced by MHD flow for entropy generation, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 567 (2023) 170353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170353

    2023

  35. [43]

    Reddy, M.A

    M.S. Reddy, M.A. Kumar, Influence of magnetic field chemical reaction and Soret - Dufour parameters on Maxwell nanofluid flow over a porous vertical stretching surface - 44 A numerical study, Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 10 (2024) 100958. https://doi....

    2024

  36. [44]

    Basit, U

    M.A. Basit, U. Farooq, M. Imran, N. Fatima, A. Alhushaybari, S. Noreen, S.M. Eldin, A. Akgül, Comprehensive investigations of (Au -Ag/Blood and Cu -Fe3O4/Blood) hybrid nanofluid over two rotating disks: Numerical and computational approach, Alexandria Engineering Journal 72 (2...

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    Senthilvadivu, K

    K. Senthilvadivu, K. Loganathan, M. Abbas, M.S. Alqahtani, Numerical study of blood - based MHD tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow over a permeable stretching sheet with variable thermal conductivity and cross -diffusion, Open Physics 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1515/p...

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Yahya, N

    A.U. Yahya, N. Salamat, W. -H. Huang, I. Siddique, S. Abdal, S. Hussain, Thermal charactristics for the flow of Williamson hybrid nanofluid ( MoS2 + ZnO) based with engine oil over a streched sheet, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 26 (2021) 101196. https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    2021

  39. [47]

    Krishnendu, K.V

    S. Krishnendu, K.V. Nagaraja, S. Shali, Analysis of Heat Transfer of the Nanofluid Al2O3/H2O Flow Across a Stretching Sheet under the Effects of Thermal Radiation, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2818 (2024) 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742 - 6596/2818/1/012013

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Vinutha, K

    K. Vinutha, K. Sajjan, J.K. Madhukesh, G.K. Ramesh, Optimization of RSM and sensitivity analysis in MHD ternary nanofluid flow between parallel plates with quadratic radiation and activation energy, J Therm Anal Calorim 149 (2024) 1595 –1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12782-1

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Areekara, Mackolil ,Joby, Mahanthesh ,B., A

    S. Areekara, Mackolil ,Joby, Mahanthesh ,B., A. and Mathew, Bulirsch -Stoer computations for bioconvective magnetized nanomaterial flow subjected to convective thermal heating and Stefan blowing: a revised Buongiorno model for theranostic applications, Wav es in Random and Com...

  42. [50]

    Areekara, J

    S. Areekara, J. Mackolil, B. Mahanthesh, A. Mathew, P. Rana, A study on nanoliquid flow with irregular heat source and realistic boundary conditions: A modified Buongiorno model for biomedical applications, Z Angew Math Mech 102 (2022) e202100167. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm....

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    Fayyadh, M

    M.M. Fayyadh, M. Basavarajappa, I. Hashim, J. Mackolil, K.S. Nisar, R. Roslan, D. Allaw, The mathematical model for heat transfer optimization of Carreau fluid conveying magnetized nanoparticles over a permeable surface with activation energy using response surface methodology...

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.