On the Challenges and Opportunities in Generative AI
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:ODEMHQFVrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The field of deep generative modeling has grown rapidly in the last few years. With the availability of massive amounts of training data coupled with advances in scalable unsupervised learning paradigms, recent large-scale generative models show tremendous promise in synthesizing high-resolution images and text, as well as structured data such as videos and molecules. However, we argue that current large-scale generative AI models exhibit several fundamental shortcomings that hinder their widespread adoption across domains. In this work, our objective is to identify these issues and highlight key unresolved challenges in modern generative AI paradigms that should be addressed to further enhance their capabilities, versatility, and reliability. By identifying these challenges, we aim to provide researchers with insights for exploring fruitful research directions, thus fostering the development of more robust and accessible generative AI solutions.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Physics-informed Conditional Normalizing Flows for Angles-only Cislunar Orbit Determination
Conditional normalizing flows model the posterior over initial states from short-arc angles-only measurements in cislunar NRHOs and supply warm starts for nonlinear least-squares refinement.
-
Training-Free Quantum Generative Paradigm via Local Parent Hamiltonians
A training-free quantum generative paradigm is proposed that encodes target distributions as ground states of constructed local parent Hamiltonians for image and text generation.
-
The Annotation Scarcity Paradox in Low-Resource NLP Evaluation: A Decade of Acceleration and Emerging Constraints
Introduces the Annotation Scarcity Paradox to describe how model scaling in low-resource NLP outpaces the human expertise required for authentic evaluation, threatening the validity of reported progress.
-
The Annotation Scarcity Paradox in Low-Resource NLP Evaluation: A Decade of Acceleration and Emerging Constraints
A critical narrative survey conceptualizes the Annotation Scarcity Paradox as a structural limit on the epistemic validity of progress claims in low-resource NLP due to strained sociolinguistic expertise and extractiv...
-
The Annotation Scarcity Paradox in Low-Resource NLP Evaluation: A Decade of Acceleration and Emerging Constraints
A narrative survey of low-resource NLP evaluation identifies the Annotation Scarcity Paradox as a structural mismatch between scalable models and scarce sociolinguistic evaluation capacity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.