Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism

Ozan Sarg{\i}n

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A β-exponential inflaton in Palatini R+R² gravity can satisfy current CMB bounds under constant-roll dynamics.

desk verdict The claimed sign error is a false alarm, but the abstract's non-Gaussianity promise is unsupported and the ACT/Planck 'agreement' is a parameter fit, not a prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.09664 v2 pith:OFNTG2F4 submitted 2026-01-14 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

Ozan Sarg{i}n This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-ph MSC 83F0583D05 PACS 98.80.Cq04.50.Kd

keywords constant-rollinflationPalatiniformalismβ-exponentialpotentialk-inflationnon-minimalcouplingR^2gravityspectralindextensor-to-scalarratio

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that constant-roll inflation, not just slow-roll, keeps the β-exponential potential viable when the scalar field is non-minimally coupled to quadratic gravity in the Palatini formalism. By reducing the dynamics to a cubic algebraic equation for the field velocity, it derives the spectral index n_s and tensor-to-scalar ratio r as functions of the field, then scans the five model parameters. It reports parameter regions where the predictions fall inside the 68% or 95% confidence contours of ACT DR6, Planck, and BICEP/Keck data. It also asserts that constant-roll dynamics generate a distinct primordial non-Gaussianity that could be observed. The importance: a non-slow-roll, modified-gravity inflationary model remains observationally alive and makes a falsifiable prediction beyond the tilt and tensor ratio.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Einstein-frame effective Lagrangian L(ϕ,X) = A(ϕ)X + B(ϕ)X² − U(ϕ), a generalized k-inflation theory obtained by solving the auxiliary-field constraint in Palatini R+R² gravity with non-minimal coupling. Under the constant-roll ansatz, the scalar equation becomes a cubic in ϕ̇ whose real root (expressed via the standard cubic formula) supplies all slow-roll parameters, the sound speed C_s, and hence n_s, r, and the power spectrum. The β-exponential potential V = V₀[1 − βλϕ]^(1/β) then converts the parameter scan into a five-parameter family of predictions.

What would settle it

Run the unconstrained background equations for the same (β, λ, κ, ξ, α) values, start ϕ̇ off the constant-roll solution, and see whether the trajectory converges to φ̈ = κHφ̇ with constant κ within a few e-folds and remains there for 50–60 e-folds; if it does not, the n_s–r predictions for those parameters do not match any realizable history. Alternatively, measure the CMB bispectrum: if the constant-roll non-Gaussian signature—once its shape and amplitude are quantified—is excluded, the model as presented is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the author's own terms, the paper's discovery is that the Palatini action with a non-minimally coupled scalar and an R² term maps to a generalized k-inflation model whose field velocity, under the constant-roll ansatz φ̈ = κHφ̇, is given by the real root of a cubic equation. Feeding this root into the slow-roll parameters and computing n_s and r for the β-exponential potential V = V₀[1 − βλφ]^(1/β), the paper finds curves in the n_s–r plane that cross the observationally allowed regions for a range of (β, λ, κ, ξ, α). The abstract's further claim is that the constant-roll dynamics yield a non-Gaussian signature that is distinct from slow-roll k-inflation and observationally viable.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the constant-roll condition φ̈ = κHφ̇ with κ constant holds for the whole observationally relevant e-fold window, and never demonstrates that such a fine-tuned trajectory is reached from generic initial conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The model identifies specific intervals for β, λ, κ, ξ, α that are consistent with ACT DR6, Planck, and BICEP/Keck data; if the model is right, these are the parameter regions to probe further.
Constant-roll k-inflation predicts a non-Gaussian signature that future CMB experiments can search for in the bispectrum, unlike slow-roll dynamics.
The Palatini formulation changes the predictions relative to the metric formulation for the same potential, offering a way to discriminate between the two formalisms using n_s and r.
The derived cubic-root procedure provides an explicit algorithm for computing observables in any Palatini R+R² model with a specified potential, extending beyond the β-exponential case.
The iterative e-fold matching between instant reheating and field integration gives a concrete numerical pipeline that can be reused for other potentials in the same gravity framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step is to check whether the constant-roll trajectory is an attractor: if generic initial conditions do not settle onto φ̈ = κHφ̇ with the same κ over the observable 50–60 e-folds, the reported n_s–r curves would be too optimistic. This is not tested in the paper.
The non-Gaussian signature is asserted qualitatively; computing its shape (local, equilateral, or folded) and amplitude (f_NL) for the reported parameter region would turn the claim into a sharper, testable prediction.
The same machinery could be applied to other potentials (e.g., power-law, natural inflation) in Palatini R+R², charting a reusable route from Jordan-frame action to constant-roll observables.
The paper's iterative algorithm matching N_* from instant reheating with the integrated e-fold count could be cross-checked by an independent numerical integration of the full background equations, a test that would confirm or refute the reported α-dependence of r.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

I read arXiv:2601.09664 with the reader's report in hand. The headline of the report — a sign error in Eq. (2.17) that propagates to invalidate all predictions — does not hold up. The reader assumed X = 1/2 φdot^2, but the paper defines X = 1/2 (∇ϕ)^2, which in FLRW is -1/2 φdot^2. With that convention, Eq. (2.17) is exactly what you get from the paper's own ρ and p. I checked the algebra from the continuity equation and from the action; both give the same result. Eq. (3.10) then follows correctly from (2.17) and the constant-roll condition. So the central dynamical equation is consistent.

What is genuinely new here is modest but real: the constant-roll version of β-exponential inflation in Palatini R^2 gravity. The effective Lagrangian A X + B X^2 - U was already derived by Antoniadis, Lykkas and Tamvakis, and the β-exponential potential was studied in a slow-roll Palatini setup by Bostan and Dejrah. This paper combines the two and runs the parameter scan. The derivation of the cubic that gives φdot[φ] is algebraically sound, and the n_s-r curves are computed from the stated equations.

The real problems are two. First, the abstract promises an evaluation of the primordial non-Gaussianity that never appears in the body. There is no bispectrum, no f_NL, nothing beyond the word in the abstract. That is an overclaim and needs to be fixed — either add the computation or delete the sentence.

Second, the 'excellent agreement' with ACT/Planck/BK18 is a parameter fit, not a prediction. They scan β, λ, κ, ξ, α and fix V0 with the power spectrum amplitude. With that many knobs, some part of a curve will wander into the contour. I would like to see a benchmark set of parameters with a likelihood value, or at least a statement that these are representative curves rather than a goodness-of-fit claim.

There are also minor issues: the constant-roll trajectory is assumed from the pivot scale onward; no stability check or exit condition is shown. That is a standard limitation of constant-roll papers, but it should be acknowledged. The notation X = 1/2 (∇ϕ)^2 is legal but likely to trip up readers used to the k-essence convention X = -1/2 (∇ϕ)^2. A footnote would have prevented the reader's sign error.

All told, this is a competent incremental paper with an unsupported claim in the abstract and a tendency to oversell a fit. It deserves a referee. The referee should focus on the non-Gaussianity claim and on whether the parameter ranges are physically motivated, not on the sign of Eq. (2.17).

Recommendation: send to peer review. It will likely be a major-revision outcome.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies constant-roll inflation driven by the β-exponential potential in Palatini f(R, φ) gravity with an R² term. After conformal transformation, the effective Einstein-frame theory is written as a generalized k-inflation Lagrangian L(φ,X)=A(φ)X+B(φ)X²−U(φ), with explicit form (2.10). The authors derive the scalar field equation, impose the constant-roll condition φ̈=κHφ̇, solve the resulting cubic for φ̇[φ], and compute the spectral index n_s and tensor-to-scalar ratio r. They scan the parameters (β, λ, κ, ξ, α) with V₀ fixed by the scalar power-spectrum amplitude, and claim that selected curves agree with ACT DR6, Planck, and BK18 constraints. The abstract additionally claims that a non-Gaussianity evaluation confirms a distinct observational signature.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a useful parameter scan of a Palatini constant-roll model and identify regions of parameter space compatible with current CMB data. The analytic setup (generalized k-inflation from Palatini R+R²) and the explicit formulas for A, B, U are potentially reusable. However, the central derivation contains a sign error in the field equation that invalidates the numerical pipeline, and the non-Gaussianity claim is not backed by any calculation in the paper. The agreement with observations is obtained by scanning five free parameters and fixing a sixth from the amplitude, so the claimed 'excellent agreement' is a multi-parameter fit rather than a sharp falsifiable prediction. In its current form, the paper does not support its main conclusions.

major comments (4)

[Eq. (2.17)] The scalar field equation has the wrong signs for the potential and kinetic-gradient terms. For L=A(φ)X+B(φ)X²−U(φ), the correct Euler–Lagrange equation in FLRW is (A+6BX)φ̈+3H(A+2BX)φ̇+A'X+3B'X²+U'=0. Setting A=1, B=0, U=V gives φ̈+3Hφ̇+V'=0. Equation (2.17) instead gives φ̈+3Hφ̇−A'X−3B'X²=U', which reduces to φ̈+3Hφ̇=V' in the canonical limit. This is a load-bearing error: it propagates directly into Eq. (3.10) and hence into the cubic solution (3.17) used for every n_s–r curve in Figs. 1–5.
[Eq. (3.10)] Even taking Eq. (2.17) as printed, substituting the constant-roll condition (3.1) yields 4Hφ̇A(κ+3)+12Hφ̇³B(κ+1)−2A'φ̇²−3B'φ̇⁴−4U'=0. The printed Eq. (3.10) has −12Hφ̇³B(κ+1) and +2A'φ̇², so it is not the result of substituting (3.1) into (2.17). Since (3.10) is the basis for the polynomial (3.11) and its solution (3.17), the numerical predictions in Figs. 1–5 rest on an internally inconsistent dynamical equation, independent of the canonical-limit sign issue.
[Abstract / Sec. 6] The abstract claims that 'an evaluation of the primordial non-Gaussianity confirms that the constant-roll dynamics generate a distinct, observationally viable phenomenological signature.' No non-Gaussianity computation, bispectrum estimate, or related expression appears anywhere in the manuscript. The only mentions are motivational remarks in Sec. 1. This is a central claim of the paper as advertised and is unsupported by the actual content.
[Secs. 3–5] The constant-roll condition (3.1) is imposed globally over the observable e-fold window, but the paper never checks whether such trajectories are dynamical attractors of the full system or whether the solution φ̇[φ] obtained from (3.17) actually satisfies φ̈=κHφ̇ consistently. The predictions are obtained by scanning five free parameters and fixing V₀ from the scalar amplitude; the figures show continuous curves with one parameter varied while others are held fixed. This makes the apparent agreement with ACT/Planck/BK18 a multi-parameter fit rather than a model prediction. The paper should either validate the attractor property and quantify the statistical weight of the scanned region, or temper the claim of 'excellent agreement.'

minor comments (4)

[Sec. 6] The first paragraph writes '¨ϕ∼βHϕ̇'; the constant-roll parameter is κ elsewhere, so this appears to be a typo.
[Eq. (3.10)] Beyond the physics, the signs in (3.10) are inconsistent with the preceding (2.17); a careful re-derivation of the complete chain (2.17)→(3.10)→(3.17) is needed.
[Figs. 1–5] The figures show continuous curves with α or κ varied, but not the density of the parameter scan or the location of individual model points inside the confidence contours. A table of representative parameter points and a statement of how many scan points fall inside each contour would substantially improve transparency.
[References] Reference [124] is listed as 'Nucl. Phys. D994' which is not a standard journal abbreviation; please verify the citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's predictions are conditional model outputs compared to external CMB data, not constructed from those data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Einstein-frame Lagrangian L(phi,X)=A(phi)X+B(phi)X^2-U(phi) is obtained from the Jordan-frame action by explicit Weyl rescaling and solving the auxiliary-field constraint, not by assuming the final observables. The equations of motion, constant-roll condition (3.1), cubic solution for phidot (3.17), and the standard formulas for n_s, r, C_s, and P_S are combined to compute observables as functions of the field and parameters. Fixing V0 via P_S≈2.1e-9 only normalizes the amplitude; it does not determine n_s or r. Scanning (beta, lambda, kappa, xi, alpha) and plotting the resulting curves against ACT/Planck/BK18 contours is standard parameter-space exploration, not a construction that forces agreement: the plotted n_s-r relation is a nontrivial output of solving the equations, including the e-fold matching (3.8) and (5.1)-(5.2). The constant-roll ansatz is a dynamical assumption about the trajectory, not an input fitted to the observational targets; lack of an attractor check is a validity concern, not circularity. The self-citations [22] and [67] appear in literature surveys and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The abstract's claim of an 'evaluation' of primordial non-Gaussianity is unsupported by any computation in the manuscript, and Eq. (2.17) has an apparent sign inconsistency that propagates to (3.10); these are significant correctness/falsifiability issues, but they are not cases of a prediction reducing by construction to its input. Therefore no circular step is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard Palatini R² technology, the Hwang–Noh perturbation formulas, and the β-exponential potential from the literature, then adds a constant-roll ansatz and scans six free parameters. No new entities are introduced; the radion/Tsallis interpretations are only motivations. The central claim rests on fitted parameter ranges rather than a first-principles derivation.

free parameters (6)

β = 0.25, 0.5, 0.8 (discrete scan)
β-exponential deformation parameter; varied to shift n_s–r curves toward observational contours.
λ = 0.001–1.0 (scan)
Exponent parameter of the potential; scanned, with larger λ moving n_s rightward.
κ = 1e-5–1.1e-2; fixed at 0.005 in Fig. 1
Constant-roll parameter; chosen small to keep n_s in the observed range.
ξ = 1e-4–1e-2 (discrete values)
Non-minimal coupling between ϕ and R; scanned, with decreasing ξ lowering n_s.
α = 1e5–8e10
Starobinsky R² coefficient; scanned; controls the suppression of r.
V0 = set by scalar power spectrum Δ²_R ≈ 2.1e-9
Potential normalization fixed iteratively through the amplitude constraint; technically a fit to the observed power.

assumptions (5)

standard math The auxiliary field χ can be eliminated on-shell to yield L(ϕ,X) = A(ϕ)X + B(ϕ)X² − U(ϕ) (Eqs. 2.6–2.10).
This is the standard Palatini R² result, previously derived in refs. [36,39,161]; the paper re-derives it without modifying it.
domain assumption Hwang–Noh first-order slow-roll formulas for n_s and r (Eqs. 3.4–3.5) apply to this generalized k-inflation theory.
The perturbation theory is imported from refs. [162–164]; its validity at first order in the slow-roll parameters is assumed, not re-established for the large-α regime.
ad hoc to paper Constant-roll condition φ̈ = κHφ̇ holds with κ constant over the whole observable window (Eq. 3.1).
This is imposed, not derived from the potential; no check is made that such trajectories are attractors of the full dynamics or that inflation exits inflation properly.
domain assumption Instant-reheating e-fold formula N* ≈ 64.7 + ½lnρ* − ¼lnρ_e (Eq. 5.1) fixes the pivot-scale crossing.
The standard instant-reheating assumption is used without sensitivity analysis; different reheating histories would shift N* and the curves.
ad hoc to paper The effective field theory remains weakly coupled and unitary at the inflationary energy scale for α up to 8×10^10 and ξ up to 1e-2.
No unitarity or cutoff analysis is provided; the large α range is selected to fit the data, not derived from physical constraints.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OFNTG2F4

@misc{pith2026260109664,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OFNTG2F4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.09664}
}

abstract

This paper investigates the inflationary dynamics of a $\beta$-exponential potential model within the framework of non-minimally coupled quadratic $(R+R^2)$ gravity. The functional form of the adopted potential provides a well-motivated framework; its physical origin can be interpreted either as the stabilization dynamics of a radion field determining the size of the extra dimension in braneworld cosmology, or as a manifestation of the $q$-exponential function emerging naturally from Tsallis non-extensive thermodynamics. Utilizing the Palatini formalism, we derive an effective Einstein-frame generalized k-inflation theory and analyze its evolution under the constant-roll condition. We perform a comprehensive scan of the parameter space to obtain predictions for the spectral index $n_s$ and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$. Our results demonstrate that for specific viable ranges of the model parameters, the inflationary observables are in excellent agreement with the latest observational data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) DR6 and the Planck mission, thereby identifying the physically consistent regions of the parameter space. Furthermore, an evaluation of the primordial non-Gaussianity confirms that the constant-roll dynamics generate a distinct, observationally viable phenomenological signature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Induced-Gravity Palatini-Like Higgs Inflation in Supergravity Confronts ACT DR6
hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

A Palatini-supergravity Higgs-inflation model with induced gravity predicts a scalar spectral index ns≈0.972-0.974, consistent with ACT DR6, and favors split supersymmetry with gravitino mass 40-60 PeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

165 extracted references · 139 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

A. A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99

1980
[2]

A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

1981
[3]

Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon

K. Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195(1981) 467

1981
[4]

A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389

1982
[5]

Albrecht and P.J

A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

1982
[6]

Linde,Chaotic Inflation, Phys

A.D. Linde,Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 177

1983
[7]

D. H. Lyth and A. Riotto,Particle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation, Physics Reports314(1999), no. 1, 1–146

1999
[8]

A. A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.30,719(1979); ,767(1979)]

1979

Show all 165 references

[9]

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe, JETP Lett.33(1981) 532–535. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.33,549(1981)]

1981
[10]

S. W. Hawking,The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe, Phys. Lett. B, 115 (1982), 295

1982
[11]

S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss,Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe, Nucl. Phys. B224 (1983) 180

1983
[12]

A. A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations, Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175–178

1982
[13]

A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982) 1110–1113. [14]PlanckCollaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, [arXiv:1807.06211]

1982 arXiv
[15]

P. A. R. Ade et al. [BICEP, Keck],Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett.151301, 127, 15 (2021), [arXiv:2110.00483]

2018
[16]

Calabrese et al

E. Calabrese et al. [ACT collaboration],The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models, JCAP11(2025), 063, [arXiv:2503.14454]

2025 arXiv
[17]

De Felice and S

A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa,f(R) Theories, Living Rev. Relativ.,13, 3 (2010), [arXiv:1002.4928]

2010 arXiv
[18]

T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni,f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 451–497, [arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]]

2010 arXiv
[19]

Capozziello and M

S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis,Extended Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rept.509(2011) 167–321, [arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]]. – 12 –

2011 arXiv
[20]

Clifton, P

T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis,Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept.513(2012) 1–189, [arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]]

2012 arXiv
[21]

S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou,Inflationaryα-attractors fromF(R)gravity, Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 12 124026, [arXiv:1612.01126]

2016 arXiv
[22]

Bostan, C

N. Bostan, C. Karahan and O. Sargın,Inflation in symmergent metric-Palatini gravity, JCAP 02(2024) 028, [arXiv:2308.04507]

2024 arXiv
[23]

Palatini,Deduzione invariantiva delle equazioni gravitazionali dal principio di hamilton, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940)43(Dec, 1919) 203–212

A. Palatini,Deduzione invariantiva delle equazioni gravitazionali dal principio di hamilton, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940)43(Dec, 1919) 203–212

1940
[24]

Bauer and D

F. Bauer and D. A. Demir,Inflation with Non-Minimal Coupling: Metric versus Palatini Formulations, Phys. Lett. B,665, 222-226 (2008), [arXiv:0803.2664]

2008 arXiv
[25]

Borunda, B

M. Borunda, B. Janssen, and M. Bastero-Gil,Palatini versus metric formulation in higher curvature gravity, JCAP11(2008) 008, [arXiv:0804.4440]

2008 arXiv
[26]

Bauer and D

F. Bauer and D. A. Demir,Higgs-Palatini Inflation and Unitarity, Phys. Lett. B698(2011) 425–429, [arXiv:1012.2900]

2011 arXiv
[27]

Tamanini and C

N. Tamanini and C. R. Contaldi,Inflationary Perturbations in Palatini Generalised Gravity, Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044018, [arXiv:1010.0689]

2011 arXiv
[28]

Enqvist, T

K. Enqvist, T. Koivisto, and G. Rigopoulos,Non-metric chaotic inflation, JCAP05(2012) 023, [arXiv:1107.3739]

2012 arXiv
[29]

Borowiec, M

A. Borowiec, M. Kamionka, A. Kurek, and M. Szydlowski,Cosmic acceleration from modified gravity with Palatini formalism, JCAP02(2012) 027, [arXiv:1109.3420]

2012 arXiv
[30]

Racioppi,Coleman-Weinberg linear inflation: metric vs

A. Racioppi,Coleman-Weinberg linear inflation: metric vs. Palatini formulation, JCAP12 (2017) 041, [arXiv:1710.04853]

2017 arXiv
[31]

Rasanen and P

S. Rasanen and P. Wahlman,Higgs inflation with loop corrections in the Palatini formulation, JCAP11, (2017) 047 , [arXiv:1709.07853]

2017 arXiv
[32]

C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu,Inflationary dynamics and preheating of the nonminimally coupled inflaton field in the metric and Palatini formalisms, Phys. Rev. D96(2017), 103542, [arXiv:1801.04089]

2017 arXiv
[33]

Stachowski, M

A. Stachowski, M. Szyd lowski, and A. Borowiec,Starobinsky cosmological model in Palatini formalism, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017), 406, [arXiv:1608.03196]

2017 arXiv
[34]

Azri and D

H. Azri and D. Demir,Affine Inflation, Phys. Rev. D95(2017), 124007, [arXiv:1705.05822]

2017 arXiv
[35]

Enckell, K

V.-M. Enckell, K. Enqvist, S. Rasanen, and E. Tomberg,Higgs inflation at the hilltop, JCAP 06(2018), 005, [arXiv:1802.09299]

2018 arXiv
[36]

Enckell, K

V.-M. Enckell, K. Enqvist, S. Rasanen and L.-P. Wahlman,Inflation withR 2 term in the Palatini formulation, JCAP02(2019) 022, [arXiv:1810.05536]

2019 arXiv
[37]

J¨ arv, A

L. J¨ arv, A. Racioppi, and T. Tenkanen,Palatini side of inflationary attractors, Phys. Rev. D 97(2018), 083513, [arXiv:1712.08471]

2018 arXiv
[38]

Rasanen,Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation with kinetic terms for the metric, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, vol.2, 2019, [arXiv:1811.09514]

S. Rasanen,Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation with kinetic terms for the metric, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, vol.2, 2019, [arXiv:1811.09514]

2019 arXiv
[39]

Antoniadis, A

I. Antoniadis, A. Karam, A. Lykkas and K. Tamvakis,Palatini inflation in models with anR 2 term, JCAP,11, (2018) 028 , [arXiv:1810.10418]

2018 arXiv
[40]

Rasanen and E

S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Planck scale black hole dark matter from Higgs inflation, JCAP, 01, (2019) 038 , [arXiv:1810.12608]

2019 arXiv
[41]

Antoniadis, A

I. Antoniadis, A. Karam, A. Lykkas, T. Pappas and K. Tamvakis,Rescuing Quartic and Natural Inflation in the Palatini Formalism, JCAP,03, (2019) 005, [arXiv:1812.00847]. – 13 –

2019 arXiv
[42]

Racioppi,Non-Minimal (Self-)Running Inflation: Metric vs

A. Racioppi,Non-Minimal (Self-)Running Inflation: Metric vs. Palatini Formulation, JHEP, 01(2021) 011, [arXiv:1912.10038]

2021 arXiv
[43]

Shimada, K

K. Shimada, K. Aoki, and K. Maeda,Metric-affine Gravity and Inflation, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), 104020, [arXiv:1812.03420]

2019 arXiv
[44]

Jinno, K

R. Jinno, K. Kaneta, K.-y. Oda, and S. C. Park,Hillclimbing inflation in metric and Palatini formulations, Phys. Lett. B791, (2019) 396-402, [arXiv:1812.11077]

2019 arXiv
[45]

Tenkanen,Minimal Higgs inflation with anR 2 term in Palatini gravity, Phys

T. Tenkanen,Minimal Higgs inflation with anR 2 term in Palatini gravity, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), 063528, [arXiv:1901.01794]

2019 arXiv
[46]

Rubio and E

J. Rubio and E. S. Tomberg,Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation, JCAP04(2019), 021, [arXiv:1902.10148]

2019 arXiv
[47]

I. D. Gialamas and A. B. Lahanas,Reheating inR 2 Palatini inflationary models, Phys. Rev. D, 101(2020) 084007, [arXiv:1911.11513]

2020 arXiv
[48]

Tenkanen,Tracing the high energy theory of gravity: an introduction to Palatini inflation, Gen

T. Tenkanen,Tracing the high energy theory of gravity: an introduction to Palatini inflation, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.52, (2020) 33, [arXiv:2001.10135]

2020 arXiv
[49]

Shaposhnikov, A

M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, and S. Zell,Standard Model Meets Gravity: Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Inflation, Phys. Rev. D103, (2021) 033006, [arXiv:2001.09088]

2021 arXiv
[50]

Tenkanen and E

T. Tenkanen and E. Tomberg,Initial conditions for plateau inflation, JCAP04(2020) 050, [arXiv:2002.02420]

2020 arXiv
[51]

Shaposhnikov, A

M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, and S. Zell,Quantum Effects in Palatini Higgs Inflation, JCAP 07(2020) 064, [arXiv:2002.07105]

2020 arXiv
[52]

Lloyd-Stubbs and J

A. Lloyd-Stubbs and J. McDonald,Sub-Planckianϕ 2 Inflation in the Palatini Formulation of Gravity with anR 2 term, Phys. Rev. D101, (2020) 123515, [arXiv:2002.08324]

2020 arXiv
[53]

I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Racioppi,Dynamically induced Planck scale and inflation in the Palatini formulation, JCAP11(2020) 014, [arXiv:2006.09124]

2020 arXiv
[54]

I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Lykkas, T. D. Pappas,Palatini-Higgs inflation with non-minimal derivative coupling, Phys. Rev. D102, (2020) 063522, [arXiv:2008.06371]

2020 arXiv
[55]

Bostan,Palatini Higgs and Coleman-Weinberg inflation with non-minimal coupling, JCAP 04(2021) 042, [arXiv:2009.04406]

N. Bostan,Palatini Higgs and Coleman-Weinberg inflation with non-minimal coupling, JCAP 04(2021) 042, [arXiv:2009.04406]

2021 arXiv
[56]

Bekov, K

S. Bekov, K. Myrzakulov, R. Myrzakulov, D. S. G´ omez,General Slow-Roll Inflation inf(R) Gravity under the Palatini Approach, Symmetry12, (2020) 1958, [arXiv:2010.12360]

2020 arXiv
[57]

Dimopoulos, S

K. Dimopoulos, S. S. L´ opez,Quintessential inflation in Palatinif(R)gravity, Phys. Rev. D 103, (2020) 043533, [arXiv:2012.06831]

2020 arXiv
[58]

I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, T. D. Pappas, V. C. Spanos,Scale-invariant quadratic gravity and inflation in the Palatini formalism, Phys. Rev. D104, (2020) 023521, [arXiv:2104.04550]

2020 arXiv
[59]

Annala, S

J. Annala, S. Rasanen,Inflation withR (αβ) terms in the Palatini formulation, JCAP09(2021) 032, [arXiv:2106.12422]

2021 arXiv
[60]

Dioguardi, A

C. Dioguardi, A. Racioppi and E. Tomberg,Slow-roll inflation in PalatiniF(R)gravity, JHEP06(2022) 106, [arXiv:2112.12149]

2022 arXiv
[61]

Bostan,Non-minimally coupled Natural Inflation: Palatini and Metric formalism with the recent BICEP/Keck, JCAP02(2023) 063, [arXiv:2209.02434]

N. Bostan,Non-minimally coupled Natural Inflation: Palatini and Metric formalism with the recent BICEP/Keck, JCAP02(2023) 063, [arXiv:2209.02434]

2023 arXiv
[62]

Dioguardi, A

C. Dioguardi, A. Racioppi and E. Tomberg,Beyond (and back to) Palatini quadratic gravity and inflation, JCAP03(2024) 041, [arXiv:2212.11869]

2024 arXiv
[63]

Eadkhong, P

T. Eadkhong, P. Dam-O, P. Channuie, D. Momeni,Nonminimally-coupled warm Higgs inflation: Metric vs. Palatini formulations, Nucl. Phys. D994(2023) 116289, [arXiv:2303.00572]. – 14 –

2023 arXiv
[64]

I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, T. D. Pappas, and E. Tomberg,Implications of Palatini gravity for inflation and beyond, Int. J. of Geo. Meth. in Mod. Phys.20, (2023) 13, 2330007, [arXiv:2303.14148]

2023 arXiv
[65]

J¨ arv, S

L. J¨ arv, S. Karamitsos, and M. Saal,Global portraits of nonminimal inflation: Metric and Palatini formalism, Phys. Rev. D109, (2024) 084073, [arXiv:2401.12314]

2024 arXiv
[66]

Hassan and S

A. Hassan and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Inflation with the Chern-Simons term in the Palatini formulation, JCAP01(2025) 087, [arXiv:2408.14983]

2025
[67]

Bostan, C

N. Bostan, C. Karahan and O. Sargın,Large field polynomial inflation in Palatinif(R, ϕ) gravity, JCAP01(2025) 115, [arXiv:2411.07995]

2025 arXiv
[68]

Bombacigno, M

F. Bombacigno, M. De Angelis, C. van de Bruck and W. Giar` e,Inflation in non-local hybrid metric-Palatini gravity, JCAP05(2025) 025, [arXiv:2412.15064]

2025 arXiv
[69]

Bostan, R

N. Bostan, R. H. Dejrah, C. Dioguardi and A. Racioppi,Natural inflation in PalatiniF(R, X), JCAP07(2025) 082, [arXiv:2503.16324]

2025
[70]

Dimopoulos, C

K. Dimopoulos, C. Dioguardi, G. H¨ utsi, A. Racioppi,Quintessential inflation in Palatini F(R, X)gravity, Eur. Phys. J. P140(2025) 1109, [arXiv:2503.21610]

2025
[71]

Pallis,Kinetically modified Palatini inflation meets ACT data, Phys

C. Pallis,Kinetically modified Palatini inflation meets ACT data, Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139739, [arXiv:2505.23243]

2025 arXiv
[72]

Bostan, R

N. Bostan, R. H. Dejrah, C. Dioguardi and A. Racioppi,Natural inflation in PalatiniF(R), [arXiv:2511.20557]
[73]

Armendariz-Picon, T

C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour, and V. F. Mukhanov,k-inflation, Phys. Lett. B458(1999) 209–218, [arXiv:hep-th/9904075]

1999 arXiv
[74]

Chiba, T

T. Chiba, T. Okabe, and M. Yamaguchi,Kinetically driven quintessence, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 023511, [arXiv:astro-ph/9912463]

2000 arXiv
[75]

Armendariz-Picon, V

C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt,A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 4438–4441, [arXiv:astro-ph/0004134]

2000 arXiv
[76]

Armendariz-Picon, V

C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt,Essentials of k-essence, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 103510, [arXiv:astro-ph/0006373]

2001 arXiv
[77]

Chiba,Tracking k-essence, Phys

T. Chiba,Tracking k-essence, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 063514, [arXiv:astro-ph/0206298]

2002 arXiv
[78]

Malquarti, E

M. Malquarti, E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and M. Trodden,A New view of k-essence, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 123503, [arXiv:astro-ph/0302279]

2003 arXiv
[79]

Malquarti, E

M. Malquarti, E. J. Copeland, and A. R. Liddle,k-essence and the coincidence problem, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 023512, [arXiv:astro-ph/0304277]

2003 arXiv
[80]

L. P. Chimento and A. Feinstein,Power-law expansion in k-essence cosmology, Mod. Phys. Lett. A19(2004) 761–768, [arXiv:astro-ph/0305007]

2004 arXiv
[81]

L. P. Chimento,Extended tachyon field, Chaplygin gas and solvable k-essence cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 123517, [arXiv:astro-ph/0311613]

2004 arXiv
[82]

R. J. Scherrer,Purely kinetic k-essence as unified dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 011301, [arXiv:astro-ph/0402316]

2004 arXiv
[83]

J. M. Aguirregabiria, L. P. Chimento, and R. Lazkoz,Phantom k-essence cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 023509, [arXiv:astro-ph/0403157]

2004 arXiv
[84]

Armendariz-Picon and E

C. Armendariz-Picon and E. A. Lim,Haloes of k-essence, JCAP08(2005) 007, [arXiv:astro-ph/0505207]

2005 arXiv
[85]

L. R. Abramo and N. Pinto-Neto,On the stability of phantom k-essence theories, Phys. Rev. D 73(2006) 063522, [arXiv:astro-ph/0511562]. – 15 –

2006 arXiv
[86]

A. D. Rendall,Dynamics of k-essence, Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 1557–1570, [arXiv:gr-qc/0511158]

2006 arXiv
[87]

Bruneton,On causality and superluminal behavior in classical field theories: Applications to k-essence theories and MOND-like theories of gravity, Phys

J.-P. Bruneton,On causality and superluminal behavior in classical field theories: Applications to k-essence theories and MOND-like theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 085013, [arXiv:gr-qc/0607055]

2007 arXiv
[88]

de Putter and E

R. de Putter and E. V. Linder,Kinetic k-essence and Quintessence, Astropart. Phys.28(2007) 263–272, [arXiv:0705.0400]

2007 arXiv
[89]

Babichev, V

E. Babichev, V. Mukhanov, and A. Vikman,k-Essence, superluminal propagation, causality and emergent geometry, JHEP02(2008) 101, [arXiv:0708.0561]

2008 arXiv
[90]

Matsumoto and S

J. Matsumoto and S. Nojiri,Reconstruction of k-essence model, Phys. Lett. B687(2010) 236–242, [arXiv:1001.0220]

2010 arXiv
[91]

Deffayet, X

C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D. A. Steer, and G. Zahariade,From k-essence to generalised Galileons, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 064039, [arXiv:1103.3260]

2011 arXiv
[92]

Unnikrishnan, V

S. Unnikrishnan, V. Sahni, and A. Toporensky,Refining inflation using non-canonical scalars, JCAP08(2012) 018, [arXiv:1205.0786]

2012 arXiv
[93]

Li and A

S. Li and A. R. Liddle,Observational constraints on k-inflation models, JCAP10(2012) 011, [arXiv:1204.6214]

2012 arXiv
[94]

T. F. Serish, S. A. H. Mansoori, F. Felegary, ¨O. Akarsu, M. Sami,k-inflation: Non-separable case meets ACT measurements, [arXiv:2511.16621]
[95]

Bili´ c, D

N. Bili´ c, D. D. Dimitrijevi´ c, G. S. Djordjevic, M. Miloˇ sevi´ c, M. Stojanovi´ c,Primordial black hole formation in k-inflation models, Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025), 235012, [arXiv:2507.02490]

2025
[96]

Bili´ c, D

N. Bili´ c, D. D. Dimitrijevi´ c, G. S. Djordjevic, M. Miloˇ sevi´ c, M. Stojanovi´ c,Scaling Invariance of Perturbations in k-Inflation Models, Universe11(2025), 128, [arXiv:2502.06456]

2025 arXiv
[97]

M. Liu, T. He, B. Chen, Z. Han, R. Yang,Reconstructing square-law k-inflation from Planck data, Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025), 102039, [arXiv:2412.16268]

2025 arXiv
[98]

A. L. Ferreira Junior, N.Pinto-Neto, J. Zanelli,Inflation and late-time accelerated expansion driven byk-essence degenerate dynamics, Phys. Rev. D109(2024), 023515, [arXiv:2311.01456]

2024 arXiv
[99]

Ageeva, P

Y. Ageeva, P. Petrov,K-inflation: The legitimacy of the classical treatment, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024), 043527, [arXiv:2310.18402]

2024 arXiv
[100]

R. Yang, M. Liu,Hamilton–Jacobi formalism for k-inflation, Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024), 101560, [arXiv:2306.09843]

2024 arXiv
[101]

C. Shen, X. Zhang, Z. Peng, H. Liu, X. Li, P. Chu,Primordial non-Gaussianity in the warm k-inflation, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), 123521, [arXiv:2303.05260]

2023 arXiv
[102]

H. D. Nguyen, M. T. Pham, D. T. Le, and Q. T. Do,Anisotropic constant-rollk-inflation model, Comm. Phys.33(2022), 15, [arXiv:2211.08032]

2022 arXiv
[103]

Shumaylov, W

Z. Shumaylov, W. Handley,Primordial power spectra fromk-inflation with curvature, Phys. Rev. D105(2022), 123532, [arXiv:2112.07547]

2022 arXiv
[104]

Mikura, Y

Y. Mikura, Y. Tada, S. Yokoyama,Minimalk-inflation in light of the conformal metric-affine geometry, Phys. Rev. D103(2021), L101303, [arXiv:2103.13045]

2021 arXiv
[105]

Pareek, A

P. Pareek, A. Nautiyal,Reheating constraints onk-inflation, Phys. Rev. D1043(2021), 083526, [arXiv:2103.01797]

2021 arXiv
[106]

Solbi, K

M. Solbi, K. Karami,Primordial black holes and induced gravitational waves ink-inflation, JCAP08(2021), 056, [arXiv:2102.05651]. – 16 –

2021 arXiv
[107]

Oikonomou,Non-minimally Coupled Scalark-inflation Dynamics, [arXiv:2101.00665]

V.K. Oikonomou,Non-minimally Coupled Scalark-inflation Dynamics, [arXiv:2101.00665]

arXiv
[108]

Motohashi, A

H. Motohashi, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama,Inflation with a constant rate of roll, JCAP09(2015), 018, [arXiv:1411.5021]

2015 arXiv
[109]

Motohashi and A

H. Motohashi and A. A. Starobinsky,Constant-roll inflation: confrontation with recent observational data, Europhys. Lett.117(2017), 39001, [arXiv:1702.05847]

2017 arXiv
[110]

S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou,Inflationary Dynamics with a Smooth Slow-Roll to Constant-Roll Era Transition, JCAP1704(2017), 041, [arXiv:1703.02853]

2017 arXiv
[111]

S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou,Inflation with a Smooth Constant-Roll to Constant-Roll Era Transition, Phys. Rev. D96(2017), 024029, [arXiv:1704.02931]

2017 arXiv
[112]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou,Constant-roll Inflation inF(R)Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017), 245012, [arXiv:1704.05945]

2017 arXiv
[113]

Motohashi and A

H. Motohashi and A. A. Starobinsky,f(R)constant-roll inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017), 538, [arXiv:1704.08188]

2017 arXiv
[114]

Gao,Reconstruction of constant slow-roll inflation, Sci

Q. Gao,Reconstruction of constant slow-roll inflation, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.60 (2017), 090411, [arXiv:1704.08559]

2017 arXiv
[115]

V. K. Oikonomou,Reheating in Constant-rollF(R)Gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A32(2017), 1750172, [arXiv:1706.00507]

2017 arXiv
[116]

S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and L. Sebastiani,Unification of Constant-roll Inflation and Dark Energy with LogarithmicR 2-corrected and ExponentialF(R)Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 923(2017) 608–632, [arXiv:1708.08346]

2017 arXiv
[117]

V. K. Oikonomou,A Smooth Constant-Roll to a Slow-Roll Modular Inflation Transition, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27(2017), 1850009, [arXiv:1709.02986]

2017 arXiv
[118]

Cicciarella, J

F. Cicciarella, J. Mabillard, and M. Pieroni,New perspectives on constant-roll inflation, JCAP 01(2018), 024, [arXiv:1709.03527]

2018 arXiv
[119]

Anguelova, P

L. Anguelova, P. Suranyi, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana,Systematics of Constant Roll Inflation, JCAP02(2018), 004, [arXiv:1710.06989]

2018 arXiv
[120]

Karam, L

A. Karam, L. Marzola, T. Pappas, A. Racioppi, and K. Tamvakis,Constant-Roll (Quasi-)Linear Inflation, JCAP05(2018), 011, [arXiv:1711.09861]

2018 arXiv
[121]

Yi and Y

Z. Yi and Y. Gong,On the constant-roll inflation, JCAP03 (2018), 052, [arXiv:1712.07478]

2018 arXiv
[122]

Q. Gao, Y. Gong, and Z. Yi,On the constant-roll inflation with large and smallη H , Universe 5(2019), 215, [arXiv:1901.04646]

2019 arXiv
[123]

S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou,Constant-rollk-Inflation Dynamics, Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020), 025003, [arXiv:1912.00475]

2020 arXiv
[124]

A. I. Keskin, M. Ya¸ sar and K. Kurt,Constant roll inflationary dynamics with generalized potentials inf(R, ϕ, X)gravity, Phys. Lett. B, 870 (2025), 139947, [arXiv:2510.10220]

2025
[125]

R. Inui, H. Motohashi, S. Pi, Y. Tada, S. Yokoyama,Constant roll and non-Gaussian tail in light of logarithmic duality, JCAP02(2025), 042, [arXiv:2409.13500]

2025 arXiv
[126]

Biswas, K

S. Biswas, K. Bhattacharya, S. Das,Reassessing constant-roll warm inflation, Phys. Rev. D 110(2024), 063536, [arXiv:2406.00340]

2024 arXiv
[127]

Herrera, M

R. Herrera, M. Shokri, J. Sadeghi,Constant-roll inflation with a complex scalar field, Annals Phys.467(2024), 169705, [arXiv:2405.08928]

2024 arXiv
[128]

S. M. Ahmadi, N. Ahmadi, M. Shokri,Analytical insights into constant-roll condition: extending the paradigm to non-canonical models, JCAP05(2024), 005, [arXiv:2312.05998]. – 17 –

2024 arXiv
[129]

Tomberg,Stochastic constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes, Phys

E. Tomberg,Stochastic constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), 043502, [arXiv:2304.10903]

2023 arXiv
[130]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, T. Paul,Holographic realization of constant roll inflation and dark energy: An unified scenario, Phys. Lett. B841, (2023) 137926, [arXiv:2304.09436]

2023 arXiv
[131]

Motohashi, Y

H. Motohashi, Y. Tada,Squeezed bispectrum and one-loop corrections in transient constant-roll inflation, JCAP08(2023), 069, [arXiv:2303.16035]

2023 arXiv
[132]

Mohammadi, N

A. Mohammadi, N. Ahmadi, M. Shokri,On the constant roll complex scalar field inflationary models, JCAP06(2023), 058, [arXiv:2212.13403]

2023 arXiv
[133]

Panda, A

S. Panda, A. Rana, R. Thakur,Constant-roll inflation in modifiedf(R, ϕ)gravity model using Palatini formalism, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 297, [arXiv:2212.00472]

2023 arXiv
[134]

Ravanpak, G

A. Ravanpak, G. F. Fadakar,Constant-roll inflation in brane induced gravity cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 924, [arXiv:2210.10327]

2022 arXiv
[135]

Anari, H

V. Anari, H. M. Sadjadi,Constant-roll, cosmic acceleration, and massive neutrinos, JCAP07 (2022), 043, [arXiv:2203.02467]

2022 arXiv
[136]

M. R. Setare, A. Ravanpak, K. Bahari, G. F. Fadakar,Warm constant-roll inflation in brane-world cosmology, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30(2021), 2150116, [arXiv:2201.02666]

2021 arXiv
[137]

AlHallak, A

M. AlHallak, A. AlRakik, N. Chamoun and M. S. El-Daher,Palatini f(R) Gravity and Variants of k-/Constant Roll/Warm Inflation within Variation of Strong Coupling Scenario, Universe8(2022), 126, [arXiv:2111.05075]

2022 arXiv
[138]

J. C. Garnica, L. G. Gomez, A. A. Navarro, Y. Rodriguez,Constant-Roll Inflation in the Generalized SU(2) Proca Theory, Annalen der Physik534(2022), 2100453, [arXiv:2109.10154]

2022 arXiv
[139]

Shokri, M

M. Shokri, M. R. Setare, S. Capozziello, J. Sadeghi,Constant-rollf(R)inflation compared with cosmic microwave background anisotropies and swampland criteria, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137(2022) 639, [arXiv:2108.00175]

2022 arXiv
[140]

D. H. Nguyen, T. M. Pham, T. Q. Do,Anisotropic constant-roll inflation for the Dirac–Born–Infeld model, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 839, [arXiv:2107.14115]

2021 arXiv
[141]

Shokri, J

M. Shokri, J. Sadeghi, S. N. Gashti,Quintessential constant-roll inflation, Phys. Dark Univ. 35(2022), 100923, [arXiv:2107.04756]

2022 arXiv
[142]

Shokri, J

M. Shokri, J. Sadeghi, M. R. Setare,Constant-roll inflation from a fermionic field, Europhys. Lett.139(2022), 19001, [arXiv:2107.03283]

2022 arXiv
[143]

V. K. Oikonomou,Generalizing the constant-roll condition in scalar inflation, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.19(2022), 2250099, [arXiv:2106.10778]

2022 arXiv
[144]

U. R. Mun,Constant-roll warm inflation and theβ-function approach, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021), 083527, [arXiv:2104.09504]

2021 arXiv
[145]

Shokri, J

M. Shokri, J. Sadeghi, M. R. Setare,The generalized sl(2,R) and su(1,1) in non-minimal constant-roll inflation, Annals of Physics429(2021), 168487, [arXiv:2104.01917]

2021 arXiv
[146]

Shokri, J

M. Shokri, J. Sadeghi, M. R. Setare, S. Capozziello,Nonminimal coupling inflation with constant slow roll, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30(2021), 2150070, [arXiv:2104.00596]

2021 arXiv
[147]

Sadeghi, S

J. Sadeghi, S. N. Gashti,Anisotropic constant-roll inflation with noncommutative model and swampland conjectures, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 301, [arXiv:2104.00117]

2021 arXiv
[148]

Guerrero, D

M. Guerrero, D. Rubiera-Garcia, D. S. Gomez,Constant roll inflation in multifield models, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), 123528, [arXiv:2008.07260]

2020 arXiv
[149]

Gao,Gauss–Bonnet inflation with a constant rate of roll, Eur

T. Gao,Gauss–Bonnet inflation with a constant rate of roll, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1013, [arXiv:2008.03976]. – 18 –

2020 arXiv
[150]

V. K. Oikonomou, F. P. Fronimos,A nearly massless graviton in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet inflation with linear coupling implies constant-roll for the scalar field, Europhys. Lett.131 (2020), 30001, [arXiv:2007.11915]

2020 arXiv
[151]

Mohammadi, T

A. Mohammadi, T. Golanbari, S. Nasri, K. Saaidi,Constant-roll brane inflation, Phys. Rev. D 101(2020), 123537, [arXiv:2004.12137]

2020 arXiv
[152]

Alcaniz and F.C

J.S. Alcaniz and F.C. Carvalho,Beta-exponential inflation, Europhys. Lett.79(2007) 39001, [arXiv:astro-ph/0612279]

2007 arXiv
[153]

Halliwell,Scalar fields in cosmology with an exponential potential, Phys

J. Halliwell,Scalar fields in cosmology with an exponential potential, Phys. Lett. B185, (1987) 341

1987
[154]

Wetterich,Kaluza-Klein cosmology and the inflationary universe, Nucl

C. Wetterich,Kaluza-Klein cosmology and the inflationary universe, Nucl. Phys. B252, (1985) 309

1985
[155]

Shafi and C

Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich,Inflation with higher dimensional gravity, Phys. Lett. B152, (1985) 51

1985
[156]

Halliwell,The quantum cosmology of Einstein-Maxwell theory in six dimensions, Nucl

J. Halliwell,The quantum cosmology of Einstein-Maxwell theory in six dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B266, (1986) 228

1986
[157]

Santos, M

M.A. Santos, M. Benetti, J. Alcaniz, F.A. Brito and R. Silva,CMB constraints on β-exponential inflationary models, JCAP03(2018) 023, [arXiv:1710.09808]

2018 arXiv
[158]

F. B. M. dos Santos, S. Santos da Costa, R. Silva, M. Benetti and J. Alcaniz,Constraining non-minimally coupledβ-exponential inflation with CMB data, JCAP06(2022) 001, [arXiv:2110.14758]

2022 arXiv
[159]

F. B. M. dos Santos, R. Silva, S. S. da Costa, M. Benetti and J. S. Alcaniz,Warm β-exponential inflation and the swampland conjectures, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 178, [arXiv:2209.06153]

2023 arXiv
[160]

Bostan and R

N. Bostan and R. H. Dejrah,Inflationary dynamics and observables:β-exponential models in PalatiniR 2 gravity, Nuclear Physics B108(2025), 117056, [arXiv:2409.10398]

2025 arXiv
[161]

Antoniadis, A

I. Antoniadis, A. Lykkas and K. Tamvakis,Constant-roll in the Palatini-R2 models, JCAP04 (2020) 033, [arXiv:2002.12681]

2020 arXiv
[162]

Noh and J.-c

H. Noh and J.-c. Hwang,Inflationary spectra in generalized gravity: Unified forms, Phys. Lett. B515(2001) 231–237, [arXiv:astro-ph/0107069]

2001 arXiv
[163]

Hwang and H

J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh,Cosmological perturbations in a generalized gravity including tachyonic condensation, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 084009, [arXiv:hep-th/0206100]

2002 arXiv
[164]

Hwang and H

J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh,Classical evolution and quantum generation in generalized gravity theories including string corrections and tachyon: Unified analyses, Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063536, [arXiv:gr-qc/0412126]

2005 arXiv
[165]

Martin, C

J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Encyclopædia Inflationaris, Phys. Dark Univ.5-6, (2014) 75, [arXiv:1303.3787]

2014 arXiv
[166]

Lucchin and S

F. Lucchin and S. Matarrese,Power Law Inflation, Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 1316. – 19 –

1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A. A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99

1980

[2] [2]

A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

1981

[3] [3]

Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon

K. Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195(1981) 467

1981

[4] [4]

A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389

1982

[5] [5]

Albrecht and P.J

A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

1982

[6] [6]

Linde,Chaotic Inflation, Phys

A.D. Linde,Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 177

1983

[7] [7]

D. H. Lyth and A. Riotto,Particle physics models of inflation and the cosmological density perturbation, Physics Reports314(1999), no. 1, 1–146

1999

[8] [8]

A. A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.30,719(1979); ,767(1979)]

1979