REVIEW 1 cited by
New Fairness Metrics for Recommendation that Embrace Differences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study fairness in collaborative-filtering recommender systems, which are sensitive to discrimination that exists in historical data. Biased data can lead collaborative filtering methods to make unfair predictions against minority groups of users. We identify the insufficiency of existing fairness metrics and propose four new metrics that address different forms of unfairness. These fairness metrics can be optimized by adding fairness terms to the learning objective. Experiments on synthetic and real data show that our new metrics can better measure fairness than the baseline, and that the fairness objectives effectively help reduce unfairness.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Generative Ghost: Investigating Ranking Bias Hidden in AI-Generated Videos
Text-video retrieval models systematically rank AI-generated videos above semantically matched real videos, driven by both visual and temporal cues and amplified by AI content in training data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.