Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Is MgB₂ a superconductor?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.04495 v3 pith:OHREE6LC submitted 2023-12-07 cond-mat.supr-con

Is MgB₂ a superconductor?

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords modelauthorsdataexperimentalsuperconductorabsenceapplicationargue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Hirsch and Marsiglio, in their recent publication (J. Supercond. Nov. Mag. 35, 3141-3145 (2022)), assert that experimental data on the trapping of magnetic flux by hydrogen-rich compounds clearly demonstrate the absence of superconductivity in hydrides at high pressures. We argue that this assertion is incorrect, as it relies on the wrong model coupled with selective manipulations (hide/delete) of calculated datasets and ignores the reference measurements after the release of pressure. A critical examination of the authors' claim of having performed fitting of experimental data to the model reveals that, in fact, the authors conducted simulations where all free parameters were fixed. Importantly, an application of the Hirsch-Marsiglio model to MgB$_2$ leads to the conclusion that it is not a superconductor.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.