Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unveiling Implicit Table Knowledge with Question-Then-Pinpoint Reasoner for Insightful Table Summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12269 v2 pith:OKM435VX submitted 2024-06-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords tableknowledgeimplicitreasonerinsightfulframeworkhigh-qualityquestion-then-pinpoint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Implicit knowledge hidden within the explicit table cells, such as data insights, is the key to generating a high-quality table summary. However, unveiling such implicit knowledge is a non-trivial task. Due to the complex nature of structured tables, it is challenging even for large language models (LLMs) to mine the implicit knowledge in an insightful and faithful manner. To address this challenge, we propose a novel table reasoning framework Question-then-Pinpoint. Our work focuses on building a plug-and-play table reasoner that can self-question the insightful knowledge and answer it by faithfully pinpointing evidence on the table to provide explainable guidance for the summarizer. To train a reliable reasoner, we collect table knowledge by guiding a teacher LLM to follow the coarse-to-fine reasoning paths and refine it through two quality enhancement strategies to selectively distill the high-quality knowledge to the reasoner. Extensive experiments on two table summarization datasets, including our newly proposed InsTaSumm, validate the general effectiveness of our framework.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What to Keep and What to Drop: Adaptive Table Filtering Framework

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ATF prunes table columns and rows with LLM scoring plus retrieval, cutting cells by about 70% and improving out-of-domain TableQA accuracy, while hurting in-domain QA and fact verification.

Pith tools