Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LongGenBench: Long-context Generation Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.04199 v3 pith:OKTB6YS7 submitted 2024-10-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords long-contextgenerationlonggenbenchbenchmarksdegradationmodelsbenchmarkllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current long-context benchmarks primarily focus on retrieval-based tests, requiring Large Language Models (LLMs) to locate specific information within extensive input contexts, such as the needle-in-a-haystack (NIAH) benchmark. Long-context generation refers to the ability of a language model to generate coherent and contextually accurate text that spans across lengthy passages or documents. While recent studies show strong performance on NIAH and other retrieval-based long-context benchmarks, there is a significant lack of benchmarks for evaluating long-context generation capabilities. To bridge this gap and offer a comprehensive assessment, we introduce a synthetic benchmark, LongGenBench, which allows for flexible configurations of customized generation context lengths. LongGenBench advances beyond traditional benchmarks by redesigning the format of questions and necessitating that LLMs respond with a single, cohesive long-context answer. Upon extensive evaluation using LongGenBench, we observe that: (1) both API accessed and open source models exhibit performance degradation in long-context generation scenarios, ranging from 1.2% to 47.1%; (2) different series of LLMs exhibit varying trends of performance degradation, with the Gemini-1.5-Flash model showing the least degradation among API accessed models, and the Qwen2 series exhibiting the least degradation in LongGenBench among open source models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ConPress: Learning Efficient Reasoning from Multi-Question Contextual Pressure

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multi-question prompts elicit shorter chain-of-thought traces, and fine-tuning on those traces transfers the compression to single-question reasoning.

  2. Exploring the Potential of LLMs for Serendipity Evaluation in Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Basic and multi-model LLM prompts can evaluate recommendation serendipity as well as or better than standard proxy formulas, reaching 21.5% Pearson correlation with user-study ratings.

  3. From General to Targeted Rewards: Surpassing GPT-4 in Open-Ended Long-Context Generation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ProxyReward trains long-form generation models by rewarding how well an AI judge can answer generated yes/no questions about the response, improving open-source models on ProxyQA.

  4. Respecting Temporal-Causal Consistency: Entity-Event Knowledge Graphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mention-level entity-event knowledge graph for RAG modestly improves temporal-causal question answering on a new narrative benchmark, with gains mostly coming from adding HyDE-style hypothetical answers.

Pith tools