REVIEW 2 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
An LLM-assisted approach to designing software architectures using ADD
read the original abstract
Designing effective software architectures is a complex, iterative process that traditionally relies on expert judgment. This paper proposes an approach for Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted software architecture design using the Attribute-Driven Design (ADD) method. By providing an LLM with an explicit description of ADD, an architect persona, and a structured iteration plan, our method guides the LLM to collaboratively produce architecture artifacts with a human architect. We validate the approach through case studies, comparing generated designs against proven solutions and evaluating them with professional architects. Results show that our LLM-assisted ADD process can generate architectures closely aligned with established solutions and partially satisfying architectural drivers, highlighting both the promise and current limitations of using LLMs in architecture design. Our findings emphasize the importance of human oversight and iterative refinement when leveraging LLMs in this domain.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SAKE: Software Architectural Knowledge Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models
Introduces SAKE benchmark with 2154 questions to assess LLMs on software architectural knowledge, showing high overall accuracy but marked gaps across categories.
-
Reliability of Large Language Models for Design Synthesis: An Empirical Study of Variance, Prompt Sensitivity, and Method Scaffolding
Preference-based prompting raises LLM adherence to object-oriented design principles in UML generation but leaves substantial output variance and model-specific differences intact.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.