Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.22688 v1 pith:OKZVYTXO submitted 2025-06-27 cs.SE

An LLM-assisted approach to designing software architectures using ADD

classification cs.SE
keywords approacharchitecturearchitecturesdesignsoftwarearchitectdesigninghuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Designing effective software architectures is a complex, iterative process that traditionally relies on expert judgment. This paper proposes an approach for Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted software architecture design using the Attribute-Driven Design (ADD) method. By providing an LLM with an explicit description of ADD, an architect persona, and a structured iteration plan, our method guides the LLM to collaboratively produce architecture artifacts with a human architect. We validate the approach through case studies, comparing generated designs against proven solutions and evaluating them with professional architects. Results show that our LLM-assisted ADD process can generate architectures closely aligned with established solutions and partially satisfying architectural drivers, highlighting both the promise and current limitations of using LLMs in architecture design. Our findings emphasize the importance of human oversight and iterative refinement when leveraging LLMs in this domain.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SAKE: Software Architectural Knowledge Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces SAKE benchmark with 2154 questions to assess LLMs on software architectural knowledge, showing high overall accuracy but marked gaps across categories.

  2. Reliability of Large Language Models for Design Synthesis: An Empirical Study of Variance, Prompt Sensitivity, and Method Scaffolding

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Preference-based prompting raises LLM adherence to object-oriented design principles in UML generation but leaves substantial output variance and model-specific differences intact.