Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Local vs. Global Models for Hierarchical Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.06394 v1 pith:OLKPQKOR submitted 2024-11-10 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords forecastinggfmshierarchicalmodelsinformationlocalaccuracyforecasts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Hierarchical time series forecasting plays a crucial role in decision-making in various domains while presenting significant challenges for modelling as they involve multiple levels of aggregation, constraints, and availability of information. This study explores the influence of distinct information utilisation on the accuracy of hierarchical forecasts, proposing and evaluating locals and a range of Global Forecasting Models (GFMs). In contrast to local models, which forecast each series independently, we develop GFMs to exploit cross-series and cross-hierarchies information, improving both forecasting performance and computational efficiency. We employ reconciliation methods to ensure coherency in forecasts and use the Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE) and Multiple Comparisons with the Best (MCB) tests to assess statistical significance. The findings indicate that GFMs possess significant advantages for hierarchical forecasting, providing more accurate and computationally efficient solutions across different levels in a hierarchy. Two specific GFMs based on LightGBM are introduced, demonstrating superior accuracy and lower model complexity than their counterpart local models and conventional methods such as Exponential Smoothing (ES) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Globalization for Scalable Short-term Load Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On Alberta's 42-area load data, global LightGBM and XGBoost with weighted instance clustering outperform local models, while global Ridge regression is slightly less accurate but far more scalable.

  2. Comparative Analysis of Global and Local Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting for Contiguous Spatial Demand Regions

    stat.AP 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A global LightGBM with a station-ID feature generally beats cluster-level and per-station models for probabilistic hourly bike-share demand forecasting.

Pith tools