REVIEW 2 cited by
Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Technologies for abusive language detection are being developed and applied with little consideration of their potential biases. We examine racial bias in five different sets of Twitter data annotated for hate speech and abusive language. We train classifiers on these datasets and compare the predictions of these classifiers on tweets written in African-American English with those written in Standard American English. The results show evidence of systematic racial bias in all datasets, as classifiers trained on them tend to predict that tweets written in African-American English are abusive at substantially higher rates. If these abusive language detection systems are used in the field they will therefore have a disproportionate negative impact on African-American social media users. Consequently, these systems may discriminate against the groups who are often the targets of the abuse we are trying to detect.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Hidden Language of Harm: Examining the Role of Emojis in Harmful Online Communication and Content Moderation
A multi-step LLM pipeline that identifies and replaces offensive or intensifying emojis in tweets reduces perceived offensiveness in human evaluation, especially for mild offenses, without large semantic loss.
-
Chatbot Deployment Considerations for Application-Agnostic Human-Machine Dialogues
Microsoft's Tay chatbot failed after learning offensive Twitter content within 16 hours, and the paper draws deployment lessons from that incident.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.