Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 148 references

Quick starch guide: A perspective on shear thickening in dense non-Brownian suspensions

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A mean-field model of stress-activated friction predicts where shear-thickening flows first destabilize in realistic geometries, while leaving the post-onset heterogeneous states outside its scope.

desk verdict A solid, honest perspective on shear thickening that does its job—the complex-flow 'predictions' in the conclusion are overclaimed but the paper itself flags the limits, so it deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11951 v1 pith:OMVGDU5J submitted 2025-06-13 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.flu-dynphysics.geo-ph

classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.flu-dynphysics.geo-ph
keywords shearthickeningdiscontinuousdensesuspensionsfrictionalcontactsWyart-Catesmodelnon-Brownianconstitutiverheologyflowinstabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This perspective argues that shear thickening in dense non-Brownian suspensions is a stress-activated transition between two microstructural states: at low stress, short-range repulsion keeps particle pairs from touching, so contacts act frictionless; above a critical stress $\tau_R$, lubrication films break down and frictional contacts form, constraining relative particle motion and raising viscosity. The paper's central claim is that the Wyart and Cates model, a mean-field interpolation between a frictionless and a frictional jamming branch, captures both continuous and discontinuous shear thickening in simple shear, and more: when applied locally, it predicts the onset of instabilities in realistic flows, including waves on an inclined film, liquid migration through a constriction, flow-rate saturation in a pipe, and flow-to-fracture transitions under air injection. The authors stress that the model cannot describe the heterogeneous states that appear after onset, such as the frictional soliton that separates two laminar regimes in a pipe. They also reframe what is special about shear-thickening suspensions: the fully thickened state is simply a frictional granular suspension, while the unconstrained low-stress state and the transitory mixed states are what make shear thickening possible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the stress-activated constraint picture, implemented quantitatively by the Wyart and Cates model, a mean-field steady-state description built on three forces: short-range repulsion, lubrication, and frictional contact. The repulsive force sets the critical stress scale $\tau_R \sim F_R/(\pi a^2)$; above it, the fraction $f(\tau/\tau_R)$ of frictional contacts rises smoothly from $0$ to $1$, and the jamming packing fraction is interpolated between the frictionless value $\phi_c^{\mu_p=0}$ and the lower frictional value $\phi_c^{\mu_p\neq 0}$. Because viscosity diverges as $(\phi-\phi_c)^{-2}$ on both branches, the interpolation yields continuous shear thickening, discontinuous shear thickening, and shear jamming, with the location of the vertical tangent in the flow curve ($\partial \dot\gamma/\partial\tau=0$) giving the predicted instability threshold. The article then treats this threshold as a local material property and couples it to free-surface or confinement conditions to predict where waves, liquid migration, solitons, and fractures begin.

What would settle it

One decisive test: measure the simple-shear flow curve of a suspension, extract $\tau^{*}_{-}$ at a given $\phi$, then run the same suspension through a straight pipe and look for the start of flow-rate saturation. If saturation begins at a wall stress different from $\tau^{*}_{-}$, or if the onset depends on pipe length or radius in a way that cannot be traced to the local stress profile, the local-mean-field assumption is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the manuscript establishes shear thickening as the rheological signature of a frictional transition: particles in a dense suspension switch from unconstrained motion, where the lubrication film and short-range repulsion keep them apart, to constrained motion, where frictional contacts dominate, once the local stress exceeds $\tau_R$. The Wyart and Cates model realizes this by writing the jamming volume fraction as $\phi_c(\tau/\tau_R) = f(\tau/\tau_R)\,\phi_c^{\mathrm{frict}} + [1-f(\tau/\tau_R)]\,\phi_c^{\mathrm{frictionless}}$, with $f$ the fraction of frictional contacts growing from zero to one with stress; viscosity diverges algebraically on each branch, producing shear-thickening flow curves and an S-shaped, negative-slope region above a packing fraction $\phi^{*}$. The paper's central discovery claim is that this single mean-field description, evaluated with rheology measured in simple shear, predicts the onset stress ($\tau^{*}_{-}$ or $P^{*}$) of material instability in four non-ideal flow settings—inclined film flow, extrusion through a constriction, pipe flow, and air invasion—while the subsequent heterogeneous states, such as the upstream-propagating frictional soliton, phase separation, and dendritic fractures, lie outside the model's scope.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that a suspension behaves as a single continuous fluid, that its response is set by one repulsive stress scale $\tau_R$, and that the flow law measured in a standard shear test still applies locally when the flow is not simple shear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Simple-shear measurements of $\tau^{*}_{-}$ and $\phi^{*}$ become predictive inputs: the same values locate instability onsets in pipe flow, inclined films, constrictions, and injection into a thin cell.
  • Oobleck waves on an incline can form without inertia as soon as the local stress crosses the DST onset; their appearance at Reynolds number below the Kapitza threshold is a consequence of the S-shaped flow curve, not turbulence.
  • In a pipe, increasing wall stress beyond $\tau^{*}_{-}(\phi)$ should produce flow-rate saturation and an upstream-propagating frictional soliton; the model predicts the onset, while the two-phase saturated state requires a different description.
  • In extrusion, liquid migration begins when the initial packing fraction passes $\phi^{*}$, so steady-shear rheology can be used to predict whether a given die will expel concentrated or diluted material.
  • For air injection, local stress above $\tau^{*}$ transiently jams the suspension into a frictional state; whether the fracture relaxes depends on whether the surrounding packing fraction still admits a flowable frictional branch.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: the same local-mean-field logic could be exported to other geometries with curved streamlines, such as flow around an obstacle or through a porous medium, by computing where particle pressure first exceeds the $\tau_R$-equivalent scale; the predicted onset pattern is testable without waiting for a full two-phase simulation.
  • Editorial: because the fully constrained state behaves as a frictional granular suspension, shear-thickening experiments may serve as a tunable laboratory for granular jamming, with $\tau_R$ as the control knob that lets the same packing repeatedly enter and leave the jammed branch.
  • Editorial: the distinction between stress-maintained shear jamming in shear-thickening suspensions and strain-induced shear jamming in non-thickening ones suggests that a phase diagram drawn with axes $\tau/\tau_R$ and $\phi$ may unify observations that currently sit in separate literatures.
  • Editorial: network analyses of minimally rigid clusters hint that a measurable structural observable, namely system-spanning rigidity, could anticipate the onset of DST, which the mean-field model only predicts implicitly through $\phi^{*}$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This perspective reviews shear thickening in dense non-Brownian suspensions, arguing for the stress-activated transition from unconstrained to constrained particle motion as the central mechanism, with the Wyart and Cates (WC) model as the primary mean-field description. The paper surveys constraint-based generalizations (sliding, rolling, twisting), network-science approaches to frictional contact networks, and recent experiments in non-viscometric flows, including inclined films, constriction flows, pipe flow, and air injection. The authors are consistently explicit that the WC model is mean-field and steady-state, and they acknowledge its limitations, notably its failure to describe the phase-separated regime in pipe flow and its inability to capture transients, migration, or local heterogeneity. The central thesis is that the model nonetheless provides a useful framework for locating the onset of material instability in complex flows.

Significance. The perspective is timely and useful: it synthesizes a rapidly evolving literature, gives proper historical context, and is unusually candid about where the WC model breaks down. The emphasis on realistic, non-viscometric flows addresses a gap in most existing reviews, and the discussion of constraint-based models and network-rigidity precursors to shear jamming provides a coherent organizing viewpoint. The explicit distinction between shear-jamming under stress and strain-induced shear-jamming, and the caution about treating cornstarch as a prototypical system, are particular strengths. The paper does not present new data or derivations, but its value as a perspective lies in the clarity and fairness of its synthesis, which are high.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 8; Section 7.3; Section 7.4] The concluding sentence that the WC model "still interestingly predicts the onset of material instability in various non-viscometric flows" overstates what Section 7 demonstrates. In Section 7.1 and Section 7.2, the onset thresholds are identified using fits of the same measured steady-shear rheology to the WC flow curve, so the agreement is a consistency check rather than an independent prediction. In Section 7.4 the text itself says the observations "can be rationalized" rather than predicted, and in Section 7.3 the model "incorrectly describes what happens once the flow rate saturates" because the suspension phase-separates. I recommend replacing "predicts" with wording such as "is consistent with the onset" or "locates the onset," and adding a sentence in Section 7 stating explicitly that transferring the homogeneous constitutive law to complex flows is an assumption rather than a derived consequence of the model's microphysics.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5] The range 0.365 ≤ φ_c^{{µs,µr}} ≤ 0.65 for three-dimensional jamming volume fractions is stated without a derivation or a direct citation. Standard monodisperse frictional-sphere packings are commonly quoted in a narrower range, so the lower bound likely depends on the specific combination of sliding, rolling, and twisting constraints and on the Maxwell-counting convention used. Please add the supporting source or state the constraint set explicitly.
  2. [Section 8] The sentence "This model can quantitatively predict shear thickening" is stronger than the preceding discussion supports, since the WC model requires the functional form of f(τ/τR) and values of the two jamming fractions as inputs. Please soften to "can quantitatively reproduce" or "can be calibrated to quantitatively describe," which is consistent with the rest of the text.
  3. [Throughout] Please correct typographical errors: "two-dimesional" in Section 7.1, "wether" in Sections 2.3 and 9.3, "F rictional" in the Figure 7 caption, and "ranges spans" in Section 5. Reference [54] also lists the place of publication as "???," which should be completed.
  4. [Figure 1 and Section 2.1] The caption of Figure 1 gives packing fractions as "wt%" for potato starch in tap water; since the text defines dense suspensions through particle volume fraction, please clarify whether these are mass fractions or volume fractions and, if the former, indicate the conversion or state that the comparison is qualitative.
  5. [Section 7.1] The critical Reynolds number ReK = 5/(6 tan θ) for Kapitza waves is quoted without a citation or derivation; please add a reference to the standard linear-stability result so that readers can verify the prefactor against the original literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the perspective uses the Wyart-Cates model as an interpretive lens, explicitly scopes its limitations, and its complex-flow 'predictions' are cross-checks of a model fitted to simple-shear data, not re-statements of its inputs.

full rationale

This is a perspective article rather than a derivation, and the default non-circular finding applies. The paper does not attempt to derive the Wyart-Cates (WC) model from scratch; it presents it as a known constitutive model with an interpolated jamming fraction, Eq. (2), and explicitly labels the model as 'mean-field and steady-state' and 'by construction' not designed for transients or heterogeneities (Section 3 and Section 6). The complex-flow comparisons in Section 7 are tests, not circular fits: the WC parameters are obtained from steady simple-shear rheology, and the observed onset of instability in incline flow, constriction flow, and pipe flow is compared with the model's predicted DST onset. That is a cross-validation between independent flow geometry and fitted constitutive rheology, and it is not a case of fitting a parameter to the very quantity later called a prediction. Moreover, the authors explicitly concede the model's failure where it should fail: Section 7.3 states that 'it incorrectly describes what happens once the flow rate saturates' because the model treats the suspension as one continuous phase while the actual flow separates into two phases, and Section 8 states that the model 'cannot (and should not be expected to) predict the local material state.' Section 7.4 uses the word 'rationalized' rather than 'predicted' for the air-injection observations. The self-citations to Singh et al. (e.g., Refs. 63, 74, 76) support portions of the narrative but are not used as a load-bearing uniqueness argument or as a way to forbid alternatives; Section 4 explicitly reviews competing hydrodynamic and modified-lubrication models. There is no equation that reduces to its own inputs and no fitted parameter renamed as an independent prediction. Therefore the paper is self-contained as a perspective and shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities, no fitted constants, and presents no new derivation. Its load-bearing assumptions are domain assumptions inherited from the cited literature, and the authors explicitly flag the limits of these assumptions in Section 7.3 and Section 8.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Wyart and Cates model, with its interpolated jamming fraction and a chosen functional form for f(tau/tau_R), is an adequate minimal model for shear thickening.
    Used throughout Sections 3, 7, and 8 as the lens for interpreting complex-flow experiments.
  • domain assumption A single stress scale tau_R from short-range repulsion controls the frictionless-to-frictional transition.
    Stated in Section 3 as the basis of the frictional transition scenario.
  • domain assumption Mean-field steady-state rheology can be applied locally in non-viscometric flows at least up to the onset of instability.
    Implicit in Section 7, where the model is used to predict onsets in incline, pipe, constriction, and air-injection flows.
  • domain assumption The quoted critical packing fractions and isostatic bounds from granular physics carry over to suspensions.
    Used in Sections 2 and 5 to interpret jamming fractions and coordination number bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quick starch guide: A perspective on shear thickening in dense non-Brownian suspensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OMVGDU5J

@misc{pith2026250611951,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quick starch guide: A perspective on shear thickening in dense non-Brownian suspensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OMVGDU5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11951}
}
read the original abstract

In this article, we provide a brief perspective on recent developments in the study of shear thickening in dense suspensions. We give a rapid overview of the state of the art and discuss current models aiming to describe this particular rheology. Although most of the experiments and simulation studies are conducted in "ideal" flows, where the sample is confined without an open boundary condition, we have decided to highlight more realistic flow conditions. We further provide an overview on how to relate the recently proposed constitutive models to these more practical flow conditions like pipe flow or flow down an incline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11951 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) A jammed colloid (schematic). Black: force g Ratt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Denn, M.M., Morris, J.F.: Rheology of non-Brownian suspensions. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 5(1) (2014)

  2. [2]

    Stickel, J.J., Powell, R.L.: Fluid mechanics and rheology of dense suspensions. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 129–149 (2005)

  3. [3]

    Guazzelli, ´E., Pouliquen, O.: Rheology of dense granular suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 852 (2018)

  4. [4]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 52, 121– 144 (2020)

    Morris, J.F.: Shear thickening of concentrated suspensions: Recent developments and relation to other phenomena. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 52, 121– 144 (2020)

  5. [5]

    Nature Reviews Physics 1(12), 716–730 (2019)

    Jerolmack, D.J., Daniels, K.E.: Viewing earth’s surface as a soft-matter land- scape. Nature Reviews Physics 1(12), 716–730 (2019)

  6. [6]

    Soft Matter 17(47), 10591–10613 (2021)

    Beris, A.N., Horner, J.S., Jariwala, S., Armstrong, M.J., Wagner, N.J.: Recent advances in blood rheology: a review. Soft Matter 17(47), 10591–10613 (2021)

  7. [7]

    Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 97–117 (2022)

    Ness, C., Seto, R., Mari, R.: The physics of dense suspensions. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 97–117 (2022)

  8. [8]

    dilatancy

    Barnes, H.A.: Shear-thickening (“dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids. J. Rheol. 33(2), 329–366 (1989)

Show all 148 references
  1. [9]

    Wagner, N.J., Brady, J.F.: Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions. Phys. Today 62, 27–32 (2009)

  2. [10]

    Soft Matter 14(2), 170–184 (2018)

    Denn, M.M., Morris, J.F., Bonn, D.: Shear thickening in concentrated suspen- sions of smooth spheres in newtonian suspending fluids. Soft Matter 14(2), 170–184 (2018)

  3. [11]

    MRS Communications 13(6), 971–979 (2023)

    Singh, A.: Hidden hierarchy in the rheology of dense suspensions. MRS Communications 13(6), 971–979 (2023)

  4. [12]

    Rheologica Acta (2023) 28

    Lemaire, E., Blanc, F., Claudet, C., Gallier, S., Lobry, L., Peters, F.: Rheology of non-brownian suspensions: a rough contact story. Rheologica Acta (2023) 28

  5. [13]

    Physical Review Letters 122(9), 098004 (2019)

    Singh, A., Pednekar, S., Chun, J., Denn, M.M., Morris, J.F.: From yielding to shear jamming in a cohesive frictional suspension. Physical Review Letters 122(9), 098004 (2019)

  6. [14]

    Williamson, R.V., Hecker, W.W.: Some properties of dispersions of the quicksand type. Ind. Eng. Chem. 23(6), 667–670 (1931)

  7. [15]

    Transactions of the Faraday Society 34, 308–316 (1938)

    Freundlich, H., R¨ oder, H.: Dilatancy and its relation to thixotropy. Transactions of the Faraday Society 34, 308–316 (1938)

  8. [16]

    Metzner, A.B., Whitlock, M.: Flow behavior of concentrated (dilatant) suspen- sions. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 2, 239–253 (1958)

  9. [17]

    Hoffman, R.L.: Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. i. observation of a flow instability. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 16, 155–173 (1972)

  10. [18]

    Hoffman, R.L.: Discontinuous and dilatant viscosity behavior in concentrated suspensions. ii. theory and experimental tests. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 46, 491– 506 (1974)

  11. [19]

    Lootens, D., Van Damme, H., H´ ebraud, P.: Giant stress fluctuations at the jamming transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 178301 (2003)

  12. [20]

    Oil Gas Sci

    Lootens, D., H´ ebraud, P., L´ ecolier, E., Van Damme, H.: Gelation, shear-thinning and shear-thickening in cement slurries. Oil Gas Sci. Technol.- Rev. IFP. 59(1), 31–40 (2004)

  13. [21]

    Bender, J., Wagner, N.J.: Reversible shear thickening in monodisperse and bidisperse colloidal dispersions. J. Rheol. 40, 899–916 (1996)

  14. [22]

    Boersma, W.H., Baets, P.J.M., Laven, J., Stein, H.N.: Time-dependent behavior and wall slip in concentrated shear thickening dispersions. J. Rheol.35(6), 1093– 1120 (1991)

  15. [23]

    D’Haene, P., Mewis, J., Fuller, G.G.: Scattering dichroism measurements of flow-induced structure of a shear thickening suspension. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 156(2), 350–358 (1993)

  16. [24]

    Journal of Rheology 64(2), 321–328 (2020)

    Xu, Q., Singh, A., Jaeger, H.M.: Stress fluctuations and shear thickening in dense granular suspensions. Journal of Rheology 64(2), 321–328 (2020)

  17. [25]

    Physical Review X 8(3), 031006 (2018)

    Saint-Michel, B., Gibaud, T., Manneville, S.: Uncovering instabilities in the spatiotemporal dynamics of a shear-thickening cornstarch suspension. Physical Review X 8(3), 031006 (2018)

  18. [26]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of 29 Sciences 114(33), 8740–8745 (2017)

    Rathee, V., Blair, D.L., Urbach, J.S.: Localized stress fluctuations drive shear thickening in dense suspensions. Proceedings of the National Academy of 29 Sciences 114(33), 8740–8745 (2017)

  19. [27]

    Journal of Rheology 64(2), 299–308 (2020)

    Rathee, V., Blair, D.L., Urbach, J.S.: Localized transient jamming in discontin- uous shear thickening. Journal of Rheology 64(2), 299–308 (2020)

  20. [28]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(32), 2203795119 (2022)

    Rathee, V., Miller, J., Blair, D.L., Urbach, J.S.: Structure of propagating high- stress fronts in a shear-thickening suspension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(32), 2203795119 (2022)

  21. [29]

    Science advances 6(16), 5589 (2020)

    Ovarlez, G., Vu Nguyen Le, A., Smit, W.J., Fall, A., Mari, R., Chatt´ e, G., Colin, A.: Density waves in shear-thickening suspensions. Science advances 6(16), 5589 (2020)

  22. [30]

    Nature (2012)

    Waitukaitis, S.R., Jaeger, H.M.: Impact-activated solidification of dense suspen- sions via dynamic jamming fronts. Nature (2012)

  23. [31]

    Roch´ e, M., Myftiu, E., Johnston, M.C., Kim, P., Stone, H.A.: Dynamic fracture of nonglassy suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 148304 (2013) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.148304

  24. [32]

    Han, E., Wyart, M., Peters, I.R., Jaeger, H.M.: Shear fronts in shear-thickening suspensions. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 073301 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevFluids.3.073301

  25. [33]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 923, 38 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021

    Brassard, M.-A., Causley, N., Krizou, N., Dijksman, J.A., Clark, A.H.: Viscous- like forces control the impact response of shear-thickening dense suspensions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 923, 38 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021. 611

  26. [34]

    Nature 532(7598), 214–217 (2016)

    Peters, I.R., Majumdar, S., Jaeger, H.M.: Direct observation of dynamic shear jamming in dense suspensions. Nature 532(7598), 214–217 (2016)

  27. [35]

    James, N.M., Han, E., Cruz, R.A.L., Jureller, J., Jaeger, H.M.: Interparticle hydrogen bonding can elicit shear jamming in dense suspensions. Nat. Mater. 17(11), 965 (2018)

  28. [36]

    ACS Central Science9(4), 639–647 (2023)

    Chen, C., Naald, M., Singh, A., Dolinski, N.D., Jackson, G.L., Jaeger, H.M., Rowan, S.J., Pablo, J.J.: Leveraging the polymer glass transition to access ther- mally switchable shear jamming suspensions. ACS Central Science9(4), 639–647 (2023)

  29. [37]

    Hsu, C.-P., Ramakrishna, S.N., Zanini, M., Spencer, N.D., Isa, L.: Roughness- dependent tribology effects on discontinuous shear thickening. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (2018)

  30. [38]

    Hsu, C.-P., Mandal, J., Ramakrishna, S.N., Spencer, N.D., Isa, L.: Exploring the roles of roughness, friction and adhesion in discontinuous shear thickening 30 by means of thermo-responsive particles. Nat. Com. (2021)

  31. [39]

    Lootens, D., Damme, H., H´ emar, Y., H´ ebraud, P.: Dilatant flow of concentrated suspensions of rough particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 268302 (2005)

  32. [40]

    Hsiao, L.C., Jamali, S., Glynos, E., Green, P.F., Larson, R.G., Solomon, M.J.: Rheological state diagrams for rough colloids in shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(15), 158001 (2017)

  33. [41]

    Physical Review Letters 127(15), 158002 (2021)

    Pradeep, S., Nabizadeh, M., Jacob, A.R., Jamali, S., Hsiao, L.C.: Jamming distance dictates colloidal shear thickening. Physical Review Letters 127(15), 158002 (2021)

  34. [42]

    James, N.M., Hsu, C.-P., Spencer, N.D., Jaeger, H.M., Isa, L.: Tuning inter- particle hydrogen bonding in shear-jamming suspensions: Kinetic effects and consequences for tribology and rheology. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10(8), 1663–1668 (2019)

  35. [43]

    Soft Matter 20, 6384–6389 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SM00624K

    Kim, H., Naald, M., Braaten, F.A., Witten, T.A., Rowan, S.J., Jaeger, H.M.: Shear thickening in suspensions of particles with dynamic brush layers. Soft Matter 20, 6384–6389 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SM00624K

  36. [44]

    Bourrianne, P., Niggel, V., Polly, G., Divoux, T., McKinley, G.H.: Tuning the shear thickening of suspensions through surface roughness and physico- chemical interactions. Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033062 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.033062

  37. [45]

    Neuville, M., Bossis, G., Persello, J., Volkova, O., Boustingorry, P., Mosquet, M.: Rheology of a gypsum suspension in the presence of different superplasticizers. J. Rheol. 56(2), 435–451 (2012)

  38. [46]

    Rheologica Acta (2017)

    Bossis, G., Boustingorry, P., Grasselli, Y., Meunier, A., Morini, R., Zubarev, A., Volkova, O.: Discontinuous shear thickening in the presence of polymers adsorbed on the surface of calcium carbonate particles. Rheologica Acta (2017)

  39. [47]

    Rheologica Acta (2021)

    Richards, J.A., O’Neill, R.E., Poon, W.C.K.: Turning a yield-stress calcite sus- pension into a shear-thickening one by tuning inter-particle friction. Rheologica Acta (2021)

  40. [48]

    Clavaud, C., B´ erut, A., Metzger, B., Forterre, Y.: Revealing the frictional tran- sition in shear-thickening suspensions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 5147–5152 (2017)

  41. [49]

    Oyarte G´ alvez, L., Beer, S., Meer, D., Pons, A.: Dramatic effect of fluid chemistry on cornstarch suspensions: Linking particle interactions to macroscopic rheology. Phys. Rev. E 95, 030602 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.030602 31

  42. [50]

    Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 650, 1105–1112 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.017

    Gauthier, A., Ovarlez, G., Colin, A.: Shear thickening in presence of adhesive contact forces: The singularity of cornstarch. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 650, 1105–1112 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.017

  43. [51]

    Seto, R., Singh, A., Chakraborty, B., Denn, M.M., Morris, J.F.: Shear jamming and fragility in dense suspensions. Gran. Matt. 21(3), 82 (2019)

  44. [52]

    Nature Physics, 1–7 (2024)

    Naald, M., Singh, A., Eid, T.T., Tang, K., Pablo, J.J., Jaeger, H.M.: Minimally rigid clusters in dense suspension flow. Nature Physics, 1–7 (2024)

  45. [53]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics56(1), 215–240 (2024)

    Kamrin, K., Hill, K.M., Goldman, D.I., Andrade, J.E.: Advances in modeling dense granular media. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics56(1), 215–240 (2024)

  46. [54]

    Cambridge University Press, ??? (2013)

    Andreotti, B., Forterre, Y., Pouliquen, O.: Granular Media: Between Fluid and Solid. Cambridge University Press, ??? (2013)

  47. [55]

    On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particles in contact

    Reynolds, O.: L VII. On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particles in contact. With experimental illustrations. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 20(127), 469–481 (1885)

  48. [56]

    In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol

    Singh, A., Magnanimo, V., Luding, S.: Effect of friction and cohesion on anisotropy in quasi-static granular materials under shear. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1542, pp. 682–685 (2013). American Institute of Physics

  49. [57]

    Peyneau, P.-E., Roux, J.-N.: Frictionless bead packs have macroscopic friction, but no dilatancy. Phys. Rev. E 78(1), 011307 (2008)

  50. [58]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 949, 9 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.741

    Athani, S., Metzger, B., Forterre, Y., Mari, R.: Transient flows and migration in granular suspensions: key role of reynolds-like dilatancy. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 949, 9 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.741

  51. [59]

    Physical Review Letters 111, 218301 (2013)

    Seto, R., Mari, R., Morris, J.F., Denn, M.M.: Discontinuous shear thickening of frictional hard-sphere suspensions. Physical Review Letters 111, 218301 (2013)

  52. [60]

    Ball, R.C., Melrose, J.R.: Lubrication breakdown in hydrodynamic simulations of concentrated colloids. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 59, 19–30 (1995)

  53. [61]

    Journal of Rheology 58(6), 1693–1724 (2014)

    Mari, R., Seto, R., Morris, J.F., Denn, M.M.: Shear thickening, frictionless and frictional rheologies in non-Brownian suspensions. Journal of Rheology 58(6), 1693–1724 (2014)

  54. [62]

    Physical Review Letters 112, 098302 (2014)

    Wyart, M., Cates, M.E.: Discontinuous shear thickening without inertia in dense non-Brownian suspensions. Physical Review Letters 112, 098302 (2014)

  55. [63]

    Journal of Rheology 62(2), 457–468 (2018)

    Singh, A., Mari, R., Denn, M.M., Morris, J.F.: A constitutive model for simple shear of dense frictional suspensions. Journal of Rheology 62(2), 457–468 (2018)

  56. [64]

    Jeffrey, D.J., Onishi, Y.: Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions 32 for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 261–290 (1984)

  57. [65]

    Jeffrey, D.J.: The calculation of the low Reynolds number resistance functions for two unequal spheres. Phys. Fluids A 4, 16–29 (1992)

  58. [66]

    Bossis, G., Brady, J.F.: Self-diffusion of Brownian particles in concentrated suspensions under shear. J. Chem. Phys. 87(9), 5437–5448 (1987)

  59. [67]

    Brady, J.F., Bossis, G.: Stokesian dynamics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 111–157 (1988)

  60. [68]

    Morris, J.F., Katyal, B.: Microstructure from simulated Brownian suspension flows at large shear rate. Phys. Fluids 14, 1920–37 (2002)

  61. [69]

    Foss, D.R., Brady, J.F.: Structure, diffusion and rheology of Brownian sus- pensions by Stokesian Dynamics simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 407, 167–200 (2000)

  62. [70]

    Physical Review Letters 123(13), 138002 (2019)

    Jamali, S., Brady, J.F.: Alternative frictional model for discontinuous shear thickening of dense suspensions: Hydrodynamics. Physical Review Letters 123(13), 138002 (2019)

  63. [71]

    Journal of Rheology 64(2), 379–394 (2020)

    Wang, M., Jamali, S., Brady, J.F.: A hydrodynamic model for discontinu- ous shear-thickening in dense suspensions. Journal of Rheology 64(2), 379–394 (2020)

  64. [72]

    Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 329, 105248 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2024

    Rosales-Romero, A., V´ azquez-Quesada, A., Prasanna Kumar, S.S., L´ opez- Aguilar, J.E., Ellero, M.: Effects of confinement-induced non-newtonian lubri- cation forces on the rheology of a dense suspension. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 329, 105248 (2024) https://doi...

  65. [73]

    Comtet, J., Chatt´ e, G., Nigu` es, A., Bocquet, L., Siria, A., Colin, A.: Pairwise frictional profile between particles determines discontinuous shear thickening transition in non-colloidal suspensions. Nat. Comm. 8, 15633 (2017)

  66. [74]

    Physical Review Letters 124, 248005 (2020)

    Singh, A., Ness, C., Seto, R., Pablo, J.J., Jaeger, H.M.: Shear thickening and jamming of dense suspensions: The “roll” of friction. Physical Review Letters 124, 248005 (2020)

  67. [75]

    Journal of Rheology 64(2), 283–297 (2020)

    More, R., Ardekani, A.: Roughness induced shear thickening in frictional non- brownian suspensions: A numerical study. Journal of Rheology 64(2), 283–297 (2020)

  68. [76]

    Physical Review Fluids 7(5), 054302 33 (2022)

    Singh, A., Jackson, G.L., Naald, M., Pablo, J.J., Jaeger, H.M.: Stress-activated constraints in dense suspension rheology. Physical Review Fluids 7(5), 054302 33 (2022)

  69. [77]

    Physical Review Letters 121(12), 128001 (2018)

    Guy, B.M., Richards, J., Hodgson, D., Blanco, E., Poon, W.C.K.: Constraint- based approach to granular dispersion rheology. Physical Review Letters 121(12), 128001 (2018)

  70. [78]

    Journal of fluid mechanics 974, 36 (2023)

    d’Ambrosio, Enzo and Koch, Donald L and Hormozi, Sarah: The role of rolling resistance in the rheology of wizarding quidditch ball suspensions. Journal of fluid mechanics 974, 36 (2023)

  71. [79]

    Physical Review E 91(5), 052302 (2015)

    Mari, R., Seto, R., Morris, J.F., Denn, M.M.: Nonmonotonic flow curves of shear thickening suspensions. Physical Review E 91(5), 052302 (2015)

  72. [80]

    Mari, R., Seto, R., Morris, J.F., Denn, M.M.: Discontinuous shear thickening in Brownian suspensions by dynamic simulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112(50), 15326–15330 (2015)

  73. [81]

    Soft Matter 12(3), 914–924 (2016)

    Ness, C., Sun, J.: Shear thickening regimes of dense non-Brownian suspensions. Soft Matter 12(3), 914–924 (2016)

  74. [82]

    Journal of Rheology 62(4), 905–918 (2018)

    Boromand, A., Jamali, S., Grove, B., Maia, J.M.: A generalized frictional and hydrodynamic model of the dynamics and structure of dense colloidal suspensions. Journal of Rheology 62(4), 905–918 (2018)

  75. [83]

    Journal of Rheology 64(5), 1107–1120 (2020)

    More, R., Ardekani, A.: A constitutive model for sheared dense suspensions of rough particles. Journal of Rheology 64(5), 1107–1120 (2020)

  76. [84]

    Hecke, M.: Jamming of soft particles: geometry, mechanics, scaling and isostatic- ity. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22(3), 033101 (2009)

  77. [85]

    Reports on Progress in Physics 82(1), 012601 (2018)

    Behringer, R.P., Chakraborty, B.: The physics of jamming for granular materials: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics 82(1), 012601 (2018)

  78. [86]

    Nature 453(7195), 629–632 (2008)

    Song, C., Wang, P., Makse, H.A.: A phase diagram for jammed matter. Nature 453(7195), 629–632 (2008)

  79. [87]

    Physical Review E 102(3), 032903 (2020)

    Santos, A.P., Bolintineanu, D.S., Grest, G.S., Lechman, J.B., Plimpton, S.J., Srivastava, I., Silbert, L.E.: Granular packings with sliding, rolling, and twisting friction. Physical Review E 102(3), 032903 (2020)

  80. [88]

    Physical Review A 27(2), 1053 (1983)

    Berryman, J.G.: Random close packing of hard spheres and disks. Physical Review A 27(2), 1053 (1983)

  81. [89]

    Nature 239(5374), 504–507 (1972)

    Visscher, W.M., Bolsterli, M.: Random packing of equal and unequal spheres in two and three dimensions. Nature 239(5374), 504–507 (1972)

  82. [90]

    Estrada, N., Taboada, A., Radjai, F.: Shear strength and force transmission in granular media with rolling resistance. Phys. Rev. E 78(2), 021301 (2008) 34

  83. [91]

    Estrada, N., Az´ ema, E., Radjai, F., Taboada, A.: Identification of rolling resis- tance as a shape parameter in sheared granular media. Phys. Rev. E 84(1), 011306 (2011)

  84. [92]

    Laun, H.M.: Rheological properties of aqueous polymer dispersions. Angew. Makromol. Chem. 123(1), 335–359 (1984)

  85. [93]

    AIChE Journal 63(3), 1091–1101 (2017)

    Cwalina, C.D., Harrison, K.J., Wagner, N.J.: Rheology of cubic particles in a concentrated colloidal dispersion suspending medium. AIChE Journal 63(3), 1091–1101 (2017)

  86. [94]

    Journal of Rheology 60(1), 47–59 (2016)

    Cwalina, C.D., Wagner, N.J.: Rheology of non-brownian particles suspended in concentrated colloidal dispersions at low particle reynolds number. Journal of Rheology 60(1), 47–59 (2016)

  87. [95]

    Soft Matter 11(28), 5656–5665 (2015)

    Royer, J.R., Burton, G.L., Blair, D.L., Hudson, S.D.: Rheology and dynamics of colloidal superballs. Soft Matter 11(28), 5656–5665 (2015)

  88. [96]

    Physical Review Letters 115, 088304 (2015)

    Guy, B.M., Hermes, M., Poon, W.C.K.: Towards a unified description of the rheology of hard-particle suspensions. Physical Review Letters 115, 088304 (2015)

  89. [97]

    Lin, N.Y.C., Guy, B.M., Hermes, M., Ness, C., Sun, J., Poon, W.C.K., Cohen, I.: Hydrodynamic and contact contributions to continuous shear thickening in colloidal suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(22), 228304 (2015)

  90. [98]

    Royer, J.R., Blair, D.L., Hudson, S.D.: Rheological signature of frictional inter- actions in shear thickening suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(18), 188301 (2016)

  91. [99]

    DeGiuli, E., D¨ uring, G., Lerner, E., Wyart, M.: Unified theory of inertial granular flows and non-Brownian suspensions. Phys. Rev. E 91, 062206 (2015)

  92. [100]

    Andreotti, B., Barrat, J.-L., Heussinger, C.: Shear flow of non-Brownian suspensions close to jamming. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 105901 (2012)

  93. [101]

    Olsson, P., Teitel, S.: Critical scaling of shear viscosity at the jamming transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 178001 (2007)

  94. [102]

    Cates, M.E., Wittmer, J.P., Bouchaud, J.-P., Claudin, P.: Jamming, force chains, and fragile matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1841–1844 (1998)

  95. [103]

    Nature 480, 355–358 (2011)

    Bi, D., Zhang, J., Chakraborty, B., Behringer, R.P.: Jamming by shear. Nature 480, 355–358 (2011)

  96. [104]

    nature 435(7045), 1079–1082 (2005) 35

    Majmudar, T.S., Behringer, R.P.: Contact force measurements and stress- induced anisotropy in granular materials. nature 435(7045), 1079–1082 (2005) 35

  97. [105]

    Physical Review Letters 82(26), 5241 (1999)

    Howell, D., Behringer, R.P., Veje, C.: Stress fluctuations in a 2d granular cou- ette experiment: a continuous transition. Physical Review Letters 82(26), 5241 (1999)

  98. [106]

    Physical review letters 110(1), 018302 (2013)

    Ren, J., Dijksman, J.A., Behringer, R.P.: Reynolds pressure and relaxation in a sheared granular system. Physical review letters 110(1), 018302 (2013)

  99. [107]

    Physical review letters 123(15), 158001 (2019)

    Zhao, Y., Bar´ es, J., Zheng, H., Socolar, J.E., Behringer, R.P.: Shear-jammed, fragile, and steady states in homogeneously strained granular materials. Physical review letters 123(15), 158001 (2019)

  100. [108]

    PhD thesis, Duke University (2013)

    Ren, J.: Nonlinear dynamics and network properties in granular materials under shear. PhD thesis, Duke University (2013)

  101. [109]

    Radjai, F., Wolf, D.E., Jean, M., Moreau, J.-J.: Bimodal character of stress transmission in granular packings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(1), 61 (1998)

  102. [110]

    Thomas, J.E., Ramola, K., Singh, A., Mari, R., Morris, J.F., Chakraborty, B.: Microscopic origin of frictional rheology in dense suspensions: correlations in force space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(12), 128002 (2018)

  103. [111]

    Journal of Rheology 64(2), 329–341 (2020)

    Thomas, J.E., Goyal, A., Singh Bedi, D., Singh, A., Del Gado, E., Chakraborty, B.: Investigating the nature of discontinuous shear thickening: Beyond a mean- field description. Journal of Rheology 64(2), 329–341 (2020)

  104. [112]

    Journal of Rheology 64(2), 309–319 (2020)

    Sedes, O., Singh, A., Morris, J.F.: Fluctuations at the onset of discontinuous shear thickening in a suspension. Journal of Rheology 64(2), 309–319 (2020)

  105. [113]

    Physical Review Fluids 7(2), 024304 (2022)

    Sedes, O., Makse, H.A., Chakraborty, B., Morris, J.F.: K-core analysis of shear- thickening suspensions. Physical Review Fluids 7(2), 024304 (2022)

  106. [114]

    Physical Review Fluids 5(3), 034307 (2020)

    Gameiro, M., Singh, A., Kondic, L., Mischaikow, K., Morris, J.F.: Interaction network analysis in shear thickening suspensions. Physical Review Fluids 5(3), 034307 (2020)

  107. [115]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02062 (2025)

    D’Amico, A., Tu, S., Singh, A.: Topological insights into dense frictional sus- pension rheology: Third order loops drive discontinuous shear thickening. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02062 (2025)

  108. [116]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22747 (2025)

    Sharma, S., Sharma, A., Singh, A.: Frictional contact network in dense suspen- sion flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22747 (2025)

  109. [117]

    Physical Review E 99(1), 012607 (2019)

    Edens, L.E., Pednekar, S., Morris, J.F., Schenter, G.K., Clark, A.E., Chun, J.: Global topology of contact force networks: Insight into shear thickening suspensions. Physical Review E 99(1), 012607 (2019)

  110. [118]

    36 Soft Matter 17(32), 7476–7486 (2021)

    Edens, L.E., Alvarado, E.G., Singh, A., Morris, J.F., Schenter, G.K., Chun, J., Clark, A.E.: Shear stress dependence of force networks in 3d dense suspensions. 36 Soft Matter 17(32), 7476–7486 (2021)

  111. [119]

    Physical Review Letters 129(6), 068001 (2022)

    Nabizadeh, M., Singh, A., Jamali, S.: Structure and dynamics of force clusters and networks in shear thickening suspensions. Physical Review Letters 129(6), 068001 (2022)

  112. [120]

    Journal of Complex Networks 6(4), 485–565 (2018)

    Papadopoulos, L., Porter, M.A., Daniels, K.E., Bassett, D.S.: Network analysis of particles and grains. Journal of Complex Networks 6(4), 485–565 (2018)

  113. [121]

    Journal of Engineering mathematics 4(4), 331–340 (1970)

    Laman, G.: On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures. Journal of Engineering mathematics 4(4), 331–340 (1970)

  114. [122]

    Journal of Rheology 68(2), 219–228 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000786 https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article- pdf/68/2/219/19504709/219 1 8.0000786.pdf

    Goyal, A., Martys, N.S., Del Gado, E.: Flow induced rigidity percola- tion in shear thickening suspensions. Journal of Rheology 68(2), 219–228 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000786 https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article- pdf/68/2/219/19504709/219 1 8.0000786.pdf

  115. [123]

    Random Structures & Algorithms 6(2-3), 161–180 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.3240060204 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/rsa.3240060204

    Molloy, M., Reed, B.: A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence. Random Structures & Algorithms 6(2-3), 161–180 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.3240060204 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/rsa.3240060204

  116. [124]

    Journal of Rheology 67(6), 1189–1197 (2023)

    Ramaswamy, M., Griniasty, I., Liarte, D.B., Shetty, A., Katifori, E., Del Gado, E., Sethna, J.P., Chakraborty, B., Cohen, I.: Universal scaling of shear thickening transitions. Journal of Rheology 67(6), 1189–1197 (2023)

  117. [125]

    Hermes, M., Guy, B.M., Poon, W.C.K., Poy, G., Cates, M.E., Wyart, M.: Unsteady flow and particle migration in dense, non-Brownian suspensions. J. Rheol. 60(5), 905–916 (2016)

  118. [126]

    Kapitza, P.L., Kapitza, S.P.: Wave flow of thin viscous fluid layers. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 18, 3–28 (1948)

  119. [127]

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 27(11), 2297 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/27/11/008

    Hwang, C.-C., Chen, J.-L., Wang, J.-S., Lin, J.-S.: Linear stability of power law liquid film flows down an inclined plane. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 27(11), 2297 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/27/11/008

  120. [128]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 821, 1 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1017/jfm.2017.276

    Allouche, M.H., Botton, V., Millet, S., Henry, D., Dagois-Bohy, S., G¨ uzel, B., Ben Hadid, H.: Primary instability of a shear-thinning film flow down an incline: experimental study. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 821, 1 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1017/jfm.2017.276

  121. [129]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 486, 21–50 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0022112003004555 37

    Forterre, Y., Pouliquen, O.: Long-surface-wave instability in dense granular flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 486, 21–50 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0022112003004555 37

  122. [130]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 563, 123–132 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0022112006001509

    Forterre, Y.: Kapiza waves as a test for three-dimensional granular flow rheol- ogy. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 563, 123–132 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0022112006001509

  123. [131]

    Physics Letters A 338(6), 479–484 (2005)

    Balmforth, N., Bush, J., Craster, R.: Roll waves on flowing cornstarch suspen- sions. Physics Letters A 338(6), 479–484 (2005)

  124. [132]

    Communications Physics 3(1), 232 (2020)

    Darbois Texier, B., Lhuissier, H., Forterre, Y., Metzger, B.: Surface-wave insta- bility without inertia in shear-thickening suspensions. Communications Physics 3(1), 232 (2020)

  125. [133]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 959, 27 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.162

    Darbois Texier, B., Lhuissier, H., Metzger, B., Forterre, Y.: Shear-thickening suspensions down inclines: from kapitza to oobleck waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 959, 27 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2023.162

  126. [134]

    Physical review letters 123(12), 128002 (2019)

    O’Neill, R.E., Royer, J.R., Poon, W.C.: Liquid migration in shear thickening sus- pensions flowing through constrictions. Physical review letters 123(12), 128002 (2019)

  127. [135]

    self-filtration

    Haw, M.: Jamming, two-fluid behavior, and “self-filtration” in concentrated particulate suspensions. Physical review letters 92(18), 185506 (2004)

  128. [136]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(17), 2321581121 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2321581121

    Bougouin, A., Metzger, B., Forterre, Y., Boustingorry, P., Lhuissier, H.: A fric- tional soliton controls the resistance law of shear-thickening suspensions in pipes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(17), 2321581121 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2321581121

  129. [137]

    Athani, S., Metzger, B., Forterre, Y., Mari, R.: Transients in shear thickening suspensions: When hydrodynamics matters. Phys. Rev. Fluids10, 043301 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.10.043301

  130. [138]

    Communications Physics (2020)

    Ozturk, D., Morgan, M.L., Sandnes, B.: Flow-to-fracture transition and pattern formation in a discontinuous shear thickening fluid. Communications Physics (2020)

  131. [139]

    PNAS Nexus 3(1), 451 (2023)

    Lilin, P., Elkhoury, J.E., Peters, I.R., Bischofberger, I.: Fracture and relaxation in dense cornstarch suspensions. PNAS Nexus 3(1), 451 (2023)

  132. [140]

    Physical Review E 110(3), 034901 (2024)

    Singh, A., Ness, C., Sharma, A.K., Pablo, J.J., Jaeger, H.M.: Rheology of bidisperse non-brownian suspensions. Physical Review E 110(3), 034901 (2024)

  133. [141]

    Soft Matter 16(1), 229–237 (2020)

    Guy, B.M., Ness, C., Hermes, M., Sawiak, L.J., Sun, J., Poon, W.C.: Test- ing the wyart–cates model for non-brownian shear thickening using bidisperse suspensions. Soft Matter 16(1), 229–237 (2020)

  134. [142]

    Journal of Rheology 62(2), 513–526 (2018) 38

    Pednekar, S., Chun, J., Morris, J.F.: Bidisperse and polydisperse suspension rheology at large solid fraction. Journal of Rheology 62(2), 513–526 (2018) 38

  135. [143]

    Journal of Rheology 67(1), 91–104 (2023)

    Malbranche, N., Chakraborty, B., Morris, J.F.: Shear thickening in dense bidisperse suspensions. Journal of Rheology 67(1), 91–104 (2023)

  136. [144]

    Otsuki, M., Hayakawa, H.: Critical scaling near jamming transition for frictional granular particles. Phys. Rev. E 83, 051301 (2011)

  137. [145]

    Henkes, S., Quint, D.A., Fily, Y., Schwarz, J.M.: Rigid cluster decomposition reveals criticality in frictional jamming. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 028301 (2016)

  138. [146]

    Nature Communications 13(1), 1–7 (2022)

    Mandal, R., Casert, C., Sollich, P.: Robust prediction of force chains in jammed solids using graph neural networks. Nature Communications 13(1), 1–7 (2022)

  139. [147]

    Soft Matter 21(15), 2826–2835 (2025)

    Aminimajd, A., Maia, J., Singh, A.: Scalability of a graph neural network in accurate prediction of frictional contact networks in suspensions. Soft Matter 21(15), 2826–2835 (2025)

  140. [148]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18743 (2025) 39

    Aminimajd, A., Maia, J., Singh, A.: Robust prediction of frictional contact net- work in near-jamming suspensions employing deep graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18743 (2025) 39

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.