pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30717 · v1 · pith:OPXWJF3Xnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th · nlin.SI

The auxiliary-deformed Breitenlhoner-Maison model: duality frames and higher-dimensional origin

Daniele Bielli , Mattia Ces\`aro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th nlin.SI
keywords Breitenlohner-Maison modelauxiliary fieldsduality framesKaluza-Klein reductionhigher-derivative gravityintegrable deformationsμ-frameν-frame
0
0 comments X

The pith

The auxiliary-deformed Breitenlohner-Maison model admits a four-dimensional uplift in both the μ-frame and ν-frame.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper first derives the μ-frame auxiliary-field description that complements the existing ν-frame for integrable deformations of the two-dimensional Breitenlohner-Maison model. It then applies an ansatz drawn from duality-invariant formulations of Einstein theory to construct explicit four-dimensional lifts of both deformed models. The resulting theories are higher-derivative extensions that lack manifest diffeomorphism invariance. A sympathetic reader cares because the construction supplies a higher-dimensional origin for these deformations inside a Kaluza-Klein reduction of general relativity.

Core claim

The authors derive the complementary μ-frame auxiliary-field perspective for the deformed Breitenlohner-Maison model and explicitly construct the D=4 uplift of both the ν-frame and μ-frame versions. The uplifted model is obtained via an ansatz inspired by duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory and yields a higher-derivative theory without manifest diffeomorphism invariance in either frame; the paper comments on possible resolutions of this feature and on the physical interpretation in four dimensions.

What carries the argument

The ansatz inspired by duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory, used to produce the four-dimensional uplift of the auxiliary-deformed two-dimensional model.

If this is right

  • The four-dimensional model is a higher-derivative theory in both frames.
  • Manifest diffeomorphism invariance is absent in both the μ-frame and ν-frame descriptions.
  • Possible resolutions of the diffeomorphism-invariance issue can be examined.
  • The physical interpretation of the model in four dimensions can be discussed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction may permit direct comparison of the deformed equations with known four-dimensional gravitational solutions that possess two commuting Killing vectors.
  • Absence of manifest diffeomorphism invariance indicates that any physical interpretation would require either a non-standard gauge choice or additional structure to restore full covariance.
  • The same ansatz technique could be applied to other integrable two-dimensional reductions to generate further higher-dimensional models.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen ansatz is sufficient to produce a consistent four-dimensional uplift of the auxiliary-deformed two-dimensional model.

What would settle it

A direct reduction of the constructed four-dimensional action under the two-Killing-vector Kaluza-Klein ansatz that fails to recover the original auxiliary-deformed two-dimensional equations of motion would disprove the uplift.

read the original abstract

The two-dimensional Breitenlohner-Maison (BM) model is a classically integrable subsector of $D=4$ general relativity endowed with two commuting Killing isometries, obtained via Kaluza-Klein reduction to $D=2$. Integrable deformations of such a theory have recently been constructed via auxiliary fields in the so-called $\nu$-frame. In this work we first extend this point of view by deriving the complementary auxiliary field perspective known as $\mu$-frame, and then explicitly construct the uplift to $D=4$ of both descriptions, relying on an ansatz inspired by duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory. The resulting four-dimensional deformed model thus obtained is a higher-derivative theory which lacks manifest diffeomorphism invariance in both frames. We comment on possible resolutions of this puzzling feature and on the physical interpretation of the model in $D=4$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to derive the complementary μ-frame auxiliary field formulation of the auxiliary-deformed Breitenlohner-Maison model, then explicitly construct the uplift to D=4 of both the μ- and ν-frame descriptions via an ansatz modeled on duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory. The resulting four-dimensional theory is higher-derivative and lacks manifest diffeomorphism invariance in both frames; the paper comments on possible resolutions of this feature and on the physical interpretation.

Significance. If the uplift construction is shown to be consistent, the result would supply a higher-dimensional origin for the auxiliary-deformed integrable 2D model, linking it to deformed 4D gravity with two commuting Killing vectors and potentially illuminating duality structures in gravitational theories.

major comments (2)
  1. [§ on uplift] § on uplift: the 4D Lagrangian is obtained by deforming a duality-invariant Einstein ansatz with the auxiliary-field terms from the μ- and ν-frames, yet the manuscript provides no explicit Kaluza-Klein reduction check confirming that the 4D theory reduces exactly to the auxiliary-deformed 2D BM model under the assumed two commuting Killing vectors.
  2. [Discussion of diffeomorphism invariance] Discussion of diffeomorphism invariance: the absence of manifest diffeomorphism invariance is noted as puzzling, but no demonstration is given that the 4D equations of motion remain compatible with 2D integrability or that the auxiliary equations close consistently after the uplift.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] Abstract and introduction: the distinction between the μ-frame and ν-frame constructions could be clarified with a short comparative table of the auxiliary-field equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We respond point by point to the major remarks below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§ on uplift] § on uplift: the 4D Lagrangian is obtained by deforming a duality-invariant Einstein ansatz with the auxiliary-field terms from the μ- and ν-frames, yet the manuscript provides no explicit Kaluza-Klein reduction check confirming that the 4D theory reduces exactly to the auxiliary-deformed 2D BM model under the assumed two commuting Killing vectors.

    Authors: The uplift is performed via an ansatz modeled directly on duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein gravity, with the auxiliary terms from each 2D frame inserted in a manner that preserves the reduction structure by construction. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit verification would make the consistency fully transparent. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection that performs the Kaluza-Klein reduction for both frames and confirms exact recovery of the auxiliary-deformed 2D model. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of diffeomorphism invariance] Discussion of diffeomorphism invariance: the absence of manifest diffeomorphism invariance is noted as puzzling, but no demonstration is given that the 4D equations of motion remain compatible with 2D integrability or that the auxiliary equations close consistently after the uplift.

    Authors: The manuscript already notes the absence of manifest diffeomorphism invariance and sketches possible resolutions. The auxiliary equations are preserved by the uplift procedure, and the 4D equations of motion are obtained from a Lagrangian that reduces to the integrable 2D theory. We acknowledge, however, that an explicit check of closure and compatibility would strengthen the discussion. We will expand the relevant section to include a concise demonstration that the auxiliary equations remain consistent and that the 2D integrability properties are retained after the uplift. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Ansatz-based 4D uplift and μ-frame derivation with non-load-bearing self-citation

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by first obtaining the complementary μ-frame auxiliary-field description (extending the ν-frame) and then positing an explicit 4D Lagrangian ansatz modeled on known duality-invariant Einstein formulations, followed by deformation with the auxiliary terms. No step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity by construction; the 4D expressions are presented as derived outputs whose KK reduction is asserted to recover the 2D model. Any reference to prior ν-frame work constitutes at most a minor self-citation that is not invoked to justify uniqueness or to close the central argument. The construction remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not rely on a self-citation chain for its load-bearing claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the construction relies on standard assumptions of Kaluza-Klein reduction and duality-invariant formulations whose details are not supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5681 in / 1153 out tokens · 31986 ms · 2026-07-01T02:03:11.941901+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    V. A. Belinsky and V. E. Zakharov,Integration of the Einstein Equations by the Inverse Scattering Problem Technique and the Calculation of the Exact Soliton Solutions,Sov. Phys. JETP48(1978) 985–994

    1978

  2. [2]

    Maison,Are the stationary, axially symmetric Einstein equations completely integrable?,Phys

    D. Maison,Are the stationary, axially symmetric Einstein equations completely integrable?,Phys. Rev. Lett.41(1978) 521

    1978

  3. [3]

    R. P. Geroch,A Method for generating solutions of Einstein’s equations,J. Math. Phys.12(1971) 918–924

    1971

  4. [4]

    R. P. Geroch,A Method for generating new solutions of Einstein’s equation. 2,J. Math. Phys.13(1972) 394–404

    1972

  5. [5]

    Julia,Group disintegrations,Conf

    B. Julia,Group disintegrations,Conf. Proc. C8006162(1980) 331–350

    1980

  6. [6]

    Julia,Infinite Lie algebras in physics, in5th Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory: Unified Field Theories and Beyond, pp

    B. Julia,Infinite Lie algebras in physics, in5th Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory: Unified Field Theories and Beyond, pp. 23–41, 6, 1981

    1981

  7. [7]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,On the Geroch Group,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.46(1987) 215

    1987

  8. [8]

    "Separation of Variables and Hamiltonian Formulation for the Ernst Equation"

    D. Korotkin and H. Nicolai,Separation of variables and Hamiltonian formulation for the Ernst equation,Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 1272–1275, [hep-th/9412072]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  9. [9]

    Isomonodromic Quantization of Dimensionally Reduced Gravity

    D. Korotkin and H. Nicolai,Isomonodromic quantization of dimensionally reduced gravity,Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 397–439, [hep-th/9605144]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  10. [10]

    Quantization of coset space sigma-models coupled to two-dimensional gravity

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben,Quantization of coset space sigma models coupled to two-dimensional gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.190(1997) 411–457, [hep-th/9607095]. 40

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  11. [11]

    Poisson Realization and Quantization of the Geroch Group

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben,Poisson realization and quantization of the Geroch group,Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) L151–L156, [gr-qc/9611061]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    Yangian Symmetry in Integrable Quantum Gravity

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben,Yangian symmetry in integrable quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B527(1998) 657–689, [hep-th/9710210]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    Nicolai,The Integrability ofN= 16Supergravity,Phys

    H. Nicolai,The Integrability ofN= 16Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B194(1987) 402

    1987

  14. [14]

    Nicolai and N

    H. Nicolai and N. P. Warner,The Structure ofN= 16Supergravity in Two-dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.125(1989) 369

    1989

  15. [15]

    E$_9$ exceptional field theory I. The potential

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben,E 9 exceptional field theory. Part I. The potential,JHEP03(2019) 089, [arXiv:1811.04088]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben,E 9 exceptional field theory. Part II. The complete dynamics,JHEP05(2021) 107, [arXiv:2103.12118]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, and A. Kleinschmidt,Maximal D = 2 supergravities from higher dimensions,JHEP01(2024) 046, [arXiv:2309.07232]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    L. T. Cole and P. Weck,Integrability in gravity from Chern-Simons theory,JHEP 10(2024) 080, [arXiv:2407.08782]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Costello and M

    K. Costello and M. Yamazaki,Gauge Theory And Integrability, III, arXiv:1908.02289

    work page arXiv 1908

  20. [20]

    Vicedo,4D Chern–Simons theory and affine Gaudin models,Lett

    B. Vicedo,4D Chern–Simons theory and affine Gaudin models,Lett. Math. Phys. 111(2021), no. 1 24, [arXiv:1908.07511]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Delduc, S

    F. Delduc, S. Lacroix, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo,A unifying 2d action for integrable σ-models from 4d Chern-Simons theory,arXiv:1909.13824

    work page arXiv 1909

  22. [22]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon,Introduction to Classical Integrable Systems. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  23. [23]

    Dorey, G

    P. Dorey, G. Korchemsky, N. Nekrasov, V. Schomerus, D. Serban, and L. Cugliandolo, eds.,Integrability: From Statistical Systems to Gauge Theory, vol. 106 ofLecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School. Oxford University Press, 7, 2019. 41

    2019

  24. [24]

    An Integrability Primer for the Gauge-Gravity Correspondence: an Introduction

    D. Bombardelli, A. Cagnazzo, R. Frassek, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, F. Loebbert, S. Negro, I. M. Szecsenyi, A. Sfondrini, S. J. van Tongeren, and A. Torrielli,An integrability primer for the gauge-gravity correspondence: An introduction,J. Phys. A49(2016), no. 32 320301, [arXiv:1606.02945]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview

    N. Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett. Math. Phys. 99(2012) 3–32, [arXiv:1012.3982]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik,N=3 supersymmetric Born-Infeld theory,Nucl. Phys. B618(2001) 3–20, [hep-th/0110074]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  27. [27]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik,New representation for Lagrangians of selfdual nonlinear electrodynamics, in4th International Workshop on Supersymmetry and Quantum Symmetries: 16th Max Born Symposium, pp. 235–250, 2002. hep-th/0202203

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  28. [28]

    Borsato, C

    R. Borsato, C. Ferko, and A. Sfondrini,Classical integrability of root-TT¯flows, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 8 086011, [arXiv:2209.14274]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Ferko, S

    C. Ferko, S. M. Kuzenko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Duality-invariant nonlinear electrodynamics and stress tensor flows,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023), no. 10 106021, [arXiv:2309.04253]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Ferko and L

    C. Ferko and L. Smith,Infinite Family of Integrable Sigma Models Using Auxiliary Fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 13 131602, [arXiv:2405.05899]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Fukushima and K

    O. Fukushima and K. Yoshida,4D Chern-Simons theory with auxiliary fields,JHEP 09(2025) 001, [arXiv:2407.02204]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,hep-th/0401146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    $T \bar{T}$-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, and R. Tateo,T¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,JHEP10(2016) 112, [arXiv:1608.05534]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Ferko, A

    C. Ferko, A. Sfondrini, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Root-T ¯T Deformations in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022), no. 20 201604, [arXiv:2206.10515]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory,Commun

    Y. Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory,Commun. Theor. Phys.73(2021), no. 5 057201, [arXiv:1904.13376]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    S. He, Y. Li, H. Ouyang, and Y. Sun,T Tdeformation: Introduction and some recent advances,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(2025), no. 10 101001, [arXiv:2503.09997]. 42

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories,Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 363–383, [arXiv:1608.05499]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Integrable higher-spin deformations of sigma models from auxiliary fields,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 6 066010, [arXiv:2407.16338]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, M. Galli, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Higher-spin currents and flows in auxiliary field sigma models,JHEP08(2025) 078, [arXiv:2504.17294]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,T Duality and TT¯-like Deformations of Sigma Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 10 101601, [arXiv:2407.11636]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Auxiliary field sigma models and Yang-Baxter deformations,JHEP05(2025) 223, [arXiv:2408.09714]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Ces` aro, A

    M. Ces` aro, A. Kleinschmidt, and D. Osten,Integrable auxiliary field deformations of coset models,JHEP11(2024) 028, [arXiv:2409.04523]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Auxiliary field deformations of (semi-)symmetric space sigma models,JHEP01(2025) 096, [arXiv:2409.05704]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Ces` aro and D

    M. Ces` aro and D. Osten,Integrable deformations of dimensionally reduced gravity, JHEP06(2025) 064, [arXiv:2502.01750]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Ferko, M

    C. Ferko, M. Galli, Z. Huang, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Soliton surfaces and the geometry of integrable deformations of theCP N−1 model,JHEP03(2026) 144, [arXiv:2509.05081]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Baglioni, D

    N. Baglioni, D. Bielli, M. Galli, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Relating auxiliary field formulations of4dduality-invariant and2dintegrable field theories, arXiv:2512.21982

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    The classical Yangian symmetry of Auxiliary Field Sigma Models

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, M. Galli, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,The classical Yangian symmetry of Auxiliary Field Sigma Models,arXiv:2605.18213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik,New approach to nonlinear electrodynamics: Dualities as symmetries of interaction,Phys. Atom. Nucl.67(2004) 2188–2199, [hep-th/0303192]. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  49. [49]

    Higher Derivative Corrections, Dimensional Reduction and Ehlers Duality

    Y. Michel and B. Pioline,Higher derivative corrections, dimensional reduction and Ehlers duality,JHEP09(2007) 103, [arXiv:0706.1769]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Enhanced Coset Symmetries and Higher Derivative Corrections

    N. Lambert and P. C. West,Enhanced Coset Symmetries and Higher Derivative Corrections,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 065002, [hep-th/0603255]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections

    N. Lambert and P. C. West,Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 066002, [hep-th/0611318]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    L. Bao, M. Cederwall, and B. E. W. Nilsson,Aspects of higher curvature terms and U-duality,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 095001, [arXiv:0706.1183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Ehlers symmetry at the next derivative order

    C. Colonnello and A. Kleinschmidt,Ehlers symmetry at the next derivative order, JHEP08(2007) 078, [arXiv:0706.2816]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B 37(1971) 95–97

    1971

  55. [55]

    S. P. Novikov,The Hamiltonian formalism and a many valued analog of Morse theory,Usp. Mat. Nauk37N5(1982), no. 5 3–49

    1982

  56. [56]

    Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun

    E. Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.92 (1984) 455–472

    1984

  57. [57]

    Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models and dS/AdS T-duality

    C. Klimcik,Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality,JHEP12(2002) 051, [hep-th/0210095]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [58]

    On integrability of the Yang-Baxter $\si$-model

    C. Klimcik,On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model,J. Math. Phys.50 (2009) 043508, [arXiv:0802.3518]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    Integrability of the bi-Yang-Baxter sigma-model

    C. Klimˇ c´ ık,Integrability of the bi-Yang-Baxter sigma-model,Lett. Math. Phys.104 (2014) 1095–1106, [arXiv:1402.2105]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals

    K. Sfetsos,Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals, Nucl. Phys. B880(2014) 225–246, [arXiv:1312.4560]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Integrability in Sigma-Models

    K. Zarembo,Integrability in Sigma-Models,arXiv:1712.07725

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Integrable models with twist function and affine Gaudin models

    S. Lacroix,Integrable models with twist function and affine Gaudin models. PhD thesis, Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure, 2018.arXiv:1809.06811

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Hoare,Integrable deformations of sigma models,J

    B. Hoare,Integrable deformations of sigma models,J. Phys. A55(2022), no. 9 093001, [arXiv:2109.14284]. 44

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Borsato,Lecture notes on current–current deformations,Eur

    R. Borsato,Lecture notes on current–current deformations,Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024), no. 6 648, [arXiv:2312.13847]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Integrable sigma models with Haantjes structure on ${H_{4}}$ Lie group

    M. Bahadori, A. Eghbali, and A. Rezaei-Aghdam,Integrable sigma models with Haantjes structure onH 4 Lie group,Nucl. Phys. B1028(2026) 117491, [arXiv:2605.20851]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Nicolai,Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable system,Lect

    H. Nicolai,Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable system,Lect. Notes Phys.396(1991) 231–273

    1991

  67. [67]

    Integrable Classical and Quantum Gravity

    H. Nicolai, D. Korotkin, and H. Samtleben,Integrable classical and quantum gravity, inNATO Advanced Study Institute on Quantum Fields and Quantum Space Time, pp. 203–243, 12, 1996.hep-th/9612065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  68. [68]

    Selfduality of d=2 Reduction of Gravity Coupled to a Sigma-Model

    L. Paulot,Selfduality of d=2 reduction of gravity coupled to a sigma-model,Phys. Lett. B609(2005) 367–371, [hep-th/0412157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  69. [69]

    Weyl,Electron and Gravitation

    H. Weyl,Electron and Gravitation. 1. (In German),Z. Phys.56(1929) 330–352

    1929

  70. [70]

    J. W. Maluf,The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity,Annalen Phys.525 (2013) 339–357, [arXiv:1303.3897]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Non-linear parent action and dual gravity

    N. Boulanger and O. Hohm,Non-linear parent action and dual gravity,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 064027, [arXiv:0806.2775]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  72. [72]

    Duality in linearized gravity

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Duality in linearized gravity,Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 024018, [gr-qc/0408101]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  73. [73]

    Gravitational Electric-Magnetic Duality, Gauge Invariance and Twisted Self-Duality

    C. Bunster, M. Henneaux, and S. Hortner,Gravitational Electric-Magnetic Duality, Gauge Invariance and Twisted Self-Duality,J. Phys. A46(2013) 214016, [arXiv:1207.1840]. [Erratum: J.Phys.A 46, 269501 (2013)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits,The Classical Theory of Fields, vol. Volume 2 of Course of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975

    1975

  75. [75]

    Krssak, R

    M. Krssak, R. J. van den Hoogen, J. G. Pereira, C. G. B¨ ohmer, and A. A. Coley, Teleparallel theories of gravity: illuminating a fully invariant approach,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 18 183001, [arXiv:1810.12932]

    work page arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Coller,On the Localization of the energy of a physical system in the general theory of relativity,Annals Phys.4(1958) 347–371

    C. Coller,On the Localization of the energy of a physical system in the general theory of relativity,Annals Phys.4(1958) 347–371

    1958

  77. [77]

    Consistent Interactions Between Gauge Fields: The Cohomological Approach

    M. Henneaux,Consistent interactions between gauge fields: The Cohomological approach,Contemp. Math.219(1998) 93–110, [hep-th/9712226]. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  78. [78]

    Local BRST cohomology in Einstein--Yang--Mills theory

    G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux,Local BRST cohomology in Einstein Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B455(1995) 357–408, [hep-th/9505173]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  79. [79]

    Modified teleparallel gravity: inflation without inflaton

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini,Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without inflaton, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 084031, [gr-qc/0610067]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  80. [80]

    On Born-Infeld Gravity in Weitzenbock spacetime

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini,On Born-Infeld Gravity in Weitzenbock spacetime,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 124019, [arXiv:0812.1981]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

Showing first 80 references.