Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 29 Nov 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Since the automorphic forms of this theory contain the weights of E_8 we can interpret the occurrence of weights in the dimensional reduction as evidence for an underlying U-duality symmetry.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.77 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0611318 (version 2)
Pith IDKTQACXJO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationNeil Lambert, Peter West. "Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections." arXiv:hep-th/0611318 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/KTQACXJO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,976 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.32 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.83 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study the higher derivative corrections that occur in type II superstring theories in ten dimensions or less. Assuming invariance under a discrete duality group G(Z) we show that the generic functions of the scalar fields that occur can be identified with automorphic forms. We then give a systematic method to construct automorphic forms from a given group G(Z) together with a chosen subgroup H and a linear representation of G(Z). This construction is based on the theory of non-linear realizations and we find that the automorphic forms contain the weights of G. We also carry out the dimensional reduction of the generic higher derivative corrections of the IIB theory to three dimensions and find that the weights of E_8 occur generalizing previous results of the authors on M-theory. Since the automorphic forms of this theory contain the weights of E_8 we can interpret the occurrence of weights in the dimensional reduction as evidence for an underlying U-duality symmetry.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study the higher derivative corrections that occur in type II superstring theories in ten dimensions or less. contribution 0.76 0.85 0.04 asserted 0.85
s1 Assuming invariance under a discrete duality group G(Z) we show that the generic functions of the scalar fields that occur can be identified with automorphic forms. result 0.83 0.93 0.40 asserted 1.00
s2 We then give a systematic method to construct automorphic forms from a given group G(Z) together with a chosen subgroup H and a linear representation of G(Z). method 0.75 0.95 0.10 asserted 1.00
s3 This construction is based on the theory of non-linear realizations and we find that the automorphic forms contain the weights of G. result 0.66 0.94 0.10 asserted 1.00
s4 We also carry out the dimensional reduction of the generic higher derivative corrections of the IIB theory to three dimensions and find that the weights of E_8 occur generalizing previous results of the authors on M-theory. result 0.87 0.95 0.15 asserted 1.00
s5 Since the automorphic forms of this theory contain the weights of E_8 we can interpret the occurrence of weights in the dimensional reduction as evidence for an underlying U-duality symmetry. interpretation 1.00 0.65 0.51 hedged possibility 0.77

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.62 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study the higher derivative corrections that occur in type II superstring theories in ten dimensions or less. Assuming invariance under a discrete duality group G(Z) we show that the generic functions of the scalar fields that occur can be identified with automorphic forms. We then give a systematic method to construct automorphic forms from a given group G(Z) together with a chosen subgroup H and a linear representation of G(Z). This construction is based on the theory of non-linear realizations and we find that the automorphic forms contain the weights of G. We also carry out the dimensional reduction of the generic higher derivative corrections of the IIB theory to three dimensions and find that the weights of E_8 occur generalizing previous results of the authors on M-theory. Since the automorphic forms of this theory contain the weights of E_8 we can interpret the occurrence of weights in the dimensional reduction as evidence for an underlying U-duality symmetry.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

14 arXiv papers cite this in 22 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 14 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
  • Two other spectacular findings provide additional support to the conjecture: * The quantum corrections to $M$-theory are compatible with the $E_10$ algebraic structure, in the sense that they correspond to roots of $E_10$ [ref] (see also [ref] for further discussions and developments). * The massive deformation of type IIA supergravity corresponds to a level 4 root of $E_10$ (or $E_11$) [ref] , a result that can be extended to other deformations of the theory in lower dimensions (see the original works [ref] for entries into this fast growing literature).

    Kac-Moody algebras and the structure of cosmological singularities: a new light on the Belinskii-Khalatnikov-Lifshitz analysis · Hidden Symmetries? · 1.00

Cites it as background 6 papers
  • Recently, several authors [ref] have initiated an investigation aimed at answering the question of whether or not the U-duality group $U_3$ in three dimensions is preserved also if the tree-level Lagrangian is supplemented by higher order curvature corrections.

    U-Duality and the Compactified Gauss-Bonnet Term · Non-Perturbative Completion and Automorphic Forms · 0.88

  • Although the coefficients, $^(D)_(p,q)$, have not been determined in generality, a significant amount of information has accumulated for the first three terms for the cases with $D≥6$ (duality groups $E_d+1$ with $d ≤4$) [ref] , and there are various conjectures concerning the coefficient of the $^4$ interaction, $^(D)_(0,0)$, for higher-rank groups [ref] .

    Eisenstein series for higher-rank groups and string theory amplitudes · Introduction · 0.80

  • In the context of U-duality, the same question arises as to whether higher-derivative interactions, beyond the already well understood gravitational sector, preserve the duality symmetry $G_3()=E_8(8)(ℤ)$ of M-theory compactified on a eight-torus [ref] .

    Higher Derivative Corrections, Dimensional Reduction and Ehlers Duality · Introduction and Summary · 0.83

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.