REVIEW 1 cited by
A Bug or a Suggestion? An Automatic Way to Label Issues
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
More and more users and developers are using Issue Tracking Systems (ITSs) to report issues, including bugs, feature requests, enhancement suggestions, etc. Different information, however, is gathered from users when issues are reported on different ITSs, which presents considerable challenges for issue classification tools to work effectively across the ITSs. Besides, bugs often take higher priority when it comes to classifying the issues, while existing approaches to issue classification seldom focus on distinguishing bugs and the other non-bug issues, leading to suboptimal accuracy in bug identification. In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based approach to automatically identify bug-reporting issues across various ITSs. The approach implements the k-NN algorithm to detect and correct misclassifications in data extracted from the ITSs, and trains an attention-based bi-directional long short-term memory (ABLSTM) network using a dataset of over 1.2 million labelled issues to identify bug reports. Experimental evaluation shows that our approach achieved an F-measure of 85.6\% in distinguishing bugs and other issues, significantly outperforming the other benchmark and state-of-the-art approaches examined in the experiment.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Applying Large Language Models to Issue Classification: Revisiting with Extended Data and New Models
Fine-tuned GPT-4o classifies GitHub issue types with about 86% F1 on NLBSE 2024 data, while a much larger NLBSE 2023 dataset does not improve results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.