REVIEW 2 cited by
GLoRE: Evaluating Logical Reasoning of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant general language understanding abilities. However, there has been a scarcity of attempts to assess the logical reasoning capacities of these LLMs, an essential facet of natural language understanding. To encourage further investigation in this area, we introduce GLoRE, a General Logical Reasoning Evaluation platform that not only consolidates diverse datasets but also standardizes them into a unified format suitable for evaluating large language models across zero-shot and few-shot scenarios. Our experimental results show that compared to the performance of humans and supervised fine-tuning models, the logical reasoning capabilities of large reasoning models, such as OpenAI's o1 mini, DeepSeek R1 and QwQ-32B, have seen remarkable improvements, with QwQ-32B achieving the highest benchmark performance to date. GLoRE is designed as a living project that continuously integrates new datasets and models, facilitating robust and comparative assessments of model performance in both commercial and Huggingface communities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Think Deep, Speak Once: Relit, A Recursive Latent Implicit Transformer Framework
ReLIT reaches 98.6% on ProofWriter and 97.6% on RuleTaker by adding a recursive latent block to a frozen TinyLlama backbone.
-
AI Benchmarks and Datasets for LLM Evaluation
A catalog of 41 existing AI benchmarks and datasets tagged with EU Trustworthy AI categories, with no new benchmarks or experimental results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.