REVIEW 2 cited by
Reconstruction of k-essence model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reconstruction of k-essence model
read the original abstract
We explicitly construct the k-essence models which reproduce the arbitrary FRW cosmology, that is, the arbitrary time-development of the scale factor or the Hubble rate. The k-essence model includes scalar quintessence model, tachyon dark energy model, ghost condensation model as special cases. Explicit formulas of the reconstruction are given. First we consider the case that the action only contains the kinetic term. In this case, we find that the model reproducing the development of the universe in the exact $\Lambda$CDM model cannot be constructed although there is a model which reproduces the development infinitely closing to $\Lambda$CDM model. We find, however, the solution is not stable. Another is more general case including potential etc., where we find that there appear infinite number of arbitrary functions of the scalar fields, which are redundant to the time development of the scale factor. By adjusting one of the redundant functions, however, we can obtain the model where any solution we need could be stable.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Is Phantom Divide Crossing in General Relativity Completely Impossible? Shortcomings in canonical and minimally coupled scalar field and Possible Solutions in $k$-essence Models
Phantom-to-quintessence crossing is impossible for a canonical scalar field, but can be engineered in finely-tuned k-essence theories where ghost instabilities are suppressed by a chosen kinetic coefficient.
-
Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism
A parameter scan of constant-roll β-exponential inflation in Palatini R² gravity claims agreement with ACT/Planck contours, but the derivation is undermined by algebraic sign errors and an absent non-Gaussianity calculation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.