REVIEW 1 cited by
Neurosymbolic AI and its Taxonomy: a survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Neurosymbolic AI deals with models that combine symbolic processing, like classic AI, and neural networks, as it's a very established area. These models are emerging as an effort toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) by both exploring an alternative to just increasing datasets' and models' sizes and combining Learning over the data distribution, Reasoning on prior and learned knowledge, and by symbiotically using them. This survey investigates research papers in this area during recent years and brings classification and comparison between the presented models as well as applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CoreThink: A Symbolic Reasoning Layer to reason over Long Horizon Tasks with LLMs
The paper claims a symbolic orchestration layer, CoreThink, achieves state-of-the-art results on seven coding and reasoning benchmarks with no training, but provides no verifiable implementation or method details.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.