Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Transverse-energy distributions at midrapidity in p+p, d+Au, and Au+Au collisions at sqrt{s_{_(NN)}}=62.4--200~GeV and implications for particle-production models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1312.6676 v1 pith:OSS6B4G2 submitted 2013-12-23 nucl-ex

Transverse-energy distributions at midrapidity in p+p, d+Au, and Au+Au collisions at sqrt{s_{_(NN)}}=62.4--200~GeV and implications for particle-production models

S.S. Adler , S. Afanasiev , C. Aidala , N.N. Ajitanand , Y. Akiba , A. Al-Jamel , J. Alexander , K. Aoki
show 383 more authors
L. Aphecetche R. Armendariz S.H. Aronson R. Averbeck T.C. Awes B. Azmoun V. Babintsev A. Baldisseri K.N. Barish P.D. Barnes B. Bassalleck S. Bathe S. Batsouli V. Baublis F. Bauer A. Bazilevsky S. Belikov R. Bennett Y. Berdnikov M.T. Bjorndal J.G. Boissevain H. Borel K. Boyle M.L. Brooks D.S. Brown N. Bruner D. Bucher H. Buesching V. Bumazhnov G. Bunce J.M. Burward-Hoy S. Butsyk X. Camard S. Campbell J.-S. Chai P. Chand W.C. Chang S. Chernichenko C.Y. Chi J. Chiba M. Chiu I.J. Choi R.K. Choudhury T. Chujo V. Cianciolo C.R. Cleven Y. Cobigo B.A. Cole M.P. Comets P. Constantin M. Csan\'ad T. Cs\"org\H{o} J.P. Cussonneau T. Dahms K. Das G. David F. De\'ak H. Delagrange A. Denisov D. d'Enterria A. Deshpande E.J. Desmond A. Devismes O. Dietzsch A. Dion J.L. Drachenberg O. Drapier A. Drees A.K. Dubey A. Durum D. Dutta V. Dzhordzhadze Y.V. Efremenko J. Egdemir A. Enokizono H. En'yo B. Espagnon S. Esumi D.E. Fields C. Finck F. Fleuret S.L. Fokin B. Forestier B.D. Fox Z. Fraenkel J.E. Frantz A. Franz A.D. Frawley Y. Fukao S.-Y. Fung S. Gadrat F. Gastineau M. Germain A. Glenn M. Gonin J. Gosset Y. Goto R. Granier de Cassagnac N. Grau S.V. Greene M. Grosse Perdekamp T. Gunji H.-{\AA}. Gustafsson T. Hachiya A. Hadj Henni J.S. Haggerty M.N. Hagiwara H. Hamagaki A.G. Hansen H. Harada E.P. Hartouni K. Haruna M. Harvey E. Haslum K. Hasuko R. Hayano X. He M. Heffner T.K. Hemmick J.M. Heuser P. Hidas H. Hiejima J.C. Hill R. Hobbs M. Holmes W. Holzmann K. Homma B. Hong A. Hoover T. Horaguchi M.G. Hur T. Ichihara H. Iinuma V.V. Ikonnikov K. Imai M. Inaba M. Inuzuka D. Isenhower L. Isenhower M. Ishihara T. Isobe M. Issah A. Isupov B.V. Jacak J. Jia J. Jin O. Jinnouchi B.M. Johnson S.C. Johnson K.S. Joo D. Jouan F. Kajihara S. Kametani N. Kamihara M. Kaneta J.H. Kang K. Katou T. Kawabata T. Kawagishi A.V. Kazantsev S. Kelly B. Khachaturov A. Khanzadeev J. Kikuchi D.J. Kim E. Kim E.J. Kim G.-B. Kim H.J. Kim Y.-S. Kim E. Kinney \'A. Kiss E. Kistenev A. Kiyomichi C. Klein-Boesing H. Kobayashi L. Kochenda V. Kochetkov R. Kohara B. Komkov M. Konno D. Kotchetkov A. Kozlov P.J. Kroon C.H. Kuberg G.J. Kunde N. Kurihara K. Kurita M.J. Kweon Y. Kwon G.S. Kyle R. Lacey J.G. Lajoie A. Lebedev Y. Le Bornec S. Leckey D.M. Lee M.K. Lee M.J. Leitch M.A.L. Leite X.H. Li H. Lim A. Litvinenko M.X. Liu C.F. Maguire Y.I. Makdisi A. Malakhov M.D. Malik V.I. Manko Y. Mao G. Martinez H. Masui F. Matathias T. Matsumoto M.C. McCain P.L. McGaughey Y. Miake T.E. Miller A. Milov S. Mioduszewski G.C. Mishra J.T. Mitchell A.K. Mohanty D.P. Morrison J.M. Moss T.V. Moukhanova D. Mukhopadhyay M. Muniruzzaman J. Murata S. Nagamiya Y. Nagata J.L. Nagle M. Naglis T. Nakamura J. Newby M. Nguyen B.E. Norman A.S. Nyanin J. Nystrand E. O'Brien C.A. Ogilvie H. Ohnishi I.D. Ojha K. Okada O.O. Omiwade A. Oskarsson I. Otterlund K. Oyama K. Ozawa D. Pal A.P.T. Palounek V. Pantuev V. Papavassiliou J. Park W.J. Park S.F. Pate H. Pei V. Penev J.-C. Peng H. Pereira V. Peresedov D.Yu. Peressounko A. Pierson C. Pinkenburg R.P. Pisani M.L. Purschke A.K. Purwar H. Qu J.M. Qualls J. Rak I. Ravinovich K.F. Read M. Reuter K. Reygers V. Riabov Y. Riabov G. Roche A. Romana M. Rosati S.S.E. Rosendahl P. Rosnet P. Rukoyatkin V.L. Rykov S.S. Ryu B. Sahlmueller N. Saito T. Sakaguchi S. Sakai V. Samsonov L. Sanfratello R. Santo H.D. Sato S. Sato S. Sawada Y. Schutz V. Semenov R. Seto D. Sharma T.K. Shea I. Shein T.-A. Shibata K. Shigaki M. Shimomura T. Shohjoh K. Shoji A. Sickles C.L. Silva D. Silvermyr K.S. Sim C.P. Singh V. Singh S. Skutnik W.C. Smith A. Soldatov R.A. Soltz W.E. Sondheim S.P. Sorensen I.V. Sourikova F. Staley P.W. Stankus E. Stenlund M. Stepanov A. Ster S.P. Stoll T. Sugitate C. Suire J.P. Sullivan J. Sziklai T. Tabaru S. Takagi E.M. Takagui A. Taketani K.H. Tanaka Y. Tanaka K. Tanida M.J. Tannenbaum A. Taranenko P. Tarj\'an T.L. Thomas M. Togawa J. Tojo H. Torii R.S. Towell V-N. Tram I. Tserruya Y. Tsuchimoto S.K. Tuli H. Tydesj\"o N. Tyurin T.J. Uam C. Vale H. Valle H.W. van Hecke J. Velkovska M. Velkovsky R. V\'ertesi V. Veszpr\'emi A.A. Vinogradov M.A. Volkov E. Vznuzdaev M. Wagner X.R. Wang Y. Watanabe J. Wessels S.N. White N. Willis D. Winter F.K. Wohn C.L. Woody M. Wysocki W. Xie A. Yanovich S. Yokkaichi G.R. Young I. Younus I.E. Yushmanov W.A. Zajc O. Zaudtke C. Zhang S. Zhou J. Zim\'anyi L. Zolin X. Zong
This is my paper
classification nucl-ex
keywords distributionscollisionspartcollmodelnumbersqrtcalculated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Measurements of the midrapidity transverse energy distribution, $d\Et/d\eta$, are presented for $p$$+$$p$, $d$$+$Au, and Au$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=200$ GeV and additionally for Au$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=62.4$ and 130 GeV. The $d\Et/d\eta$ distributions are first compared with the number of nucleon participants $N_{\rm part}$, number of binary collisions $N_{\rm coll}$, and number of constituent-quark participants $N_{qp}$ calculated from a Glauber model based on the nuclear geometry. For Au$+$Au, $\mean{d\Et/d\eta}/N_{\rm part}$ increases with $N_{\rm part}$, while $\mean{d\Et/d\eta}/N_{qp}$ is approximately constant for all three energies. This indicates that the two component ansatz, $dE_{T}/d\eta \propto (1-x) N_{\rm part}/2 + x N_{\rm coll}$, which has been used to represent $E_T$ distributions, is simply a proxy for $N_{qp}$, and that the $N_{\rm coll}$ term does not represent a hard-scattering component in $E_T$ distributions. The $dE_{T}/d\eta$ distributions of Au$+$Au and $d$$+$Au are then calculated from the measured $p$$+$$p$ $E_T$ distribution using two models that both reproduce the Au$+$Au data. However, while the number-of-constituent-quark-participant model agrees well with the $d$$+$Au data, the additive-quark model does not.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.