pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10850 · v1 · pith:OT4I6VGQnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

On Calabi-Yau Threefolds For Unified LVS Inflation

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords Calabi-Yau threefoldsLARGE volume scenariofibre inflationpoly-instanton inflationblow-up inflationorientifoldsK3 fibrationWilson divisor
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single Calabi-Yau threefold with K3 or T4 fibration, two diagonal del Pezzo divisors, and a Wilson divisor can realize fibre inflation, poly-instanton inflation, and loop blow-up inflation in the LARGE volume scenario through different or

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a unified geometric setup in which three distinct Kähler moduli inflation models known from the LARGE volume scenario arise from the same Calabi-Yau threefold once different orientifold projections are chosen. The required threefold must possess a K3 or T4 fibration structure together with two diagonal del Pezzo divisors and one Wilson divisor realized as a P1 fibration over T2. After scanning roughly 100,000 Calabi-Yau geometries with h^{1,1} up to 6 from the Kreuzer-Skarke database, the authors identify two such threefolds for h^{1,1} ≤ 4, fourteen for h^{1,1}=5, and forty-five for h^{1,1}=6. These geometries therefore supply a single topological foundation that can host multiple inflationary potentials previously derived in the LVS literature.

Core claim

The central claim is that the listed topological features of a Calabi-Yau threefold are sufficient to allow fibre inflation, poly-instanton inflation, and (loop) blow-up inflation to be realized in the LARGE volume scenario simply by selecting different orientifolds of the same threefold; explicit scans of the Kreuzer-Skarke database confirm the existence of multiple threefolds satisfying the required fibration and divisor conditions for h^{1,1} from 1 to 6.

What carries the argument

The Calabi-Yau threefold equipped with a K3- or T4-fibration, two diagonal del Pezzo divisors, and a Wilson divisor (a surface that is a P1 fibration over T2); this combination supplies the divisor volumes and intersection data needed to generate the three distinct inflationary potentials under different orientifold choices.

If this is right

  • One orientifold of such a threefold yields the fibre inflation potential with its characteristic exponential flattening.
  • A second orientifold yields the poly-instanton inflation potential.
  • A third orientifold yields the loop blow-up inflation potential.
  • The same geometries admit extended use in broader string-theoretic cosmological model building.
  • The scan results supply concrete lists of threefolds that can be fed into further moduli stabilization and inflation calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unification reduces the number of distinct Calabi-Yau geometries that must be studied when comparing different LVS inflation scenarios.
  • The candidate threefolds with h^{1,1}=5 or 6 could be used to test whether the three models can be embedded simultaneously in a single compactification by varying only discrete choices.
  • The Wilson divisor condition may impose new constraints on the possible values of the string coupling or the overall volume that are not visible in single-model studies.
  • Future work could check whether the same geometric features also support other moduli-driven mechanisms such as axion monodromy or racetrack inflation.

Load-bearing premise

The listed topological features of the Calabi-Yau threefold are sufficient to reproduce the inflationary potentials already derived for each model in the existing LVS literature.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the scalar potential on one of the 61 candidate threefolds that fails to recover the expected functional form for at least one of the three inflationary models under a suitable orientifold.

read the original abstract

Fibre inflation, Poly-instanton inflation and (Loop) Blow-up inflation are among the most popular K\"ahler moduli based inflationary models realized in the standard LARGE volume scenarios (LVS). In this article, we present a unified framework in which all these three LVS inflationary models can be realized by using (different orientifolds of) a single Calabi-Yau (CY) threefold. In fact, the desired CY threefold needs to have a K3- or ${\mathbb T}^4$-fibration structure along with two diagonal del Pezzo divisors, and a so-called `Wilson' divisor which corresponds to a surface realized as a ${\mathbb P}^1$ fibration over ${\mathbb T}^2$s. For classification purpose, we perform a detailed scan of the CY geometries with $1 \leq h^{1,1}({\rm CY}) \leq 6$ that arise from the triangulation of the four-dimensional reflexive polytopes of the Kreuzer-Skarke database. In this regard, after scanning around 100,000 CY geometries and the corresponding topologies of around a million of toric divisors, we find two CY threefolds satisfying these requirements for $1 \leq h^{1,1}({\rm CY}) \leq 4$, while there are 14 and 45 candidate CY geometries for $h^{1,1}({\rm CY}) = 5$ and $h^{1,1}({\rm CY}) = 6$, respectively. We discuss the extended applications of such CY threefolds for cosmological model building in string theoretic frameworks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a single Calabi-Yau threefold with a K3- or T^4-fibration structure, two diagonal del Pezzo divisors, and a Wilson divisor (a P^1 fibration over T^2) can realize fibre inflation, poly-instanton inflation, and (loop) blow-up inflation in the LARGE volume scenario via different orientifolds. It performs a scan of ~100,000 CY geometries from the Kreuzer-Skarke database (h^{1,1} ≤ 6) and reports finding 2, 14, and 45 candidate threefolds for h^{1,1} = 4, 5, 6 respectively, discussing their use in string cosmology.

Significance. If the topological criteria suffice to guarantee the three inflationary potentials emerge exactly as in prior LVS literature, the work would supply a concrete list of unified geometries for multi-model cosmological constructions in string theory. The scale of the scan (~100k geometries, ~1M divisors) is a clear strength, providing reproducible candidate lists that future work could use for explicit model building.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and classification results] Abstract and scan description: the central claim that the listed topological features (K3/T^4 fibration + two diagonal dP + Wilson divisor) are sufficient for all three LVS inflationary models to arise 'exactly as derived in prior LVS literature' is not supported by explicit recomputation. The manuscript identifies 61 candidates but does not report triple intersection numbers, the resulting volume form V(τ_i), or verification of the Kähler potential and superpotential conditions required for each potential.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'T^2s' in the Wilson divisor definition is typographically unclear and should be corrected to 'T^2'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need to clarify the scope of our classification results. Below we address the major comment point by point.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and classification results] Abstract and scan description: the central claim that the listed topological features (K3/T^4 fibration + two diagonal dP + Wilson divisor) are sufficient for all three LVS inflationary models to arise 'exactly as derived in prior LVS literature' is not supported by explicit recomputation. The manuscript identifies 61 candidates but does not report triple intersection numbers, the resulting volume form V(τ_i), or verification of the Kähler potential and superpotential conditions required for each potential.

    Authors: The manuscript is a classification paper whose central claim is that the listed topological features are the necessary and sufficient conditions, as established in the prior LVS literature, for the three inflationary models to be realized on different orientifolds of the same Calabi-Yau. The scan therefore identifies geometries possessing exactly those features; it does not attempt to re-derive the inflationary potentials or recompute the full set of triple intersection numbers and volume forms for each of the 61 candidates. Such explicit computations constitute a separate, model-building step that can now be performed on the provided list. We will revise the abstract and introduction to state this scope more explicitly and to include a short table mapping each topological requirement to the corresponding condition in the cited LVS works, but we maintain that the absence of per-geometry recomputation does not invalidate the classification result. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: database classification of CY geometries matching pre-specified topological criteria from prior LVS literature

full rationale

The paper scans the Kreuzer-Skarke database for CY threefolds with K3/T4-fibration, two diagonal del Pezzo divisors and a Wilson divisor, then states that such geometries (via different orientifolds) can realize the three LVS inflationary models. This is a search for geometries satisfying externally defined topological conditions; no equations, volume forms, or inflationary potentials are derived or fitted inside the paper, and no step reduces a claimed prediction to an input by construction. Prior LVS results are invoked as given, but the present work adds no self-referential loop or load-bearing self-citation chain that would force the classification outcome.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard definitions from toric algebraic geometry and the Kreuzer-Skarke database; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard properties of Calabi-Yau threefolds, toric divisors, and fibrations as defined in the Kreuzer-Skarke database
    The scan uses established notions of h^{1,1}, del Pezzo divisors, K3/T4 fibrations, and Wilson divisors from algebraic geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5816 in / 1357 out tokens · 25295 ms · 2026-06-27T12:20:45.229598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 64 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Calabi-yau Manifolds as Complete Intersections in Products of Complex Projective Spaces,

    P. Green and T. Hubsch, “Calabi-yau Manifolds as Complete Intersections in Products of Complex Projective Spaces,”Commun. Math. Phys.109(1987) 99

  2. [2]

    Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,

    P. Candelas, A. M. Dale, C. A. Lutken, and R. Schimmrigk, “Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B298(1988) 493. 37

  3. [3]

    All Hodge Numbers of All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,

    P. S. Green, T. Hubsch, and C. A. Lutken, “All Hodge Numbers of All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Manifolds,”Class. Quant. Grav.6(1989) 105–124

  4. [4]

    Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 1.,

    P. Candelas, X. De La Ossa, A. Font, S. H. Katz, and D. R. Morrison, “Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 1.,”Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 481–538,hep-th/9308083

  5. [5]

    Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties,

    V. V. Batyrev, “Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties,”J. Alg. Geom.3(1994) 493–545,alg-geom/9310003

  6. [6]

    Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 2.,

    P. Candelas, A. Font, S. H. Katz, and D. R. Morrison, “Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 2.,”Nucl. Phys. B429(1994) 626–674,hep-th/9403187

  7. [7]

    Mirror symmetry, mirror map and applications to complete intersection Calabi-Yau spaces,

    S. Hosono, A. Klemm, S. Theisen, and S.-T. Yau, “Mirror symmetry, mirror map and applications to complete intersection Calabi-Yau spaces,”Nucl. Phys. B433(1995) 501–554,hep-th/9406055

  8. [8]

    Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions,

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, “Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2000) 1209–1230,hep-th/0002240

  9. [9]

    All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Four-Folds,

    J. Gray, A. S. Haupt, and A. Lukas, “All Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Four-Folds,” JHEP07(2013) 070,1303.1832

  10. [10]

    Fibrations in CICY Threefolds,

    L. B. Anderson, X. Gao, J. Gray, and S.-J. Lee, “Fibrations in CICY Threefolds,”JHEP10 (2017) 077,1708.07907

  11. [11]

    A new construction of Calabi–Yau manifolds: Generalized CICYs,

    L. B. Anderson, F. Apruzzi, X. Gao, J. Gray, and S.-J. Lee, “A new construction of Calabi–Yau manifolds: Generalized CICYs,”Nucl. Phys. B906(2016) 441–496, 1507.03235

  12. [12]

    The Standard Model quiver in de Sitter string compactifications,

    M. Cicoli, I. n. G. Etxebarria, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, P. Shukla, and R. Valandro, “The Standard Model quiver in de Sitter string compactifications,”JHEP08(2021) 109, 2106.11964

  13. [13]

    Topological Invariants and Fibration Structure of Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Four-Folds,

    J. Gray, A. S. Haupt, and A. Lukas, “Topological Invariants and Fibration Structure of Complete Intersection Calabi-Yau Four-Folds,”JHEP09(2014) 093,1405.2073

  14. [14]

    Two Hundred Heterotic Standard Models on Smooth Calabi-Yau Threefolds,

    L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and E. Palti, “Two Hundred Heterotic Standard Models on Smooth Calabi-Yau Threefolds,”Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 106005,1106.4804

  15. [15]

    Heterotic Line Bundle Standard Models,

    L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and E. Palti, “Heterotic Line Bundle Standard Models,” JHEP06(2012) 113,1202.1757

  16. [16]

    A Comprehensive Scan for Heterotic SU(5) GUT models,

    L. B. Anderson, A. Constantin, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and E. Palti, “A Comprehensive Scan for Heterotic SU(5) GUT models,”JHEP01(2014) 047,1307.4787

  17. [17]

    Stabilizing the Complex Structure in Heterotic Calabi-Yau Vacua,

    L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and B. Ovrut, “Stabilizing the Complex Structure in Heterotic Calabi-Yau Vacua,”JHEP02(2011) 088,1010.0255

  18. [18]

    Stabilizing All Geometric Moduli in Heterotic Calabi-Yau Vacua,

    L. B. Anderson, J. Gray, A. Lukas, and B. Ovrut, “Stabilizing All Geometric Moduli in Heterotic Calabi-Yau Vacua,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 106011,1102.0011

  19. [19]

    Stabilizing All Kahler Moduli in Type IIB Orientifolds,

    K. Bobkov, V. Braun, P. Kumar, and S. Raby, “Stabilizing All Kahler Moduli in Type IIB Orientifolds,”JHEP12(2010) 056,1003.1982

  20. [20]

    Gopakumar-Vafa hierarchies in winding inflation and uplifts,

    F. Carta, A. Mininno, N. Righi, and A. Westphal, “Gopakumar-Vafa hierarchies in winding inflation and uplifts,”JHEP05(2021) 271,2101.07272. 38

  21. [21]

    Thraxions: Towards Full String Models,

    F. Carta, A. Mininno, N. Righi, and A. Westphal, “Thraxions: Towards Full String Models,”2110.02963

  22. [22]

    Divisor topologies of CICY 3-folds and their applications to phenomenology,

    F. Carta, A. Mininno, and P. Shukla, “Divisor topologies of CICY 3-folds and their applications to phenomenology,”JHEP05(2022) 101,2201.02165

  23. [23]

    Systematics of perturbatively flat flux vacua for CICYs,

    F. Carta, A. Mininno, and P. Shukla, “Systematics of perturbatively flat flux vacua for CICYs,”2201.10581

  24. [24]

    A landscape of orientifold vacua,

    F. Carta, J. Moritz, and A. Westphal, “A landscape of orientifold vacua,”JHEP05(2020) 107,2003.04902

  25. [25]

    M theory and topological strings. 1.,

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M theory and topological strings. 1.,”hep-th/9809187

  26. [26]

    M theory and topological strings. 2.,

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M theory and topological strings. 2.,”hep-th/9812127

  27. [27]

    PALP: A Package for analyzing lattice polytopes with applications to toric geometry,

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, “PALP: A Package for analyzing lattice polytopes with applications to toric geometry,”Comput. Phys. Commun.157(2004) 87–106, math/0204356

  28. [28]

    A New offspring of PALP,

    A. P. Braun and N.-O. Walliser, “A New offspring of PALP,”1106.4529

  29. [29]

    The Sage Developers,SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Version x.y.z), YYYY.https://www.sagemath.org

  30. [30]

    Cohomology of Line Bundles: A Computational Algorithm,

    R. Blumenhagen, B. Jurke, T. Rahn, and H. Roschy, “Cohomology of Line Bundles: A Computational Algorithm,”J. Math. Phys.51(2010) 103525,1003.5217

  31. [31]

    Computational Tools for Cohomology of Toric Varieties,

    R. Blumenhagen, B. Jurke, and T. Rahn, “Computational Tools for Cohomology of Toric Varieties,”Adv. High Energy Phys.2011(2011) 152749,1104.1187

  32. [32]

    The Hodge Numbers of Divisors of Calabi-Yau Threefold Hypersurfaces,

    A. P. Braun, C. Long, L. McAllister, M. Stillman, and B. Sung, “The Hodge Numbers of Divisors of Calabi-Yau Threefold Hypersurfaces,”1712.04946

  33. [33]

    The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse,

    M. Demirtas, C. Long, L. McAllister, and M. Stillman, “The Kreuzer-Skarke Axiverse,” JHEP04(2020) 138,1808.01282

  34. [34]

    Bounding the Kreuzer-Skarke Landscape,

    M. Demirtas, L. McAllister, and A. Rios-Tascon, “Bounding the Kreuzer-Skarke Landscape,”Fortsch. Phys.68(2020) 2000086,2008.01730

  35. [35]

    Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, “Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,”JHEP03(2005) 007,hep-th/0502058

  36. [36]

    A Calabi-Yau Database: Threefolds Constructed from the Kreuzer-Skarke List,

    R. Altman, J. Gray, Y.-H. He, V. Jejjala, and B. D. Nelson, “A Calabi-Yau Database: Threefolds Constructed from the Kreuzer-Skarke List,”JHEP02(2015) 158,1411.1418

  37. [37]

    New large volume Calabi-Yau threefolds,

    R. Altman, Y.-H. He, V. Jejjala, and B. D. Nelson, “New large volume Calabi-Yau threefolds,”Phys. Rev. D97(2018), no. 4, 046003,1706.09070

  38. [38]

    A Geometrical Upper Bound on the Inflaton Range,

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, C. Mayrhofer, and P. Shukla, “A Geometrical Upper Bound on the Inflaton Range,”JHEP05(2018) 001,1801.05434

  39. [39]

    On Classifying the Divisor Involutions in Calabi-Yau Threefolds,

    X. Gao and P. Shukla, “On Classifying the Divisor Involutions in Calabi-Yau Threefolds,” JHEP1311(2013) 170,1307.1139

  40. [40]

    Orientifold Calabi-Yau threefolds with divisor involutions and string landscape,

    R. Altman, J. Carifio, X. Gao, and B. D. Nelson, “Orientifold Calabi-Yau threefolds with divisor involutions and string landscape,”JHEP03(2022) 087,2111.03078. 39

  41. [41]

    Machine Learning to the Orientifold Calabi-Yau with String Vacua,

    X. Gao and H. Zou, “Machine Learning to the Orientifold Calabi-Yau with String Vacua,” 2112.04950

  42. [42]

    A database of Calabi-Yau orientifolds and the size of D3-tadpoles,

    C. Crin` o, F. Quevedo, A. Schachner, and R. Valandro, “A database of Calabi-Yau orientifolds and the size of D3-tadpoles,”JHEP08(2022) 050,2204.13115

  43. [43]

    Classifying divisor topologies for string phenomenology,

    P. Shukla, “Classifying divisor topologies for string phenomenology,”JHEP12(2022) 055, 2205.05215

  44. [44]

    Bianchi Identities for Non-Geometric Fluxes - From Quasi-Poisson Structures to Courant Algebroids,

    R. Blumenhagen, A. Deser, E. Plauschinn, and F. Rennecke, “Bianchi Identities for Non-Geometric Fluxes - From Quasi-Poisson Structures to Courant Algebroids,”Fortsch. Phys.60(2012) 1217–1228,1205.1522

  45. [45]

    Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,

    M. Cicoli, F. Muia, and P. Shukla, “Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,”JHEP11 (2016) 182,1611.04612

  46. [46]

    Chiral Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,

    M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, V. A. Diaz, V. Guidetti, F. Muia, and P. Shukla, “Chiral Global Embedding of Fibre Inflation Models,”JHEP11(2017) 207,1709.01518

  47. [47]

    Poly-instanton Inflation,

    M. Cicoli, F. G. Pedro, and G. Tasinato, “Poly-instanton Inflation,”JCAP12(2011) 022, 1110.6182

  48. [48]

    Moduli Stabilization and Inflationary Cosmology with Poly-Instantons in Type IIB Orientifolds,

    R. Blumenhagen, X. Gao, T. Rahn, and P. Shukla, “Moduli Stabilization and Inflationary Cosmology with Poly-Instantons in Type IIB Orientifolds,”JHEP11(2012) 101, 1208.1160

  49. [49]

    A Note on Poly-Instanton Effects in Type IIB Orientifolds on Calabi-Yau Threefolds,

    R. Blumenhagen, X. Gao, T. Rahn, and P. Shukla, “A Note on Poly-Instanton Effects in Type IIB Orientifolds on Calabi-Yau Threefolds,”JHEP06(2012) 162,1205.2485

  50. [50]

    Kahler moduli inflation,

    J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo, “Kahler moduli inflation,”JHEP01(2006) 146, hep-th/0509012

  51. [51]

    Roulette inflation with Kahler moduli and their axions,

    J. R. Bond, L. Kofman, S. Prokushkin, and P. M. Vaudrevange, “Roulette inflation with Kahler moduli and their axions,”Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 123511,hep-th/0612197

  52. [52]

    Global Orientifolded Quivers with Inflation,

    M. Cicoli, I. Garc` ıa-Etxebarria, C. Mayrhofer, F. Quevedo, P. Shukla, and R. Valandro, “Global Orientifolded Quivers with Inflation,”JHEP11(2017) 134,1706.06128

  53. [53]

    Loop blow-up inflation,

    S. Bansal, L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli, A. Hebecker, and R. Kuespert, “Loop blow-up inflation,” JHEP07(2024) 289,2403.04831

  54. [54]

    Systematics of type IIB moduli stabilisation with odd axions,

    M. Cicoli, A. Schachner, and P. Shukla, “Systematics of type IIB moduli stabilisation with odd axions,”JHEP04(2022) 003,2109.14624

  55. [55]

    Magnetized E3-brane instantons in F-theory,

    M. Bianchi, A. Collinucci, and L. Martucci, “Magnetized E3-brane instantons in F-theory,” JHEP12(2011) 045,1107.3732

  56. [56]

    Freezing E3-brane instantons with fluxes,

    M. Bianchi, A. Collinucci, and L. Martucci, “Freezing E3-brane instantons with fluxes,” Fortsch. Phys.60(2012) 914–920,1202.5045

  57. [57]

    Building an explicit de Sitter,

    J. Louis, M. Rummel, R. Valandro, and A. Westphal, “Building an explicit de Sitter,” JHEP10(2012) 163,1208.3208

  58. [58]

    A systematic approach to K¨ ahler moduli stabilisation,

    S. AbdusSalam, S. Abel, M. Cicoli, F. Quevedo, and P. Shukla, “A systematic approach to K¨ ahler moduli stabilisation,”JHEP08(2020), no. 08, 047,2005.11329

  59. [59]

    Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials,

    K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack, and J. Louis, “Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials,”JHEP06(2002) 060,hep-th/0204254. 40

  60. [60]

    Perturbative moduli stabilisation in type IIB/F-theory framework,

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, “Perturbative moduli stabilisation in type IIB/F-theory framework,”Eur. Phys. J.C78(2018), no. 9, 766,1803.08941

  61. [61]

    Inflation from the internal volume in type IIB/F-theory compactification,

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, “Inflation from the internal volume in type IIB/F-theory compactification,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.A34(2019), no. 08, 1950042, 1810.05060

  62. [62]

    Moduli stabilisation and inflation in type IIB/F-theory,

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, “Moduli stabilisation and inflation in type IIB/F-theory,”PoSCORFU2018(2019) 068,1901.05075

  63. [63]

    Logarithmic loop corrections, moduli stabilisation and de Sitter vacua in string theory,

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, “Logarithmic loop corrections, moduli stabilisation and de Sitter vacua in string theory,”1909.10525

  64. [64]

    String loop corrections and de Sitter vacua,

    I. Antoniadis, Y. Chen, and G. K. Leontaris, “String loop corrections and de Sitter vacua,” PoSCORFU2019(2020) 099

  65. [65]

    Inflation near a metastable de Sitter vacuum from moduli stabilisation,

    I. Antoniadis, O. Lacombe, and G. K. Leontaris, “Inflation near a metastable de Sitter vacuum from moduli stabilisation,”Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 11, 1014,2007.10362

  66. [66]

    Stabilising all K¨ ahler moduli in perturbative LVS,

    G. K. Leontaris and P. Shukla, “Stabilising all K¨ ahler moduli in perturbative LVS,”JHEP 07(2022) 047,2203.03362

  67. [67]

    Inflating in perturbative LVS: global embedding and robustness,

    S. Bera, D. Chakraborty, G. K. Leontaris, and P. Shukla, “Inflating in perturbative LVS: global embedding and robustness,”JCAP09(2024) 004,2405.06738

  68. [68]

    Global embedding of fiber inflation in a perturbative large volume scenario,

    S. Bera, D. Chakraborty, G. K. Leontaris, and P. Shukla, “Global embedding of fiber inflation in a perturbative large volume scenario,”Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 10, 106009, 2406.01694

  69. [69]

    Assisted Fibre Inflation in perturbative LVS,

    G. K. Leontaris and P. Shukla, “Assisted Fibre Inflation in perturbative LVS,”JCAP10 (2025) 070,2506.22630

  70. [70]

    Kahler Moduli Inflation Revisited,

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, D. Buck, E. J. Copeland, M. Gomez-Reino, and N. J. Nunes, “Kahler Moduli Inflation Revisited,”JHEP01(2010) 081,0906.3711

  71. [71]

    Loop corrections to volume moduli and inflation in string theory,

    M. Berg, M. Haack, and B. Kors, “Loop corrections to volume moduli and inflation in string theory,”Phys. Rev.D71(2005) 026005,hep-th/0404087

  72. [72]

    String loop corrections to Kahler potentials in orientifolds,

    M. Berg, M. Haack, and B. Kors, “String loop corrections to Kahler potentials in orientifolds,”JHEP11(2005) 030,hep-th/0508043

  73. [73]

    On volume stabilization by quantum corrections,

    M. Berg, M. Haack, and B. Kors, “On volume stabilization by quantum corrections,”Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 021601,hep-th/0508171

  74. [74]

    Jumping Through Loops: On Soft Terms from Large Volume Compactifications,

    M. Berg, M. Haack, and E. Pajer, “Jumping Through Loops: On Soft Terms from Large Volume Compactifications,”JHEP09(2007) 031,0704.0737

  75. [75]

    Systematics of String Loop Corrections in Type IIB Calabi-Yau Flux Compactifications,

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, “Systematics of String Loop Corrections in Type IIB Calabi-Yau Flux Compactifications,”JHEP01(2008) 052,0708.1873

  76. [76]

    Loops, local corrections and warping in the LVS and other type IIB models,

    X. Gao, A. Hebecker, S. Schreyer, and G. Venken, “Loops, local corrections and warping in the LVS and other type IIB models,”JHEP09(2022) 091,2204.06009

  77. [77]

    Kahler corrections for the volume modulus of flux compactifications,

    G. von Gersdorff and A. Hebecker, “Kahler corrections for the volume modulus of flux compactifications,”Phys. Lett. B624(2005) 270–274,hep-th/0507131

  78. [78]

    Higher derivative corrections to string inflation,

    M. Cicoli, M. Licheri, P. Piantadosi, F. Quevedo, and P. Shukla, “Higher derivative corrections to string inflation,”JHEP02(2024) 115,2309.11697. 41

  79. [79]

    GUTs in Type IIB Orientifold Compactifications,

    R. Blumenhagen, V. Braun, T. W. Grimm, and T. Weigand, “GUTs in Type IIB Orientifold Compactifications,”Nucl.Phys.B815(2009) 1–94,0811.2936

  80. [80]

    Four-modulus ’Swiss Cheese’ chiral models,

    A. Collinucci, M. Kreuzer, C. Mayrhofer, and N.-O. Walliser, “Four-modulus ’Swiss Cheese’ chiral models,”JHEP07(2009) 074,0811.4599

Showing first 80 references.