Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Real-space observation of the low-temperature Skyrmion lattice in Cu2OSeO3(100) single crystal

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Magnetic force microscopy images the low-temperature skyrmion lattice in a bulk Cu2OSeO3 crystal for the first time, and shows that repeated field cycling can anneal it into a single crystal locked to the lattice axes.

desk verdict First real-space MFM of the low-temperature skyrmion lattice in bulk Cu2OSeO3; the evidence is convincing but the FFT-based phase identification needs a real-space discriminator to fully rule out multi-domain single-q textures. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00517 v1 pith:OTSP2KQC submitted 2025-08-30 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Gerald Malsch , Peter Milde , Dmytro Ivaneiko , Andreas Bauer , Christian Pfleiderer , H. Berger , Lukas M. Eng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords skyrmionlatticeCu2OSeO3magneticforcemicroscopylow-temperaturephaseannealingdomainorientationcubicanisotropyhelical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first real-space magnetic force microscopy images of the low-temperature skyrmion phase in bulk Cu2OSeO3. At 10 K, with the magnetic field along a <100> direction, the authors resolve helical, conical, tilted conical, and skyrmion lattice domains by tuning the external field. They show that repeated small field cycles—a magnetic annealing protocol—nucleate the skyrmion lattice and, with enough cycles, transform a misoriented skyrmion 'polycrystal' into a single crystal whose lattice orientation locks to the underlying Cu2OSeO3 cubic axes. Along the way they observe coexistence of tilted conical and skyrmion states, and they do not find the stretched skyrmion lattice reported in some resonance experiments. If correct, this establishes the low-temperature skyrmion phase as a real, imageable bulk texture and clarifies how it nucleates and orders.

What carries the argument

The central object is the skyrmion lattice itself: a triangular array of swirling spin textures whose sixfold Fourier symmetry can be measured even when individual skyrmions are hard to identify in raw images. The key mechanism is magnetic annealing—repeatedly sweeping the external field by 5–10 mT between consecutive images—which drives nucleation of skyrmions from the tilted conical state and then orders a skyrmion polycrystal into a single crystal. The identification of lattice orientation relies on a moving-window fast Fourier transform algorithm that extracts the in-plane rotation angle of the sixfold diffraction pattern, with an angular resolution of about 5 degrees.

What would settle it

Observe the same sample at 80 mT and 10 K with a probe that resolves individual skyrmion cores, for example spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy on a cleaved surface or Lorentz transmission electron microscopy on a thin lamella of identical material. If the pattern is a triangular array of isolated skyrmion cores, the skyrmion-lattice assignment is confirmed; if it is a stripe-like or disordered modulation, the assignment fails. Alternatively, run small-angle neutron scattering on the identical field-cycled crystal: a sixfold scattering pattern rotated to <100> would confirm the lattic

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using magnetic force microscopy at 10 K, the paper reports the first real-space imaging of the low-temperature skyrmion lattice in bulk Cu2OSeO3. As the field is lowered from saturation, the images resolve helical, conical, tilted conical, and skyrmion lattice domains in one crystal. The central discovery is that field cycling acts as magnetic annealing: it first nucleates skyrmions out of the tilted conical state, with both phases coexisting at the transition, then converts a disordered skyrmion polycrystal into a long-range-ordered skyrmion single crystal whose lattice orientation becomes locked to the <100> directions of the Cu2OSeO3 crystal, an effect attributed to cubic anisotropy. The

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the pattern at +80 mT is a triangular skyrmion lattice rests on the sixfold symmetry of the Fourier transform of a background-subtracted MFM image, because the raw MFM signal fluctuates too much to identify individual skyrmions directly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At 10 K, sweeping the field from saturation to zero reveals four distinct magnetic textures in one crystal: helical, conical, tilted conical, and skyrmion lattice.
  • Repeated small field cycles nucleate the skyrmion lattice out of the tilted conical state, with both phases coexisting during the transition.
  • Longer cycling anneals the skyrmion polycrystal into a single skyrmion lattice whose orientation locks to Cu2OSeO3's <100> axes.
  • The low-temperature skyrmion phase transition is kinetically slow: thermal activation at 10 K is insufficient to complete it quickly, which accounts for the large hysteresis seen in bulk measurements.
  • No stretched skyrmion lattice is found in the low-field region; instead a proper helical phase with all three helical domains populated appears, disagreeing with an earlier ferromagnetic resonance report.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the skyrmion lattice orientation locks to <100> directions, strain or electric-field tuning of the cubic anisotropy should rotate or reorient the lattice on demand; the paper does not test this, but it follows directly from the locking mechanism it reports.
  • The observed coexistence of tilted conical and skyrmion phases under field cycling suggests that bulk hysteresis measurements may include kinetic effects; one testable consequence is that faster cooling or larger field steps should delay or prevent skyrmion nucleation.
  • MFM is surface-sensitive, so whether the locked single-domain skyrmion lattice seen near the surface matches the bulk spin texture could be checked with a bulk probe such as small-angle neutron scattering on the same annealed crystal.
  • The discrepancy with the stretched skyrmion lattice reported from ferromagnetic resonance could stem from surface versus bulk sensitivity or from different field protocols; a combined MFM and resonance study on the same sample after identical annealing would settle which picture is correct.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports magnetic force microscopy (MFM) imaging at 10 K of a bulk Cu2OSeO3(100) single crystal as a function of external magnetic field. The authors identify helical, conical, tilted conical, and skyrmion lattice states, and focus on the low-temperature skyrmion phase stabilized by magnetic field cycling. They observe nucleation and coexistence of tilted conical and skyrmion lattice domains, and claim that prolonged magnetic annealing converts a multidomain skyrmion polycrystal into a long-range-ordered skyrmion lattice locked to the ⟨100⟩ crystal axes. The paper also reports a negative result: no stretched skyrmion lattice is found at low fields, in contrast to an FMR-based report.

Significance. If the identification is sound, this is the first real-space observation of the low-temperature skyrmion phase in bulk Cu2OSeO3, which would be a valuable complement to prior SANS, magnetization, specific heat, and FMR studies. The imaging of nucleation dynamics and the annealing-induced ordering of skyrmion lattice domains would add new information on the metastability and anisotropy-controlled orientation of this phase. The study also usefully documents the absence of a stretched skyrmion lattice in the investigated field range. The supplementary wavelength and orientation analysis is careful and demonstrates cross-sample consistency, with no ad-hoc parameters beyond peripheral fits.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, Fig. 3 and Supplementary S3] The central claim that the +80 mT texture is a triangular skyrmion lattice rests on the sixfold FFT analysis, but that analysis is not selective for a 2D triangular modulation. The angular procedure partitions the FFT into six 60° intervals and averages them. A single-q helical or tilted-conical domain produces two FFT peaks separated by 180°, which fall into the same folded 60° sector. Therefore the condensation of spectral weight into a single peak around ⟨100⟩ in Fig. 3E is equally consistent with alignment of a 1D-modulated state. The zoomed FFTs in Fig. 3C,D show six peaks, but a window containing three 1D domains with wavevectors separated by 60° would also produce six peaks. Since the authors state that "the quite fluctuating MFM-signal makes a direct threshold based identification of the skyrmions and direct analysis of the lattice at least challenging," the phase label cannot be
  2. [Main text, Fig. 2] Figure 2 is used to support the nucleation scenario and coexistence of tilted conical and skyrmion lattice states. However, the panel labels are not backed by the same FFT or real-space analysis described in Fig. 3. For example, Fig. 2(c) is labeled "First skyrmions appear" without specifying the criterion that distinguishes these objects from tilted conical domains or from imaging artefacts. Given the admitted difficulty of direct identification, each phase label in the field-cycling sequence needs an explicit criterion, or a statement that the label is inferred from the field history and the later FFT analysis. This is load-bearing for the nucleation dynamics claim.
  3. [Main text, Fig. 3E and Supplementary S4] The claim that magnetic annealing produces a long-range-ordered skyrmion single crystal locked to the crystal lattice is based on the same folded angular distribution. Even setting aside the folding ambiguity, the measurement of the ~21° rotation between FFT patterns in Fig. 3C,D uses an angular resolution that is stated only in Supplementary S4 as about 5°. The main text should state this resolution when interpreting the angular shift, and the annealing result should be supported by a real-space correlation length or an explicit measure of lattice orientational order, rather than only spectral weight in a folded histogram.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Numerous typos and grammatical errors should be corrected: "proofed" -> "proved/proven", "skrmion" -> "skyrmion", "Evenso" -> "Even so", "intercepted" -> "interspersed", "suszeptibility" -> "susceptibility", "appraoch" -> "approach".
  2. [Fig. 3] The color coding in Fig. 3A is described in the text but the color bar orientation and the meaning of gray/desaturated areas should be clarified directly in the caption.
  3. [Supplementary S2] The two fits for λ′(B) yield B* values of (138±2) mT and (135±2) mT. It would be helpful to state explicitly that these fits are not used to define the magnetic phases and that the ambiguity between rotation and stretching of the helix does not affect the main conclusions.
  4. [Supplementary S4] "CieCAM" should be "CIECAM02". Also, the sentence "the resulting color map... by linearly interpolating between the latter and a middle gray in the CieCAM color space" is unclear and should be rephrased.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central MFM observations are independent of any fitted parameters or self-citation-defined results.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report; it contains no derivation in which a target quantity is defined in terms of itself. The central claim—real-space observation of the low-temperature skyrmion lattice—rests on direct MFM imaging. Phase labels are assigned by comparing MFM contrast and FFT peak patterns with well-established textures from prior work (refs 25–27), including earlier MFM studies of Cu2OSeO3 by the same group. That is external calibration of the imaging method, not a self-citation-borne result. The supplementary wavelength fits (B* ≈ 138 mT or 135 mT) are descriptive fits to measured pitch data and are not used to identify or predict the skyrmion phase. The FFT orientation algorithm assumes sixfold symmetry 'to account for the six-fold symmetry of a triangular skyrmion lattice' (S3), but this is an analysis convention for measuring orientation, not an inference that defines the skyrmion lattice into existence; the real-space dot pattern and FFT peaks are independent input data. The existence of the low-temperature skyrmion phase is imported from earlier SANS/FMR/magnetization work (refs 18–22), partly by co-authors, but that evidence is external and not regenerated here. The acknowledged difficulty of direct threshold-based skyrmion identification in fluctuating MFM signal is a robustness/ambiguity limitation, not a circular step. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central observation is an experimental imaging result. It rests on standard assumptions about MFM contrast and the transfer of phase labels from prior literature, plus two peripheral fit parameters for the field dependence of the apparent helix wavelength in the supplementary. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • B* (cos fit) = 138 ± 2 mT
    Fit parameter for apparent wavelength dependence λ'(B)=λ0/cos(B/B*) in the helical state (SI Fig. S5). Not used for phase identification.
  • B* (quadratic fit) = 135 ± 2 mT
    Fit parameter for alternative quadratic model λ'(B)=λ0(1+1/2(B/B*)^2). The paper cannot distinguish the two models.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption MFM contrast after subtracting a saturated-state background reflects the local magnetic texture without significant topographic contamination.
    Method described in main text; all MFM images are background-corrected with images at |B_ext|=250 mT.
  • domain assumption Expected real-space patterns for helical, conical, tilted conical, and skyrmion states are known from prior MFM studies and simulations.
    Used to label phases in Fig. 1; relies on refs 25-27 and standard visibility rules.
  • domain assumption The magnetization-based phase diagram (Fig. 1a) is representative for the surface region imaged by MFM.
    Figure 1a shows the fields used for the images; no direct measurement of the local phase boundary on the imaged surface is provided.
  • domain assumption The sixfold FFT symmetry of the imaged 2D pattern is sufficient to identify a triangular skyrmion lattice with the stated 5° angular resolution.
    The authors note direct threshold-based identification is challenging, so they rely on FFT angular analysis (main text and S3-S4).
  • domain assumption Susceptibility constants χ_int^|| = 2·χ_int^⊥ = 1.76 from ref 36 apply to the helical state of this sample.
    Used in SI S2 to rescale field axes for the plate sample; if wrong, the quantitative overlap could shift, but qualitative phases remain.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real-space observation of the low-temperature Skyrmion lattice in Cu2OSeO3(100) single crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OTSP2KQC

@misc{pith2026250900517,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real-space observation of the low-temperature Skyrmion lattice in Cu2OSeO3(100) single crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OTSP2KQC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00517}
}
read the original abstract

Cu2OSeO3 is a skyrmion host material in which two distinct thermodynamically stable skyrmion phases were identified. We report magnetic force microscopy imaging of the low-temperature magnetic phases in bulk Cu2OSeO3(100) single crystal. Tuning the external magnetic field over the various phase transition at a temperature of 10 K, we observe the formation of helical, conical, tilted conical and skyrmion lattice domains in real space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00517 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Magnetic imaging of a Cu2OSeO3 single crystal in various fields parallel to ⟨100⟩ at 10K. (a) Phase diagram derived from magnetometry for high field cooling and susequent lowering of the field. The helical state with multiple q-vectors, denoted by the turquoise hashed area, is typically only observed after zero field cooling. The insets schematically show the expected MFM patterns. Ramping the field down from satura… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Transition from the tilted conical state to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Analysis of skyrmion lattice rotation domains. (A) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Back , author V

    author author C. Back , author V. Cros , author H. Ebert , author K. Everschor-Sitte , author A. Fert , author M. Garst , author T. Ma , author S. Mankovsky , author T. L. \ Monchesky , author M. Mostovoy , author N. Nagaosa , author S. S. P. \ Parkin , author C. Pfleiderer , author N. Reyren , author A. Rosch , author Y. Taguchi , author Y. Tokura , auth...

    doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ab8418 2020

  2. [2]

    Stasinopoulos , author S

    author author I. Stasinopoulos , author S. Weichselbaumer , author A. Bauer , author J. Waizner , author H. Berger , author S. Maendl , author M. Garst , author C. Pfleiderer , \ and\ author D. Grundler ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 111 ,\ pages 032408 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Kruchkov , author J

    author author A. Kruchkov , author J. White , author M. Bartkowiak , author I. Z ivkovi\' c , author A. Magrez , \ and\ author H. R nnow ,\ @noop journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 10466 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    author author J. S. \ White , author I. Z Z ivkovi c \' c , author A. J. \ Kruchkov , author M. Bartkowiak , author A. Magrez , \ and\ author H. M. \ R nnow ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.014021 journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied \ volume 10 ,\ pages 014021 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.10.014021 2018

  5. [5]

    Huang , author M

    author author P. Huang , author M. Cantoni , author A. Kruchkov , author J. Rajeswari , author A. Magrez , author F. Carbone , \ and\ author H. M. \ R nnow ,\ 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02097 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 18 ,\ pages 5167 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note pMID: 30040904 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02097 https://...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02097 2018

  6. [6]

    Wan , author Y

    author author X. Wan , author Y. Hu , \ and\ author B. Wang ,\ 10.1063/5.0003880 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 116 ,\ pages 182403 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0003880 2020

  7. [7]

    Seki , author Y

    author author S. Seki , author Y. Okamura , author K. Shibata , author R. Takagi , author N. D. \ Khanh , author F. Kagawa , author T. Arima , \ and\ author Y. Tokura ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.220404 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 220404 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.220404 2017

  8. [8]

    Okamura , author Y

    author author Y. Okamura , author Y. Yamasaki , author D. Morikawa , author T. Honda , author V. Ukleev , author H. Nakao , author Y. Murakami , author K. Shibata , author F. Kagawa , author S. Seki , author T. Arima , \ and\ author Y. Tokura ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.174417 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 174417 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.174417 2017

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Nakajima , author V

    author author T. Nakajima , author V. Ukleev , author K. Ohishi , author H. Oike , author F. Kagawa , author S.-i. \ Seki , author K. Kakurai , author Y. Tokura , \ and\ author T.-h. \ Arima ,\ 10.7566/JPSJ.87.094709 journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ v...

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    Deng , author H.-C

    author author L. Deng , author H.-C. \ Wu , author A. P. \ Litvinchuk , author N. F. Q. \ Yuan , author J.-J. \ Lee , author R. Dahal , author H. Berger , author H.-D. \ Yang , \ and\ author C.-W. \ Chu ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1922108117 journal journal Proceedings of the National Aca...

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Crisanti , author N

    author author M. Crisanti , author N. Reynolds , author I. Z Z ivkovi c \' c , author A. Magrez , author H. M. \ R nnow , author R. Cubitt , \ and\ author J. S. \ White ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.214435 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 214435 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Nishibori , author S

    author author E. Nishibori , author S. Karatsu , author C. Terakura , author N. Takeshita , author M. Kinoshita , author S. Ishiwata , author Y. Tokura , \ and\ author S. Seki ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.201106 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 201106 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    author author M. N. \ Wilson , author M. Crisanti , author C. Barker , author A. S S tefan c c i c c , author J. S. \ White , author M. T. \ Birch , author G. Balakrishnan , author R. Cubitt , \ and\ author P. D. \ Hatton ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.174421 journal journal Phys. Rev...

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    author author A. S. \ Sukhanov , author P. Vir , author A. S. \ Cameron , author H. C. \ Wu , author N. Martin , author S. M\"uhlbauer , author A. Heinemann , author H. D. \ Yang , author C. Felser , \ and\ author D. S. \ Inosov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184408 journal journal P...

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    author author P. M. \ Neves , author D. A. \ Gilbert , author S. Ran , author I.-L. \ Liu , author S. Saha , author J. Collini , author M. Bleuel , author J. Paglione , author J. A. \ Borchers , \ and\ author N. P. \ Butch ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.134410 journal journal Phys. R...

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    author author M. N. \ Wilson , author M. T. \ Birch , author A. S S tefan c c i c c , author A. C. \ Twitchett-Harrison , author G. Balakrishnan , author T. J. \ Hicken , author R. Fan , author P. Steadman , \ and\ author P. D. \ Hatton ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013096 jour...

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    \ Han , author J

    author author M.-G. \ Han , author J. A. \ Garlow , author Y. Kharkov , author L. Camacho , author R. Rov , author J. Sauceda , author G. Vats , author K. Kisslinger , author T. Kato , author O. Sushkov , author Y. Zhu , author C. Ulrich , author T. Söhnel , \ and\ author J. S...

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Chacon , author L

    author author A. Chacon , author L. Heinen , author M. Halder , author A. Bauer , author W. Simeth , author S. M\" u hlbauer , author H. Berger , author M. Garst , author A. Rosch , \ and\ author C. Pfleiderer ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Phys. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 936 ( ye...

    2018

  11. [19]

    Halder , author A

    author author M. Halder , author A. Chacon , author A. Bauer , author W. Simeth , author S. M\"uhlbauer , author H. Berger , author L. Heinen , author M. Garst , author A. Rosch , \ and\ author C. Pfleiderer ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.144429 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 9...

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    author author L. J. \ Bannenberg , author H. Wilhelm , author R. Cubitt , author A. Labh , author M. P. \ Schmidt , author E. Leli\'evre-Berna , author C. Pappas , author M. Mostovoy , \ and\ author A. O. \ Leonov ,\ 10.1038/s41535-019-0150-7 journal journal npj Quantum Mater....

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Aqeel , author J

    author author A. Aqeel , author J. Sahliger , author T. Taniguchi , author S. M\"andl , author D. Mettus , author H. Berger , author A. Bauer , author M. Garst , author C. Pfleiderer , \ and\ author C. H. \ Back ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.017202 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett...

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Lee , author J

    author author O. Lee , author J. Sahliger , author A. Aqeel , author S. Khan , author S. Seki , author H. Kurebayashi , \ and\ author C. H. \ Back ,\ 10.1088/1361-648x/ac3e1c journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 34 ,\ pages 095801 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    uhlbauer , author B. Binz , author F. Jonietz , author C. Pfleiderer , author A. Rosch , author A. Neubauer , author R. Georgii , \ and\ author P. B\

    author author S. M\"uhlbauer , author B. Binz , author F. Jonietz , author C. Pfleiderer , author A. Rosch , author A. Neubauer , author R. Georgii , \ and\ author P. B\"oni ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 13 ,\ pages 915 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009

  16. [24]

    author author A. O. \ Leonov \ and\ author C. Pappas ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.144410 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 144410 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Milde , author E

    author author P. Milde , author E. Neuber , author A. Bauer , author C. Pfleiderer , author H. Berger , \ and\ author L. Eng ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 5612 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  18. [26]

    author author S. L. \ Zhang , author A. Bauer , author D. M. \ Burn , author P. Milde , author E. Neuber , author L. M. \ Eng , author H. Berger , author C. Pfleiderer , author G. van der Laan , \ and\ author T. Hesjedal ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 16 ,\ pag...

    2016

  19. [27]

    Milde , author L

    author author P. Milde , author L. K\" o hler , author E. Neuber , author P. Ritzinger , author M. Garst , author A. Bauer , author C. Pfleiderer , author H. Berger , \ and\ author L. M. \ Eng ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024426 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 02...

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    @noop title O micron N ano T echnology G mbh, T aunusstein, G ermany , \ NoStop

  21. [29]

    @noop title RHK T echnology, I nc., 1050 E ast M aple R oad, T roy, MI 48083 USA , \ NoStop

  22. [30]

    @noop title NANOSENSORS , R ue J aquet- D roz 1, C ase P ostale 216, CH -2002 N euchatel, S witzerland , \ NoStop

    2002

  23. [31]

    author author A. O. \ Leonov , author C. Pappas , \ and\ author I. K\'ezsm\'arki ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043386 journal journal Phys. Rev. Research \ volume 2 ,\ pages 043386 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    author author B. E. \ Zuniga Cespedes , author P. Vir , author P. Milde , author C. Felser , \ and\ author L. M. \ Eng ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184411 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 103 ,\ pages 184411 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    ohler , author J. Seidel , author L. Eng , author A. Bauer , author A. Chacon , author J. Kindervater , author S. M\

    author author P. Milde , author D. K\"ohler , author J. Seidel , author L. Eng , author A. Bauer , author A. Chacon , author J. Kindervater , author S. M\"uhlbauer , author C. Pfleiderer , author C. Sch\"utte , \ and\ author A. Rosch ,\ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 3...

    2013

  26. [34]

    Rajeswari , author P

    author author J. Rajeswari , author P. Huang , author G. F. \ Mancini , author Y. Murooka , author T. Latychevskaia , author D. McGrouther , author M. Cantoni , author E. Baldini , author J. S. \ White , author A. Magrez , author T. Giamarchi , author H. M. \ R nnow , \ and\ a...

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    Huang , author T

    author author P. Huang , author T. Sch\" o nenberger , author M. Cantoni , author L. Heinen , author A. Magrez , author A. Rosch , author F. Carbone , \ and\ author H. M. \ R nnow ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Nanotechnol. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 761 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  28. [36]

    Janoschek , author M

    author author M. Janoschek , author M. Garst , author A. Bauer , author P. Krautscheid , author R. Georgii , author P. B\"oni , \ and\ author C. Pfleiderer ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 87 ,\ pages 134407 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.