Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 32 references

Self-gravitating strings and quantum effects in two-dimensional gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Self-gravitating winding strings are written in closed analytic form in two-dimensional dilaton gravity, and quantum back-reaction adds thermal radiation at the winding-string temperature.

desk verdict A workmanlike and mostly solid closed-form solution for the 2D winding-string system, with a real but fixable completeness gap and an ad hoc quantum extension; it deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09586 v2 pith:OUUMWJV2 submitted 2025-06-11 hep-th gr-qc

Akihiro Ishibashi , Yoshinori Matsuo , Akane Tanaka This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords self-gravitatingstringsHorowitz-Polchinskisolutionwindingtwo-dimensionaldilatongravityRSTmodelblack-hole/stringtransitionlarge-dimensionlimitthermalbackgroundradiation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a bound state of self-gravitating fundamental strings, described by winding strings around the Euclidean time circle (the Horowitz-Polchinski solution), can be written down in closed analytic form in two-dimensional dilaton gravity, and that its quantum-corrected version is also exactly solvable. The classical solution is controlled by one integration constant and splits into three interior geometries: singular, horizonless and regular, and horizon-bearing; the horizonless regular branch is the candidate for the surface of a large-dimension string star. In the RST model, an exactly solvable quantum-corrected version of the same gravity theory, the solution again takes closed form and acquires a background thermal flux whose temperature matches the winding-string temperature, in analogy to the thermal equilibrium vacuum around a black hole. If the construction holds, the black-hole/string transition becomes accessible to exact analytic study in this two-dimensional setting.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the first-order reduction of the equations of motion, Eqs. (2.39)-(2.41) in the classical theory and Eqs. (3.32)-(3.34) in the RST model: three ordinary differential equations whose consistency with the full equations is checked by differentiation. The integration is closed by using the winding string field $\chi$ itself as the spatial coordinate, which turns the equations into a single quadrature whose answer is the incomplete gamma function $\Gamma(-\alpha,\chi^2)$ with $\alpha=1/k$; the integration constant $C_0$ then classifies the interior geometry. In the RST model, the quantum-corrected field $\Omega=\Omega_0\chi^{-2\alpha}e^{-\chi^2}$ plays the role of $e^{-2\phi}$, and the fixed critical value $\Omega_c$ decides whether the singularity is naked or hidden behind a horizon.

What would settle it

Integrate the full static equations of motion (2.35)-(2.38) numerically from the flat asymptotic region with the same boundary conditions and compare the result with Eq. (2.53) for each sign of $C_0$; any discrepancy, or any static winding-string solution satisfying the full equations but not the first-order system, would show that the analytic expression is not the complete Horowitz-Polchinski solution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Eq. (2.53), $e^{2\tilde r_*}=\frac{\beta_H^2}{2\beta^2}e^{-2\phi_0}\left[\Gamma(-\alpha,\chi^2)+C_0\right]$, together with the companion expressions for the dilaton and conformal factor, is the full analytic Horowitz-Polchinski solution in two-dimensional dilaton gravity, replacing the previously numerical solution. The same incomplete-gamma-function integration works in the RST model, giving Eq. (3.46) in terms of the quantum field $\Omega$; the solution then has either a singularity at the critical value $\Omega=\Omega_c$ or a horizon that hides it, depending on $C_0$. The paper further claims that, just as the two-dimensional black hole is the near-horizon limit of a large-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole, this winding-string geometry is the near-surface limit of a large-dimensional self-gravitating string bound state. It also claims that the RST solution contains background radiation at the winding-string temperature, whose entropy is a volume integral of the flux term even in the horizonless branch.

Load-bearing premise

The physical identification of the two-dimensional solution with the near-surface geometry of a higher-dimensional string star depends on the large-dimension limit map, which was derived for the Schwarzschild near-horizon geometry and is assumed to extend to the Horowitz-Polchinski bound state; the paper itself notes that a central singularity could be hidden because the construction focuses only on the surface.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The analytic form makes the dependence of the geometry on the temperature $\beta$ and the integration constant $C_0$ explicit, so the singular, regular, and horizon branches can be studied directly from the formulas.
  • For $C_0<0$ the solution describes a black hole with winding-string hair whose entropy exceeds the bare black-hole entropy $2\Omega_h$.
  • For $C_0=0$ the spacetime is regular, horizonless, and has two spatial infinities, matching the expected surface of a self-gravitating string star in the large-dimension limit.
  • In the RST model the background flux contributes a volume entropy $S_{\rm flux}=\int dr_*\,4\pi\kappa/\beta$, so the total entropy separates into a string/black-hole surface part and a radiation part.
  • Because the equations are solved exactly without a weak-gravity expansion, the solution gives a controlled setting in which to study the string phase that a black hole enters at small string coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication not drawn in the paper: if the large-dimension map extends to the Horowitz-Polchinski bound state, the $C_0=0$ branch provides an exact blueprint for the string star's surface, and its two spatial infinities may correspond to interior and exterior regions whose matching the paper leaves implicit.
  • The paper does not settle whether the central singularity is physical; a natural next step would be to match the two-dimensional solution to a higher-dimensional interior and see whether the condition of a regular center selects a discrete value of $C_0$.
  • The thermal flux appears even in the horizonless branch, suggesting that the string star sits in a thermal equilibrium state; one could test this by computing correlation functions of the winding field in this background.
  • Since Eq. (2.53) is closed, local observables such as curvature, temperature, and entropy density can be derived from it and compared with a future numerical large-dimension Horowitz-Polchinski solution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies winding-string bound states (the Horowitz-Polchinski solution) in two-dimensional dilaton gravity. For the classical two-dimensional black hole background, the authors integrate a first-order system of equations taken from Brustein, Giveon, Itzhaki and Zigdon, and obtain a closed-form solution for the winding scalar χ, the dilaton ϕ, and the conformal factor ρ, Eqs. (2.50), (2.53), and (2.55). They classify the interior structure according to an integration constant C0 into singular, regular, and horizon-bearing branches. They then repeat the construction in the RST model, introducing an O(κ) modification of the winding-string effective action in Eq. (3.24), and obtain the analogous closed-form solution Eq. (3.46). They compute the on-shell action and entropy in the RST model, and claim that the solution contains background radiation at the same temperature as the winding strings, in analogy with the Hartle-Hawking vacuum. The paper also argues that the two-dimensional solution describes the near-surface geometry of a higher-dimensional self-gravitating string configuration in the large-dimension limit.

Significance. The paper provides explicit analytic solutions of a nonlinear system that had previously been treated numerically, and it is the first to present a Horowitz-Polchinski-type solution in the RST model with quantum corrections. The explicit formulas and the C0 classification are useful concrete data for the black-hole/string correspondence in a solvable toy model. The derivation of the on-shell action and entropy, including the observation that a volume-divergent term is interpretable as the entropy of a background flux, is a clear strength. However, the central physical claims—that Eq. (2.53) is 'the' complete analytic Horowitz-Polchinski solution, and that the RST solution possesses background radiation at exactly the winding-string temperature—are stronger than the derivation establishes, because the first-order reduction is assumed rather than proved, and the quantum modification of the winding action is chosen by hand.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2–2.3, Eqs. (2.39)–(2.41), (2.53)] The paper shows that any solution of the first-order system (2.39)–(2.41) solves the full equations of motion (2.35)–(2.38), but it does not show that every solution with the Horowitz-Polchinski boundary conditions lies on this first-order surface. The full system is second order and has more integration constants than the C0-labelled family. Consequently, Eq. (2.53) is a particular branch of solutions, and the abstract and §4 overstate the result when they call it the complete analytic Horowitz-Polchinski solution. Please either prove that the Horowitz-Polchinski boundary conditions select this branch, or explicitly restate the claim as 'an analytic solution on the first-order branch.'
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (3.24)] The O(κ) modification of the winding-string effective action in Eq. (3.24) is introduced by assumption, and every quantum-corrected result in Section 3—including the solution (3.46), the integration constants t± in Eq. (3.40), and the thermal-flux claim (3.72)–(3.74)—depends on this non-unique choice. The paper does not derive this modification from the worldsheet, from the RST symmetry, or from any consistency condition, and it does not assess how the results would change under a different O(κ) completion. This limitation should be acknowledged explicitly; otherwise the quantum-corrected geometry appears more model-independent than the construction warrants.
  3. [§3.4, Eqs. (3.72)–(3.74)] The claim that the solution contains background radiation at the winding-string temperature is partly definitional: β is the Euclidean period inserted into the winding-string action (2.29)/(3.24), and the entropy density relation s = β(ε + P) with T = 1/β is part of the thermodynamic definition. The result should therefore be presented as a consistency property of the chosen framework rather than an independent physical prediction. A stronger check would be to compute the stress tensor in a different vacuum or to compare with a probe calculation that does not use the first-order equations to fix t±.
  4. [§2.1 and §4] The interpretation of the two-dimensional solution as the near-surface geometry of a higher-dimensional self-gravitating string star relies on the large-dimension map (2.24)–(2.28), which is derived for the Schwarzschild near-horizon geometry. The extension to the Horowitz-Polchinski bound state is by analogy, and the paper itself concedes in §4 that focusing on the surface cannot detect a central singularity. The paper should clearly separate the exact toy-model result—a genuine solution of the 2D equations—from the conjectural dimensional lift, and should state whether the claimed large-D correspondence is a theorem, an ansatz, or an open question.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (2.58)] The integrand of the proper-distance integral is typeset ambiguously: the placement of the square root around Γ(−α, χ²)+C0 should be made explicit with brackets.
  2. [§4] There is a typo in the first paragraph of the discussion: 'Horiwitz-Polchinski' should be 'Horowitz-Polchinski.'
  3. [Fig. 1 and Fig. 2] The panels in Figures 1 and 2 are not individually labeled with their vertical-axis quantities in the captions; adding per-panel labels such as e^{2ρ}, χ, or Ω would make the classification easier to read.
  4. [§3.4, Eq. (3.74)] The entropy of the background flux, S_flux = ∫ dr* 4πκ/β, is infinite unless the spatial volume is regulated, but the regularization scheme (e.g., an IR cutoff) is not specified; a brief statement of the intended regularization would be helpful.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The analytic Horowitz-Polchinski solution is a genuine quadrature of an externally sourced first-order ansatz and no parameter is fitted, but the abstract's claim that the RST background radiation has the same temperature as the winding strings is partly definitional: the single parameter β fixes the winding period, the flux constants (3.40), and the thermodynamic reading s = β(ε+P), so that…

  1. self definitional [Sec. 3.4, Eqs. (3.40) and (3.72)-(3.74); claim restated in the Abstract and Sec. 4.]
    "(3.40) t+ = t− = −(β²_H/(8πβ))². The energy density of the background flux for our solution (3.40) is estimated as ε = 1/π e^{−ρ}(T++ + T−−) = 2πκ/β² e^{−ρ}. The entropy density is given by s = β(ε + P) = 2βε = 4πκ/β e^{−ρ}. Abstract: 'our string solution in the RST model contains the background radiation, whose temperature is the same as that of the winding strings.'"

    The equality of temperatures is partly definitional. In (2.29) β is introduced as 'the inverse temperature, or equivalently the period of the Euclidean time circle', so the winding-string temperature 1/β is an input. The flux identified as radiation is fixed by t+ = t− = −(β²_H/8πβ)² (3.40), obtained by imposing the constraint (3.39) on the first-order surface (3.32), whose coefficient contains this same β. The radiation temperature is then read off through the thermodynamic identity s = β(ε+P) (3.73) using that identical β, so 'the same temperature as that of the winding strings' is substantially the single parameter β circulating through the action, the ansatz, the constraint, and the thermodynamic relation.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The analytic solution (2.50), (2.53), (2.55) is obtained by integrating the first-order subsystem (2.39)-(2.41), imported from [16] (Brustein, Giveon, Itzhaki, Zigdon; different authors from the present paper, so not a self-citation) and re-verified here by direct substitution into (2.35)-(2.38); the output is a genuine quadrature in the incomplete gamma function, not a renaming or a fitted quantity. No parameter is fitted to any target: C0 and Ω0 are free integration constants whose sign classification (singular, regular, horizon) is a mathematical observation, not a curve fit. The RST construction rests on the explicitly announced action ansatz (3.24) and the first-order equations (3.32)-(3.34), which are assumptions verified by substitution; stated assumptions are not circularity, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work is invoked. The only substantially definitional element is the Sec. 3.4 temperature equality discussed in the step above, which motivates a score of 3 rather than 0. Two correctness caveats are noted but they are correctness risks, not circularity: (i) the paper proves only that every solution of (2.39)-(2.41) satisfies the full equations of motion, not that the Horowitz-Polchinski boundary conditions force the solution onto that first-order surface, so calling (2.53) 'the' complete solution is stronger than the derivation establishes; and (ii) the large-dimension map to the string-star surface is conceded in Sec. 4 to be an analogy ('there might be another possibility that the singularity cannot be seen because we focused only near the surface'). These gaps affect the strength of the claims, but no input is disguised as an output in the main derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, fields, or forces are introduced; the winding string field chi and the RST background flux are elements of the existing models. The central claim rests on the first-order reduction from [16], the ad hoc RST winding action, and the large-D interpretative map.

free parameters (3)
  • C0 = arbitrary integration constant (sign classifies solution)
    Appears in (2.53) and (3.46); C0 > 0 gives a singularity, C0 = 0 gives the regular classical solution, C0 < 0 gives a horizon. Not predicted by the theory.
  • Omega0 (classical e^(-2 phi0)) = arbitrary integration constant
    Sets the mass scale M through (3.60); a free scale of the solution family.
  • beta (inverse temperature) = input inverse temperature
    Euclidean time period in the winding-string action; the solution family is parametrized by it. Not determined by the equations.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The 2D dilaton-gravity action (2.1) is the target-space effective theory of the SL(2,R)_k/U(1) gauged WZW model
    Sec. 2.1-2.2; justifies using 2D geometry as a near-horizon large-D limit and introducing winding strings.
  • domain assumption The winding-string effective action (2.29) with mass term (beta^2 e^(2 rho) - beta_H^2) chi^2 captures near-Hagedorn string thermodynamics
    Sec. 2.2, from [16,32]; the central solution solves these equations of motion.
  • domain assumption The RST additions, anomaly term (3.4) and local counterterm (3.6), correctly encode quantum backreaction of massless matter
    Sec. 3.1; standard RST model.
  • ad hoc to paper The O(kappa) modified winding-string action (3.24) is the correct quantum effective action for winding strings in the RST model
    Sec. 3.2; introduced by assumption to keep the model solvable; not derived or compared to alternatives.
  • domain assumption The first-order systems (2.39)-(2.41) and (3.32)-(3.34) contain the physical self-gravitating string solutions
    Sec. 2.2 (from [16]) and Sec. 3.2; only the implication solution implies equations of motion is proven, not completeness.
  • standard math Standard properties of the incomplete gamma function Gamma(-alpha, x) used for asymptotics and classification
    Sec. 2.3, Eqs. (2.54), (2.59)-(2.60), (3.79).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-gravitating strings and quantum effects in two-dimensional gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OUUMWJV2

@misc{pith2026250609586,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-gravitating strings and quantum effects in two-dimensional gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OUUMWJV2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09586}
}
read the original abstract

It is expected that when the string coupling is taken to be sufficiently small, a black hole turns into a bound state of self-gravitating fundamental strings. This state would be described by winding strings wrapping around the Euclidean time circle, known as the Horowitz-Polchinski solution. In this paper, we study such a self-gravitating string configuration in two-dimensional dilaton gravity theories. We first derive an analytic expression of the solution describing a winding string in two-dimensions and investigate in detail the geometry of this solution. Our winding string solution in two dimensions describes the geometry near the surface of the bound state of self-gravitating strings in the large-dimension limit, much like a two-dimensional black hole describes the near horizon geometry of the Schwarzschild black hole in the large-dimension limit. To study quantum effects around self-gravitating strings, we obtain an analytic solution of winding strings in the RST model. In a similar fashion to the Hartle-Hawking vacuum around a black hole, our string solution in the RST model contains the background radiation, whose temperature is the same as that of the winding strings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09586 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Plots of classical solution e 2ρ and χ in the proper coordinate r and in the tortoise coordinate r∗. At a finite r, e 2ρ and χ diverges for C0 > 0, while e 2ρ goes to zero for C0 < 0. For C0 = 0, both Ω and χ are finite for finite r. In the tortoise coordinate, the divergence for C0 > 0 appears at finite r∗, while e 2ρ approaches zero in r∗ → −∞ for C0 ≤ 0. asymptotically flat, and the solution approaches the black … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plots of solution of Ω, e 2ρ and χ in the RST model. The geometry has a singularity when Ω takes the critical value, Ω = Ωc. In the proper coordinate r, solutions reach either the singularity Ω = Ωc or the horizon e 2ρ = 0 at finite r. In the tortoise coordinate r∗, Ω goes to zero at finite r∗ for C0 > 0 and asymptotes to its lower bound in r∗ → −∞ for C0 ≤ 0. The geometry has a singularity, if the lower bound is sm… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    A Puncture in the Euclidean Black Hole

    R. Brustein, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and Y. Zigdon, “A puncture in the Euclidean black hole,” JHEP 04 (2022), 021 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)021 [arXiv:2112.03048 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory,

    L. Susskind, “Some speculations about black hole entropy in string theory,” [arXiv:hep-th/9309145 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    Black Hole-String Correspondence

    L. Susskind, “Black Hole-String Correspondence,” [arXiv:2110.12617 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [3]

    Role of String Excitations in the Last Stages of Black Hole Evaporation,

    M. J. Bowick, L. Smolin and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, “Role of String Excitations in the Last Stages of Black Hole Evaporation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986), 424 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.424

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.424 1986

  5. [4]

    A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, “A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997), 6189-6197 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6189 [arXiv:hep-th/9612146 [hep-th]]. 25

    arXiv 1997

  6. [5]

    Selfgravitating fundamental strings,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, “Selfgravitating fundamental strings,” Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998), 2557-2563 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.2557 [arXiv:hep-th/9707170 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [6]

    Selfgravitating fundamental strings and black holes,

    T. Damour and G. Veneziano, “Selfgravitating fundamental strings and black holes,” Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000), 93-119 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00596-9 [arXiv:hep-th/9907030 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [7]

    Selfgravitating strings and string / black hole correspondence,

    R. R. Khuri, “Selfgravitating strings and string / black hole correspondence,” Phys. Lett. B 470 (1999), 73-76 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01265-4 [arXiv:hep- th/9910122 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 1999

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    Touring the Hagedorn ridge,

    J. L. F. Barbon and E. Rabinovici, “Touring the Hagedorn ridge,” doi:10.1142/9789812775344 0048 [arXiv:hep-th/0407236 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  2. [9]

    Fundamental strings and black holes,

    A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, “Fundamental strings and black holes,” JHEP 01 (2007), 071 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/01/071 [arXiv:hep-th/0611062 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  3. [10]

    On the Relevance of the Ther- mal Scalar,

    T. G. Mertens, H. Verschelde and V. I. Zakharov, “On the Relevance of the Ther- mal Scalar,” JHEP 11 (2014), 157 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)157 [arXiv:1408.7012 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Size scaling of self gravitating polymers and strings,

    S. Kawamoto and T. Matsuo, “Size scaling of self gravitating polymers and strings,” PTEP 2015 (2015) no.12, 123B02 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv165 [arXiv:1506.01160 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Effective field theory for closed strings near the Hagedorn temperature,

    R. Brustein and Y. Zigdon, “Effective field theory for closed strings near the Hagedorn temperature,” JHEP 04 (2021), 107 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)107 [arXiv:2101.07836 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [13]

    String scale black holes at large D,

    Y. Chen and J. Maldacena, “String scale black holes at large D,” JHEP 01 (2022), 095 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)095 [arXiv:2106.02169 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    On the black hole/string transition,

    Y. Chen, J. Maldacena and E. Witten, “On the black hole/string transition,” [arXiv:2109.08563 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Black holes as frozen stars,

    R. Brustein, A. J. M. Medved and T. Simhon, “Black holes as frozen stars,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.2, 024019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024019 [arXiv:2109.10017 [gr-qc]]. 26

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Thermal equilibrium in string theory in the Hagedorn phase,

    R. Brustein and Y. Zigdon, “Thermal equilibrium in string theory in the Hagedorn phase,” JHEP 05 (2022), 031 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2022)031 [arXiv:2201.03541 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Winding Tachyons and Stringy Black Holes,

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu and D. Kutasov, “Winding Tachyons and Stringy Black Holes,” [arXiv:2204.00012 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    On the entropy of strings and branes,

    R. Brustein and Y. Zigdon, “On the entropy of strings and branes,” JHEP 10 (2022), 112 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)112 [arXiv:2208.07372 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    On small black holes in string theory,

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu and D. Kutasov, “On small black holes in string theory,” JHEP 03 (2024), 116 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)116 [arXiv:2210.12033 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    The correspondence between rotating black holes and fundamental strings,

    N. ˇCeplak, R. Emparan, A. Puhm and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c, “The correspondence between rotating black holes and fundamental strings,” JHEP 11 (2023), 226 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)226 [arXiv:2307.03573 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Self gravitating spinning string condensates,

    J. E. Santos and Y. Zigdon, “Self gravitating spinning string condensates,” JHEP 07 (2024), 217 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)217 [arXiv:2403.20332 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    On string theory and black holes,

    E. Witten, “On string theory and black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991), 314-324 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.314

    1991 doi

  16. [24]

    Some global aspects of string compactifi- cations,

    S. Elitzur, A. Forge and E. Rabinovici, “Some global aspects of string compactifi- cations,” Nucl. Phys. B 359 (1991), 581-610 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90073-7

    1991 doi

  17. [25]

    Classical solutions of two-dimensional string theory,

    G. Mandal, A. M. Sengupta and S. R. Wadia, “Classical solutions of two-dimensional string theory,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991), 1685-1692 doi:10.1142/S0217732391001822

    1991 doi

  18. [26]

    String propagation in a black hole geometry,

    R. Dijkgraaf, H. L. Verlinde and E. P. Verlinde, “String propagation in a black hole geometry,” Nucl. Phys. B 371 (1992), 269-314 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90237-6

    1992 doi

  19. [27]

    Evanescent black holes,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., S. B. Giddings, J. A. Harvey and A. Strominger, “Evanescent black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) no.4, R1005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.R1005 [arXiv:hep-th/9111056 [hep-th]]. 27

    1992 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hierarchical dimensional reduction and gluing geometries,

    J. Soda, “Hierarchical dimensional reduction and gluing geometries,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 89, 1303-1310 (1993) doi:10.1143/PTP.89.1303

    1993 doi

  21. [29]

    Large-D gravity and low-D strings,

    R. Emparan, D. Grumiller and K. Tanabe, “Large-D gravity and low-D strings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no.25, 251102 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.251102 [arXiv:1303.1995 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    The Endpoint of Hawking radiation,

    J. G. Russo, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, “The Endpoint of Hawking radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992), 3444-3449 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.3444 [arXiv:hep- th/9206070 [hep-th]]

    1992

  23. [31]

    Liouville models of black hole evaporation,

    A. Bilal and C. G. Callan, Jr., “Liouville models of black hole evaporation,” Nucl. Phys. B 394 (1993), 73-100 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90102-U [arXiv:hep- th/9205089 [hep-th]]

    1993

  24. [32]

    The Hagedorn Transition and the Number of Degrees of Freedom of String Theory,

    J. J. Atick and E. Witten, “The Hagedorn Transition and the Number of Degrees of Freedom of String Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 310 (1988), 291-334 doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(88)90151-4 28

    1988 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.