Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.10200 v2 pith:OVWLEG6M submitted 2020-05-20 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords bertweetenglishlanguagemodelpre-trainedtweettweetsapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present BERTweet, the first public large-scale pre-trained language model for English Tweets. Our BERTweet, having the same architecture as BERT-base (Devlin et al., 2019), is trained using the RoBERTa pre-training procedure (Liu et al., 2019). Experiments show that BERTweet outperforms strong baselines RoBERTa-base and XLM-R-base (Conneau et al., 2020), producing better performance results than the previous state-of-the-art models on three Tweet NLP tasks: Part-of-speech tagging, Named-entity recognition and text classification. We release BERTweet under the MIT License to facilitate future research and applications on Tweet data. Our BERTweet is available at https://github.com/VinAIResearch/BERTweet

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Psychology-driven LLM Agents for Explainable Panic Prediction on Social Media during Sudden Disaster Events

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    PsychoAgent claims to predict individual panic during disasters by simulating psychological chains with LLMs, but its evaluation is weakened by selective screening and a circular BERT verification loop.

  2. Involvement drives complexity of language in online debates

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Influential Twitter users who are more partisan, negative, or offensive tend to use more lexically complex language, but the causal claim that involvement drives complexity is not supported.

Pith tools