Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Thermal-environment measurements can restore charge lost by a quantum battery, and the amount recovered is set by the entanglement the battery forms with a reference system.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 00:34 UTC pith:OWBQAIYP

load-bearing objection Pure-state charge-retrieval gap is clean and new; the mixed-state Corollary 1 is asserted without proof and is the load-bearing weakness. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.00483 v2 pith:OWBQAIYP submitted 2025-11-01 quant-ph

Lost and found charge in quantum batteries

Debanjan Dey Sarkar , Mallika Mondal , Preeti Parashar , Tamal Guha This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantum batteriesthermal operationscharge retrievalenvironment assistanceentanglement of formationfree energythermal purificationquantum thermodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Quantum batteries inevitably lose free energy when they interact with a thermal environment. This paper shows that the loss is not permanent: if an agent measures the environmental particle that participated in the interaction (weak assistance), part of the leaked charge can be retrieved; if the agent additionally measures a reference system that purifies the thermal bath (strong assistance), a pure battery can have its full post-interaction energy restored. The central claim is quantitative: the gap between strong and weak retrieval equals (1/β) times the entanglement of formation generated by the thermal operation between the battery and the reference system, saturating for pure initial battery states. The result turns the apparently useless thermal environment into a resource for charge recovery and makes the entanglement created during decoherence operationally visible.

Core claim

For any quantum battery ρs and any thermal operation Λβ, the paper proves that Wstrong(ρs,Λβ) − Wweak(ρs,Λβ) ≥ (1/β) Ef(σsR), where σsR is the joint state of the battery and the reference R that purifies the thermal bath, and Ef is the entanglement of formation. For pure batteries the inequality saturates: Theorem 2 gives Wstrong = E(σs) and Theorem 1 gives Wweak = E(σs) − (1/β) Ef(σsR). Thus the shortfall of one-measurement assistance is exactly the entanglement the battery creates with the inaccessible purification, and strong assistance lifts the bound, achieving the maximum possible charge retrieval for pure states.

What carries the argument

The key construction is the isometric extension VΛβ built from the energy-preserving system-bath unitary and the canonical purification |φ+β⟩bR of the thermal bath. This isometry maps the battery into a tripartite system-bath-reference state. The argument then pivots on a lemma that equates the minimal average conditional entropy at the battery, optimized over all POVMs on the bath, with the entanglement of formation Ef(σsRR′) of the battery's reduced state with a purification; for pure batteries this reduces to Ef(σsR). The strong-assistance bound is achieved by measuring b and R in product bases that collapse the battery to pure states, giving Wstrong = Tr(σs Hs).

Load-bearing premise

The strong-assistance protocol assumes the purifying reference R of the thermal bath can be measured without thermodynamic cost; for a real bath that purification is usually an unphysical mathematical object, so without it strong retrieval is an idealization and the 'retrieved charge' would shrink once measurement work is accounted for.

What would settle it

Prepare a qubit battery in a pure state |ψ⟩=a|0⟩+b|1⟩, couple it to a qubit thermal bath via the α=1 unitary of the paper (a controlled-phase gate), and implement the optimal weak and strong measurement protocols. The paper predicts Wweak = Wstrong = |b|² for all pure states, so the gap is zero. If a measurement on the reference R yields a nonzero gap, or if the retrieved energy differs from |b|², the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Quantum battery discharge is not fatal: after a finite thermal interaction, a measurement on the interacting bath particle can recover a measured fraction of the lost free energy.
  • With access to the purifying reference, pure quantum batteries can be fully 'recharged' to the total energy of the post-interaction state, not merely its free energy.
  • The gap Δ between strong and weak retrieval is an operational witness of entanglement generated by a thermal operation; measuring both protocols yields a lower bound on Ef(σsR).
  • For a full thermalization map (which sends every state to the thermal state), weak assistance retrieves nothing while strong assistance retrieves the thermal state's energy — an extreme activation gap.
  • At absolute zero, the purification factorizes and the gap vanishes, so strong and weak assistance coincide.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reference R is not physically accessible — as is usually the case for a real thermal bath — Wstrong should be read as an idealized upper bound; an experimental implementation would need a concrete ancilla preparation, whose energy cost would reduce the net retrieved charge. This suggests a modified 'net strong retrieval' quantity the paper leaves implicit.
  • The same isometric-extension logic might assign a thermodynamic value to information obtained from the environment in other open-system tasks, such as quantum process tomography or channel correction, turning the entanglement gap into a general resource currency.
  • The saturation of Corollary 1 for pure batteries could be used as a calibration tool: the measured gap directly gives (1/β) Ef(σsR), so a state-tomography-free estimate of entanglement of formation in a thermal interaction becomes possible.
  • For mixed initial states the gap is only lower-bounded by the entanglement term; exploring how much the gap exceeds Ef(σsR) across temperature and interaction parameters would sharpen the theorem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a resource-theoretic model in which a quantum battery loses free energy to a thermal bath under a thermal operation. It defines 'weak assistance' as optimizing a POVM on the bath qudit after the interaction, and 'strong assistance' as optimizing product POVMs on the bath and on the reference system R that purifies the bath. The main claims are: Proposition 1 bounds weak and strong retrieved free energy; Theorem 1 bounds weak retrieval by E(σs) − (1/β)Ef(σsR), with saturation for pure initial states; Theorem 2 states that for pure batteries strong retrieval reaches E(σs); and Corollary 1 concludes that Δ = Wstrong − Wweak ≥ (1/β)Ef(σsR), with saturation for pure batteries. A qubit-battery analysis (Proposition 2 and Appendix F) is offered to illustrate the gap.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper gives an operational interpretation of the entanglement of formation generated between a battery and the reference purification during thermalization, connecting battery physics with quantum-information measures. Strengths are that the main inequalities are derived from standard resource-theoretic ingredients (free energy, thermal operations, GHJW), and the pure-state saturation argument is coherent. However, the headline Corollary 1 is currently unproved for mixed states, and the qubit structural result is narrower than stated, so the paper needs revision before its central claims can be relied upon.

major comments (3)
  1. [Corollary 1 (after Theorem 2)] The headline lower bound Δ ≥ (1/β)Ef(σsR) is not proved for mixed batteries. Theorem 1/Appendix B gives Wweak = E(σs) − (1/β)Ef(σsRR′) exactly, with monotonicity to Ef(σsR); Theorem 2/Appendix C gives Wstrong = E(σs) only for pure ρs and, for mixed ρs, only the upper bound Wstrong ≤ E(σs) − (1/β)Ef(σsR′). Combining these bounds does not produce Δ ≥ (1/β)Ef(σsR); it requires a nontrivial relation between the conditional entropy minimized over product measurements on bR and the entanglement of formation quantities. This relation is neither stated nor derived. Please supply a proof of Corollary 1, or explicitly restrict it to pure initial batteries.
  2. [Proposition 2 and Appendix E, Eq. (10)] The claim that 'any qubit thermal operation' admits the isometric form of Eq. (10) is not established. Appendix E derives this form under the assumptions Hs = Hb, non-degenerate qubit Hamiltonians, and a single-qubit bath. General thermal operations on a qubit system may use a multi-level bath; even for a qubit bath, the action of the energy-preserving unitary is not forced to be that of Eq. (10) unless the only degenerate total-energy subspace is spanned by |0s1b⟩ and |1s0b⟩ and the diagonal basis vectors are invariant. The proposition overstates its scope and is used to claim the extreme cases in Appendix F are exhaustive. Please either prove the general form or explicitly restrict Proposition 2 and the qubit analysis to the stated special case.
  3. [Protocol assumptions: measurement costs and access to R] The strong-assistance protocol assumes that the reference system R purifying the thermal bath can be accessed and measured, and that all measurements are cost-free in the free-energy accounting. In a standard open-system setting the purification of a thermal bath is not an accessible physical system, and feedback/erasure costs can change the net retrievable charge. This does not invalidate the mathematics, but it should be stated clearly as an idealization limiting the operational interpretation of Wstrong and of Corollary 1.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text before Theorem 2] The sentence 'Note that Proposition 2 identifies an upper-bound for it' appears to be a cross-reference error: the upper bound for Wstrong was identified in Proposition 1 (and the weak upper bound in Theorem 1). Proposition 2, which appears later, is about the isometric form, not an upper bound.
  2. [Title and abstract] 'loosing' should be 'losing'.
  3. [Theorem 3 and Case 1] The notation Ef(σs|RR′) is confusing; elsewhere the paper writes Ef(σsRR′) for entanglement of formation across the s|RR′ bipartition. Please make the bipartition explicit consistently.
  4. [Theorem 3(i)] The phrase 'activation of charge retrieval' is not defined; the statement says strong assistance can recover E(τβ) for a thermal map, but it is unclear what is being 'activated' relative to known results. Please define the term or rephrase.
  5. [Appendix D, Lemma 4] The proof uses a 'non-signaling constraint' without specifying which parties are non-signaling. This should be stated explicitly, since the argument appears to use that the reference marginal is unaffected by the choice of input state.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Central derivation is self-contained; self-citations are non-load-bearing. The unproven mixed-state Corollary 1 is a proof gap, not a circularity.

full rationale

The main quantitative results are derived from the definitions and from standard external facts. Equations (11) and (15) rewrite the assisted retrieval functionals as E(σs) − β^{-1} times a minimized average conditional entropy; this is just expansion of the free-energy definition, not a fitted input. Lemma 2, which identifies the minimized average conditional entropy with entanglement of formation, uses the standard GHJW/Hughston-Jozsa-Wootters and Wootters results; it is external and not imported from the authors' own prior work. Theorem 1 then follows by applying Lemma 2 and monotonicity of Ef under partial trace, giving the stated upper bound. Theorem 2 is derived constructively: for a pure battery, a product POVM on the bath and reference collapses the battery to pure states, so Wstrong = E(σs). The claimed Corollary 1 for arbitrary mixed batteries is not actually derived from Theorems 1 and 2: those theorems supply only an upper bound on Wweak and a pure-state value for Wstrong, so a mixed-state lower bound on Δ would require an additional argument. That is a mathematical gap or possible error, not an instance of a result being equivalent to its own input by construction. The self-citations ([32], [35], [44], [51], [62]) appear in background/discussion contexts and do not carry any load-bearing proof step. Thus, while the mixed-state corollary is under-supported, the derivation chain is not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central theorems are parameter-free; no numbers are fitted to data. The main auxiliary assumptions are standard resource-theoretic modeling choices plus the GHJW equivalence. The least supported item is Proposition 2's universality claim for qubit thermal operations; it is used for the illustrative example rather than the central theorems.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption β-thermal operations admit a Stinespring dilation with an energy-preserving unitary and a thermal bath state (Eq. (2)).
    Standard resource-theory model of thermal operations; this is the starting point for the whole discharge/channel framework.
  • domain assumption The thermal bath state can be purified by a reference R with locally thermal marginals (Eq. (3)).
    Underlies the isometric extension and the definition of strong assistance; physical accessibility of R is not addressed.
  • domain assumption Measurements on the bath and reference are cost-free, and the average post-measurement free energy counts as retrieved charge (Definitions 1–2).
    No measurement work, erasure cost, or feedback cost is subtracted; without this the W values are not net retrieval.
  • standard math Every pure decomposition of the relevant reduced state is realizable by a rank-one POVM on the complementary system (Lemma 2 / GHJW).
    Powers the exact evaluation of Wweak in terms of Ef(σsRR') and is used throughout the proofs.
  • domain assumption For completely non-degenerate Hs=Hb, an energy-preserving unitary that induces a thermal map is essentially the SWAP operation (Lemma 4).
    Used for Theorem 3(i); relies on complete non-degeneracy and the uniqueness argument in Appendix D.
  • ad hoc to paper Every qubit thermal operation is representable by the single-qubit-bath isometry of Eq. (10) with one U(2) parameter family.
    Used for the explicit qubit examples; the proof parameterizes one two-qubit unitary and does not demonstrate coverage of all thermal operations beyond that setting.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 16201 in / 33172 out tokens · 357751 ms · 2026-08-04T00:34:28.575886+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lost and found charge in quantum batteries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OWBQAIYP

@misc{pith2026251100483,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lost and found charge in quantum batteries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OWBQAIYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.00483}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Quantum batteries are prone to losing their stored charge, when interacting with a thermal environment. However, getting a limited assistance from the thermal environment, is it possible to recover the charge back, in a reusable form? Here, we answer this question, by involving an assistance of a suitable measurement performed on the environment. This framework resembles the structure of quantum instruments in the thermodynamic scenario. Our proposed framework involves two different kind of assistance from thermal environment - one by accessing only the thermal particle, actively participating in the interaction, providing a weak retrieval of charge, while the other involves local assistance from an additional quantum system purifying the thermal environment, resulting in the strong retrieval of the lost charges. By setting the upper-bound on the amount of charges retrieved in each of these two situations, we report that their difference characterizes the amount of entanglement generated between the quantum battery and the reference system due to the thermal interaction. Finally, we exemplify the extreme instances of the difference between the weak and the strongly retrieved charges for qubit batteries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.00483 by Debanjan Dey Sarkar, Mallika Mondal, Preeti Parashar, Tamal Guha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Color online) A schematic diagram of charge re￾trieval in a quantum battery, assisted by the thermal envir￾onment. (a) The free energetic charge stored in a quantum battery inevitably degraded due to the interaction with a thermal environment of inverse temperature β. (b) Retrieval of the lost charge in the QB under weak assistance. Here the agent using the QB classically aided by the information extracte… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Demultiplexing Generalized Information via Quantum Transmission Lines

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces and characterizes quantum demultiplexers (Q-DEMUX) for perfect routing of classical and quantum information, with a link to quantum instrument incompatibility and an oblivious-sender variant.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Thermodynamical proof of the gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems,

    Andrew Lenard, “Thermodynamical proof of the gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems,” Journal of Statistical Physics19, 575–586 (1978)

    1978

  2. [2]

    Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechan- ics,

    Sandu Popescu, Anthony J Short, and Andreas Winter, “Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechan- ics,” Nature Physics2, 754–758 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation the- orems, and counting statistics in quantum systems,

    Massimiliano Esposito, Upendra Harbola, and Shaul Mukamel, “Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation the- orems, and counting statistics in quantum systems,” Re- views of modern physics81, 1665–1702 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    Resource theory of quantum states out of thermal equi- librium,

    Fernando GSL Brandao, Michał Horodecki, Jonathan Oppenheim, Joseph M Renes, and Robert W Spekkens, “Resource theory of quantum states out of thermal equi- librium,” Physical Review Letters111, 250404 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    Funda- mental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermody- namics,

    Michał Horodecki and Jonathan Oppenheim, “Funda- mental limitations for quantum and nanoscale thermody- namics,” Nature communications4, 2059 (2013)

    2059

  6. [6]

    The role of quantum information in thermodynamics—a topical review,

    John Goold, Marcus Huber, Arnau Riera, Lídia Del Rio, and Paul Skrzypczyk, “The role of quantum information in thermodynamics—a topical review,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49, 143001 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    How small can thermal machines be? the smallest pos- sible refrigerator,

    Noah Linden, Sandu Popescu, and Paul Skrzypczyk, “How small can thermal machines be? the smallest pos- sible refrigerator,” Physical Review Letters105, 130401 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Quantum effects improve the energy efficiency of feedback control,

    Jordan M Horowitz and Kurt Jacobs, “Quantum effects improve the energy efficiency of feedback control,” Phys- ical Review E89, 042134 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Experimental demonstration of quantum effects in the operation of microscopic heat engines,

    James Klatzow, Jonas N Becker, Patrick M Led- ingham, Christian Weinzetl, Krzysztof T Kaczmarek, Dylan J Saunders, Joshua Nunn, Ian A Walmsley, Raam Uzdin, and Eilon Poem, “Experimental demonstration of quantum effects in the operation of microscopic heat engines,” Physical Review Letters122, 110601 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Quantum thermal absorption ma- chines: refrigerators, engines and clocks,

    Mark T Mitchison, “Quantum thermal absorption ma- chines: refrigerators, engines and clocks,” Contemporary Physics60, 164–187 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Quantum thermal machines: a simple scheme with realistic bath modelling,

    Felipe Barra, “Quantum thermal machines: a simple scheme with realistic bath modelling,” Quantum Views6, 68 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batter- ies,

    Robert Alicki and Mark Fannes, “Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batter- ies,” Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics87, 042123 (2013)

    2013

  13. [13]

    Quantum thermodynamics of general quantum processes,

    Felix Binder, Sai Vinjanampathy, Kavan Modi, and John Goold, “Quantum thermodynamics of general quantum processes,” Physical Review E91, 032119 (2015)

    2015

  14. [14]

    Colloquium: quantum batteries,

    Francesco Campaioli, Stefano Gherardini, James Q Quach, Marco Polini, and Gian Marcello Andolina, “Colloquium: quantum batteries,” Reviews of Modern Physics96, 031001 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Enhancing the charging power of quantum batter- ies,

    Francesco Campaioli, Felix A Pollock, Felix C Binder, Lu- cas Céleri, John Goold, Sai Vinjanampathy, and Kavan Modi, “Enhancing the charging power of quantum batter- ies,” Physical Review Letters118, 150601 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    High-power collect- ive charging of a solid-state quantum battery,

    Dario Ferraro, Michele Campisi, Gian Marcello Andolina, 6 Vittorio Pellegrini, and Marco Polini, “High-power collect- ive charging of a solid-state quantum battery,” Physical Review Letters120, 117702 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    Dissipative charging of a quantum battery,

    Felipe Barra, “Dissipative charging of a quantum battery,” Physical Review Letters122, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Ultrafast charging in a two-photon dicke quantum battery,

    Alba Crescente, Matteo Carrega, Maura Sassetti, and Dario Ferraro, “Ultrafast charging in a two-photon dicke quantum battery,” Physical Review B102, 245407 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Quantum battery based on superabsorption,

    Yudai Ueki, Shunsuke Kamimura, Yuichiro Matsuzaki, Kyo Yoshida, and Yasuhiro Tokura, “Quantum battery based on superabsorption,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan91, 124002 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Large collective power enhancement in dissipative charging of a quantum battery,

    Sagar Pokhrel and Julio Gea-Banacloche, “Large collective power enhancement in dissipative charging of a quantum battery,” Physical Review Letters134, 130401 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Dephasing enabled fast charging of quantum batteries,

    Rahul Shastri, Chao Jiang, Guo-Hua Xu, B Prasanna Ven- katesh, and Gentaro Watanabe, “Dephasing enabled fast charging of quantum batteries,” npj Quantum Information 11, 9 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Extractable work, therole ofcorrelations, andasymptotic freedom in quantum batteries,

    Gian Marcello Andolina, Maximilian Keck, Andrea Mari, Michele Campisi, Vittorio Giovannetti, and Marco Polini, “Extractable work, therole ofcorrelations, andasymptotic freedom in quantum batteries,” Physical Review Letters 122, 047702 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Entanglement, coherence, and extract- able work in quantum batteries,

    Hai-Long Shi, Shu Ding, Qing-Kun Wan, Xiao-Hui Wang, and Wen-Li Yang, “Entanglement, coherence, and extract- able work in quantum batteries,” Physical Review Letters 129, 130602 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Topological quantum batteries,

    Zhi-Guang Lu, Guoqing Tian, Xin-You Lü, and Cheng Shang, “Topological quantum batteries,” Physical Review Letters134, 180401 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Precision and work fluctuations in gaussian battery charging,

    Nicolai Friis and Marcus Huber, “Precision and work fluctuations in gaussian battery charging,” Quantum2, 61 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Bounds on the capacity and power of quantum batteries,

    Sergi Julià-Farré, Tymoteusz Salamon, Arnau Riera, Man- abendra N Bera, and Maciej Lewenstein, “Bounds on the capacity and power of quantum batteries,” Physical Review Research2, 023113 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    Lower and upper bounds of quantum battery power in multiple central spin systems,

    Li Peng, Wen-Bin He, Stefano Chesi, Hai-Qing Lin, and Xi-Wen Guan, “Lower and upper bounds of quantum battery power in multiple central spin systems,” Physical Review A103, 052220 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Quantum work capacitances: Ul- timate limits for energy extraction on noisy quantum batteries,

    Salvatore Tirone, Raffaele Salvia, Stefano Chessa, and Vittorio Giovannetti, “Quantum work capacitances: Ul- timate limits for energy extraction on noisy quantum batteries,” SciPost Physics17, 041 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    The change in quantum battery capacity under local pauli noise,

    Guoji Bai, Helin Gong, and Bo Li, “The change in quantum battery capacity under local pauli noise,” The European Physical Journal Plus139, 1–10 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Work extraction and thermodynamics for individual quantum systems,

    Paul Skrzypczyk, Anthony J Short, and Sandu Popescu, “Work extraction and thermodynamics for individual quantum systems,” Nature communications5, 4185 (2014)

    2014

  31. [31]

    Assisted work distillation,

    Benjamin Morris, Ludovico Lami, and Gerardo Adesso, “Assisted work distillation,” Physical Review Letters122, 130601 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Thermodynamic advancement in the causally insepar- able occurrence of thermal maps,

    Tamal Guha, Mir Alimuddin, and Preeti Parashar, “Thermodynamic advancement in the causally insepar- able occurrence of thermal maps,” Physical Review A 102, 032215 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems,

    Allahverdyan, A. E., Balian, R., and Nieuwenhuizen, Th. M., “Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems,” Europhys. Lett.67, 565–571 (2004)

    2004

  34. [34]

    Extended local ergotropy,

    Riccardo Castellano, Donato Farina, Vittorio Giovannetti, and Antonio Acin, “Extended local ergotropy,” Physical Review Letters133, 150402 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Operational ergotropy: suboptimality of the geodesic drive,

    Pritam Halder, Srijon Ghosh, Saptarshi Roy, and Tamal Guha, “Operational ergotropy: suboptimality of the geodesic drive,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05956 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    A resource theory of activity for quantum thermodynamics in the absence of heat baths,

    Swati, U Singh, and G Chiribella, “A resource theory of activity for quantum thermodynamics in the absence of heat baths,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08926 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Quantum lost and found,

    Matteo Gregoratti and Reinhard F Werner, “Quantum lost and found,” Journal of Modern Optics50, 915–933 (2003)

    2003

  38. [38]

    Correcting quantum channels by measuring the environment,

    Patrick Hayden and Christopher King, “Correcting quantum channels by measuring the environment,” Quant. Info. Comp.5, 156 (2005)

    2005

  39. [39]

    Classical capacities of quantum channels with environment assistance,

    Siddharth Karumanchi, Stefano Mancini, Andreas Winter, and Dong Yang, “Classical capacities of quantum channels with environment assistance,” Problems of Information Transmission52, 214–238 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Quantumchannelcapacitieswithpassive environment assistance,

    Siddharth Karumanchi, Stefano Mancini, Andreas Winter, andDongYang,“Quantumchannelcapacitieswithpassive environment assistance,” IEEE Transactions on Informa- tion Theory62, 1733–1747 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Capacities of gaussian quantum channels with passive environment assistance,

    Samad Khabbazi Oskouei, Stefano Mancini, and Andreas Winter, “Capacities of gaussian quantum channels with passive environment assistance,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory68, 339–358 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Quantum state recovery via environment-assisted meas- urement and weak measurement,

    Sajede Harraz, Shuang Cong, and Juan J Nieto, “Quantum state recovery via environment-assisted meas- urement and weak measurement,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics61, 140 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    High-fidelity quantum teleportation through noisy chan- nels via weak measurement and environment-assisted measurement,

    Sajede Harraz, Jiao-Yang Zhang, and Shuang Cong, “High-fidelity quantum teleportation through noisy chan- nels via weak measurement and environment-assisted measurement,” Results in Physics55, 107164 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Minimal help, maximal gain: Environmental assistance unlocks en- coding strength,

    Snehasish Roy Chowdhury, Sutapa Saha, Subhendu B Ghosh, Ranendu Adhikary, and Tamal Guha, “Minimal help, maximal gain: Environmental assistance unlocks en- coding strength,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.09340 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Environment-assisted bosonic quantum communications,

    Stefano Pirandola, Carlo Ottaviani, Christian S Jacobsen, Gaetana Spedalieri, Samuel L Braunstein, Tobias Gehring, and Ulrik L Andersen, “Environment-assisted bosonic quantum communications,” npj Quantum Information7, 77 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Entanglement-enhanced information transmission over a quantum channel with correlated noise,

    Chiara Macchiavello and G Massimo Palma, “Entanglement-enhanced information transmission over a quantum channel with correlated noise,” Physical Review A65, 050301 (2002)

    2002

  47. [47]

    Quantum channels with a finite memory,

    Garry Bowen and Stefano Mancini, “Quantum channels with a finite memory,” Physical Review A69, 012306 (2004)

    2004

  48. [48]

    Exploiting entanglement in communication channels with correlated noise,

    Jonathan Ball, Andrzej Dragan, and Konrad Banaszek, “Exploiting entanglement in communication channels with correlated noise,” Physical Review A69, 042324 (2004)

    2004

  49. [49]

    Experimental demonstration of entanglement-enhanced classical communication over a quantum channel with correlated noise,

    Konrad Banaszek, Andrzej Dragan, Wojciech Wasilewski, and Czesław Radzewicz, “Experimental demonstration of entanglement-enhanced classical communication over a quantum channel with correlated noise,” Physical Review Letters92, 257901 (2004)

    2004

  50. [50]

    Quantum shan- non theory with superpositions of trajectories,

    Giulio Chiribella and Hlér Kristjánsson, “Quantum shan- non theory with superpositions of trajectories,” Proceed- ings of the Royal Society A475, 20180903 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Quantum networks boosted by entanglement with a con- trol system,

    Tamal Guha, Saptarshi Roy, and Giulio Chiribella, “Quantum networks boosted by entanglement with a con- trol system,” Physical Review Research5, 033214 (2023). 7

    2023

  52. [52]

    Quick charging of a quantum battery with superposed trajectories,

    Po-Rong Lai, Jhen-Dong Lin, Yi-Te Huang, Hsien-Chao Jan, and Yueh-Nan Chen, “Quick charging of a quantum battery with superposed trajectories,” Physical Review Research6, 023136 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Interference between lossy quantum evolutions activates information backflow,

    Sutapa Saha and Ujjwal Sen, “Interference between lossy quantum evolutions activates information backflow,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.22150 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Experimental quantum communic- ation enhancement by superposing trajectories,

    Giulia Rubino, Lee A Rozema, Daniel Ebler, Hlér Kristjánsson, Sina Salek, Philippe Allard Guérin, Alastair A Abbott, Cyril Branciard, Časlav Brukner, Gi- ulio Chiribella,et al., “Experimental quantum communic- ation enhancement by superposing trajectories,” Physical Review Research3, 013093 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    On quantum error- correction by classical feedback in discrete time,

    M Gregoratti and RF Werner, “On quantum error- correction by classical feedback in discrete time,” Journal of Mathematical Physics45, 2600–2612 (2004)

    2004

  56. [56]

    On environment-assisted capacities of quantum channels,

    Andreas Winter, “On environment-assisted capacities of quantum channels,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0507045 (2005)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Resources of the quantum world,

    Gilad Gour, “Resources of the quantum world,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05474 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,

    William K Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Physical Review Letters 80, 2245 (1998)

    1998

  59. [59]

    Limits for entanglement measures,

    Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, and Ryszard Horo- decki, “Limits for entanglement measures,” Physical Re- view Letters84, 2014 (2000)

    2014

  60. [60]

    Daemonic ergotropy: enhanced work extraction from quantum correlations,

    Gianluca Francica, John Goold, Francesco Plastina, and Mauro Paternostro, “Daemonic ergotropy: enhanced work extraction from quantum correlations,” npj Quantum Information3, 12 (2017)

    2017

  61. [61]

    Work extraction from coherently activated maps via quantum switch,

    Kyrylo Simonov, Gianluca Francica, Giacomo Guarnieri, and Mauro Paternostro, “Work extraction from coherently activated maps via quantum switch,” Physical Review A 105, 032217 (2022)

    2022

  62. [62]

    Activation of thermal states by coherently controlled thermalization processes,

    Kyrylo Simonov, Saptarshi Roy, Tamal Guha, Zoltán Zimborás, and Giulio Chiribella, “Activation of thermal states by coherently controlled thermalization processes,” New Journal of Physics27(2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    Quantum thermodynamic advantage in work ex- traction from steerable quantum correlations,

    Tanmoy Biswas, Chandan Datta, and Luis Pedro García- Pintos, “Quantum thermodynamic advantage in work ex- traction from steerable quantum correlations,” Physical Review Letters135, 110402 (2025)

    2025

  64. [64]

    Stochastic quantum dynamics and relativ- ity,

    Nicolas Gisin, “Stochastic quantum dynamics and relativ- ity,” Helv. Phys. Acta62, 363–371 (1989)

    1989

  65. [65]

    A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix,

    Lane P Hughston, Richard Jozsa, and William K Woot- ters, “A complete classification of quantum ensembles having a given density matrix,” Physics Letters A183, 14–18 (1993)

    1993

  66. [66]

    Necessary and suffi- cient quantum information characterization of einstein- podolsky-rosen steering,

    Marco Piani and John Watrous, “Necessary and suffi- cient quantum information characterization of einstein- podolsky-rosen steering,” Physical Review Letters114, 060404 (2015). APPENDIX A. Proof of Proposition 1 Let us recall the expression ofWweak(ρs, Λβ)in Defini- tion 1, Wweak(ρs,Λ β) = max {Πk b } X k pkFβ(σs|k) = max {Πk b } X k pk[Tr(Hsσs|k)− 1 β S(...

    2015

  67. [67]

    Proof of part (i) We begin with the following two Lemmas. While Lemma 3 is simple, we will find a nontrivial implication of it in Lemma 4, in the question of identifying the Stine- spring representation of a thermal mapΛβ(ρs) = τ s β,∀ρ s, uniquely. Lemma 3.Consider any N-partite pure quantum state |ψ⟩A1···AN , with the iso-spectral marginals forA1,· · ·,...

  68. [68]

    (3) the purified environment is simply |ϕ+ ∞⟩bR = |0⟩b ⊗ |0⟩R, by rescal- ing E0 = 0

    Proof of part (ii) When the thermal environment is of absolute zero tem- perature, that is,β→ ∞, then using Eq. (3) the purified environment is simply |ϕ+ ∞⟩bR = |0⟩b ⊗ |0⟩R, by rescal- ing E0 = 0. Note that, the complete non-degeneracy of Hs = Hb indeed confirms that the purified environment must be of the product form. Then for any unitaryUsb on the QB-...

  69. [69]

    For α = 0, the action ofVΛβ on an arbitrary pure qubit battery as in Eq

    Case 1. For α = 0, the action ofVΛβ on an arbitrary pure qubit battery as in Eq. (28), can be rewritten as VΛβ (a|0⟩+b|1)⟩ → 1√ Z (|00⟩+e − β 2 |11⟩)sR ⊗(a|0⟩+b|1⟩) b Now under the weak assistance, any POVM performed on the bath qubit has no implication on the QB itself. Therefore, the amount of charge retrieved under weak assistance is simply Wweak(|ψ⟩,Λ...

  70. [70]

    For α = 1, the action of VΛβ on a pure QB |ψ⟩ = a|0⟩+b|1⟩, will take the form VΛβ (a|0⟩+b|1⟩)→a|0⟩ s ⊗ |ϕ+ β ⟩bR −b|1⟩ s ⊗ |ϕ− β ⟩bR = 1√ Z (|ξ⟩s ⊗ |00⟩bR +e − β 2 |ψ⟩s ⊗ |11⟩bR)

    Case 2. For α = 1, the action of VΛβ on a pure QB |ψ⟩ = a|0⟩+b|1⟩, will take the form VΛβ (a|0⟩+b|1⟩)→a|0⟩ s ⊗ |ϕ+ β ⟩bR −b|1⟩ s ⊗ |ϕ− β ⟩bR = 1√ Z (|ξ⟩s ⊗ |00⟩bR +e − β 2 |ψ⟩s ⊗ |11⟩bR). (29) where,|ξ⟩=a|0⟩ −b|1⟩. Evidently, from Eq. (29), it is clear that Wweak(|ψ⟩,Λ β) =W strong(|ψ⟩,Λ β) =E(σ s) = 1 Z E(|ξ⟩⟨ξ|) + e−β Z E(|ψ⟩⟨ψ|) =|b| 2. Note that, in p...