Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MatchZoo: A Toolkit for Deep Text Matching

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.07270 v1 pith:OWPN3U5T submitted 2017-07-23 cs.IR cs.CL

MatchZoo: A Toolkit for Deep Text Matching

classification cs.IR cs.CL
keywords modelsmatchingtextdeeptoolkitmatchzooadditionadopted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, deep neural models have been widely adopted for text matching tasks, such as question answering and information retrieval, showing improved performance as compared with previous methods. In this paper, we introduce the MatchZoo toolkit that aims to facilitate the designing, comparing and sharing of deep text matching models. Specifically, the toolkit provides a unified data preparation module for different text matching problems, a flexible layer-based model construction process, and a variety of training objectives and evaluation metrics. In addition, the toolkit has implemented two schools of representative deep text matching models, namely representation-focused models and interaction-focused models. Finally, users can easily modify existing models, create and share their own models for text matching in MatchZoo.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A study on the Interpretability of Neural Retrieval Models using DeepSHAP

    cs.IR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Explores reference document choices for applying DeepSHAP to neural retrieval models and reports that its explanations differ substantially from those of LIME.