REVIEW 3 cited by
MadMiner: Machine learning-based inference for particle physics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Precision measurements at the LHC often require analyzing high-dimensional event data for subtle kinematic signatures, which is challenging for established analysis methods. Recently, a powerful family of multivariate inference techniques that leverage both matrix element information and machine learning has been developed. This approach neither requires the reduction of high-dimensional data to summary statistics nor any simplifications to the underlying physics or detector response. In this paper we introduce MadMiner, a Python module that streamlines the steps involved in this procedure. Wrapping around MadGraph5_aMC and Pythia 8, it supports almost any physics process and model. To aid phenomenological studies, the tool also wraps around Delphes 3, though it is extendable to a full Geant4-based detector simulation. We demonstrate the use of MadMiner in an example analysis of dimension-six operators in ttH production, finding that the new techniques substantially increase the sensitivity to new physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Higgs Signal Strength Estimation with Machine Learning under Systematic Uncertainties
SAGE, a dual-branch GNN trained under nuisance fluctuations, estimates the Higgs signal strength with near-nominal coverage (0.662-0.683) but wider intervals than the top FAIR-HUC leaderboard methods.
-
Unbinning global LHC analyses
Simulation-based inference produces stronger combined LHC constraints on SMEFT Wilson coefficients than histogram-based inference for four di-boson processes.
-
Communicating Likelihoods with Normalising Flows
A normalizing-flow workflow compresses sample-based likelihoods into small files, validated with a radial Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on three high-energy physics examples.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.