Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Note on Quantum Phase Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.02241 v1 pith:OZ3NPIUV submitted 2023-04-05 quant-ph

A Note on Quantum Phase Estimation

classification quant-ph
keywords epsilonphaseestimationalgorithmboundprobabilityproofapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the phase estimation problem. We show an alternative, simpler and self-contained proof of query lower bounds. Technically, compared to the previous proofs [NW99, Bes05], our proof is considerably elementary. Specifically, our proof consists of basic linear algebra without using the knowledge of Boolean function analysis and adversary methods. Qualitatively, our bound is tight in the low success probability regime and offers a more fine-grained trade-off. In particular, we prove that for any $\epsilon > 0, p \geq 0$, every algorithm requires at least $\Omega(p/{\epsilon})$ queries to obtain an ${\epsilon}$-approximation for the phase with probability at least p. However, the existing bounds hold only when $p > 1/2$. Quantitatively, our bound is tight since it matches the well-known phase estimation algorithm of Cleve, Ekert, Macchiavello, and Mosca [CEMM98] which requires $O(1/{\epsilon})$ queries to obtain an ${\epsilon}$-approximation with a constant probability. Following the derivation of the lower bound in our framework, we give a new and intuitive interpretation of the phase estimation algorithm of [CEMM98], which might be of independent interest.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.