REVIEW 2 cited by
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Medical Multimodal Large Language Models for Medical Visual Grounding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) inherit the superior text understanding capabilities of LLMs and extend these capabilities to multimodal scenarios. These models achieve excellent results in the general domain of multimodal tasks. However, in the medical domain, the substantial training costs and the requirement for extensive medical data pose challenges to the development of medical MLLMs. Furthermore, due to the free-text form of answers, tasks such as visual grounding that need to produce output in a prescribed form become difficult for MLLMs. So far, there have been no medical MLLMs works in medical visual grounding area. For the medical vision grounding task, which involves identifying locations in medical images based on short text descriptions, we propose Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning medical multimodal large language models for Medcial Visual Grounding (PFMVG). To validate the performance of the model, we evaluate it on a public benchmark dataset for medical visual grounding, where it achieves competitive results, and significantly outperforming GPT-4v. Our code will be open sourced after peer review.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Seeing the Trees for the Forest: Rethinking Weakly-Supervised Medical Visual Grounding
A disease-aware prompting method that reweights chest X-ray features using the model's own explainability map improves weakly-supervised visual grounding on three benchmarks.
-
ClinKD: Cross-Modal Clinical Knowledge Distiller For Multi-Task Medical Images
ClinKD combines a modified rotary position embedding, confidence-weighted pseudo-label distillation, and CLIP-based answer selection, reporting state-of-the-art scores on Med-GRIT and LLaVA-Med-QA benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.