Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 75 references

For fibres as long as the channel half-height, near-wall orientation and tumbling are controlled by the ratio of wall distance to fibre length, y⁺/ℓ⁺.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

For long fibres in a turbulent channel, near-wall orientation statistics collapse when wall distance is normalised by fibre length, and pole-vaulting-driven tumbling peaks at about half a fibre length from the wall with amplitude ~ (ℓ⁺)⁻².

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-01 challenge →

load-bearing objection First systematic experiment–simulation comparison in the ℓ/h=O(1) regime, with a plausible but not fully isolated (ℓ⁺)⁻² scaling; deserves refereeing, not a clean home run. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19116 v1 pith:OZHKOA22 submitted 2026-07-21 physics.flu-dyn

Long rigid fibres in a turbulent channel flow: comparison between experiments and simulations

Defa Sun , Florian Zumbo , Christophe Pitiot , Sandra Bosio , Cyrille Claudet , Jeremie Bec , Christophe Brouzet This is my paper
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords turbulent channel flowrigid fibresslender-body modelfibre orientationtumbling ratepole-vaultingkayakingwall-bounded turbulence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how rigid fibres whose length approaches the channel half-height behave in turbulent channel flow, and compares experiments with slender-body simulations. It claims that, near a wall, fibre orientation statistics from three different lengths collapse when the wall distance is measured in units of the fibre length: the dimensionless quantity y⁺/ℓ⁺, not y⁺ alone, sets the transition from wall-imposed alignment to bulk behaviour. It further claims that the intense "pole-vaulting" tumbling seen when a nearly vertical fibre touches the wall happens at a centre distance y⁺ ≈ ℓ⁺/2 and has magnitude decreasing as (ℓ⁺)⁻², matching a simple dimensional estimate based on the friction velocity and fibre length. If correct, a single geometrical ratio organises both orientation and rotation for long fibres, and the slender-body model can be trusted for orientation and tumbling while translation needs settling and finite-thickness corrections.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that geometry alone organises the near-wall statistics of long rigid fibres. The wall imposes a non-penetration bound |p_y| ≤ 2y⁺/ℓ⁺ on the wall-normal orientation component, and the measured ⟨p_y²⟩ grows like (y⁺/ℓ⁺)² until all orientations become accessible at y⁺ = ℓ⁺/2. When plotted against y⁺/ℓ⁺, the streamwise, wall-normal, and spanwise orientation second moments approximately collapse for ℓ/h = 0.25, 0.5, and 1, in both experiments and simulations. The same length sets the local maximum of tumbling: near y⁺ ≈ ℓ⁺/2, "pole-vaulting" events dominate, and their spanwise tumbling intensity scales as (ℓ⁺)⁻², consistent with the estimate that a wall-touching f

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dimensionless wall distance y⁺/ℓ⁺, which enters through the geometric constraint that a rigid rod of length ℓ cannot penetrate the wall: |p_y| ≤ 2y⁺/ℓ⁺. This single quantity collapses orientation statistics and locates the pole-vaulting peak. The simulations use a rigid slender-body model in which the local velocity gradient is replaced by the fibre-length-averaged velocity U_ℓ and directional gradient G_ℓ, a non-local Jeffery equation, together with a frictionless elastic wall collision law. The dimensional estimate Ω_T,z ~ uτ/ℓ, equivalently ⟨Ω⁺²_T,z⟩ ~ (ℓ⁺)⁻², carries the quantitative prediction for tumbling.

Load-bearing premise

The key premise is that statistics conditioned on instantaneous wall distance in a settling-dominated experiment can be compared with gravity-free simulations at the same distance; the paper itself cautions that this does not condition on trajectory history, so if settling history matters, the claimed agreement and the attribution of translational differences weaken.

What would settle it

Run the same experiments with neutrally buoyant fibres (settling velocity reduced to well below the friction velocity) at the same ℓ⁺ and Reτ. If the bulk velocity deficit and enhanced tumbling vanish, settling-induced sampling is confirmed; if the y⁺/ℓ⁺ orientation collapse and the pole-vaulting peak at y⁺ ≈ ℓ⁺/2 with (ℓ⁺)⁻² scaling persist, these geometric and dimensional scalings are robust.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Near-wall orientation statistics of any long rigid fibre in a channel can be predicted from y⁺/ℓ⁺ alone once the flow's friction velocity is known.
  • The pole-vaulting tumbling maximum should occur at a centre-of-mass distance of half a fibre length from the wall, with intensity falling like the inverse square of fibre length in wall units.
  • Kayaking, not the mean shear, sets near-wall tumbling, so local velocity-gradient models (point-particle Jeffery descriptions) are insufficient for fibres longer than the viscous scale.
  • Slender-body simulations are adequate for orientation and rotation of long fibres, but reproducing experimental translation will require adding gravity, finite-diameter drag, and a more detailed wall-contact model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the y⁺/ℓ⁺ collapse reflects geometry rather than Reynolds number, it should hold in other wall-bounded shear flows, such as boundary layers and ducts, and for flexible fibres whose effective contour length sets the relevant ℓ⁺; a testable prediction is that their orientation transition also occurs at y⁺ ≈ ℓ⁺/2.
  • The (ℓ⁺)⁻² scaling implies that as fibres become very long in wall units, pole-vaulting tumbling becomes weak relative to kayaking, so the dominant near-wall tumbling mechanism should switch; this could be checked by extending to ℓ/h > 1 if the channel geometry allows.
  • The settling-induced sampling bias could be quantified by tracking the time since last wall contact in gravity-free simulations and re-weighting statistics; if the experimental velocity lag is reproduced, trajectory history is confirmed as the mechanism.
  • The orientation-dependent tumbling mismatch for non-streamwise fibres, which exceeds 100% for the longest fibres, is a clean target for interface-resolved or inertial slender-body simulations; matching it would isolate finite-diameter fluid-inertia effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental and numerical study of long rigid polystyrene fibres in a turbulent water channel at Re_tau≈400, with fibre lengths ℓ/h = 0.25, 0.5 and 1 (ℓ+ ≈ 96.5, 193, 386), all with St+ ≈ 15–24 and a settling velocity Vg≈0.5 u_tau. Three-camera 3D tracking is used to obtain wall-distance-conditioned statistics of concentration, translational velocity, orientation, and tumbling. Numerical simulations use a rigid slender-body model in DNS of a channel flow, but with gravity switched off because including gravity causes all simulated fibres to sediment to the wall. The central claims are: (i) near-wall orientation statistics collapse when the wall distance is normalised by fibre length, y+/ℓ+; (ii) a local tumbling-rate maximum near y+≈ℓ+/2 is associated with pole-vaulting events, and its magnitude scales as (ℓ+)^−2, consistent with a dimensional estimate based on u_tau and ℓ; (iii) experiments and simulations 'agree well' for orientation and tumbling while showing larger translational discrepancies attributed to settling, finite fibre diameter, and finite slip Reynolds number.

Significance. If established, the y+/ℓ+ collapse would provide a simple geometrical variable controlling the wall-induced alignment transition for finite-length fibres, and the (ℓ+)^−2 pole-vaulting scaling would be a clean predictive result for near-wall tumbling. The paper is valuable for producing a rare experimental dataset in the previously unexplored regime ℓ/h=O(1), and for performing a systematic, parameter-matched comparison with a slender-body model. Strengths include the parameter-free nature of the geometric non-penetration bound used to explain ⟨p_y^2⟩∝(y+/ℓ+)^2, the coherent derivation of the angular equations in §3.1, and a candid, well-structured §5 that acknowledges the gravity omission and remaining discrepancies. However, the central scaling claim is not cleanly isolated because the three fibre sets vary ℓ+, ℓ/h, λ and St+ simultaneously, and the simulations—which receive the same simultaneous variation—do not reproduce the distinct experimental peak. The abstract's 'agree well' is also difficult to reconcile with the >100% conditioned tumbling discrepancy for the longest fibres shown in Fig. 16. The overall claims are defensible but need substantial qualification and addition

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.4, Fig. 15(d)] The claim that the pole-vaulting maximum scales as (ℓ+)^−2 is underdetermined by the data shown. The three experimental sets vary ℓ+ (96.5, 193, 386), ℓ/h (0.25, 0.5, 1), aspect ratio λ (10, 20, 40) and St+ (15, 19, 24) simultaneously, while the dimensional estimate uses only uτ and ℓ. With only three points in geometric progression, the compensated collapse in Fig. 15(d) cannot distinguish (ℓ+)^−2 from, e.g., (ℓ/h)^−1 times a function of ℓ+, or from weak dependences on λ or St+. In addition, the numerical simulations, which share the same simultaneous parameter variation, do not show a distinct peak in Fig. 13—only a change of slope—so they do not independently confirm the mechanism. Please either provide a test with independent variation of the parameters, add a formal model comparison with confidence intervals, or explicitly state that the three-point sample is consistent with, but do
  2. [§3.2 and §5.1] The numerical comparison is built on gravity-free simulations because including gravity makes all fibres sediment (§3.2). The resulting concentration profile is symmetric with a maximum at y+≈2 (Fig. 7b), whereas the experimental profile is strongly asymmetric with a maximum at y+≈30–50 (Fig. 7a). All statistics are then conditioned on instantaneous wall distance; however, as acknowledged in the first paragraph of §5.1, conditioning does not remove the selection bias because it does not condition on the history of the fibre trajectory. This is a load-bearing limitation: the experiments and simulations are not two realisations of the same physical system, and the comparison cannot cleanly discriminate model error from selection effects. The paper should reframe the simulations as a gravity-free reference case and restrict 'agreement' claims to that interpretation. This is not a fatal flaw
  3. [Abstract and Fig. 16] The abstract states that 'experiments and simulations agree well for orientation and tumbling', yet Fig. 16 shows that the wall-normal component of the mean-square tumbling rate, conditioned on streamwise orientation px for fibres at 30≤y+≤60, differs by about 15% for the shortest fibres but exceeds 100% for the longest fibres. This is a direct contradiction unless 'agree well' is qualified by length and wall region. The discrepancy is discussed qualitatively in §5.3 and attributed to finite-diameter and finite-slip-Reynolds-number effects, which is plausible but not quantitatively tested. The abstract, introduction, and conclusions should be revised to state the error levels explicitly and to avoid the impression that the model is quantitatively validated for the longest fibres.
  4. [§4.3, Fig. 11(e)] The collapse of ⟨p_y^2⟩ when plotted against y+/ℓ+ is the strongest and most convincing claim in the paper, because it follows from the geometric non-penetration bound |p_y|≤2y+/ℓ+ and is not fitted. However, the same figure shows that ⟨p_x^2⟩ and ⟨p_z^2⟩ collapse only approximately, and the experimental and numerical curves deviate systematically in the interval 30≲y+≲90 for the two longest fibres (Fig. 10). The paper should be explicit that the clean collapse is for the wall-normal component only, and that the degree of approximate collapse for the other components is not quantified. As written, the abstract's broad statement 'orientation statistics collapse' may overstate the evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.5] The smoothing procedure uses an 'rlowess' span of 0.4 and a minimum trajectory length of 10 points. These are user-chosen parameters; a sensitivity test or at least an estimate of the induced bias in the tumbling-rate statistics near the endpoints would strengthen the methods.
  2. [Figures 8–15] Experimentally measured conditional profiles are shown without error bars or confidence intervals. Given the strong conditioning on y+ and the limited number of trajectories (10^3–10^4 per length), some quantification of sampling error is important for judging the significance of the differences between experimental and numerical curves.
  3. [§2.2] The text states that measured velocity profiles at z/h=9.25 are about 90% of the mid-span maxima, but it is not stated how the fibre measurement volume (|z|/h≲4) was verified to be unaffected by sidewalls. Please make the statistical homogeneity check explicit.
  4. [References] Item 'DiBenedetto 2026' is cited as 'Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 58, 355–382'. If this is a forthcoming article, please mark it as 'in press' and check the volume/year consistency. Similarly, 'Joshi et al. 2026' is an arXiv preprint; a status note would be useful.
  5. [Numerical parameters, Table 2] The table gives Nx×Ny×Nz = 192×193×192 for a domain of 4π×2×4π/3. This is a fairly coarse resolution near the wall; a brief grid-convergence statement would help the reader assess whether the near-wall results are numerically converged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central scaling claims are geometric/dimensional, not fitted; only minor self-referential lineage appears.

full rationale

The paper's main quantitative claims—the y^+/ell^+ orientation collapse and the (ell^+)^-2 pole-vaulting tumbling scaling—are not fitted inputs relabeled as predictions. The y^+/ell^+ collapse follows from the rigid-fibre non-penetration bound |p_y| <= 2y^+/ell^+, an identity given the fibre length and wall geometry, and is compared with the data rather than constructed from them. The tumbling scaling is a dimensional estimate: 'Taking u_tau as the characteristic velocity and ell as the characteristic lever arm gives <Omega_{T,z}^2> ~ (u_tau/ell)^2', which is then checked against compensated experimental/simulation profiles, not used to generate those profiles. The slender-body model is derived from Cox/Keller-Rubinow theory with parameters (St^+, ell^+) computed from independently measured fibre properties, not calibrated to the target statistics. The only self-citation of note is the statement that the model 'builds on our previous simulations of slender flexible fibres in turbulent channel flow (Bec et al. 2024a)', but that is lineage for the numerical framework, not the load-bearing evidence for the collapse or scaling. The paper also explicitly concedes the gravity-free simulation caveat in §5.1, which limits certainty but does not constitute circularity. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its own inputs; the score reflects only minor self-referential lineage, not any reduction of the central result to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central scaling rests on standard slender-body theory, geometric constraints, and dimensional analysis. The most fragile assumption is that gravity-free simulations give unbiased conditioned statistics despite the acknowledged settling-history bias. Other model ingredients, especially the collision law and slenderness limits, are known to be violated and are discussed, not fixed.

free parameters (2)
  • rlowess smoothing span = 0.4
    Used for all position and orientation differentiation; tumbling-rate magnitudes depend on this smoothing choice, and no sensitivity analysis is provided (§2.5).
  • minimum trajectory length = 10 points
    Trajectories shorter than 10 frames are discarded; this affects sample statistics and derivative estimates (§2.5).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Slender-body theory (Eq. 3.1) applies to fibres with aspect ratio λ = 10–40 and slip Reynolds number O(1–10), although it strictly requires λ ≫ 1 and Re_d ≪ 1.
    The drag/torque closure is the core of the model; §5.3 concedes experimental fibres violate these limits (d⁺ ≈ 10, Re_slip ≈ O(1–10)).
  • domain assumption Gravity-free simulations provide a meaningful reference for wall-distance-conditioned statistics in a settling-dominated experiment.
    §3.2 removes g_eff because gravity caused all simulated fibres to settle; §5.1 admits conditioning on y⁺ does not remove settling-history bias.
  • domain assumption Wall contacts follow an instantaneous, frictionless, perfectly elastic collision law.
    Eq. (3.11); §5.2 notes the model omits lubrication and tangential contact forces and that with gravity simulated fibres never resuspend.
  • domain assumption Fibres are passive and dilute: no momentum feedback, no fibre–fibre collisions, no hydrodynamic interactions.
    Stated at the start of §3; experimental volume fraction is about 10⁻⁵, making this plausible for the experiments.
  • domain assumption The DNS at Re_τ ≈ 393 reproduces the experimental channel flow at Re_τ ≈ 386 in the central spanwise region.
    §2.2 and §3.2; PIV profiles match DNS except near the sidewall, and tracked fibres are restricted to |z|/h ≲ 4.
  • domain assumption Experimental fibres are rigid because their length is below the estimated elastic length ℓ_E ≈ 50 mm.
    §2.3; the rigidity assumption underlies treating fibres as straight rods in reconstruction and simulation.

reviewed 2026-08-01 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long rigid fibres in a turbulent channel flow: comparison between experiments and simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OZHKOA22

@misc{pith2026260719116,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long rigid fibres in a turbulent channel flow: comparison between experiments and simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OZHKOA22}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19116}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The dynamics of long rigid fibres transported by turbulent channel flow are investigated experimentally and numerically. Experiments use polystyrene fibres of three lengths, $\ell/h=0.25$, $0.5$ and $1$, with moderate inertia, $St^+\approx20$. Their settling velocity is comparable to the friction velocity, causing accumulation near the bottom wall. Measurements are compared systematically with simulations based on a rigid slender-body model. Statistics conditioned on the distance from the wall are used to characterise the effects of fibre length and confinement on translation, orientation and tumbling. Away from the wall, the experimental fibres lag the fluid, with no clear dependence of the velocity deficit on length. Near the wall, the shortest fibres move faster than the local mean flow, whereas longer fibres remain slower, indicating length-dependent sampling of near-wall turbulence. Confinement also strongly constrains orientation and rotation. Fibres close to the wall predominantly undergo "kayaking" motion, tumbling in planes approximately parallel to it. Orientation statistics collapse when wall distance is normalised by fibre length, identifying $y^+/\ell^+$ as the relevant geometrical variable. Where fibres can acquire a significant wall-normal orientation, "pole-vaulting" events produce a local tumbling-rate maximum at $y^+\approx\ell^+/2$. Its magnitude decreases approximately as $(\ell^+)^{-2}$, consistently with a dimensional estimate based on the near-wall velocity variation sampled along the fibre. Experiments and simulations agree well for orientation and tumbling but differ more for translational velocity. The discrepancies highlight the effect of settling, finite fibre thickness and finite slip Reynolds number that are not fully represented by the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19116 by Christophe Brouzet, Christophe Pitiot, Cyrille Claudet, Defa Sun, Florian Zumbo, Jeremie Bec, Sandra Bosio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Sketch of the turbulent water channel platform. (b) Sketch of the camera configuration for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Spanwise planes where experimental velocity profiles have been measured through PIV. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of fibre detections. The top row shows typical images from a side camera, while [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Typical reconstructed trajectories for 10 mm long fibres. The colour indicates the time and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time evolution of the centre-of-mass position (top row) and orientation-vector components (bottom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Typical snapshot of a numerical simulation showing the bottom half of the channel, with a volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experimental (a) and numerical (b) wall-normal concentration profiles for the three fibre lengths. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mean velocity of the fibre centre of mass in the streamwise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Probability density functions of the streamwise and wall-normal components of the fibre centre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Mean-square values of the different components of the orientation unit vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Mean-square values of the different components of the orientation vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Probability density functions of the orientation vector components for three different regions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Tumbling rate as a function of the wall distance. Experimental data are represented by squares, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Decomposition of the mean-square tumbling rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Wall-normal (a,c) and spanwise (b,d) components of the mean-square tumbling rate for the three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Wall-normal component of the mean-square tumbling angular velocity, conditioned on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_16.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    , Lundell, F

    Abbasi Hoseini , A. , Lundell, F. & Andersson, H. I. 2015 Finite-length effects on dynamical behavior of rod-like particles in wall-bounded turbulent flow . Int. J. Multiphase Flow 76 , 13--21

    2015

  2. [2]

    Adrian, R. J. 2007 Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence . Phys. Fluids 19 (4), 041301

    2007

  3. [3]

    , De Paoli, M

    Alipour, M. , De Paoli, M. , Ghaemi, S. & Soldati, A. 2021 Long non-axisymmetric fibres in turbulent channel flow . J. Fluid Mech. 916 , A3

    2021

  4. [4]

    , De Paoli, M

    Alipour, M. , De Paoli, M. & Soldati, A. 2022 Influence of reynolds number on the dynamics of rigid, slender and non-axisymmetric fibres in channel flow turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 934 , A18

    2022

  5. [5]

    , Allen, D

    Allen, S. , Allen, D. , Phoenix, V. , Le Roux, G. , Dur \'a ntez Jim \'e nez, P. , Simonneau, A. , Binet, S. & Galop, D. 2019 Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment . Nat. Geosci. 12 , 339--344

    2019

  6. [6]

    Andersson, H. I. , Celledoni, E. , Ohm, L. , Owren, B. & Tapley, B. K. 2021 An integral model based on slender body theory, with applications to curved rigid fibers . Phys. Fluids 33 (4), 041904

    2021

  7. [7]

    Ardekani, M. N. & Brandt, L. 2019 Turbulence modulation in channel flow of finite-size spheroidal particles . J. Fluid Mech. 859 , 887--901

    2019

  8. [8]

    Baker, L. J. & Coletti, F. 2022 Experimental investigation of inertial fibres and disks in a turbulent boundary layer . J. Fluid Mech. 943 , A27

    2022

  9. [9]

    Batchelor, G. K. 1970 Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in stokes flow . J. Fluid Mech. 44 (3), 419--440

    1970

  10. [10]

    , Brouzet, C

    Bec, J. , Brouzet, C. & Henry, C. 2024 a\/ Enhanced transport of flexible fibers by pole vaulting in turbulent wall-bounded flow . Phys. Rev. Fluids 9 , L062501

    2024

  11. [11]

    , Gustavsson, K

    Bec, J. , Gustavsson, K. & Mehlig, B. 2024 b\/ Statistical models for the dynamics of heavy particles in turbulence . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 56 (Volume 56, 2024), 189--213

    2024

  12. [12]

    & Shapiro, M

    Bernstein, O. & Shapiro, M. 1994 Direct determination of the orientation distribution function of cylindrical particles immersed in laminar and turbulent shear flows . J. Aerosol Sci. 25 (1), 113--136

    1994

  13. [13]

    1963 The stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle

    Brenner, H. 1963 The stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle . Chem. Eng. Sci. 18 (1), 1--25

    1963

  14. [14]

    Bretherton, F. P. 1962 The motion of rigid particles in a shear flow at low reynolds number . J. Fluid Mech. 14 (2), 284--304

    1962

  15. [15]

    , Verhille, G

    Brouzet, C. , Verhille, G. & Le Gal, P. 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (074501)

    2014

  16. [16]

    , Miozzi, M

    Capone, A. , Miozzi, M. & Romano, G. P. 2017 On translational and rotational relative velocities of fibers and fluid in a turbulent channel flow with a backward-facing step . Int. J. Multiphase Flow 94 , 189--200

    2017

  17. [17]

    , Giurgiu, V

    Caridi, G. , Giurgiu, V. , De Paoli, M. & Soldati, A. 2025 Complete solid-body rotation rate measurements of micro-plastic curved fibers in turbulence . Exp. Fluids 66

    2025

  18. [18]

    , Rosti, M

    Chiarini, A. , Rosti, M. E. & Mazzino, A. 2024 Dynamics and applications of finite-size fibre-like objects in turbulent flows . European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 108 , 104--118

    2024

  19. [19]

    Cox, R. G. 1970 The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid part 1. general theory . J. Fluid Mech. 44 (4), 791--810

    1970

  20. [20]

    De La Rosa Zambrano, H. M. , Verhille, G. & Le Gal, P. 2018 Fragmentation of magnetic particle aggregates in turbulence . Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (084605)

    2018

  21. [21]

    DiBenedetto, M. H. 2026 The fluid mechanics of ocean microplastics . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 58 , 355--382

    2026

  22. [22]

    , Amberg, G

    Do-Quang, M. , Amberg, G. , Brethouwer, G. & Johansson, A. V. 2014 Simulation of finite-size fibers in turbulent channel flows . Phys. Rev. E 89 , 013006

    2014

  23. [23]

    , Soldati, A

    Dotto, D. , Soldati, A. & Marchioli, C. 2020 Deformation of flexible fibers in turbulent channel flow . Acta Mech

    2020

  24. [24]

    , Hosseini, S

    Eshghinejadfard, A. , Hosseini, S. A. & Th \'e venin, D. 2017 Fully-resolved prolate spheroids in turbulent channel flows: A lattice boltzmann study . AIP Adv. 7 (9), 095007

    2017

  25. [25]

    , Beckedorff, L

    Giurgiu, V. , Beckedorff, L. , Caridi, G. C. A. , Lagemann, C. & Soldati, A. 2024 a\/ Machine learning-enhanced piv for analyzing microfiber-wall turbulence interactions . Int. J. Multiphase Flow 181 , 105021

    2024

  26. [26]

    , Caridi, G

    Giurgiu, V. , Caridi, G. C. A. , De Paoli, M. & Soldati, A. 2024 b\/ Full rotational dynamics of plastic microfibers in turbulence . Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 , 054101

    2024

  27. [27]

    , Sheikh, M

    Gustavsson, K. , Sheikh, M. Z. , Lopez, D. , Naso, A. , Pumir, A. & Mehlig, B. 2019 Effect of fluid inertia on the orientation of a small prolate spheroid settling in turbulence . New J. Phys. 21 (8), 083008

    2019

  28. [28]

    , Sheikh, M

    Gustavsson, K. , Sheikh, M. Z. , Naso, A. , Pumir, A. & Mehlig, B. 2021 Effect of particle inertia on the alignment of small ice crystals in turbulent clouds . J. Atmos. Sci. 78 (8), 2573 -- 2587

    2021

  29. [29]

    H kansson, K. M. O. , Kvick, M. , Lundell, F. , Wittberg, L. P. & S \"o derberg, L. D. 2013 Measurement of width and intensity of particle streaks in turbulent flows . Exp. Fluids 54 (1555)

    2013

  30. [30]

    & Zisserman, A

    Hartley, R. & Zisserman, A. 2004 Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision\/ , 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press

    2004

  31. [31]

    , Candelier, F

    Ibarra, E. , Candelier, F. & Verhille, G. 2026 Trapping of a flexible disk in a vortical flow: Reconstruction process, measurements, and theory . Phys. Rev. Fluids 11 , 044302

    2026

  32. [32]

    Jeffery, G. B. 1922 The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 102 (715), 161--179

    1922

  33. [33]

    , Roy, A

    Joshi, A. , Roy, A. , Sharma, A. & Koch, D. L. 2026 An inertial slender-body theory . arXiv preprint (2607.02993)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Keller, J. B. & Rubinow, S. I. 1976 Slender-body theory for slow viscous flow . J. Fluid Mech. 75 (4), 705--714

    1976

  35. [35]

    & Shelley, M

    Lindner, A. & Shelley, M. 2015 Elastic fibers in flows . In Fluid--Structure Interactions in Low-Reynolds-Number Flows\/ . The Royal Society of Chemistry

    2015

  36. [36]

    , S \"o derberg, L

    Lundell, F. , S \"o derberg, L. D. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2011 Fluid mechanics of papermaking . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43 (Volume 43, 2011), 195--217

    2011

  37. [37]

    & Campolo, M

    Marchioli, C. & Campolo, M. 2021 Drag reduction in turbulent flows by polymer and fiber additives . KONA Powder and Particle Journal 38 , 64--81

    2021

  38. [38]

    , Fantoni, M

    Marchioli, C. , Fantoni, M. & Soldati, A. 2010 Orientation, distribution, and deposition of elongated, inertial fibers in turbulent channel flow . Phys. Fluids 22 (3), 033301

    2010

  39. [39]

    , Rosti, M

    Marchioli, C. , Rosti, M. E. & Verhille, G. 2026 Flexible fibers in turbulence . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 58 , 167--92

    2026

  40. [40]

    Masuk, A. U. M. , Salibindla, A. K. R. & Ni, R. 2021 The orientational dynamics of deformable finite-sized bubbles in turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 915 (A79)

    2021

  41. [41]

    , Jord \'a n, A

    Mentes, D. , Jord \'a n, A. , Farkas, L. , Mur \'a nszky, G. , Fiser, B. , Viskolcz, B. & P \'o liska, C. 2024 Evaluating emissions and air quality implications of residential waste incineration . Scientific Reports 14 (1), 21314

    2024

  42. [42]

    & Leweke, T

    Meunier, P. & Leweke, T. 2003 Analysis and treatment of errors due to high velocity gradients in particle image velocimetry . Exp. Fluids 35 (5), 408--421

    2003

  43. [43]

    & Arcen, B

    Michel, A. & Arcen, B. 2021 Reynolds number effect on the concentration and preferential orientation of inertial ellipsoids . Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (114305), 114305

    2021

  44. [44]

    & Arcen, B

    Michel, A. & Arcen, B. 2023 Translational and angular velocities statistics of inertial prolate ellipsoids in a turbulent channel flow up to Re_ = 1000 . J. Fluid Mech. 966 , A17

    2023

  45. [45]

    2007 PIVMat : A PIV post-processing and data analysis toolbox for MATLAB

    Moisy, F. 2007 PIVMat : A PIV post-processing and data analysis toolbox for MATLAB

    2007

  46. [46]

    Monty, J. P. 2005 Developments in smooth wall turbulent duct flows . PhD thesis, University of Melbourne

    2005

  47. [47]

    , Andersson, H.I

    Mortensen, P.H. , Andersson, H.I. , Gillissen, J.J.J. & Boersma, B.J. 2008 a\/ Dynamics of prolate ellipsoidal particles in a turbulent channel flow . Phys. Fluids 20 (9), 093302

    2008

  48. [48]

    , Andersson, H.I

    Mortensen, P.H. , Andersson, H.I. , Gillissen, J.J.J. & Boersma, B.J. 2008 b\/ On the orientation of ellipsoidal particles in a turbulent shear flow . Int. J. Multiphase Flow 34 (7), 678--683

    2008

  49. [49]

    & Bruce, C.W

    Newsom, R.K. & Bruce, C.W. 1998 Orientational properties of fibrous aerosols in atmospheric turbulence . J. Aerosol Sci. 29 (7), 773--797

    1998

  50. [50]

    , Ouellette, N

    Ni, R. , Ouellette, N. T. & Voth, G. A. 2014 Alignment of vorticity and rods with lagrangian fluid stretching in turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 743 , R3

    2014

  51. [51]

    Oehmke, T. B. , Bordoloi, A. D. , Variano, E. & Verhille, G. 2021 Spinning and tumbling of long fibers in isotropic turbulence . Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 , 044610

    2021

  52. [52]

    & Kerekes, R.J

    Olson, J.A. & Kerekes, R.J. 1998 The motion of fibres in turbulent flow . J. Fluid Mech. 377 , 47--64

    1998

  53. [53]

    , Polanco, J

    Ouchene, R. , Polanco, J. I. , Vinkovic, I. & Simo \"e ns, S. 2018 Acceleration statistics of prolate spheroidal particles in turbulent channel flow . Journal of Turbulence 19 (10), 827--848

    2018

  54. [54]

    Ouellette, N. T. , Xu, H. & Bodenschatz, E. 2006 A quantitative study of three-dimensional Lagrangian particle tracking algorithms . Exp. Fluids 40 (2), 301--313

    2006

  55. [55]

    & Voth, G

    Parsa, S. & Voth, G. A. 2014 Inertial range scaling in rotations of long rods in turbulence . Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 , 024501

    2014

  56. [56]

    Paschkewitz, J. S. , Dubief, Y. , Dimitropoulos, C. D. , Shaqfeh, E. S. G. & Moin, P. 2004 Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction using rigid fibres . J. Fluid Mech. 518 , 281--317

    2004

  57. [57]

    Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows\/ . Cambridge University Press

    2000

  58. [58]

    , Voth, G

    Pujara, N. , Voth, G. A. & Variano, E. A. 2019 Scale-dependent alignment, tumbling and stretching of slender rods in isotropic turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 860 , 465--486

    2019

  59. [59]

    Redlinger-Pohn, J. D. , Liverts, M. & Lundell, F. 2022 Parameter regimes and rates of fibre collection on screens of various design . Sep. Purif. Technol. 259 (118053)

    2022

  60. [60]

    , Schlatter, P

    Sardina, G. , Schlatter, P. , Brandt, L. , Picano, F. & Casciola, C. M. 2012 Wall accumulation and spatial localization in particle-laden wall flows . J. Fluid Mech. 699 , 50--78

    2012

  61. [61]

    , Kuperman, S

    Shaik, S. , Kuperman, S. , Rinsky, V. & van Hout, R. 2020 Measurements of length effects on the dynamics of rigid fibers in a turbulent channel flow . Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 , 114309

    2020

  62. [62]

    & van Hout , R

    Shaik, S. & van Hout , R. 2023 Kinematics of rigid fibers in a turbulent channel flow . Int. J. Multiphase Flow 158 , 104262

    2023

  63. [63]

    & Koch, D.L

    Shin, M. & Koch, D.L. 2005 Rotational and translational dispersion of fibres in isotropic turbulent flows . J. Fluid Mech. 540 , 143--173

    2005

  64. [64]

    Squires, K. D. & Eaton, J. K. 1991 Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence . Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 3 (5), 1169--1178

    1991

  65. [65]

    2017 A lagrangian study of inhomogeneous turbulence

    Stelzenmuller, N. 2017 A lagrangian study of inhomogeneous turbulence . PhD thesis, Universit \'e Grenoble-Alpes

    2017

  66. [66]

    Tritton, D. J. 1959 Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers . J. Fluid Mech. 6 (4), 547--567

    1959

  67. [67]

    & Bartoli, A

    Verhille, G. & Bartoli, A. 2016 3d conformation of a flexible fiber in a turbulent flow . Exp. Fluids 57

    2016

  68. [68]

    Voth, G. A. & Soldati, A. 2017 Anisotropic particles in turbulence . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49 (Volume 49, 2017), 249--276

    2017

  69. [69]

    , Zhao, L

    Yuan, W. , Zhao, L. , Andersson, H. I. & Deng, J. 2018 a\/ Three-dimensional vorono \" analysis of preferential concentration of spheroidal particles in wall turbulence . Phys. Fluids 30 (6), 063304

    2018

  70. [70]

    , Zhao, L

    Yuan, W. , Zhao, L. , Challabotla, N. R. , Andersson, H. I. & Deng, J. 2018 b\/ On wall-normal motions of inertial spheroids in vertical turbulent channel flows . Acta Mech. 229 (7), 2947--2965

    2018

  71. [71]

    , Giurgiu, V

    Zaza, D. , Giurgiu, V. , Iovieno, M. & Soldati, A. 2026 Angular velocity of kolmogorov-scale fibers as proxy for turbulent dissipation . Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 , 054001

    2026

  72. [72]

    , Guo, Y

    Zhang, Z. , Guo, Y. , Peng, C. & Wang, L.-P. 2025 Turbulent channel flow laden with finite-size cylindrical particles . J. Fluid Mech. 1024 , A11

    2025

  73. [73]

    & Andersson, H

    Zhao, L. & Andersson, H. I. 2016 Why spheroids orient preferentially in near-wall turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 807 , 221--234

    2016

  74. [74]

    , Challabotla, N

    Zhao, L. , Challabotla, N. R. , Andersson, H. I. & Variano, E. A. 2015 Rotation of nonspherical particles in turbulent channel flow . Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 244501

    2015

  75. [75]

    , Challabotla, N

    Zhao, L. , Challabotla, N. R. , Andersson, H. I. & Variano, E. A. 2019 Mapping spheroid rotation modes in turbulent channel flow: effects of shear, turbulence and particle inertia . J. Fluid Mech. 876 , 19--54

    2019

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 1, 2026.