Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Aligning CodeLLMs with Direct Preference Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.18585 v1 pith:OZVBJXF3 submitted 2024-10-24 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords codellmsllmspreferencealgorithmalignmentbecausedataonly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The last year has witnessed the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs) across diverse domains. Among them, CodeLLMs have garnered particular attention because they can not only assist in completing various programming tasks but also represent the decision-making and logical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. However, current CodeLLMs mainly focus on pre-training and supervised fine-tuning scenarios, leaving the alignment stage, which is important for post-training LLMs, under-explored. This work first identifies that the commonly used PPO algorithm may be suboptimal for the alignment of CodeLLM because the involved reward rules are routinely coarse-grained and potentially flawed. We then advocate addressing this using the DPO algorithm. Based on only preference data pairs, DPO can render the model rank data automatically, giving rise to a fine-grained rewarding pattern more robust than human intervention. We also contribute a pipeline for collecting preference pairs for DPO on CodeLLMs. Studies show that our method significantly improves the performance of existing CodeLLMs on benchmarks such as MBPP and HumanEval.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can We Generate Images with CoT? Let's Verify and Reinforce Image Generation Step by Step

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying test-time verifiers, DPO preference alignment, and a new adaptive reward model (PARM) to autoregressive image generators improves GenEval score from 53% to 77%.

Pith tools