Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring Kolmogorov-Arnold networks for realistic image sharpness assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.07762 v3 pith:P2RV66CC submitted 2024-09-12 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords kansfeaturesimagerealisticassessmentkolmogorov-arnoldmid-levelnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Score prediction is crucial in evaluating realistic image sharpness based on collected informative features. Recently, Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KANs) have been developed and witnessed remarkable success in data fitting. This study introduces the Taylor series-based KAN (TaylorKAN). Then, different KANs are explored in four realistic image databases (BID2011, CID2013, CLIVE, and KonIQ-10k) to predict the scores by using 15 mid-level features and 2048 high-level features. Compared to support vector regression, results show that KANs are generally competitive or superior, and TaylorKAN is the best one when mid-level features are used. This is the first study to investigate KANs on image quality assessment that sheds some light on how to select and further improve KANs in related tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficiency Bottlenecks of Convolutional Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Comprehensive Scrutiny with ImageNet, AlexNet, LeNet and Tabular Classification

    cs.CV 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CKANs are measurably less efficient than standard CNNs, and on ImageNet the accuracy gap is large, but the paper's baseline and timing comparisons are not controlled.

Pith tools