Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 141 references

Physical Pictures for Quasisymmetry in Crystals

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two physical mechanisms generate quasisymmetry in crystals: emergent symmetry from sublattice localization and symmetry inherited from nearby high-symmetry points, supported by first-principles and k·p analysis.

desk verdict The paper's two-picture taxonomy for quasisymmetry is genuinely useful, and the emergent-symmetry half is well supported; the inheritance half is quantitatively underbuilt and needs more work before the framework is advertised as predictive. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.18132 v2 pith:P4BAJQFA submitted 2026-02-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Bryan D. Assunção , Emmanuel V. C. Lopes , Tome M. Schmidt , Gerson J. Ferreira This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quasisymmetryemergentsymmetryspin-orbitcouplingk·ptheoryfirst-principlescalculationwurtzitesemiconductorstransitionmetaldichalcogenidessublatticelocalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the puzzling near-symmetries seen in several crystals—dubbed quasisymmetries—are not accidental, but come from two identifiable physical sources. In one picture, when electronic wavefunctions sit almost entirely on one sublattice, that sublattice's own extra mirror or inversion symmetry acts on the states, enlarging the effective symmetry group and forbidding first-order spin-orbit couplings. In the other picture, states at a generic wavevector inherit selection rules from a nearby high-symmetry point through the k·p expansion, so small spin-orbit gaps along certain paths are remnants of that point's stricter symmetry. The authors quantify how good a quasisymmetry is with a single number, the metric epsilon, which measures how unitarily the proposed symmetry acts inside the relevant subspace. If correct, the work turns a classification scheme into a predictive tool for engineering spin splittings, optical selection rules, and near-degeneracies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quasisymmetry operator Q acting within a low-energy subspace A of band states, together with the metric ε = sqrt(Tr[P_A Q† P_A Q]/N_A), which equals unity exactly when A is invariant under Q. In the emergent-symmetry picture, Q is a mirror or inversion that leaves the sublattice invariant, and the effective group becomes G_k ⊗ {E, Q}. In the inheritance picture, the k·p approximation u_{n,k} ≈ u_{n,k0} transfers the symmetry constraints of the high-symmetry point k0 to nearby k, making the δk term in the spin-orbit matrix element the only allowed contribution. Perturbative partitioning of the Hamiltonian is used to show that when Q forbids the first-order term, the

What would settle it

For AgLa, compute the full spin-orbit matrix elements along the T path from a method that includes core-state contributions and compare with the δk-only expression. If the p-term contribution is comparable to or larger than the δk-term, or if the T-path gap does not shrink toward R, the inheritance picture is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: quasisymmetries are exact symmetries of a selected subspace of electronic states, not of the whole crystal. For Sn/SiC and transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers the subspace is invariant under an emergent mirror (M_y) that the crystal group lacks; for wurtzites it is invariant under spatial inversion. In each case the measured metric epsilon is close to 1 (0.76–0.99), confirming near-exact invariance, and the augmented quasisymmetry group turns an allowed first-order spin-orbit coupling into a forbidden one, pushing the splitting to second order. For AgLa, no such emergent symmetry exists along the T and W paths; instead the crossing states at generic k-points

Load-bearing premise

The central claims rest on approximations the paper does not fully verify quantitatively: for AgLa, that the k·p correction is small enough for the δk term to dominate, and for Sn/SiC, that the scalar- and full-relativistic basis sets are consistent enough to compute first-order SOC; if either fails, the corresponding quasisymmetry explanation loses its quantitative footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Near-degenerate gaps that look accidental become explainable: when a quasisymmetry forbids the first-order spin-orbit term, the gap is set by second-order processes, so smallness is a symmetry consequence, not a fine-tuned accident.
  • The metric ε gives a single computable number that can be used to screen materials for quasisymmetry from first-principles data alone.
  • In the inheritance picture, avoided-crossing gaps along generic paths scale with the distance δk to the high-symmetry point, so band-structure data along a path can directly indicate which picture applies.
  • For wurtzites, inversion quasisymmetry does more than the quasi-cubic approximation sometimes fails to: it suppresses the A-transition in GaP by about 70%, matching experiment.
  • Because the quasisymmetry group is a direct product extension, the framework applies to any perturbation—strain, electric fields, optical transitions—not only spin-orbit coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two pictures are not mutually exclusive; a sublattice-localized state sitting near a high-symmetry point could exhibit both an enhanced ε and inherited selection rules. The paper does not analyze this combined regime, but the machinery it develops would apply.
  • One could turn ε into a high-throughput descriptor: compute the Q-matrix for candidate materials and rank them by deviation from unity, much as pseudosymmetry searches rank crystal structures—except the search would target band subspaces rather than lattices.
  • Editorial note: the paper states that for Sn/SiC the basis-set consistency needed for the first-order SOC calculation could not be guaranteed, so the quantitative suppression claim there rests on the TMD examples and on the wurtzite symmetry arguments.
  • A direct testable extension: if the inheritance picture holds, the T-path gaps in AgLa should decrease monotonically as the path approaches R (δk→0); this could be checked by tracking gap size along the full T path in a single calculation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that quasisymmetry (QS) in crystals arises from two distinct physical mechanisms: (i) an emergent symmetry due to strong wavefunction localization on a sublattice (mirror for Sn/SiC and TMDs; spatial inversion for wurtzites), and (ii) a quasisymmetry inherited from a nearby high-symmetry point through k·p selection rules (AgLa). The authors introduce a metric ε (Eq. 13) that quantifies how unitarily a proposed QS operator acts within a selected subspace, and they use group-theoretic selection rules plus first-principles/Wannier calculations to show that QS suppresses first-order spin-orbit coupling. They also apply the inversion QS in wurtzites to explain weak A-transition oscillator strengths in GaP, and they reinterpret the quasi-cubic approximation as a special case of the emergent symmetry picture. The central taxonomy is clear and the presentation is generally careful, but the inheritance picture—which is demonstrated only for AgLa—rests on an unquantified k·p expansion, and there is an internal inconsistency in the treatment of the δk term in the SOC matrix elements.

Significance. If established, the two-picture taxonomy gives physical substance to the formal QS framework of Refs. [91-93], turning it into a predictive tool for near-degeneracies, SOC splittings, and optical selection rules. The ε metric offers a practical, quantitative diagnostic that could enable high-throughput QS identification. The paper also usefully reconciles conflicting interpretations of Sn/SiC and connects the quasi-cubic approximation to the QS paradigm. These are meaningful contributions. The computational work is based on standard, well-tested tools (QE, VASP, Wannier90, DFT2kp, IrRep, Qsymm), and the group-theoretic arguments are internally consistent as far as they go. However, the quantitative support is incomplete in places: the AgLa inheritance analysis does not verify the smallness of the k·p expansion parameter, the role of the δk term is stated inconsistently, and the first-order SOC extraction relies on unvalidated Wannier basis compatibility. These gaps need to be addressed before the central claim can be considered fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.B / III.B, Eq. (9)] The inheritance picture relies on the k·p expansion u_{n,k} ≈ u_{n,k0} + Σ_{m≠n} (δk·p_{mn}/Δ_{nm}) u_{m,k0}, requiring |δk·p_{mn}/Δ_{nm}| ≪ 1 for all relevant remote states m. For the AgLa T and W crossings, the paper never reports values of δk, p_{mn}, or Δ_{nm}. Without such numbers, the claim that only the δk term contributes along T (Eqs. 22-23) is not quantitatively established: if any remote-state coupling is not small, additional contributions to ⟨m,k|H_SOC|n,k⟩ arise. Please provide an explicit check of the expansion parameter for the actual crossing points, or state the symmetry reasons that make all such couplings negligible.
  2. [Sec. II.B after Eq. (11); Sec. III.B Eqs. (22)-(24)] The treatment of the δk term is internally inconsistent. The text after Eq. (11) states that the δk-term contribution is 'typically small and can be neglected,' reducing the matrix element to ⟨m,k|H′|n,k⟩ = ⟨m,k0|H′|n,k0⟩. But Sec. III.B explicitly attributes the small T-path gaps to δk terms (Eqs. 22-23) and contrasts them with the p-term that dominates along W. If the δk term is neglected, the first-order T-path matrix element would vanish (because the p-term vanishes by symmetry at R), leaving the gap unexplained. The paper needs to settle whether the δk term is the leading contribution (and then keep it in Eq. (11)) or is negligible (and then explain the T gaps via second-order processes). The current text cannot have both.
  3. [Sec. II.D / Eq. (14) and TMD results in Sec. III.A.2] The numerical first-order SOC contributions, λ_C^(1) = 1.78 meV (MoS2) and 10.6 meV (WSe2), are obtained from H_SOC ≈ H_FR − H_SR ⊗ σ0, which presupposes that the SR and FR Wannier bases are exactly compatible. The authors acknowledge this difficulty and list methods (num_iter=0, symmetry-adapted, selectively localized Wannier functions), but they do not report any quantitative measure of basis compatibility for the specific systems. The central claim that QS suppresses the first-order SOC (λ_C^(1) significantly below the total λ_C) depends on these numbers. Please provide a compatibility check (e.g., Wannier spreads, band-structure interpolation errors, or a comparison between different localization schemes) and show that the first-order values are stable under the basis choice.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption reads 'Sns+p_z'; this appears to be a typo for 's+p_z'. Please correct.
  2. [Sec. II.C, Eq. (13)] The ε metric is presented without uncertainty estimates or a null baseline. Since ε is proposed as a practical diagnostic, it would be helpful to know how far the quoted values (e.g., 0.968, 0.95, 0.93, 0.76) are from a meaningful reference, e.g., a random subspace of the same dimension.
  3. [General / Appendix A] The manuscript states that 'all scripts and input files used here are available upon reasonable request.' For reproducibility, consider depositing them in a public repository (Zenodo, GitHub, etc.) and including the DOI in the manuscript.
  4. [Sec. II.B] The notation for the k·p expansion is a bit confusing: the central point is κ≡k with q=0, but earlier κ=k+q. Please clarify the hierarchy of k, k0, δk, and q in one place to help the reader.
  5. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (22)-(24)] Equations (22)-(24) are central but the notation '⟨α|V_y|β⟩_R' is not defined explicitly as the matrix element of ∂V/∂y at R; please define V_ν and the subscript R to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central two-picture claims are grounded in independent DFT wavefunctions and external group-theory results; the only mild concerns are self-selection of QS subspaces and an unquantified k·p expansion parameter, both correctness issues rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper does not derive its main results from its own conclusions. The emergent-symmetry picture is tested by computing representation matrices Q_{mn} = <m|Q|n> from DFT wavefunctions and comparing them with the metric epsilon; the operators Q (M_y for Sn/SiC and TMDs, I for wurtzites) are proposed from sublattice geometry and orbital localization, not fitted to make epsilon large. The SOC suppression claim is supported by independent Wannier-derived H_SOC = H_FR - H_SR, with the first-order contribution compared against the non-QS valence band, so it is not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The inheritance picture for AgLa uses a standard k.p expansion together with the external group-theoretic classification of Ref. [93]; the paper's own equations (9)-(11) and the selection rules in Table II are what select the delta-k vs p terms. The unquantified condition |delta-k . p / Delta| << 1 is a substantive support gap: the paper asserts, rather than demonstrates, that the delta-k term is the only contributor along the T path. However, this is a correctness/verification concern, not a circular reduction — the conclusion does not presuppose the neglected term's smallness. The explicit Appendix B limitation about truncated momentum sums is an honest statement of a computational restriction and does not undermine the wannier-based SOC analysis. Self-citations (Refs. 85, 90, 115, 128) are for codes, tools, or unrelated results and are not load-bearing; the QS framework itself comes from external works (Refs. 91-93). Thus no step reduces to its own input by construction, and the paper is best scored as essentially non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. The central inputs are standard perturbation theory, the k·p/Bloch approximation, and a new physical hypothesis—sublattice localization generates quasisymmetry—which is validated only by the chosen examples and the ε metric. Wurtzite k·p parameters are fitted from DFT. No free parameter is fitted to the quasisymmetry metric itself, but the choice of subspace A and proposed operator Q strongly influences ε.

free parameters (1)
  • Wurtzite k·p parameters (Δ1, Δ2, Δ3, A1–A7) = Not tabulated; fitted to DFT band structures (Sec. III A 3, Fig. 6a)
    Used to evaluate the quasi-cubic ratio Δ3/Δ2 and to test the inversion-QS constraints; these are standard k·p parameters fitted to ab initio bands, not part of the core ε computation.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Löwdin partitioning perturbation theory (Eqs. 1-3) for separating subspace A and remote bands B
    Used throughout Sec. II A to define first- and second-order contributions to the effective Hamiltonian; standard quantum-mechanical perturbation theory.
  • domain assumption Bloch-function approximation u_{n,k}(r) ≈ u_{n,k0}(r) for k=k0+δk when |δk·p_{mn}/Δ_{nm}|≪1 (Eqs. 9-10)
    Load-bearing for the inheritance picture in Sec. II B and the AgLa analysis in Sec. III B; not quantitatively validated for the T and W paths.
  • domain assumption H_SOC ≈ H_FR − H_SR ⊗ σ0 with compatible Wannier bases (Eq. 14)
    Used to extract first-order SOC intensities for TMDs (Sec. II D, III A 2); the paper notes in Sec. III A that the basis-compatibility requirement fails for Sn/SiC due to highly entangled bands.
  • ad hoc to paper Strong wavefunction localization on a sublattice makes the sublattice's extra symmetry Q an approximate symmetry of the selected subspace A
    The proposed mechanism for the emergent-symmetry picture (Sec. II A, III A); supported only by the selected case studies and the ε metric, not by a general theorem.
  • domain assumption δk-dependent SOC terms are small compared with p-dependent terms in k·p models
    Used in Sec. III B to explain why AgLa's T-path gaps are smaller than W-path gaps; qualitative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physical Pictures for Quasisymmetry in Crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P4BAJQFA

@misc{pith2026260218132,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physical Pictures for Quasisymmetry in Crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P4BAJQFA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.18132}
}
abstract

Quasisymmetry (QS) provides a novel route to understand and control near-degeneracies, Berry curvature, optical selection rules, and symmetry-protected phenomena in quantum materials. Here we give physical interpretations of the emergence of QS operators across multiple material families. Using density functional theory and the $\mathbf{\mathit{k}}\cdot\mathbf{\mathit{p}}$ formalism, we identify QS subspaces and calculate their representation matrices, quantifying the quasisymmetry via a metric $\epsilon$ that measures subspace invariance. For Sn/SiC and transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers, QS corresponds to an emergent mirror symmetry, whereas in wurtzite crystals it manifests as an emergent spatial inversion. By contrast, for AgLa the QS appearing in avoided crossings is inherited from a nearby high-symmetry point rather than being an emergent lattice symmetry. Combining group-theoretical analysis and $\mathbf{\mathit{k}}\cdot\mathbf{\mathit{p}}$ modeling, our results establish concrete physical pictures for QS and provide practical criteria to diagnose it in first-principles calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.18132 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Top view of a 2H transition metal dichalco [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Crystal structure of the Sn/SiC(0001)-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Complex matrix Qm,n = ⟨m|My|n⟩, with the RL and ZL subspaces highlighted by the dashed lines. The val￾ues within the squares of the diagram correspond to |Qm,n| 2 , which also defines the color intensity, while the color itself represents the complex phase of the matrix element. The ma￾trix is shown on a large scale in (a), while in (b) we zoom into the RL and ZL subspaces. it matches our emergent symmetry picture. … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Band structure of MoS2 calculated us￾ing Quantum ESPRESSO and Wannier90, without SOC (black dashed lines) and with SOC (red solid lines). (b) Side and top views of the charge density associated with the first con￾duction band of MoS2 at K. The brown and cyan sphere…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a,c) Complex matrices Qm,n = ⟨m|My|n⟩ for the TMD monolayers MoS2 and WSe2, respectively. The regions enclosed by dashed lines correspond to the QS subspaces. (b,d) Zoom into the QS subspaces of (a,c). (e,g) Equivalent matrices, Qm,n = ⟨m|I|n⟩, for the wurtzites GaN a…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Band structure of wurtzite GaN obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Simple cubic unit cell of AgLa, with La (green) and Ag (gray) atoms. (b) Brillouin zone of the AgLa crystal, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sn/SiC We consider the Sn/SiC(0001)-1×1 surface, a trian- gular lattice of Sn atoms adsorbed on a 6H-SiC (0001) substrate [Fig. 2(a)]. The Brillouin zone is shown in Fig. 2(b). This system hosts quasi-degenerate states near theKpoint, with conflicting interpretations in the lit- erature [94, 95]. In Ref. [94], the authors explain the near degeneracy as an...

  2. [2]

    with theQsymmcode [117]. The vanishing of theδ n,m i terms indicates that the small SOC gap in RL bands arises, to leading order, from second-order contributions from ∆R,Z+ x ≈∆ R,Z− x , which are constrained to be equal by the quasisymmetry, as well as the intraband couplings ∆Z+ z ≈∆ Z− z within the ZL sector. To connect theM y quasisymmetry with the SU...

  3. [3]

    Monolayer TMDs A similar mechanism appears in monolayer TMDs such as MoS 2 and WSe 2, which belong to space groupP 6m2 (D1 3h) and exhibit unusually small SOC splitting in the first conduction band at theKpoint (little groupC 3h), as shown in Fig. 4. The standard explanation from Ref. [125] uses a tight-binding model withH SOC =λL·S, justified by strong W...

  4. [4]

    Wurtzites Wurtzite materials such as GaN, GaP, and ZnO belong to space groupP6 3mc(C 4 6v) with little groupC 6v at Γ. Their band structures are commonly modeled using the quasi-cubic approximation [43–47], treating wurtzite as a strained zincblende (space groupF ¯43morT 2 d ) along the [111] direction. Thus, the quasi-cubic approximation can be interpret...

  5. [5]

    G. F. Koster, J. O. Dimmock, R. G. Wheeler, and H. Statz,The Properties of the Thirty-Two Point Groups(M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1963)

    1963

  6. [6]

    Bir and G

    G. Bir and G. Pikus,Symmetry and Strain-induced Ef- fects in Semiconductors, A Halsted Press book (Wiley, 1974)

    1974

  7. [7]

    Winkler,Spin-orbit coupling effects in two- dimensional electron and hole systems, Springer tracts in modern physics (Springer, Berlin, 2003)

    R. Winkler,Spin-orbit coupling effects in two- dimensional electron and hole systems, Springer tracts in modern physics (Springer, Berlin, 2003)

    2003

  8. [8]

    Dresselhaus, G

    M. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Mat- ter, SpringerLink: Springer e-Books (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007)

    2007

Show all 141 references
  1. [9]

    Willatzen and L

    M. Willatzen and L. C. L. Y. Voon,The kp method: electronic properties of semiconductors, Vol. 1 (Springer, 2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Peter and M

    Y. Peter and M. Cardona,Fundamentals of Semicon- ductors: Physics and Materials Properties(Springer Science & Business Media, 2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Nonstandard symme- try classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hy- brid structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  4. [12]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Building blocks of topological quantum chemistry: Ele- mentary band representations, Phys. Rev. B97, 035139 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Cano and B

    J. Cano and B. Bradlyn, Band representations and topo- logical quantum chemistry, Annu. Rev. Conden. Ma. P. 12, 225–246 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  9. [17]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z 2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quan- tum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells, Science314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    K¨ onig, S

    M. K¨ onig, S. Wiedmann, C. Br¨ une, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall insulator state in hgte quantum wells, Science318, 766 (2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    Hsieh, D

    D. Hsieh, D. Qian, L. Wray, Y. Xia, Y. S. Hor, R. J. Cava, and M. Z. Hasan, A topological dirac insulator in a quantum spin hall phase, Nature452, 970 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Hsieh, Y

    D. Hsieh, Y. Xia, D. Qian, L. Wray, J. H. Dil, F. Meier, J. Osterwalder, L. Patthey, J. G. Checkelsky, N. P. Ong, A. V. Fedorov, H. Lin, A. Bansil, D. Grauer, Y. S. Hor, R. J. Cava, and M. Z. Hasan, A tunable topological in- sulator in the spin helical dirac transport regime, ...

    2009

  14. [22]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys

    L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 10.1103/physrevlett.106.106802 (2011)

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    Tanaka, Z

    Y. Tanaka, Z. Ren, T. Sato, K. Nakayama, S. Souma, T. Takahashi, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Experimental realization of a topological crystalline insulator in snte, Nat. Phys.8, 800–803 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Dziawa, B

    P. Dziawa, B. J. Kowalski, K. Dybko, R. Buczko, A. Szczerbakow, M. Szot, E. Lusakowska, T. Balasub- ramanian, B. M. Wojek, M. H. Berntsen, O. Tjernberg, and T. Story, Topological crystalline insulator states in pb1-xsnxse, Nat. Mater.11, 1023 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y. Savrasov, Topological semimetal and fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. B83, 205101 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    A. A. Burkov and L. Balents, Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 127205 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Singh, A

    B. Singh, A. Sharma, H. Lin, M. Z. Hasan, R. Prasad, and A. Bansil, Topological electronic structure and weyl semimetal in the tlbise2 class of semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B86, 115208 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    S. M. Young, S. Zaheer, J. C. Y. Teo, C. L. Kane, E. J. Mele, and A. M. Rappe, Dirac semimetal in three di- mensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 140405 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    M. Z. Hasan, S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, and S.-M. Huang, Discovery of weyl fermion semimetals and topological 11 fermi arc states, Annu. Rev. Conden. Ma. P.8, 289–309 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and su- perconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Kitaev, V

    A. Kitaev, V. Lebedev, and M. Feigel’man, Periodic ta- ble for topological insulators and superconductors, in AIP Conference Proceedings(AIP, 2009) p. 22–30

    2009

  26. [34]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    Neupert, M

    T. Neupert, M. M. Denner, J.-X. Yin, R. Thomale, and M. Z. Hasan, Charge order and superconductivity in kagome materials, Nat. Phys.18, 137–143 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Zhang, Z

    Z. Zhang, Z. Wu, C. Fang, F.-c. Zhang, J. Hu, Y. Wang, and S. Qin, Topological superconductivity from uncon- ventional band degeneracy with conventional pairing, Nat. Commun.15, 10.1038/s41467-024-52156-1 (2024)

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Krempask´ y, L

    J. Krempask´ y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Simplified lcao method for the periodic potential problem, Phys. Rev.94, 1498–1524 (1954)

    1954

  34. [42]

    C. M. Goringe, D. R. Bowler, and E. Hern´ andez, Tight- binding modelling of materials, Rep. Prog. Phys.60, 1447 (1997)

    1997

  35. [43]

    J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Motion of electrons and holes in perturbed periodic fields, Phys. Rev.97, 869 (1955)

    1955

  36. [44]

    E. O. Kane, Energy band structure in p-type germanium and silicon, J. Phys. Chem. Solids1, 82 (1956)

    1956

  37. [45]

    E. O. Kane, Band structure of indium antimonide, J. Phys. Chem. Solids1, 249 (1957)

    1957

  38. [46]

    J. M. Luttinger and W. Kohn, Motion of Electrons and Holes in Perturbed Periodic Fields, Phys. Rev.97, 869 (1955)

    1955

  39. [47]

    Cardona and F

    M. Cardona and F. H. Pollak, Energy-Band Structure of Germanium and Silicon: The kp Method, Phys. Rev. 142, 530 (1966)

    1966

  40. [48]

    Hopfdeld, Fine structure in the optical absorption edge of anisotropic crystals, J

    J. Hopfdeld, Fine structure in the optical absorption edge of anisotropic crystals, J. Phys. Chem. Solids15, 97 (1960)

    1960

  41. [49]

    L. C. Lew Yan Voon, M. Willatzen, M. Cardona, and N. E. Christensen, Terms linear in k in the band struc- ture of wurtzite-type semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B53, 10703 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    S. L. Chuang and C. S. Chang, kp method for strained wurtzite semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B54, 2491 (1996)

    1996

  43. [51]

    Gutsche and E

    E. Gutsche and E. Jahne, Spin-Orbit Splitting of the Valence Band of Wurtzite Type Crystals, Phys. Status Solidi B19, 823 (1967)

    1967

  44. [52]

    Pikus, A new method of calculating the energy spec- trum of carriers in semiconductors

    G. Pikus, A new method of calculating the energy spec- trum of carriers in semiconductors. i. neglecting spin- orbit interaction, Sov. Phys. J. Exp. Theor. Phys.14, 898 (1962)

    1962

  45. [53]

    Y. A. Bychkov and ´E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2d electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP lett 39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  46. [54]

    Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys

    G. Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

    1955

  47. [55]

    Mera Acosta, L

    C. Mera Acosta, L. Yuan, G. M. Dalpian, and A. Zunger, Different shapes of spin textures as a journey through the brillouin zone, Phys. Rev. B104, 104408 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Liu and Y

    W. Liu and Y. Xu,Spintronic 2D materials: fundamen- tals and applications(Elsevier, 2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Splendiani, L

    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C.-Y. Chim, G. Galli, and F. Wang, Emerging photolumines- cence in monolayer mos2, Nano Lett.10, 1271 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of mos 2 and other group-vi dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der waals het- erostructures, Nature499, 419–425 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically thin mos2: a new direct-gap semiconductor, Physical review letters105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    K. M. McCreary, A. T. Hanbicki, G. G. Jernigan, J. C. Culbertson, and B. T. Jonker, Synthesis of large-area ws2 monolayers with exceptional photoluminescence, Scientific reports6, 19159 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Wo´ zniak, P

    T. Wo´ zniak, P. E. Faria Junior, G. Seifert, A. Chaves, and J. Kunstmann, Excitongfactors of van der waals heterostructures from first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B101, 10.1103/physrevb.101.235408 (2020)

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    Singh, D

    V. Singh, D. J. Late, and S. Rath, Tunable light emis- sion from chemical vapor deposited two-dimensional mose2 by layer variation and s incorporation, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A38(2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    A. M. Jones, H. Yu, N. J. Ghimire, S. Wu, G. Aivazian, J. S. Ross, B. Zhao, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, D. Xiao, et al., Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer wse2, Nature nanotechnology8, 634 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    P. E. Faria Junior, D. Hernang´ omez-P´ erez, T. Amit, J. Fabian, and S. Refaely-Abramson, Generalized many- body excitongfactors: Magnetic hybridization and nonmonotonic rydberg series in monolayer wse 2, Phys. Rev. B112, L241404 (2025)

    2025

  58. [66]

    Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Cole- man, and M. S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectron- ics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Nanotechnology7, 699–712 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    Chhowalla, H

    M. Chhowalla, H. S. Shin, G. Eda, L.-J. Li, K. P. Loh, and H. Zhang, The chemistry of two-dimensional lay- ered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets, Nature Chemistry5, 263–275 (2013)

    2013

  60. [68]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Photonics and optoelectronics of 2d semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Photonics10, 216–226 (2016). 12

    2016

  61. [69]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2d transition metal dichalcogenides, Na- ture Reviews Materials2, 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33 (2017)

    2017 doi

  62. [70]

    Glazov, A

    M. Glazov, A. Arora, A. Chaves, and Y. G. Gobato, Excitons in two-dimensional materials and heterostruc- tures: Optical and magneto-optical properties, MRS Bull.49, 899–913 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    S. Deb, J. Krause, P. E. Faria Junior, M. A. Kempf, R. Schwartz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Fabian, and T. Korn, Excitonic signatures of ferroelectric order in parallel-stacked mos2, Nat. Commun.15, 10.1038/s41467-024-52011-3 (2024)

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    G. H. Han, D. L. Duong, D. H. Keum, S. J. Yun, and Y. H. Lee, van der waals metallic transition metal dichalcogenides, Chemical Reviews118, 6297–6336 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Yagmurcukardes, Y

    M. Yagmurcukardes, Y. Qin, S. Ozen, M. Sayyad, F. M. Peeters, S. Tongay, and H. Sahin, Quantum properties and applications of 2d janus crystals and their super- lattices, Applied Physics Reviews7, 10.1063/1.5135306 (2020)

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. Zhou, and Y. Guo, Symmetry manipula- tion of two-dimensional semiconductors by janus struc- ture, Accounts of Materials Research6, 124–128 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Zhang, Z

    L. Zhang, Z. Yang, T. Gong, R. Pan, H. Wang, Z. Guo, H. Zhang, and X. Fu, Recent advances in emerging janus two-dimensional materials: from fundamental physics to device applications, Journal of Materials Chemistry A8, 8813–8830 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    Yin, H.-J

    W.-J. Yin, H.-J. Tan, P.-J. Ding, B. Wen, X.-B. Li, G. Teobaldi, and L.-M. Liu, Recent advances in low- dimensional janus materials: theoretical and simulation perspectives, Materials Advances2, 7543–7558 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    Garcia-Arellano, K

    G. Garcia-Arellano, K. Boujdaria, M. Chamarro, and C. Testelin, Land´ egfactors in tetragonal halide per- ovskite: A multiband k.p model, Phys. Rev. B106, 165201 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    S. D. Stranks and H. J. Snaith, Metal-halide perovskites for photovoltaic and light-emitting devices, Nature Nan- otechnology10, 391 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    A. K. Jena, A. Kulkarni, and T. Miyasaka, Halide per- ovskite photovoltaics: Background, status, and future prospects, Chemical Reviews119, 3036 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Naguib, V

    M. Naguib, V. N. Mochalin, M. W. Barsoum, and Y. Gogotsi, 25th anniversary article: Mxenes: A new family of two-dimensional materials, Advanced Materi- als26, 992–1005 (2013)

    2013

  73. [81]

    Khazaei, A

    M. Khazaei, A. Ranjbar, M. Arai, T. Sasaki, and S. Yunoki, Electronic properties and applications of mx- enes: a theoretical review, Journal of Materials Chem- istry C5, 2488–2503 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    S. Guha, A. Kabiraj, and S. Mahapatra, High- throughput design of functional-engineered mxene tran- sistors with low-resistive contacts, npj Computational Materials8, 10.1038/s41524-022-00885-6 (2022)

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    Li, R.-L

    J. Li, R.-L. Chu, J. K. Jain, and S.-Q. Shen, Topolog- ical Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 136806 (2009)

    2009

  76. [84]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, J. Tworzyd lo, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Theory of the topological Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 196805 (2009)

    2009

  77. [85]

    St¨ utzer, Y

    S. St¨ utzer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, P. Titum, N. H. Lindner, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Photonic topological anderson insulators, Nature560, 461–465 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    Zhang, Z.-Q

    J. Zhang, Z.-Q. Zhang, S.-g. Cheng, and H. Jiang, Topological anderson insulator via disorder-recovered average symmetry, Phys. Rev. B106, 10.1103/phys- revb.106.195304 (2022)

    2022 doi

  79. [87]

    M. D. Caio, G. M¨ oller, N. R. Cooper, and M. J. Bhaseen, Topological marker currents in chern insula- tors, Nat. Phys.15, 257–261 (2019)

    2019

  80. [88]

    Varjas, M

    D. Varjas, M. Fruchart, A. R. Akhmerov, and P. M. Perez-Piskunow, Computation of topological phase di- agram of disordered pb 1−xsnxTe using the kernel poly- nomial method, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 10.1103/physrevre- search.2.013229 (2020)

    2020 doi

  81. [89]

    B. D. Assun¸ c˜ ao, G. J. Ferreira, and C. H. Lewenkopf, Phase transitions and scale invariance in topological an- derson insulators, Phys. Rev. B109, L201102 (2024)

    2024

  82. [90]

    Kroumova, M

    E. Kroumova, M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, S. Ivantchev, J. M. Igartua, and H. Wondratschek, Pseudo: a program for a pseudosymmetry search, J. Appl. Crystallogr.34, 783 (2001)

    2001

  83. [91]

    P. H. Zwart, R. W. Grosse-Kunstleve, A. A. Lebedev, G. N. Murshudov, and P. D. Adams, Surprises and pit- falls arising from (pseudo)symmetry, Acta Crystallogr. D64, 99–107 (2007)

    2007

  84. [92]

    Capillas, E

    C. Capillas, E. S. Tasci, G. de la Flor, D. Oroben- goa, J. M. Perez-Mato, and M. I. Aroyo, A new com- puter tool at the bilbao crystallographic server to detect and characterize pseudosymmetry, Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater.226, 186 (2011)

    2011

  85. [93]

    Nolze, T

    G. Nolze, T. Tokarski, and L. Rychlowski, Use of elec- tron backscatter diffraction patterns to determine the crystal lattice. part 3. pseudosymmetry, J. Appl. Crys- tallogr.56, 367–380 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    Crasto de Lima and G

    F. Crasto de Lima and G. J. Ferreira, High-degeneracy points protected by site-permutation symmetries, Phys. Rev. B101, 041107 (2020)

    2020

  87. [95]

    C. Guo, L. Hu, C. Putzke, J. Diaz, X. Huang, K. Manna, F.-R. Fan, C. Shekhar, Y. Sun, C. Felser, C. Liu, B. A. Bernevig, and P. J. W. Moll, Quasi-symmetry-protected topology in a semi-metal, Nat. Phys.18, 813 (2022)

    2022

  88. [96]

    L.-H. Hu, C. Guo, Y. Sun, C. Felser, L. Elcoro, P. J. W. Moll, C.-X. Liu, and B. A. Bernevig, Hierarchy of qua- sisymmetries and degeneracies in the CoSi family of chi- ral crystal materials, Phys. Rev. B107, 125145 (2023)

    2023

  89. [97]

    J. Li, A. Zhang, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, Group Theory on Quasisymmetry and Protected Near Degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 026402 (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    K. Yaji, A. Visikovskiy, T. Iimori, K. Kuroda, S. Hayashi, T. Kajiwara, S. Tanaka, F. Komori, and S. Shin, Coexistence of Two Types of Spin Splitting Originating from Different Symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 126403 (2019)

    2019

  91. [99]

    L. L. Tao, J. Li, Y. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Sui, B. Song, M. Y. Zhuravlev, and Q. Liu, Rashba-like spin splitting around non-time-reversal-invariant momenta, Phys. Rev. B 107, 235138 (2023)

    2023

  92. [100]

    L. L. Tao, Spin polarization in materials described by noncentrosymmetric and nonsymmorphic space groups, Phys. Rev. B110, L121125 (2024)

    2024

  93. [101]

    L. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Li, H. Wu, and Q. Liu, Quantum spin hall effect protected by spin u(1) quasisymmetry, Phys. Rev. B110, L161104 (2024). 13

    2024

  94. [102]

    L. Liu, Y. Liu, J. Li, H. Wu, and Q. Liu, Orbital doublet driven even-spin chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B110, 035161 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    Li, F.-R

    J. Li, F.-R. Fan, and W. Yao, Quasisymmetry enriched gapless criticality at chern insulator transitions (2026), arXiv:2601.15011 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2026

  96. [104]

    Zhang, X

    A. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Li, P. Liu, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, Topological charge quadrupole protected by spin-orbit u(1) quasi-symmetry in antiferromagnet ndbipt, New- ton1(2025)

    2025

  97. [105]

    M. Roig, Y. Yu, R. C. Ekman, A. Kreisel, B. M. Ander- sen, and D. F. Agterberg, Quasisymmetry-constrained spin ferromagnetism in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 016703 (2025)

    2025

  98. [106]

    M. Kang, M. Lee, and S. Cheon, Subsymmetry pro- tected topology in topological insulators and supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033323 (2024)

    2024

  99. [107]

    L. L. Tao, Q. Zhang, H. Li, X. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Sui, B. Song, and M. Y. Zhuravlev, Quasisymmetry pro- tected ising spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.155412 (2023)

    2023 doi

  100. [108]

    J. Ren, C. Liang, and C. Fang, Quasisymmetry groups and many-body scar dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 10.1103/physrevlett.126.120604 (2021)

    2021 doi

  101. [109]

    Ren, Y.-P

    J. Ren, Y.-P. Wang, and C. Fang, Quasi-nambu- goldstone modes in many-body scar models, Phys. Rev. B110, 10.1103/physrevb.110.245101 (2024)

    2024 doi

  102. [110]

    L¨ owdin, A note on the quantum-mechanical per- turbation theory, J

    P.-O. L¨ owdin, A note on the quantum-mechanical per- turbation theory, J. Chem. Phys.19, 1396 (1951)

    1951

  103. [111]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Giron- coli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerst- mann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin- Samos, N. Marzari, F...

    2009

  104. [112]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carn- imeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. G...

    2017

  105. [113]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  106. [114]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  107. [115]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  108. [116]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune,et al., Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications, J. Phys. Condens. Mat- ter32, 165902 (2020)

    2020

  109. [117]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  110. [118]

    T. Cole, S. Coh, and D. Vanderbilt, Python Tight Bind- ing (PythTB) (2025)

    2025

  111. [119]

    J. V. V. Cassiano, A. de Lelis Ara´ ujo, P. E. Faria Junior, and G. J. Ferreira, Dft2kp: Effective kp models from ab-initio data, SciPost Physics Codebases 10.21468/sci- postphyscodeb.25 (2024)

    2024 doi

  112. [120]

    Iraola, J

    M. Iraola, J. L. Ma˜ nes, B. Bradlyn, M. K. Horton, T. Neupert, M. G. Vergniory, and S. S. Tsirkin, IrRep: Symmetry eigenvalues and irreducible representations of ab initio band structures, Comput. Phys. Commun. 272, 108226 (2022)

    2022

  113. [121]

    Varjas, T

    D. Varjas, T. ¨O. Rosdahl, and A. R. Akhmerov, Qsymm: Algorithmic symmetry finding and symmetric hamilto- nian generation, New J. Phys.20, 093026 (2018)

    2018

  114. [122]

    Sakuma, Symmetry-adapted wannier functions in the maximal localization procedure, Phys

    R. Sakuma, Symmetry-adapted wannier functions in the maximal localization procedure, Phys. Rev. B87, 235109 (2013)

    2013

  115. [123]

    S. S. Tsirkin, High performance wannier interpolation of berry curvature and related quantities with wannier- berri code, NPJ Comput. Mater.7, 10.1038/s41524-021- 00498-5 (2021)

    2021 doi

  116. [124]

    R. Wang, E. A. Lazar, H. Park, A. J. Millis, and C. A. Marianetti, Selectively localized wannier func- tions, Phys. Rev. B90, 10.1103/physrevb.90.165125 (2014)

    2014 doi

  117. [125]

    R. S. Mulliken, Report on notation for the spectra of polyatomic molecules, J. Chem. Phys.23, 1997–2011 (1955)

    1997

  118. [126]

    Aroyo, J

    M. Aroyo, J. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. De La Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bilbao crystallographic server, Bulg. Chem. Commun. 43, 183 – 197 (2011), cited by: 637

    2011

  119. [127]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao crystallographic server: I. databases and crystallographic computing programs, Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater.221, 15–27 (2006)

    2006

  120. [128]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. M. Perez-Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao crystallographic server. ii. representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crystallogr. A62, 115–128 (2006)

    2006

  121. [129]

    Ko´ smider, J

    K. Ko´ smider, J. W. Gonz´ alez, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Large spin splitting in the conduction band of transi- tion metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B88, 245436 (2013)

    2013

  122. [130]

    Z. Y. Zhu, Y. C. Cheng, and U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, Gi- ant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B84, 10.1103/physrevb.84.153402 (2011)

    2011 doi

  123. [131]

    P. E. Faria Junior, T. Campos, C. M. Bastos, M. Gmi- tra, J. Fabian, and G. M. Sipahi, Realistic multiband kp approach from ab initio and spin-orbit coupling ef- 14 fects of inas and inp in wurtzite phase, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235204 (2016)

    2016

  124. [132]

    J. Fu, P. H. Penteado, D. R. Candido, G. J. Ferreira, D. P. Pires, E. Bernardes, and J. C. Egues, Spin-orbit coupling in wurtzite heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134416 (2020)

    2020

  125. [133]

    D. W. Langer, R. N. Euwema, K. Era, and T. Koda, Spin exchange in excitons, the quasicubic model and deformation potentials in ii-vi compounds, Phys. Rev. B2, 4005–4022 (1970)

    1970

  126. [134]

    Suzuki, T

    M. Suzuki, T. Uenoyama, and A. Yanase, First- principles calculations of effective-mass parameters of AlN and GaN, Phys. Rev. B52, 8132 (1995)

    1995

  127. [135]

    A. A. Yamaguchi, Y. Mochizuki, H. Sunakawa, and A. Usui, Determination of valence band splitting pa- rameters in gan, J. Appl. Phys.83, 4542–4544 (1998)

    1998

  128. [136]

    D. J. Dugdale, S. Brand, and R. A. Abram, Direct cal- culation ofk·pparameters for wurtzite aln, gan, and inn, Phys. Rev. B61, 12933 (2000)

    2000

  129. [137]

    W. R. L. Lambrecht, A. V. Rodina, S. Limpijumnong, B. Segall, and B. K. Meyer, Valence-band ordering and magneto-optic exciton fine structure in zno, Phys. Rev. B65, 10.1103/physrevb.65.075207 (2002)

    2002 doi

  130. [138]

    Assali, J

    S. Assali, J. Greil, I. Zardo, A. Belabbes, M. W. A. de Moor, S. Koelling, P. M. Koenraad, F. Bechstedt, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and J. E. M. Haverkort, Optical study of the band structure of wurtzite gap nanowires, J. Appl. Phys.120, 10.1063/1.4959147 (2016)

    2016 doi

  131. [139]

    B. C. da Silva, O. D. D. Couto, H. T. Obata, M. M. de Lima, F. D. Bonani, C. E. de Oliveira, G. M. Sipahi, F. Iikawa, and M. A. Cotta, Optical absorption exhibits pseudo-direct band gap of wurtzite gallium phosphide, Sci. Rep.10, 10.1038/s41598-020-64809-4 (2020)

    2020 doi

  132. [140]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  133. [141]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. H. Madsen, and L. D. Marks, Wien2k: An apw+lo program for calculating the properties of solids, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074101 (2020). Appendix A: Computational Methodology First-principles simulations were performed within the fr...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.