Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Explainability Methods: Insights into Sparse Network Performance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.13698 v1 pith:P525VV2I submitted 2023-07-07 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords networkperformanceexplainabilityprunednetworksconceptshypothesislimited
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Discovering a high-performing sparse network within a massive neural network is advantageous for deploying them on devices with limited storage, such as mobile phones. Additionally, model explainability is essential to fostering trust in AI. The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) finds a network within a deep network with comparable or superior performance to the original model. However, limited study has been conducted on the success or failure of LTH in terms of explainability. In this work, we examine why the performance of the pruned networks gradually increases or decreases. Using Grad-CAM and Post-hoc concept bottleneck models (PCBMs), respectively, we investigate the explainability of pruned networks in terms of pixels and high-level concepts. We perform extensive experiments across vision and medical imaging datasets. As more weights are pruned, the performance of the network degrades. The discovered concepts and pixels from the pruned networks are inconsistent with the original network -- a possible reason for the drop in performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Does Pruning Benefit Vision Representations?

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Pruned vision models can outperform dense ones on interpretability, object discovery, and distortion robustness, but only at architecture-dependent sparsity levels.

Pith tools