Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.14960 v3 pith:P5EYUV2H submitted 2022-03-24 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords slicesdominosdmscross-modaldataframeworkimagesmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models that achieve high overall accuracy often make systematic errors on important subsets (or slices) of data. Identifying underperforming slices is particularly challenging when working with high-dimensional inputs (e.g. images, audio), where important slices are often unlabeled. In order to address this issue, recent studies have proposed automated slice discovery methods (SDMs), which leverage learned model representations to mine input data for slices on which a model performs poorly. To be useful to a practitioner, these methods must identify slices that are both underperforming and coherent (i.e. united by a human-understandable concept). However, no quantitative evaluation framework currently exists for rigorously assessing SDMs with respect to these criteria. Additionally, prior qualitative evaluations have shown that SDMs often identify slices that are incoherent. In this work, we address these challenges by first designing a principled evaluation framework that enables a quantitative comparison of SDMs across 1,235 slice discovery settings in three input domains (natural images, medical images, and time-series data). Then, motivated by the recent development of powerful cross-modal representation learning approaches, we present Domino, an SDM that leverages cross-modal embeddings and a novel error-aware mixture model to discover and describe coherent slices. We find that Domino accurately identifies 36% of the 1,235 slices in our framework - a 12 percentage point improvement over prior methods. Further, Domino is the first SDM that can provide natural language descriptions of identified slices, correctly generating the exact name of the slice in 35% of settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Metadata: CAPRA for Hidden Subgroup Analysis under Missing Metadata in Medical Imaging

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CAPRA calibrates image-derived semantic proxy axes on a small labeled split into a reusable subgroup interface for failure auditing and domain-dependent robust transfer without deployment metadata.

  2. Intersectional Disentangling of Temporal and Acquisition Bias in Fetal Ultrasound

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The headline disentangling of scan-delivery and pixel-spacing effects is absent from the paper's body, which reports different results.

  3. A global log for medical AI

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MedLog defines a nine-field, syslog-style event log for clinical AI, intended to support real-world surveillance and auditing; the four-deployment validation claimed in the abstract is absent from the body.

Pith tools