Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Debiased Classifier with Biased Committee

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.10843 v5 pith:P5IOX6MF submitted 2022-06-22 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords datacommitteeclassifierspurioustrainingbias-conflictingbiasedclassifiers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural networks are prone to be biased towards spurious correlations between classes and latent attributes exhibited in a major portion of training data, which ruins their generalization capability. We propose a new method for training debiased classifiers with no spurious attribute label. The key idea is to employ a committee of classifiers as an auxiliary module that identifies bias-conflicting data, i.e., data without spurious correlation, and assigns large weights to them when training the main classifier. The committee is learned as a bootstrapped ensemble so that a majority of its classifiers are biased as well as being diverse, and intentionally fail to predict classes of bias-conflicting data accordingly. The consensus within the committee on prediction difficulty thus provides a reliable cue for identifying and weighting bias-conflicting data. Moreover, the committee is also trained with knowledge transferred from the main classifier so that it gradually becomes debiased along with the main classifier and emphasizes more difficult data as training progresses. On five real-world datasets, our method outperforms prior arts using no spurious attribute label like ours and even surpasses those relying on bias labels occasionally.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Re-evaluating Group Robustness via Adaptive Class-Specific Scaling

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Class-specific score scaling at test time lets a vanilla ERM model match or surpass debiasing methods and yields a scalar robust-average accuracy trade-off metric.

Pith tools