REVIEW 2 cited by
Attribution-based XAI Methods in Computer Vision: A Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The advancements in deep learning-based methods for visual perception tasks have seen astounding growth in the last decade, with widespread adoption in a plethora of application areas from autonomous driving to clinical decision support systems. Despite their impressive performance, these deep learning-based models remain fairly opaque in their decision-making process, making their deployment in human-critical tasks a risky endeavor. This in turn makes understanding the decisions made by these models crucial for their reliable deployment. Explainable AI (XAI) methods attempt to address this by offering explanations for such black-box deep learning methods. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of attribution-based XAI methods in computer vision and review the existing literature for gradient-based, perturbation-based, and contrastive methods for XAI, and provide insights on the key challenges in developing and evaluating robust XAI methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Verifying Machine Unlearning with Explainable AI
The authors use SIDU heatmaps and two new metrics to test whether machine unlearning removes reliance on human patterns in a thermal object-counting model.
-
Entropy-Centric Explainable AI for Remote Sensing Image Segmentation
An entropy-based sampling explanation method for segmentation, paired with a high-salience removal test, is reported to outperform Grad-CAM, Score-CAM, and Seg-Sobol on WHU building footprint segmentation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.