Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.19804 v2 pith:P5R43HPP submitted 2024-09-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords fairnessgenerationaddressattributesconcernsdemographicgithubmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently gained significant attention for its enhanced ability to integrate external knowledge sources into open-domain question answering (QA) tasks. However, it remains unclear how these models address fairness concerns, particularly with respect to sensitive attributes such as gender, geographic location, and other demographic factors. First, as language models evolve to prioritize utility, like improving exact match accuracy, fairness considerations may have been largely overlooked. Second, the complex, multi-component architecture of RAG methods poses challenges in identifying and mitigating biases, as each component is optimized for distinct objectives. In this paper, we aim to empirically evaluate fairness in several RAG methods. We propose a fairness evaluation framework tailored to RAG, using scenario-based questions and analyzing disparities across demographic attributes. Our experimental results indicate that, despite recent advances in utility-driven optimization, fairness issues persist in both the retrieval and generation stages. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address fairness concerns throughout the RAG pipeline. The dataset and code used in this study are publicly available at this GitHub Repository https://github.com/elviswxy/RAG_fairness .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bias Amplification in RAG: Poisoning Knowledge Retrieval to Steer LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A retrieval-augmented generation system can be poisoned with reward-optimized biased documents and vector-space manipulation to substantially increase biased LLM outputs.

  2. Safety Degradation in AI Agents

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding retrieval to aligned LLMs degrades safety: refusal rates fall, bias and harmfulness rise, and prompt-based mitigation only partially restores alignment.

  3. On the Merits of LLM-Based Corpus Enrichment

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-generated, query-biased documents added to a search corpus improve retrieval effectiveness, RAG answer accuracy, and answer attribution in proof-of-concept experiments that use oracle-selected source documents.

  4. LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion

    cs.CY 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    This paper proposes a taxonomy of LLM harms in five categories and suggests mitigation strategies plus a dynamic auditing system for responsible development.

Pith tools