REVIEW 2 cited by
Projection-Cost-Preserving Sketches: Proof Strategies and Constructions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this note we illustrate how common matrix approximation methods, such as random projection and random sampling, yield projection-cost-preserving sketches, as introduced in [FSS13, CEM+15]. A projection-cost-preserving sketch is a matrix approximation which, for a given parameter $k$, approximately preserves the distance of the target matrix to all $k$-dimensional subspaces. Such sketches have applications to scalable algorithms for linear algebra, data science, and machine learning. Our goal is to simplify the presentation of proof techniques introduced in [CEM+15] and [CMM17] so that they can serve as a guide for future work. We also refer the reader to [CYD19], which gives a similar simplified exposition of the proof covered in Section 2.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quasi-optimal hierarchically semi-separable matrix approximation
A randomized algorithm produces an HSS approximation with expected error at most O(log(N/k)) times optimal, using O(k log(N/k)) matrix-vector products.
-
A recursive butterfly factorization with optimality guarantees
A recursive butterfly representation leads to entry-access and matrix-free butterfly approximations with provably near-optimal error guarantees.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.