Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Iterating Tutte's edge-erasure rule until topology changes gives a bijective proof of topological recursion for maps.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-05 04:21 UTC pith:P5W6M6JJ

load-bearing objection A novel and potentially important bijective derivation of topological recursion, but the stuffed-case central bijection rests on an unproved root-choice independence claim that needs a real proof. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00117 v2 pith:P5W6M6JJ submitted 2026-07-31 math.GT math-phmath.COmath.MP

A bijective topological recursion for maps

Ga\"etan Borot , Alessandro Giacchetto , Lasse Merkens This is my paper
classification math.GT math-phmath.COmath.MP MSC 05A1905A1505C3081T3282B41
keywords topological recursionmapsTutte decompositionstuffed mapsself-avoiding loopspair-of-pants excisionformal generating seriesMirzakhani–McShane identity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that the standard topological-recursion formulas used to count maps of arbitrary genus and number of boundaries can be obtained by a purely bijective combinatorial procedure, valid already at the level of formal generating series and without any analyticity assumption. The construction iterates Tutte's classic edge-erasing rule, stopping just before the next step would change the topology, which splits every map into a 'skin' (an annular remainder) and a 'core' on which one more application would change topology. Applying the rule once more to the core and gluing the skin to the removed piece reveals an embedded pair of pants, and excising it gives the recursion. This attaches a direct enumerative meaning to every term of the (blobbed) topological recursion, including the recursion kernel, which had previously been missing. The same mechanism extends from ordinary maps to maps with tubes (equivalently self-avoiding loop models) and to stuffed maps, where faces may have arbitrary topology.

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 5.4: for stuffed maps of topology (g,n) outside the low-topology cases (0,1), (0,2), (1,1), the generating series W*_{g,n} satisfies an excision formula of the form W*_{g,n}(x1,...,xn) = <S*(x1,x)( M_y W*_{g-1,n+1}(x,y,...)|_{y=x} + sum over splittings W*_{h',...} M_x W*_{h'',...}) + W*_{0,2}(x1,x) V_{g,n}(x;...) >_x. Here S* enumerates skin maps and acts as the recursion kernel; V_{g,n} enumerates indecomposable maps and produces the blob term; and M_x is the formal monodromy, a series-level combination of an ordinary series with the series of 'special' maps whose boundary is adjacent to a single face. Theorem 5.10 identifies S* as the quotient of an integrated

What carries the argument

Skinning: repeatedly erase the root edge of the first boundary, following Tutte's rule, but stop immediately before the step that would change the topology. The removed pieces assemble into the skin map, an annulus with one simple boundary; the remaining object is the core map. One additional Tutte step applied to the core, with the skin glued back, produces an embedded pair of pants whose excision is the recursive move. The skin generating series S*(x1,x) is the recursion kernel; the formal monodromy M_x = 1 + R_x and formal discontinuity D_x = 1 + (1/2)R_x package the 'special boundary' contributions; and V_{g,n} records the indecomposable stuffed maps that prevent a pair-of-pants excision

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that arbitrary choices of roots on unrooted boundary components created when erasing annular or internal faces are harmless: the paper states (Sections 3.5 and 4.4) that any choice yields the same stuffed map after gluing and preserves the Markovian nature of skinning, but gives no complete proof of this independence.

What would settle it

Take a stuffed map in which the first boundary is glued to one boundary component of an internal face with topology not a disc, and let the unrooted boundary left after erasing that face carry two different admissible root positions. Enumerate the resulting skin/core pairs (and the recovered maps) for a small explicit weight assignment; if the two choices lead to different generating series coefficients or different recovered maps, the bijections (3.26)/(4.19) overcount.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • The enumeration of ordinary maps, maps with tubes/self-avoiding loops, and stuffed maps is now bijective, so the recursions hold coefficient by coefficient as formal power series, with no convergence or analytic-continuation hypotheses.
  • The recursion kernel S* is enumerated explicitly by skin maps, giving the first direct combinatorial interpretation of the kernel in topological recursion for these models.
  • The blob term in the stuffed case is identified with indecomposable maps, i.e. configurations in which the first boundary is homotopic to a boundary component of an internal face and no pair-of-pants cut lowers complexity.
  • Under analytic-goodness assumptions, the formal monodromy and discontinuity operators become evaluation on the other sheet of the Zhukovsky spectral curve, and the excision formula becomes the residue form of (blobbed) topological recursion, recovering known analytic results.
  • The root-edge path that drives skinning gives a discrete analogue of the Mirzakhani–McShane identity: the same terminating configurations (hit another boundary, or meet itself) produce a pair of pants, but here the pair of pants is an actual submap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because skin maps are enumerated by a simple transfer-matrix composition of elementary skins, the recursion could yield refined statistics (number of skin layers, gluing length) and possibly new random-map decompositions of fixed-topology maps along their skin boundaries.
  • The asserted independence of arbitrary root choices on unrooted boundaries created by erasing annular or internal faces is testable on low-order coefficients; if it ever fails, the orbifold weights and the bijections (3.26) and (4.19) would need correction.
  • The path-based description suggests that the same skinning mechanism might extend to non-orientable maps or to other decorations, since only the topological effect of a Tutte step is used.
  • One could feed the skin/core decomposition into peeling-type explorations, using the skin as the random 'lazy' part, to study geometry of maps of fixed topology rather than only planar maps.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims a bijective, purely combinatorial derivation of topological-recursion-type formulae for maps, maps with tubes (equivalently self-avoiding loop models), and stuffed maps, working at the level of formal generating series and without analyticity assumptions. The construction iterates Tutte's edge-erasing procedure until the topology would change, producing a skin/core pair; gluing the skin back to the core gives a bijection, and one further topology-changing Tutte step is read as an excision of an embedded pair of pants. The skin-generating series S* is identified with the recursion kernel, and the stuffed case introduces an indecomposable contribution V_{g,n} playing the role of the blob term. Section 6 then shows that, under analytic-goodness assumptions, the formal excision formulae imply the usual (blobbed) topological recursion.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper would be a substantial advance: it gives an enumerative meaning to every term of the topological recursion for maps and of the blobbed topological recursion for stuffed maps, including the recursion kernel, and it does so without analytic continuation. The explicit bijections for ordinary maps in Section 2 are detailed and convincing, and the formal-series framework is clean. The Mirzakhani–McShane analogy is thoughtful and likely to be influential. However, the manuscript currently defers or omits several load-bearing arguments in the stuffed and tube cases, most notably the proof of independence of root choices in the skinning iteration and the derivation of the stuffed skin-enumeration formula. These are fixable in my view, but they need to be supplied before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.5 and §4.4, Eqs. (3.26) and (4.19)] The skinning bijection for maps with tubes and for stuffed maps requires choosing arbitrary roots on unrooted boundaries created when an annular or internal face is erased. The text asserts (footnote 3 and §3.5) that 'the Markovian nature of the skinning process is preserved under any such choice' and that gluing back is independent of the choice because of the rotational automorphism of the erased face, but no proof is given. The rotational automorphism of the face need not extend to an automorphism of the whole skin or core, so different choices could produce different (s, m̂) pairs. If that happens, the same map m is counted multiple times in (3.26)/(4.19) and, through them, in the excision formula (5.19). This is load-bearing. Please provide a full proof, or define the equivalence relation on pairs (s, m̂) and verify that the 1/|Aut| weights in S* and Ŵ* match the orbit sizes.
  2. [§4.4, Proposition 4.6] The skin-enumeration formula for stuffed maps, S*(x1,x), is stated with the proof omitted: the text says the argument is parallel to Proposition 3.6. This formula gives the recursion kernel and is used in Theorem 5.10 and in the analytic Section 6. In the stuffed case the positive-part identity (4.18), the pointed-disc relation (4.21), and the new annular potentials O and eO are not straightforward analogues of the maps-with-tubes case; the elimination of the S*-dependent term in (4.18) requires the triple-product identity and the annulus skinning relation. Please supply the details of the proof, at least in an appendix.
  3. [§5.1.4, Theorem 5.4] The main excision formula, Theorem 5.4, is stated as following from Proposition 4.5 by 'straightforward algebraic manipulations', but the derivation is not given. This is the central theorem of the paper (Theorem A in the introduction), and it is not merely a cosmetic repackaging: it introduces the formal monodromy M, the special-boundary series R, and the low-topology cases (0,2) and (1,1). The omitted algebra should be written out or at least carefully outlined, particularly the passage from (5.16) to (5.19) and the treatment of the (1,1) case.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 22, §4.2] The caption states that the stuffed map m has topology (g,n)=(5,1), but the displayed data (h,m)=(2,4), c=2, p1=1, p2=0, K1={3}, K2={2,4} give, via the genus constraint (4.5), g = 2 + (1+1-1) + (0+2-1) = 4. The caption should presumably say (4,1).
  2. [Footnotes 3 and 6] The paper explicitly flags the missing root-choice proof in footnotes 3 and 6 but does not provide the deferred argument. If the proof is added, these footnotes should reference it; if it is not added, the corresponding claims should be weakened.
  3. [§2.3 and §3.4] The definitions of elementary skin maps in Cases (I), (R), (D>) and (D=) are intricate; Figure 15 helps for the map case, but the tube and stuffed analogues (Figures 17–23) are not accompanied by fully worked degree-counting examples. A short worked example for one stuffed internal-face case would improve readability.
  4. [Eq. (4.17)] The notation O(x,y) vs eO(x,y) is easy to confuse; the sentence in Lemma 5.7, 'Here eO is defined as O, with the annular potential O replaced by eO', is circular on first reading. Please rename one of them or add a one-line clarification.
  5. [References] The paper repeatedly uses [BGS26] 'In preparation' for the correspondence between maps with tubes and self-avoiding loops. If this is not yet available, please state the essential part of the correspondence in the text or add a reference to a public preprint.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the skinning and excision formulae are derived from explicit bijections; the only flagged issue is an unproved root-choice independence that is a correctness gap, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's main results are not circular. The skin series S* is defined combinatorially (Definitions 2.4 and 4.4) from elementary skin maps, and Theorem B / Propositions 2.6, 3.6, and 4.6 solve the resulting recursion using the skinning relations for annuli and pointed discs; no fitted parameter or normalization is renamed as a prediction. The excision formula of Theorem A follows from the explicit bijection (5.15), with the blob term V_{g,n} defined independently via indecomposable maps (Definition 5.2) and expressed in Lemma 5.8 in terms of lower-complexity series, so the recursion is well-founded. The analytic section (Section 6) relies on the published linear loop equations of [Bor14] to identify the formal monodromy/discontinuity and to recover the usual blobbed topological recursion; this is external, machine-checkable-style evidence rather than a self-citation chain, and the combinatorial theorems do not depend on it. The only flagged self-citation to an in-preparation paper is [BGS26] in Section 3.2, used only for a side equivalence, not load-bearing. The genuine concern is root-choice independence in Section 3.5 and Section 4.4: the text asserts that 'any such choice' of root on the unrooted boundary preserves the Markovian nature and that gluing back is independent of the choice, but no proof is supplied. If that independence failed, the bijections (3.26) and (4.19) would overcount. This is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction: no equation of the paper is defined in terms of its own output. Accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The formal combinatorial theorems rest on standard formal-series conventions and on the Tutte classification. The only assumption specific to this paper is the harmless-root-independence used when internal faces create unrooted boundaries; it is flagged by the authors in Section 3.5. Section 6 additionally assumes analytically good weights. No fitted parameters or new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (6)
  • standard math Formal bilateral Laurent series with the expansion conventions 1/(x1-x2)=sum_{k>=0} x2^k/x1^{k+1} and coefficient extraction are well defined; series have finite coefficient support at each monomial in q,t.
    Used throughout Sections 2-5 to make recurrences and residues hold as formal identities; polynomiality is argued in Section 2.1 via edge-counting.
  • standard math Euler characteristic of a map satisfies chi = V - E + F = 2 - 2g - n.
    Used in Section 2.1 to define topology and in Section 2.3 to argue that a skin has vanishing Euler characteristic, hence is an annulus.
  • domain assumption Erasing the root edge of the first boundary exhausts all possibilities and the cases (I), (R), (D=), (D>) described in Section 2.2 form a complete classification.
    The whole skinning construction starts from this geometric classification; the paper recalls it from [Tut63] and [WL72].
  • domain assumption Gluing a simple boundary to another boundary is inverse to cutting and produces a unique map, so no overcounting occurs with labelled rooted boundaries; in the orbifold setting, automorphism factors are handled by ordinary weights.
    Used to define elementary skin maps and the bijections (2.26), (3.26), and (4.19); the simple-face condition is defined in Section 2.3.
  • ad hoc to paper For maps with tubes and stuffed maps, the arbitrary choice of a root on an unrooted boundary created by erasing an internal or annular face does not change the resulting isomorphism class and preserves the Markovian nature of the iteration.
    Explicitly introduced in Section 3.5 and used for the skinning bijections in Sections 3.4 through 4.4; no detailed proof of independence is supplied.
  • domain assumption There exist 'analytically good' assignments of the weights satisfying properties (A1)-(C3) for which the generating series converge and continue meromorphically after the Zhukovsky change of variables.
    Section 6 derives analytic blobbed topological recursion only under this assumption; existence is asserted with citations to [Eyn16], [BEO15], and [Bor14], not proved here.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 56764 in / 16634 out tokens · 179947 ms · 2026-08-05T04:21:38.118439+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A bijective topological recursion for maps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P5W6M6JJ

@misc{pith2026260800117,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A bijective topological recursion for maps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P5W6M6JJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00117}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We prove bijectively a recursive excision formula for maps of arbitrary topology. This yields the topological recursion formulae governing their enumeration, already at the level of formal generating series and without any analyticity assumption. We extend the result to maps carrying self-avoiding loop models and to stuffed maps, i.e. a variant of maps allowing faces of arbitrary topology. Our results give a precise combinatorial meaning to all terms of the (blobbed) topological recursion known for (stuffed) maps, including the recursion kernel, which had so far been missing. The construction relies on the simple idea of iterating Tutte's algorithm until the topology changes. Equivalently, it can be interpreted as a pair-of-pants decomposition driven by a path issuing from the root of the first boundary, providing an analogue for maps of the Mirzakhani-McShane identity for hyperbolic surfaces.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , title =

    Tutte, William T. , title =. 1962 , journal =

    work page 1962

  2. [2]

    , title =

    Tutte, William T. , title =. 1963 , journal =

    work page 1963

  3. [3]

    and Lehman, Alfred B

    Walsh, Timothy R.S. and Lehman, Alfred B. , journal =. Counting rooted maps by genus. 1972 , publisher =

    work page 1972

  4. [4]

    A planar diagram theory for strong interactions , year =. Nucl. Phys. B , fjournal =

    work page

  5. [5]

    Planar diagrams , year =

    Br. Planar diagrams , year =. Commun. Math. Phys. , fjournal =

    work page

  6. [6]

    , title =

    Harer, John and Zagier, Don B. , title =. 1986 , journal =

    work page 1986

  7. [7]

    1990 , journal =

    Witten, Edward , title =. 1990 , journal =

    work page 1990

  8. [8]

    Higher Genus Correlators from the Hermitian One-Matrix Model

    Ambj. Higher genus correlators from the hermitian one-matrix model , year =. Phys. Lett. B , fjournal =. hep-th/9203009 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    1992 , journal =

    Kontsevich, Maxim , title =. 1992 , journal =

    work page 1992

  10. [10]

    Matrix model calculations beyond the spherical limit , year =

    Ambj. Matrix model calculations beyond the spherical limit , year =. Nucl. Phys. B , fjournal =. hep-th/9302014 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Construction of Non-critical String Field Theory by Transfer Matrix Formalism in Dynamical Triangulation

    Watabiki, Yoshiyuki , title =. 1995 , journal =. hep-th/9401096 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  12. [12]

    2004 , journal =

    Eynard, Bertrand , title =. 2004 , journal =. hep-th/0407261 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    and Zvonkin, Alexander K

    Lando, Sergei K. and Zvonkin, Alexander K. , title =. 2004 , publisher =

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Topological expansion of the 2-matrix model correlation functions: diagrammatic rules for a residue formula

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas , title =. 2005 , journal =. math-ph/0504058 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    2007 , journal =

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas , title =. 2007 , journal =. math-ph/0702045 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  16. [16]

    2007 , journal =

    Mirzakhani, Maryam , title =. 2007 , journal =

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    Topological expansion of mixed correlations in the hermitian 2 Matrix Model and x-y symmetry of the F_g invariants

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas , title =. 2008 , journal =. 0705.0958 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Topological expansion and boundary conditions

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas , title =. 2008 , journal =. 0710.0223 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [19]

    Enumeration of maps with self avoiding loops and the O(n) model on random lattices of all topologies

    Borot, Ga\"etan and Eynard, Bertrand , title =. 2011 , journal =. 0910.5896 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Formal matrix integrals and combinatorics of maps

    Eynard, Bertrand , title =. Random Matrices, Random Processes and Integrable Systems , editors =. 2011 , publisher =. math-ph/0611087 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    A recursive approach to the O(n) model on random maps via nested loops

    Borot, Ga\"etan and Bouttier, J\'er\'emie and Guitter, Emmanuel , title =. 2012 , journal =. 1106.0153 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    More on the O(n) model on random maps via nested loops: loops with bending energy

    Borot, Ga\"etan and Bouttier, J\'er\'emie and Guitter, Emmanuel , title =. 2012 , journal =. 1202.5521 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    Asymptotic expansion of

    Borot, Ga. Asymptotic expansion of. 2013 , journal =. 1107.1167 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Formal multidimensional integrals, stuffed maps, and topological recursion

    Borot, Ga\"etan , title =. 2014 , journal =. 1307.4957 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    2009 , archivePrefix =

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas , title =. 2009 , archivePrefix =

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    , title =

    Kostov, Ivan K. , title =. Mod. Phys. Lett. A , fjournal =. 1989 , pages =

    work page 1989

  27. [27]

    and Staudacher, Matthias , title =

    Kostov, Ivan K. and Staudacher, Matthias , title =. Nucl. Phys. B , fjournal =. 1992 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/9203030 , doi =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  28. [28]

    Eynard, Bertrand and Kristjansen, Charlotte , title =. Nucl. Phys. B , fjournal =. 1995 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/9506193 , doi =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  29. [29]

    ALEA, Lat

    Korzhenkova, Aleksandra , title =. ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , fjournal =. 2022 , archivePrefix =. 2112.11576 , doi =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Abstract loop equations, topological recursion, and applications

    Borot, Ga. Abstract loop equations, topological recursion and new applications , year =. Commun. Number Theory Phys. , fjournal =. 1303.5808 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    The peeling process of infinite Boltzmann planar maps

    Budd, Timothy , title =. 2016 , journal =. 1506.01590 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    2016 , publisher =

    Eynard, Bertrand , title =. 2016 , publisher =

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Geometric recursion , year =

    Andersen, J. Geometric recursion , year =. 1711.04729 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Blobbed topological recursion: properties and applications

    Borot, Ga\"etan and Shadrin, Sergey , title =. 2017 , journal =. 1502.00981 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Andersen, J. The. 2024 , journal =. 1703.03307 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    2018 , note =

    Budd, Timothy , title =. 2018 , note =. 1809.02012 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    Topological Recursion and its Influence in Analysis, Geometry, and Topology , editors =

    Kontsevich, Maxim and Soibelman, Yan , title =. Topological Recursion and its Influence in Analysis, Geometry, and Topology , editors =. 2018 , volume =. 1701.09137 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Simple maps, Hurwitz numbers, and Topological Recursion

    Borot, Ga. Simple maps,. 2020 , journal =. 1710.07851 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Lecture notes on topological recursion and geometry

    Borot, Ga\"etan , title =. 2020 , journal =. 1705.09986 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Bijective enumeration of planar bipartite maps with three tight boundaries, or how to slice pairs of pants

    Bouttier, J\'er\'emie and Guitter, Emmanuel and Miermont, Gr\'egory , title =. 2022 , journal =. 2104.10084 , archivePrefix =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Topological recursion for

    Andersen, J. Topological recursion for. 2023 , journal =. 1905.10352 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    2023 , publisher =

    Curien, Nicolas , title =. 2023 , publisher =

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Topological recursion for

    Bonzom, Valentin and Chapuy, Guillaume and Charbonnier, S\'everin and. Topological recursion for. 2024 , journal =. 2206.14768 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    2025 , journal =

    Bouttier, J\'er\'emie and Guitter, Emmanuel and Miermont, Gr\'egory , title =. 2025 , journal =. doi:10.4171/AIHPD/218 , notes =. 2406.13528 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    2025 , eprint =

    Volumes of moduli spaces of bordered. 2025 , eprint =

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Chidambaram, Nitin K. and. Refined lattice counting on the moduli space of. 2026 , eprint =

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    Andersen, J. On the. 2026 , eprint =

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    In preparation , year =

    Borot, Ga\"etan and. In preparation , year =

    work page