REVIEW 2 cited by
Superintegrability of the monomial Uglov matrix model
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this paper we propose a resolution to the problem of $\beta$-deforming the non-Gaussian monomial matrix models. The naive guess of substituting Schur polynomials with Jack polynomials does not work in that case, therefore, we are forced to look for another basis for superintegrability. We find that the relevant symmetric functions are given by Uglov polynomials, and that the integration measure should also be deformed. The measure appears to be related to the Uglov limit as well, when the quantum parameters $(q,t)$ go to a root of unity. The degree of the root must be equal to the degree of the potential. One cannot derive these results directly, for example, by studying Virasoro constraints. Instead, we use the recently developed techniques of $W$-operators to arrive at the root of unity limit. From the perspective of matrix models this new example demonstrates that even with a rather nontrivial integration measure one can find a superintegrability basis by studying the hidden symmetry of the moduli space of deformations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On the superintegrability of the Gaussian $\beta$ ensemble and its $(q,t)$ generalisation
The (q,t)-generalised Gaussian beta ensemble superintegrability conjecture is proved, yielding a new duality and a functional equation for spectral moments.
-
Superintegrability of the Wilson family of matrix models and moments of multivariable orthogonal polynomials
New superintegrability formulas are proposed for eigenvalue models built on multivariate Meixner-Pollaczek and Wilson measures, with the Wilson case left partly conjectural.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.