REVIEW 3 cited by
Epsilon expansion for a Fermi gas at infinite scattering length
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We show that there exists a systematic expansion around four spatial dimensions for Fermi gas in the unitarity regime. We perform the calculations to leading and next-to-leading orders in the expansion over epsilon=4-d, where d is the dimensionality of space. We find the ratio of chemical potential and Fermi energy to be mu/eF=1/2 epsilon^3/2 + 1/16 epsilon^5/2 ln epsilon -0.0246 epsilon^5/2 and the ratio of the gap in the fermion quasiparticle spectrum and the chemical potential to be Delta/mu=2/epsilon-0.691. The minimum of the fermion dispersion curve is located at |p|=(2m epsilon_0)^1/2 where epsilon_0/mu=2+O(epsilon). Extrapolation to d=3 gives results consistent with Monte Carlo simulations.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Revisiting Schr\"odinger CFTs: Factorization, Massless Particles, and a Path to the Bootstrap
Schrödinger CFTs are reformulated via a harmonic-trap thermofield double, giving a state-operator correspondence for all operators and a factorization proof of non-renormalization.
-
Trapping-potential dependence of the unitary Fermi gas at the BCS-BEC crossover
Trap-induced corrections to the unitary Fermi gas phonon spectrum and dynamic structure factor are computed in three EFT/WKB regimes, with low-energy corrections depending on trap shape and high-energy corrections set...
-
Conformal Mapping of Non-Lorentzian Geometries in SU(1,2) Conformal Field Theory
An explicit conformal mapping is derived between null-reduced R times S^3 and Omega-deformed Minkowski TNC geometries, giving the state-operator generator map H0 = (R^2 H + C/R^2 - J - N)/2 in SU(1,2) non-Lorentzian CFTs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.