Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 91 references

Effects of correlated noise on the excitation of robust breathers in an ac-driven, lossy sine-Gordon system

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a damped, ac-driven sine-Gordon system, breathers still emerge under Gaussian noise with finite correlation time or length, and the breather-only occurrence frequency is nonmonotonic in both, peaking near 0.9 for temporal and 0.6 for…

desk verdict Useful numerical extension of noise-induced breather generation to colored noise, but the headline nonmonotonicity needs a finite-time convergence check and error bars before I'd trust the peak. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08439 v1 pith:PBXKFOEH submitted 2025-02-12 nlin.PS cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech

Giovanni Di Fresco , Duilio De Santis , Claudio Guarcello , Bernardo Spagnolo , Angelo Carollo , Davide Valenti This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.PScond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech MSC 35Q5137K4060H1582C31 PACS 05.40.-a05.45.-a74.50.+r
keywords perturbedsine-Gordonmodelnoise-inducedbreatherscorrelatednoiseOrnstein-UhlenbeckprocesslongJosephsonjunctionsbreatheroccurrencefrequencynonmonotonicresponse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the dissipation-robust breathers previously seen under white thermal noise still appear when the noise has finite correlation time $\tau$ or correlation length $\lambda$, and whether these correlations can be used as controls. It answers yes on both counts: for a parameter set where white noise produces almost only kinks, raising $\tau$ makes breather-only runs the most likely outcome, with the occurrence frequency peaking near $0.9$, while raising $\lambda$ produces a peak near $0.6$. The same data show that the average inverse hitting time drops monotonically with $\tau$ and $\lambda$, so larger correlation scales systematically delay the emergence of solitonic modes. The practical payoff is that experimental noise in long Josephson junctions does not have to be white for the breather-generation protocol to work, and the noise correlation properties become a tuning dial.

What carries the argument

The central object is the stochastically forced sine-Gordon equation $\varphi_{xx}-\varphi_{tt}-\alpha\varphi_t=\sin\varphi-A\sin(\omega t)-\gamma(x,t)$, with damping $\alpha=0.2$, ac drive $A=0.59$ at frequency $\omega=0.6$, and zero-mean Gaussian noise $\gamma$ with exponential correlation either in time, $\langle\gamma(x,t)\gamma(x',t')\rangle=(\varepsilon/\tau)\delta(x-x')e^{-|t-t'|/\tau}$, or in space, $\langle\gamma(x,t)\gamma(x',t')\rangle=(\varepsilon/\lambda)e^{-|x-x'|/\lambda}\delta(t-t')$. Temporal correlations are generated numerically through an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; spatial correlations are generated in Fourier space from the square root of the correlation spectrum. The statistical argument rests on classifying $N=250$--$500$ independent runs by an amplitude threshold: at least one kink if a $2\pi$-step appears, breathers-only if all modes have amplitudes between $\varphi^*=4\arctan(\sqrt{1-\omega^2}/\omega)$ and $2\pi$, and no excitation otherwise. The hitting time $t^*$, the first time $|\varphi|$ reaches $\varphi^*$ anywhere in the domain, supplies the timescale observable whose inverse is measured as a function of $\tau$ and $\lambda$.

What would settle it

Repeat the measurement of the breather-only occurrence frequency $f_b$ at the largest correlation scales studied (e.g., $\tau\simeq 9$ and $\lambda\simeq 25$) with simulation windows $T=500$, $1000$, and $2000$; if $f_b$ keeps increasing with $T$ instead of falling after its intermediate peak, the claimed nonmonotonicity is a finite-horizon artifact rather than a stationary property of the noisy dynamics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Breathers—localized, time-oscillating kink–antikink bound states—are shown to be robustly excited in a damped, ac-driven sine-Gordon system when the Gaussian noise is temporally correlated (Ornstein–Uhlenbeck) or spatially correlated (exponential kernel), not only in the white-noise limit. For a fixed noise amplitude $\varepsilon=0.04$, which in the white-noise limit yields kink-type excitations in almost every run, the breather-only occurrence frequency $f_b$ is a nonmonotonic function of both correlation scales: it rises from near zero at $\tau=\Delta t$ to a maximum of approximately $0.9$ as $\tau$ grows, and from near zero at $\lambda=\Delta x$ to approximately $0.6$ for intermediate $\lambda$, before falling as correlations become very large. The average inverse hitting time $1/t^*$, where $t^*$ is the first time $|\varphi|$ crosses the static breather amplitude threshold $\varphi^*=4\arctan(\sqrt{1-\omega^2}/\omega)$, decreases monotonically with both $\tau$ and $\lambda$, indicating that correlated noise slows the stochastic generation of solitonic modes. Spatially correlated noise with $\lambda$ larger than the kink width produces a distinct collective regime in which fluctuations spread across the system and generate cascades of solitons that can still relax into stable, isolated breathers.

Load-bearing premise

The classification assumes that every run that would eventually produce a breather does so within the fixed simulation window $T=500$, so runs whose breathers form later are recorded as 'no excitation' and the reported fall of $f_b$ at large correlation scales may be an artifact of stopping too early.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At fixed noise amplitude, tuning $\tau$ or $\lambda$ switches the system's most probable outcome from kink-dominated to breather-dominated and back, providing continuous control over breather-only occurrence.
  • Because the average inverse hitting time falls monotonically with both correlation scales, noise correlations act as a built-in delay that sets when, on average, solitonic modes first appear.
  • For spatial correlation lengths exceeding the kink width, excitation events become collective cascades that spread over the whole junction and only later condense into stable isolated breathers.
  • The white-noise results of the earlier protocol are recovered in both limits $\tau\to0$ and $\lambda\to0$, so the correlated-noise regime is a genuine extension of the known breather-generation mechanism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the downturn of $f_b$ at large $\tau$ and $\lambda$ is partly caused by the finite simulation window $T=500$, then extending the runs until hitting times saturate could shift the apparent peak to larger correlation scales or flatten it; this is an implicit alternative reading of the data, not a claim the paper makes.
  • Because the noise variance is rescaled by $1/\tau$ and $1/\lambda$, some of the reported effect is equivalent to lowering the effective white-noise intensity; the genuinely new information is how the shape of the excitation-time distribution and the spatial pattern of events change with correlations.
  • The collective cascade regime seen for large $\lambda$ suggests a concrete experimental target: using spatially correlated noise to create synchronized multi-soliton states in long Josephson junctions, a state the paper observes qualitatively but does not quantify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the damped, ac-driven sine-Gordon equation (Eq. 1) under Gaussian noise with either finite temporal correlation (Eq. 2) or finite spatial correlation (Eq. 3). The authors simulate the stochastic partial differential equation with implicit finite differences, generate correlated noise via an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck scheme (Appendix A) and a Fourier-space method (Appendix B), and validate the generators against analytical correlation functions. They classify N=250 to N=500 independent runs into kink-containing (fk), breather-only (fb), and no-excitation (f0) outcomes, and define a hitting time t* at which the field first reaches the static-breather amplitude threshold. The central claim is that breathers are still excited for correlated noise and that fb is nonmonotonic in both the correlation time τ and the correlation length λ, rising to about 0.9 and 0.6, respectively, before falling again at large correlation scales, while the inverse hitting time decreases monotonically. The white-noise limits are reported to reproduce previous results from Refs. [48,49].

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a practically useful control knob for the noise-assisted generation of dissipative-robust sine-Gordon breathers, which is relevant for proposed experiments in long Josephson junctions. The manuscript is careful in several respects: the numerical noise generators are described in detail and checked against analytical correlation functions in Figs. A.6 and B.7, the parameter set is anchored to previous white-noise studies, and the qualitative distinction between isolated (temporal-correlation) and collective (spatial-correlation) excitation pathways is physically interesting. However, the main quantitative claim is currently not fully supported because the finite observation window T=500 censors late events, and because the correlation-scale scans also change the effective noise amplitude through the 1/τ and 1/λ prefactors. These issues affect the magnitude and even the existence of the reported nonmonotonic peaks, so the result is significant but requires additional numerical controls before it can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Fig. 3, Appendix A] The central nonmonotonic claim for fb(τ) is not protected against censoring by the finite observation window T=500. The paper defines t*=∞ for runs in which |φ| never reaches φ* (Section 3.1), and Fig. 3(B) shows that 1/t* decreases monotonically with τ, so runs that would cross the threshold after T are counted in f0 rather than in fb. Since f0 rises on exactly the large-τ side of the fb peak in Fig. 3(A), the reported downturn of fb may be an artifact of the horizon rather than a steady-state property. A T-convergence check at representative τ values (for example, doubling or tripling T at the peak and at the largest τ) or a survival/hazard analysis is needed to support the shape of the fb(τ) curve claimed in the abstract.
  2. [§2, Eqs. (2)-(3), Appendices A and B] The correlation-scale scans conflate correlation with noise amplitude. With the prefactors ε/τ and ε/λ in Eqs. (2) and (3), the stationary variance of the noise decreases as τ or λ increases, as the histograms in Figs. A.6 and B.7 confirm. Therefore the rise in fb in Figs. 3 and 5 could, in principle, be reproduced by simply lowering the white-noise amplitude in the same ε scan; the claim that correlations themselves provide a control knob beyond amplitude rescaling requires either matching the stationary variance across τ/λ or comparing each correlated case against white noise with the same variance. Without such a control, the reported nonmonotonicity in Fig. 3(A) may be an amplitude effect rather than a genuine correlation effect.
  3. [§3.2, Fig. 5(B), Appendix B] The censoring issue also affects the spatial-correlation case, where Fig. 5(B) shows 1/t* decreasing monotonically with λ. The f0 curve in Fig. 5(A) is essentially zero for most λ and begins to rise only at the largest studied value, λ=25=L/2, which is exactly the range where Appendix B reports finite-size deviations in the generated correlation function. Consequently, the small f0 rise at λ=25 cannot be cleanly interpreted as either a physical freezing effect or a finite-size artifact. Restricting the interpretation to λ values where the noise generator is validated, and additionally checking the T-dependence for intermediate λ, would make the spatial-correlation conclusion much more robust.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A and Fig. A.6] There are typos: the Appendix A title reads "T emporally" instead of "Temporally", and the Fig. A.6 caption uses "approeach" instead of "approach".
  2. [§3.1 and §3.2] The manuscript does not explain why Fig. 2 uses N=500 trajectories while Figs. 3 and 5 use N=250, nor does it report confidence intervals for the binomial frequencies. At N=250, the standard error for a frequency near 0.5 is about 0.03, which is not negligible for distinguishing neighboring points in the fb curves.
  3. [§3.1] The definition of t*=∞ for runs with no threshold crossing is a censored-data convention, but the text does not state how many runs are censored in each panel of Figs. 3(B) and 5(B). Reporting the censored fraction would help the reader gauge how much of the decreasing 1/t* curve is driven by the f0 events.
  4. [§3.2] The sentence "The f0 curve is essentially equal to zero—up to λ≈L/2, where it shows a small, but appreciable, increasing trend" would benefit from a quantitative statement of the standard error at λ=25, since with N=250 a single run already changes f0 by 0.004 and the reported trend is only a few runs wide.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central fb(τ) and fb(λ) results are measured from simulations using an externally defined breather threshold, and the cited prior work only supplies the white-noise baseline and motivation.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are numerical measurements rather than derivations. The occurrence frequencies fk, fb, and f0 are counted from N=250 or N=500 independent runs, with the breather-only category defined by the amplitude threshold φ* = 4 arctan(√(1−ω²)/ω), taken from standard static sine-Gordon breather theory (Refs. [25,26]) and not fitted to the simulation output. There is no parameter fitted to a subset of the data and then reported as a prediction, and no equation of the paper reduces fb(τ) or fb(λ) to an input by construction. The τ and λ scans are implemented through the correlation functions in Eqs. (2) and (3), and the numerical noise generators are separately validated against the analytical correlation functions in Appendices A and B, so the noise statistics are checked independently of the output statistics. Self-citations, chiefly Refs. [48,49], are used to motivate the phenomenon and to set the white-noise limit and parameter values; the text states that 'the remaining parameters are set such that Ref. [48,49]’s results are progressively reached as τ→0'. This is a consistency check and a baseline, not a load-bearing derivation: rejecting those references would not force or invalidate the measured τ/λ dependence, which stands on the present simulations. The finite observation window T=500 and the ε/τ and ε/λ prefactors raise legitimate questions about late-event censoring and effective-amplitude rescaling, and the paper itself acknowledges the slowdown and the amplitude rescaling; however, these are correctness or interpretation concerns, not circularity, because the reported quantities are not made equal to the model inputs by definition. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited, and the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities and fits no free parameters to data; the model parameters (α, A, ω, ε, L, T) are inputs taken from the prior white-noise studies or chosen for the scans. The load-bearing assumptions are numerical convergence, statistical equivalence of the noise generation schemes, the breather classification criterion, and the adequacy of the finite simulation horizon.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The implicit finite-difference scheme converges to the solution of the stochastic damped driven sine-Gordon equation on the chosen grid.
    Used throughout Section 2 and in all numerical integrations; no convergence study or error estimate is provided.
  • standard math The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process defined by Eq. (A.2) has the same statistics as the noise in Eq. (2).
    Invoked in Appendix A to generate temporally correlated noise; standard result but not proven here.
  • standard math The Fourier-space algorithm of Appendix B generates noise with the correlation function Eq. (3).
    Standard spectral method; validated numerically in Fig. B.7 for λ up to 25.
  • domain assumption An excitation is a breather if its amplitude lies between φ* and 2π, where φ* is the static breather amplitude.
    Used in Section 3.1 to classify runs; driven breathers may differ from static breathers, and no independent check (e.g., energy or spectral signature) is reported.
  • domain assumption T=500 is long enough to capture the relevant breather-generation statistics for all reported τ and λ.
    Appendix A notes τ must be much smaller than T; Figs. 3B and 5B show monotonically increasing hitting times, so the finite horizon may bias large-τ/λ frequencies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of correlated noise on the excitation of robust breathers in an ac-driven, lossy sine-Gordon system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PBXKFOEH

@misc{pith2026250208439,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of correlated noise on the excitation of robust breathers in an ac-driven, lossy sine-Gordon system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PBXKFOEH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08439}
}
read the original abstract

Thermal noise and harmonic forcing have recently been shown to cooperatively excite sine-Gordon breathers robust to dissipation. Such a phenomenon has been found assuming a Gaussian noise source, delta-correlated both in time and space. In light of the potential implications of this generation technique, e.g., for the experimental observation of breathers in long Josephson junctions, it is physically motivated to investigate the effects of more realistic noise sources with finite correlation time and/or correlation length. Here, breathers are demonstrated to still emerge under this broader class of noise sources. The correlation time and the correlation length are found to offer control over the probability of observing breathers, as well on the typical timescale for their emergence. In particular, our results show that, as compared to the thermal case, the temporal and spatial correlations in the noise can lead to a larger breather-only occurrence frequency, i.e., the latter quantity behaves nonmonotonically versus both the correlation time and the correlation length. Overall, noise correlations represent a powerful tool for controlling the excitation of the elusive breather modes in view of experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08439 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Contour plots of the field φ (x, t), for different choices of the correlation time τ, showing the robustness of the breather emergence phenomenon, as well as the τ-induced slowdown of the dynamics. We take τ = ∆t (i.e., white-noise limit) in panel (A), τ = 300 ∆t in panel (B) and τ = 900∆t in panel (C). The remaining simulation parameters are: α = 0.2, A = 0.59, ω = 0.6, ε = 0.004. The remaining parameters are set s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Occurrence frequencies of getting at least one kink-type object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In panel (A) the occurrence frequencies are reported versus the correlation time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contour plots of the field φ(x, t), for different choices of the correlation length λ, exemplifying the robustness of the breather emergence phenomenon to spatial correlations, as well as the λ-induced collective excitation mechanism. We take λ = ∆x (i.e., white-noise …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Panel (A): occurrence frequencies versus the correlation length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. S. Miguel, R. Toral, Stochastic effects in physical systems, in: Instabil- ities and nonequilibrium structures VI, Springer, 2000, pp. 35–127

    2000

  2. [2]

    A. C. Scott, Encyclopedia of Nonlinear Science, Routledge, 2006

    2006

  3. [3]

    Garc ´ ıa-Ojalvo, J

    J. Garc ´ ıa-Ojalvo, J. Sancho, Noise in spatially extended systems, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  4. [4]

    Sancho, M

    J. Sancho, M. San Miguel, Langevin equations with colored noise, Noise in nonlinear dynamical systems 1 (1989) 72–109

    1989

  5. [5]

    H¨ aunggi, P

    P. H¨ aunggi, P. Jung, Colored noise in dynamical systems, Adv. Chem. Phys. 89 (1994) 239–326

    1994

  6. [6]

    Maggi, N

    C. Maggi, N. Gnan, M. Paoluzzi, E. Zaccarelli, A. Crisanti, Critical active dynamics is captured by a colored-noise driven field theory, Commun. Phys. 5 (1) (2022) 55

    2022

  7. [7]

    O. M. Tiokang, F. N. Tchangnwa, J. D. Tchinda, A. T. Tsokeng, M. Tchoffo, Effects of colored noise on the dynamics of quantum entangle- ment of a one-parameter qubit–qutrit system, Chin. Phys. B 31 (5) (2022) 050306

    2022

  8. [8]

    Barone, G

    A. Barone, G. Patern` o, Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect, Wiley, New York, 1982

    1982

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    N. F. Pedersen, Solitons in Josephson Transmission Lines, in: S. E. Trullinger, V. E. Zakharov, V. L. Pokrovsky (Eds.), Solitons, Elsevier, 1986, pp. 469–501. 14

    1986

  2. [10]

    R. D. Parmentier, Solitons and Long Josephson Junctions, in: H. Wein- stock, R. W. Ralston (Eds.), The New Superconducting Electronics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993, pp. 221–248

    1993

  3. [11]

    A. V. Ustinov, Solitons in Josephson junctions, Physica D 123 (1-4) (1998) 315–329

    1998

  4. [12]

    J. J. Mazo, A. V. Ustinov, The sine-Gordon equation in Josephson- junction arrays, Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 155–175. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06722-3_7

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    I. I. Soloviev, N. V. Klenov, S. V. Bakurskiy, A. L. Pankratov, L. S. Kuzmin, Symmetrical Josephson vortex interferometer as an advanced ballistic single-shot detector, Applied Physics Letters 105 (20) (2014) 202602. arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/ 10.1063/...

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    Tafuri, Fundamentals and Frontiers of the Josephson Effect, Springer Nature, 2019

    F. Tafuri, Fundamentals and Frontiers of the Josephson Effect, Springer Nature, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    A. I. Braginski, Superconductor electronics: Status and outlook, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 32 (1) (2019) 23–44. doi: 10.1007/s10948-018-4884-4 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-018-4884-4

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    L. S. Revin, A. L. Pankratov, A. V. Gordeeva, A. A. Yablokov, I. V. Rakut, V. O. Zbrozhek, L. S. Kuzmin, Microwave photon detection by an al joseph- son junction, Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 11 (1) (2020) 960–965

    2020

  9. [17]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, L. Fu, Universal josephson diode effect, Sci- ence Advances 8 (23) (2022) eabo0309. arXiv:https://www.science. org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abo0309, doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo0309. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abo0309

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Nadeem, M

    M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, X. Wang, The superconducting diode ef- fect, Nature Reviews Physics 5 (10) (2023) 558–577. doi:10.1038/ s42254-023-00632-w . URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00632-w

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Guarcello, S

    C. Guarcello, S. Pagano, G. Filatrella, Efficiency of diode effect in asymmet- ric inline long Josephson junctions, Applied Physics Letters 124 (16) (2024) 162601. arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/doi/10. 1063/5.0211230/19883359/162601\_1\_5.0211230.pdf, doi:10.1...

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Ghosh, V

    S. Ghosh, V. Patil, A. Basu, Kuldeep, A. Dutta, D. A. Jangade, R. Kulka- rni, A. Thamizhavel, J. F. Steiner, F. von Oppen, M. M. Deshmukh, High-temperature josephson diode, Nature Materials 23 (5) (2024) 612–

    2024

  13. [21]

    R. A. Hovhannisyan, T. Golod, V. M. Krasnov, Controllable manipulation of semifluxon states in phase-shifted josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 227001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.227001. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.227001

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Citro, C

    R. Citro, C. Guarcello, S. Pagano, Josephson Junctions, Superconducting Circuits, and Qubit for Quantum Technologies, Springer Nature Switzer- land, Cham, 2024, pp. 1–59. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55657-9_1 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55657-9_1

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    S. Benz, J. Biesecker, C. Burroughs, M. Castellanos-Beltran, P. Dressel- haus, N. Flowers-Jacobs, A. Fox, P. Hopkins, R. Johnson-Wilke, D. Olaya, et al., Ac metrology applications of the josephson effect, Applied Physics Letters 125 (5) (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    V. M. Krasnov, Resonant switching current detector based on under- damped josephson junctions, Physical Review Applied 22 (2) (2024) 024015

    2024

  17. [25]

    A. C. Scott, Nonlinear Science: Emergence and Dynamics of Coherent Structures, Oxford, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Dauxois, M

    T. Dauxois, M. Peyrard, Physics of Solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    Fujii, M

    T. Fujii, M. Nishida, N. Hatakenaka, Mobile qubits in quantum joseph- son circuits, Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008) 024505. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77. 024505. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.024505

    2008 doi

  20. [28]

    A. V. Gordeeva, A. L. Pankratov, Defect formation in long josephson junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 212504. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.212504. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.212504

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    V. M. Krasnov, Terahertz electromagnetic radiation from intrinsic joseph- son junctions at zero magnetic field via breather-type self-oscillations, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 174517. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.174517. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.174517

    2011 doi

  22. [30]

    De Santis, C

    D. De Santis, C. Guarcello, B. Spagnolo, A. Carollo, D. Valenti, Generation of travelling sine-gordon breathers in noisy long joseph- son junctions, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 158 (2022) 112039. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112039. 16 URL https://www.sciencedirect....

    2022

  23. [31]

    Sundaresh, J

    A. Sundaresh, J. I. V¨ ayrynen, Y. Lyanda-Geller, L. P. Rokhinson, Diamag- netic mechanism of critical current non-reciprocity in multilayered super- conductors, Nature Communications 14 (1) (2023) 1628

    2023

  24. [32]

    A. R. Bishop, K. Fesser, P. S. Lomdahl, S. E. Trullinger, Influence of soli- tons in the initial state on chaos in the driven damped sine-Gordon system, Physica D 7 (1-3) (1983) 259–279

    1983

  25. [33]

    Bishop, P

    A. Bishop, P. Lomdahl, Nonlinear dynamics in driven, damped sine-Gordon systems, Physica D 18 (1-3) (1986) 54–66

    1986

  26. [34]

    P. S. Lomdahl, M. R. Samuelsen, Persistent breather excitations in an ac- driven sine-Gordon system with loss, Phys. Rev. A 34 (1) (1986) 664

    1986

  27. [35]

    Y. S. Kivshar, B. A. Malomed, Dynamics of solitons in nearly integrable systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (4) (1989) 763

    1989

  28. [36]

    P. S. Lomdahl, M. R. Samuelsen, Modulation of the breather frequency in the ac-driven sine-Gordon system with loss, Phys. Lett. A 128 (8) (1988) 427–432

    1988

  29. [37]

    Gr¨ onbech-Jensen, Y

    N. Gr¨ onbech-Jensen, Y. S. Kivshar, M. R. Samuelsen, Stabilization of breathers in a parametrically driven sine-Gordon system with loss, Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 5698–5701

    1991

  30. [38]

    Grønbech-Jensen, B

    N. Grønbech-Jensen, B. A. Malomed, M. R. Samuelsen, Stability of breathers in the ac-driven sine-Gordon system, Phys. Lett. A 166 (5) (1992) 347–351. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)90720-7

    1992 doi

  31. [39]

    Grønbech-Jensen, Zero-voltage states in ac-driven long Josephson junc- tions, Phys

    N. Grønbech-Jensen, Zero-voltage states in ac-driven long Josephson junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B 45 (1992) 7315–7320. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.45. 7315

    1992 doi

  32. [40]

    Y. S. Kivshar, N. Grønbech-Jensen, R. D. Parmentier, Kinks in the presence of rapidly varying perturbations, Phys. Rev. E 49 (5) (1994) 4542

    1994

  33. [41]

    N. R. Quintero, A. S´ anchez, ac driven sine-Gordon solitons: dynamics and stability, Eur. Phys. J. B 6 (1998) 133–142

    1998

  34. [42]

    Zharnitsky, I

    V. Zharnitsky, I. Mitkov, N. Grønbech-Jensen, π kinks in strongly ac driven sine-Gordon systems, Phys. Rev. E 58 (1) (1998) R52

    1998

  35. [43]

    K. Ø. Rasmussen, V. Zharnitsky, I. Mitkov, N. Grønbech-Jensen, Higher- order effects on Shapiro steps in Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1) (1999) 58

    1999

  36. [44]

    Salerno, Y

    M. Salerno, Y. Zolotaryuk, Soliton ratchetlike dynamics by ac forces with harmonic mixing, Phys. Rev. E 65 (5) (2002) 056603. 17

    2002

  37. [45]

    Zamora-Sillero, N

    E. Zamora-Sillero, N. R. Quintero, F. G. Mertens, Ratchet effect in a damped sine-Gordon system with additive and parametric ac driving forces, Phys. Rev. E 74 (4) (2006) 046607

    2006

  38. [46]

    Alvarez-Nodarse, N

    R. Alvarez-Nodarse, N. R. Quintero, F. G. Mertens, Kink topology control by high-frequency external forces in nonlinear Klein-Gordon models, Phys. Rev. E 90 (4) (2014) 042916

    2014

  39. [47]

    Kiselev, V

    O. Kiselev, V. Y. Novokshenov, Emergence and Decay of π-Kinks in the Sine-Gordon Model with High-Frequency Pumping, J. Math. Sci. 252 (2) (2021) 175–189

    2021

  40. [48]

    De Santis, C

    D. De Santis, C. Guarcello, B. Spagnolo, A. Carollo, D. Valenti, Ac-locking of thermally-induced sine-Gordon breathers, Chaos Solitons Fractals 170 (2023) 113382. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113382

    2023

  41. [49]

    De Santis, C

    D. De Santis, C. Guarcello, B. Spagnolo, A. Carollo, D. Valenti, Noise- induced, ac-stabilized sine-Gordon breathers: Emergence and statistics, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 131 (2024) 107796. doi:10.1016/ j.cnsns.2023.107796

    2024

  42. [50]

    P. J. Pascual, S. Jim´ enez, L. V´ azquez, Numerical simulations of a nonlin- ear Klein-Gordon model. Applications, in: P. L. Garrido, J. Marro (Eds.), Third Granada Lectures in Computational Physics, Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, 1995, pp. 211–270

    1995

  43. [51]

    Jim´ enez, P

    S. Jim´ enez, P. Pascual, C. Aguirre, L. V´ azquez, A panoramic view of some perturbed nonlinear wave equations, Intern. Journ. of Bifurcation and Chaos 14 (01) (2004) 1–40

    2004

  44. [52]

    De Santis, C

    D. De Santis, C. Guarcello, B. Spagnolo, A. Carollo, D. Valenti, Breather dynamics in a stochastic sine-Gordon equation: Evidence of noise-enhanced stability, Chaos Solitons Fractals 168 (2023) 113115. doi:10.1016/j. chaos.2023.113115

    2023

  45. [53]

    Dienst, E

    A. Dienst, E. Casandruc, D. Fausti, L. Zhang, M. Eckstein, M. Hoff- mann, V. Khanna, N. Dean, M. Gensch, S. Winnerl, W. Seidel, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, A. Cavalleri, Optical excitation of Josephson plasma solitons in a cuprate superconductor, Nat. Mater. 12 (6) (2013) 535–541

    2013

  46. [54]

    Laplace, A

    Y. Laplace, A. Cavalleri, Josephson plasmonics in layered superconduc- tors, Adv. Phys.-X 1 (3) (2016) 387–411. doi:10.1080/23746149.2016. 1212671

    2016

  47. [55]

    S. Fava, G. D. Vecchi, G. Jotzu, M. Buzzi, T. Gebert, Y. Liu, B. Keimer, A. Cavalleri, Magnetic field expulsion in optically driven YBa 2Cu3O6.48 (2024). arXiv:2405.00848. 18

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Gritsev, A

    V. Gritsev, A. Polkovnikov, E. Demler, Linear response theory for a pair of coupled one-dimensional condensates of interacting atoms, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 174511. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.174511

    2007 doi

  49. [57]

    Gritsev, E

    V. Gritsev, E. Demler, M. Lukin, A. Polkovnikov, Spectroscopy of collective excitations in interacting low-dimensional many-body systems using quench dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (20) (2007) 200404

    2007

  50. [58]

    E. G. Dalla Torre, E. Demler, A. Polkovnikov, Universal Rephasing Dy- namics after a Quantum Quench via Sudden Coupling of Two Initially Independent Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 090404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.090404

    2013 doi

  51. [59]

    Neuenhahn, A

    C. Neuenhahn, A. Polkovnikov, F. Marquardt, Localized Phase Structures Growing Out of Quantum Fluctuations in a Quench of Tunnel-coupled Atomic Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 085304. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.109.085304

    2012

  52. [60]

    Lovas, R

    I. Lovas, R. Citro, E. Demler, T. Giamarchi, M. Knap, E. Orignac, Many- body parametric resonances in the driven sine-Gordon model, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 075426. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.075426

    2022 doi

  53. [61]

    E. Wybo, A. Bastianello, M. Aidelsburger, I. Bloch, M. Knap, Prepar- ing and Analyzing Solitons in the Sine-Gordon Model with Quantum Gas Microscopes, Phys. Rev. X Quantum 4 (2023) 030308. doi:10.1103/ PRXQuantum.4.030308

    2023

  54. [62]

    W. F. Ames, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Aca- demic press, 1977

    1977

  55. [63]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, B. P. Flannery, Numer- ical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, 1992

    1992

  56. [64]

    Guarcello, D

    C. Guarcello, D. Valenti, B. Spagnolo, Phase dynamics in graphene-based Josephson junctions in the presence of thermal and correlated fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 174519. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174519

    2015 doi

  57. [65]

    De Santis, C

    D. De Santis, C. Guarcello, B. Spagnolo, A. Carollo, D. Valenti, Genera- tion of travelling sine-Gordon breathers in noisy long Josephson junctions, Chaos Solitons Fractals 158 (2022) 112039. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2022. 112039

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    De Santis, C

    D. De Santis, C. Guarcello, B. Spagnolo, A. Carollo, D. Valenti, Supratransmission-induced travelling breathers in long Josephson junc- tions, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. (2022) 106736doi:10.1016/ j.cnsns.2022.106736. 19

    2022

  59. [67]

    De Santis, B

    D. De Santis, B. Spagnolo, A. Carollo, D. Valenti, C. Guarcello, Heat- transfer fingerprint of Josephson breathers, Chaos Solitons Fractals 185 (2024) 115088. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115088

    2024

  60. [68]

    D. R. Gulevich, M. B. Gaifullin, F. V. Kusmartsev, Controlled dynamics of sine-Gordon breather in long Josephson junctions, Eur. Phys. J. B 85 (2012) 24

    2012

  61. [69]

    Monaco, Traveling electromagnetic waves in annular Josephson tunnel junctions, Wave Motion 88 (2019) 214–225

    R. Monaco, Traveling electromagnetic waves in annular Josephson tunnel junctions, Wave Motion 88 (2019) 214–225. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti. 2019.04.010

    2019 doi

  62. [70]

    A. V. Chechkin, O. Y. Sliusarenko, R. Metzler, J. Klafter, Barrier crossing driven by L´ evy noise: Universality and the role of noise intensity, Phys. Rev. E 75 (4) (2007) 041101

    2007

  63. [71]

    G. Afek, N. Davidson, D. A. Kessler, E. Barkai, Colloquium: Anomalous statistics of laser-cooled atoms in dissipative optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 (3) (2023) 031003

    2023

  64. [72]

    Baule, P

    A. Baule, P. Sollich, Exponential increase of transition rates in metastable systems driven by non-Gaussian noise, Sci. Rep. 13 (1) (2023) 3853

    2023

  65. [73]

    Guarcello, D

    C. Guarcello, D. Valenti, G. Augello, B. Spagnolo, The role of non-Gaussian sources in the transient dynamics of long Josephson junctions., Acta Phys. Pol. B 44 (5) (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    Guarcello, G

    C. Guarcello, G. Filatrella, B. Spagnolo, V. Pierro, D. Valenti, Voltage drop across Josephson junctions for L´ evy noise detection, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (4) (2020) 043332

    2020

  67. [75]

    Guarcello, L´ evy noise effects on Josephson junctions, Chaos Solitons Fractals 153 (2021) 111531

    C. Guarcello, L´ evy noise effects on Josephson junctions, Chaos Solitons Fractals 153 (2021) 111531. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111531

    2021

  68. [76]

    K. G. Fedorov, A. L. Pankratov, Mean time of the thermal escape in a current-biased long-overlap Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 024504

    2007

  69. [77]

    K. G. Federov, A. L. Pankratov, B. Spagnolo, Influence of length on the noise delayed switching of long Josephson junctions, Intern. Journ. of Bi- furcation and Chaos 18 (09) (2008) 2857–2862

    2008

  70. [78]

    A. L. Pankratov, Noise self-pumping in long Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 024515

    2008

  71. [79]

    Augello, D

    G. Augello, D. Valenti, A. L. Pankratov, B. Spagnolo, Lifetime of the superconductive state in short and long Josephson junctions, Eur. Phys. J. B 70 (1) (2009) 145–151. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2009-00155-x. 20

    2009 doi

  72. [80]

    A. L. Pankratov, A. V. Gordeeva, L. S. Kuzmin, Drastic Suppression of Noise-Induced Errors in Underdamped Long Josephson Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 087003

    2012

  73. [81]

    Guarcello, D

    C. Guarcello, D. Valenti, A. Carollo, B. Spagnolo, Stabilization Effects of Dichotomous Noise on the Lifetime of the Superconducting State in a Long Josephson Junction, Entropy 17 (2015) 2862–2875

    2015

  74. [82]

    Belinski, E

    V. Belinski, E. Verdaguer, Gravitational solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2001

    2001

  75. [83]

    Purwins, H

    H.-G. Purwins, H. B¨ odeker, S. Amiranashvili, Dissipative solitons, Ad- vances in Physics 59 (5) (2010) 485–701

    2010

  76. [84]

    S. V. Suchkov, A. A. Sukhorukov, J. Huang, S. V. Dmitriev, C. Lee, Y. S. Kivshar, Nonlinear switching and solitons in pt-symmetric photonic sys- tems, Laser & Photonics Reviews 10 (2) (2016) 177–213

    2016

  77. [85]

    V. G. Bykov, S. V. Trofimenko, Slow strain waves in blocky geological media from GPS and seismological observations on the Amurian plate, Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 23 (6) (2016) 467–475.doi:10.5194/npg-23-467-2016

    2016 doi

  78. [86]

    Y. Song, X. Shi, C. Wu, D. Tang, H. Zhang, Recent progress of study on optical solitons in fiber lasers, Applied Physics Reviews 6 (2) (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    W. Wang, L. Wang, W. Zhang, Advances in soliton microcomb generation, Advanced Photonics 2 (3) (2020) 034001–034001

    2020

  80. [88]

    L. V. Yakushevich, L. A. Krasnobaeva, Ideas and methods of nonlinear mathematics and theoretical physics in dna science: the mclaughlin-scott equation and its application to study the dna open state dynamics, Biophys. Rev. 13 (2021) 315–338

    2021

  81. [89]

    B. A. Malomed, Soliton models: Traditional and novel, one- and multidi- mensional, Low Temp. Phys. 48 (11) (2022) 856–895. doi:10.1063/10. 0014579

    2022 doi

  82. [90]

    B. A. Malomed, Multidimensional soliton systems, Advances in Physics: X 9 (1) (2024) 2301592. 21

    2024

  83. [618]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-024-01804-4

    doi:10.1038/s41563-024-01804-4 . URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-024-01804-4

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.