Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Odor Descriptor Understanding through Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.03719 v1 pith:PFWCS6CQ submitted 2022-05-07 cs.LG

Odor Descriptor Understanding through Prompting

classification cs.LG
keywords embeddingsmethodsodorwordscontemporarydescriptorolfactoryprompting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Embeddings from contemporary natural language processing (NLP) models are commonly used as numerical representations for words or sentences. However, odor descriptor words, like "leather" or "fruity", vary significantly between their commonplace usage and their olfactory usage, as a result traditional methods for generating these embeddings do not suffice. In this paper, we present two methods to generate embeddings for odor words that are more closely aligned with their olfactory meanings when compared to off-the-shelf embeddings. These generated embeddings outperform the previous state-of-the-art and contemporary fine-tuning/prompting methods on a pre-existing zero-shot odor-specific NLP benchmark.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.