Pith. sign in

REVIEW

OffCon$^3$: What is state of the art anyway?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.11331 v2 pith:PGZVFQTY submitted 2021-01-27 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords policyapproachescontinuouscontroloff-policyoffconperformancesimilar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Two popular approaches to model-free continuous control tasks are SAC and TD3. At first glance these approaches seem rather different; SAC aims to solve the entropy-augmented MDP by minimising the KL-divergence between a stochastic proposal policy and a hypotheical energy-basd soft Q-function policy, whereas TD3 is derived from DPG, which uses a deterministic policy to perform policy gradient ascent along the value function. In reality, both approaches are remarkably similar, and belong to a family of approaches we call `Off-Policy Continuous Generalized Policy Iteration'. This illuminates their similar performance in most continuous control benchmarks, and indeed when hyperparameters are matched, their performance can be statistically indistinguishable. To further remove any difference due to implementation, we provide OffCon$^3$ (Off-Policy Continuous Control: Consolidated), a code base featuring state-of-the-art versions of both algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools