Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safety

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.01111 v1 pith:PHQQ6W26 submitted 2024-11-02 cs.AI

Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safety

classification cs.AI
keywords safetydatahumanmethodmodelaccuracybehaviorcapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning based fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) on human preferences has been shown to enhance both their capabilities and safety behavior. However, in cases related to safety, without precise instructions to human annotators, the data collected may cause the model to become overly cautious, or to respond in an undesirable style, such as being judgmental. Additionally, as model capabilities and usage patterns evolve, there may be a costly need to add or relabel data to modify safety behavior. We propose a novel preference modeling approach that utilizes AI feedback and only requires a small amount of human data. Our method, Rule Based Rewards (RBR), uses a collection of rules for desired or undesired behaviors (e.g. refusals should not be judgmental) along with a LLM grader. In contrast to prior methods using AI feedback, our method uses fine-grained, composable, LLM-graded few-shot prompts as reward directly in RL training, resulting in greater control, accuracy and ease of updating. We show that RBRs are an effective training method, achieving an F1 score of 97.1, compared to a human-feedback baseline of 91.7, resulting in much higher safety-behavior accuracy through better balancing usefulness and safety.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MentalThink: Shaping Thoughts in Mental SVG World

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    MLLMs that generate and render SVG sketches as multi-turn intermediate reasoning steps reach 55.1% on VSIBench and 76.0% on MindCube, far above the Qwen2.5-VL-7B backbone.

  2. Mach-Mind-4-Flash Technical Report

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Post-training alone—parallel domain RL experts, Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation, and Hybrid Median-length Policy Optimization—lifts a 3B-activated MoE to roughly 100B-class agent and reasoning scores.

  3. RLBFF: Binary Flexible Feedback to bridge between Human Feedback & Verifiable Rewards

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RLBFF extracts binary principles from human feedback to train reward models that outperform Bradley-Terry models on RM-Bench and JudgeBench and enable customizable inference-time focus for LLM alignment.