pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28094 · v1 · pith:PHZYHN5Znew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 🌀 gr-qc

Scalar absorption beyond geometric optics in Klein-Gordon-separable Johannsen black hole spacetimes

Jining Tang , Yang Huang , Hongsheng Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Johannsen metricscalar absorptionKlein-Gordon separabilityblack hole geometry testswave opticssuperradianceno-hair theorempartial waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite-frequency scalar absorption detects radial deformations in Johannsen black holes that null geodesics miss.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets up massless scalar plane-wave absorption for a Klein-Gordon-separable subclass of Johannsen metrics, restricting attention to the leading deformation sectors A1(r), A2(r), and A5(r). It derives the separated angular and radial equations and constructs the partial-wave cross sections, showing that changes to the radial size function X(r) affect absorption at low, intermediate, and high frequencies while a pure kinetic-term deformation in A5(r) leaves the high-frequency null-capture cross section unchanged. A sympathetic reader would care because the work isolates finite-frequency wave absorption as an observable that can access radial propagation details inaccessible to both the horizon area law and geometric-optics capture.

Core claim

In asymptotically flat Johannsen spacetimes restricted to the A1, A2, and A5 deformation sectors that preserve Klein-Gordon separability, the partial-wave absorption of massless scalars separates deformations that alter the radial size function X(r) from those that enter only the radial kinetic term; the former modify the low-frequency area law, the high-frequency null-capture cross section, and the finite-frequency spectra, whereas a pure A5 deformation leaves the leading null-capture observable unchanged while remaining detectable in wave propagation, including off-axis incidence, co- and counter-rotating contributions, and superradiant modes whose threshold shifts with X(r+).

What carries the argument

The partial-wave framework obtained by matching solutions of the separated radial Klein-Gordon equation in Johannsen metrics to asymptotic plane waves.

If this is right

  • Deformations changing X(r) alter the low-frequency absorption area law, the high-frequency capture cross section, and the finite-frequency spectra.
  • A pure A5 deformation leaves the leading null-capture cross section unchanged but changes finite-frequency absorption.
  • Shifts in X(r+) move the horizon angular velocity and therefore the superradiant threshold for co-rotating modes.
  • Off-axis incidence separates co- and counter-rotating contributions in the absorption spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same separation of radial-size and kinetic-term effects could be checked for electromagnetic or gravitational perturbations if separability extends to those fields.
  • Numerical evaluation of the absorption spectra for concrete values of the deformation parameters would quantify how large the finite-frequency signal is relative to Kerr.
  • Combining absorption measurements with shadow-size data could tighten bounds on the Johannsen parameters beyond what either observable achieves alone.

Load-bearing premise

The Johannsen metric in the chosen A1, A2, and A5 sectors admits exact Klein-Gordon separability so that radial solutions can be cleanly matched to incoming and outgoing waves at infinity.

What would settle it

An explicit partial-wave calculation for a nonzero A5 parameter that produces a measurable deviation from the Kerr absorption cross section at intermediate frequencies while the high-frequency limit exactly recovers the Kerr null-capture cross section.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28094 by Hongsheng Zhang, Jining Tang, Yang Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dimensionless scalar wave effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: High-frequency geometric capture cross section as a function of incidence angle for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Hierarchy of Johannsen coefficients with increasing radial falloff. The plotted quantity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: On-axis total absorption spectra for Kerr and for the leading Johannsen deformations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relative deviations from Kerr by deformation sector for on-axis incidence at fixed spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Azimuthal asymmetry for off-axis incidence at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Partial absorption cross section σ11/(πM2 ) for the l = m = 1 scalar mode at a/M = 0.99 and γ = π/2. The main panel shows the finite-frequency scale of this mode, while the inset magnifies the low-frequency superradiant regime, where Γω11 < 0 and hence σ11 < 0. Negative values in the inset are a mode-level superradiant effect and do not imply a negative total absorption cross section. The vertical dashed l… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dimensionless scalar wave effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Frequency dependence of the relative deviations used in the hierarchy comparison at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Total absorption spectra for the same on-axis setup as Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Co- and counter-rotating azimuthal contributions to the absorption spectrum for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Positive amplification factor of the l = m = 1 superradiant mode at a/M = 0.99, matching the spin used in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Johannsen metric is a natural and significant generalization of the Kerr metric, representing the most general stationary, axisymmetric spacetime that preserves the Carter constant of motion. The theoretical status furnishes a powerful, systematic framework for strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem and for investigations of deviations from Kerr black-hole geometries. We formulate massless scalar plane-wave absorption in a Klein-Gordon-separable subclass of Johannsen spacetimes. In the asymptotically flat Johannsen metric, we impose Klein-Gordon separability, derive the separated angular and radial equations, and build a partial wave framework for the leading deformation sectors $A_1(r)$, $A_2(r)$, and $A_5(r)$. The resulting description separates deformations that change the radial size function $X(r)$ from those that enter only the radial kinetic term. The former modify the low-frequency area law, the high-frequency null-capture cross section, and the finite-frequency absorption spectra, whereas a pure $A_5$ deformation leaves the leading null-capture observable unchanged while remaining detectable in wave propagation. We further examine off-axis incidence, co-/counter-rotating contributions, and superradiant modes, where changes in $X(r_+)$ shift the horizon angular velocity and hence the superradiant threshold. Our results identify finite-frequency absorption as a wave-optics diagnostic that can probe radial propagation sectors inaccessible to both the area law and null geodesic capture observables, offering a new tool for strong-field tests of black hole geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper formulates massless scalar plane-wave absorption in a Klein-Gordon-separable subclass of Johannsen spacetimes. It imposes separability to derive angular and radial equations for the leading A1(r), A2(r), and A5(r) deformation sectors, isolates deformations that modify the radial size function X(r) from those entering only the radial kinetic term, and computes their differential effects on the low-frequency area law, high-frequency null-capture cross section, finite-frequency absorption spectra, off-axis incidence, co-/counter-rotating modes, and superradiant thresholds via partial-wave matching to asymptotic plane waves.

Significance. If the separation and matching hold, the work supplies a concrete wave-optics diagnostic capable of probing radial propagation sectors inaccessible to both the horizon area law and null-geodesic capture observables. The explicit separation of X(r) deformations from pure kinetic-term deformations supplies a useful organizing principle for strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the Johannsen metric admits Klein-Gordon separability when restricted to A1(r), A2(r), and A5(r), but does not quote the explicit condition on the metric functions that enforces separability; an equation reference would clarify the domain of validity.
  2. The description of the partial-wave framework mentions matching to asymptotic plane waves but does not indicate whether the radial equation is solved numerically or via continued fractions; a brief statement on the method would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript, the accurate summary of its scope, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation begins by restricting the Johannsen metric to the A1(r), A2(r), A5(r) sectors that admit Klein-Gordon separability, imposes the separation ansatz on the wave equation, obtains the radial ODE, and matches its asymptotic solutions to plane waves to extract absorption cross-sections. The separation of X(r) deformations from pure kinetic-term deformations is a direct algebraic consequence of the separated radial equation itself; the low-frequency area law, high-frequency capture cross-section, and finite-frequency spectra are then computed from that equation without any parameter being fitted to the target observables and then relabeled as a prediction. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, an imported uniqueness theorem, or an ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The entire chain is therefore self-contained within the stated metric subclass and the standard partial-wave matching procedure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper relies on standard general-relativity assumptions plus the additional requirement of Klein-Gordon separability for the chosen deformation functions; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the Johannsen deformation functions themselves.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Johannsen metric admits a Carter constant and the chosen deformation functions allow separation of the massless Klein-Gordon equation.
    Invoked to derive separated angular and radial equations for the absorption problem.
  • standard math Asymptotic flatness and standard boundary conditions at the horizon and infinity hold for the deformed metric.
    Required for plane-wave incidence and partial-wave matching.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5807 in / 1420 out tokens · 39810 ms · 2026-06-29T11:06:23.987169+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Roy P. Kerr. Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics.Physical Review Letters, 11(5):237–238, 1963. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.11.237 1963

  2. [2]

    Carter,Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,Phys

    Brandon Carter. Global structure of the kerr family of gravitational fields.Physical Review, 174(5):1559–1571, 1968. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.174.1559

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.174.1559 1968

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott, et al. Tests of general relativity with gw150914.Physical Review Letters, 116(22):221101, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.221101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.221101 2016

  4. [4]

    First m87 event horizon telescope results

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Kazunori Akiyama, et al. First m87 event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the supermassive black hole.The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875(1):L1, 2019. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  5. [5]

    Sotiriou, et al

    Leor Barack, Vitor Cardoso, Samaya Nissanke, Thomas P. Sotiriou, et al. Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(14):143001, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 2019

  6. [6]

    Misner, Kip S

    Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, and John Archibald Wheeler.Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973

    1973

  7. [7]

    Wald.General Relativity

    Robert M. Wald.General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984

    1984

  8. [8]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983

    Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar.The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983

    1983

  9. [9]

    Carroll.Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity

    Sean M. Carroll.Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Addison Wesley, San Francisco, 2004

    2004

  10. [10]

    Metric for rapidly spinning black holes suitable for strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem.Physical Review D, 83(12):124015, 2011

    Tim Johannsen and Dimitrios Psaltis. Metric for rapidly spinning black holes suitable for strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem.Physical Review D, 83(12):124015, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.124015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.124015 2011

  11. [11]

    On generic parametrizations of spinning black-hole geometries.Physical Review D, 89(6):064007, 2014

    Vitor Cardoso, Paolo Pani, and João Rico. On generic parametrizations of spinning black-hole geometries.Physical Review D, 89(6):064007, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.064007 2014

  12. [12]

    Regular black hole metric with three constants of motion.Physical Review D, 88(4):044002, 2013

    Tim Johannsen. Regular black hole metric with three constants of motion.Physical Review D, 88(4):044002, 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.044002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.044002 2013

  13. [13]

    Asymptotically flat, parametrized black hole metric preserving kerr symmetries.Physical Review D, 101(8):084030, 2020

    Zack Carson and Kent Yagi. Asymptotically flat, parametrized black hole metric preserving kerr symmetries.Physical Review D, 101(8):084030, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101. 084030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101 2020

  14. [14]

    Frolov, Pavel Krtous, and David Kubiznak

    Valeri P. Frolov, Pavel Krtous, and David Kubiznak. Black holes, hidden symmetries, and complete integrability.Living Reviews in Relativity, 20(1):6, 2017. doi: 10.1007/ s41114-017-0009-9. 26

    2017

  15. [15]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko. Axisymmetric black holes allowing for separation of variables in the klein-gordon and hamilton-jacobi equations.Physical Review D, 97(8):084044, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.084044

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.084044 2018

  16. [16]

    Separability of the klein-gordon equation for rotating spacetimes obtained from newman-janis algorithm.Physical Review D, 100(10):104054, 2019

    Che-Yu Chen and Pisin Chen. Separability of the klein-gordon equation for rotating spacetimes obtained from newman-janis algorithm.Physical Review D, 100(10):104054, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104054

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.104054 2019

  17. [17]

    Black hole shadow in a general rotating spacetime obtained through newman- janis algorithm.Physical Review D, 100(2):024028, 2019

    Rajibul Shaikh. Black hole shadow in a general rotating spacetime obtained through newman- janis algorithm.Physical Review D, 100(2):024028, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.024028 2019

  18. [18]

    Shadow of a disformal kerr black hole in quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories.The European Physical Journal C, 80(12):1180, 2020

    Fen Long, Songbai Chen, Mingzhi Wang, and Jiliang Jing. Shadow of a disformal kerr black hole in quadratic degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories.The European Physical Journal C, 80(12):1180, 2020. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08744-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08744-8 2020

  19. [19]

    Volker Perlick and Oleg Yu. Tsupko. Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies.Physics Reports, 947:1–39, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.004 2022

  20. [20]

    Dynamics of null particles and shadow for general rotating black hole.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023 (11):141, 2023

    Kun Meng, Xi-Long Fan, Song Li, Wen-Biao Han, and Hongsheng Zhang. Dynamics of null particles and shadow for general rotating black hole.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023 (11):141, 2023. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2023)141

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2023)141 2023

  21. [21]

    W. G. Unruh. Absorption cross section of small black holes.Physical Review D, 14(12): 3251–3259, 1976. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3251

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.3251 1976

  22. [22]

    Don N. Page. Particle emission rates from a black hole. ii. massless particles from a rotating hole.Physical Review D, 14(12):3260–3273, 1976. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3260

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.3260 1976

  23. [23]

    Absorption and emission spectra of a schwarzschild black hole.Physical Review D, 18(4):1030–1036, 1978

    Norma Sanchez. Absorption and emission spectra of a schwarzschild black hole.Physical Review D, 18(4):1030–1036, 1978. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.1030 1978

  24. [24]

    Teukolsky

    Saul A. Teukolsky. Perturbations of a rotating black hole. i. fundamental equations for gravitational, electromagnetic, and neutrino-field perturbations.The Astrophysical Journal, 185:635–647, 1973. doi: 10.1086/152444

    work page doi:10.1086/152444 1973

  25. [25]

    black hole

    A. A. Starobinsky and S. M. Churilov. Amplification of electromagnetic and gravitational waves scattered by a rotating “black hole”.Soviet Physics JETP, 38:1–5, 1974. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 3 (1973)

    1974

  26. [26]

    S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press. Perturbations of a rotating black hole. iii. interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnetic radiation.The Astrophysical Journal, 193: 443–461, 1974. doi: 10.1086/153180

    work page doi:10.1086/153180 1974

  27. [27]

    J. A. H. Futterman, F. A. Handler, and R. A. Matzner.Scattering from Black Holes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988

    1988

  28. [28]

    Caio F. B. Macedo, Luiz C. S. Leite, Ednilton S. Oliveira, Sam R. Dolan, and Luís C. B. Crispino. Absorption of planar massless scalar waves by kerr black holes.Physical Review D, 88(6):064033, 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064033. 27

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.064033 2013

  29. [29]

    Sam R. Dolan. Scattering and absorption of gravitational plane waves by rotating black holes. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25(23):235002, 2008. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/25/23/235002

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/23/235002 2008

  30. [30]

    Luiz C. S. Leite, Sam R. Dolan, and Luís C. B. Crispino. Absorption of electromagnetic and gravitational waves by kerr black holes.Physics Letters B, 774:130–134, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.048 2017

  31. [31]

    Luiz C. S. Leite, Sam R. Dolan, and Luís C. B. Crispino. Scattering of massless bosonic fields by kerr black holes: On-axis incidence.Physical Review D, 100(8):084025, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.084025

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.084025 2019

  32. [32]

    Das, Gary Gibbons, and Samir D

    Sumit R. Das, Gary Gibbons, and Samir D. Mathur. Universality of low energy absorption cross sections for black holes.Physical Review Letters, 78(3):417–419, 1997. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.78.417

    1997

  33. [33]

    Low-frequency scalar absorption cross sections for stationary black holes

    Atsushi Higuchi. Low-frequency scalar absorption cross sections for stationary black holes. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 18(20):L139–L144, 2001. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/18/20/102

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/20/102 2001

  34. [34]

    Addendum to ‘low-frequency scalar absorption cross sections for stationary black holes’.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19(3):599–600, 2002

    Atsushi Higuchi. Addendum to ‘low-frequency scalar absorption cross sections for stationary black holes’.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19(3):599–600, 2002. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/ 19/3/401

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/ 2002

  35. [35]

    Complex angular momentum in black hole physics and quasinormal modes.Physical Review D, 67(12):124017, 2003

    Yves Décanini, Antoine Folacci, and Bruce Jensen. Complex angular momentum in black hole physics and quasinormal modes.Physical Review D, 67(12):124017, 2003. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.67.124017

    2003

  36. [36]

    Universality of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes.Physical Review D, 83(4):044032, 2011

    Yves Décanini, Gilles Esposito-Farèse, and Antoine Folacci. Universality of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes.Physical Review D, 83(4):044032, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.044032 2011

  37. [37]

    Fine structure of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28(17):175021,

    Yves Décanini, Antoine Folacci, and Bernard Raffaelli. Fine structure of high-energy absorption cross sections for black holes.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28(17):175021,

  38. [38]

    doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/28/17/175021

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/17/175021

  39. [39]

    Benone, Luiz C

    Carolina L. Benone, Luiz C. S. Leite, Luís C. B. Crispino, and Sam R. Dolan. On-axis scalar absorption cross section of kerr-newman black holes: Geodesic analysis, sinc and low-frequency approximations.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 27(11):1843012,

  40. [40]

    doi: 10.1142/S0218271818430125

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271818430125

  41. [41]

    Black hole absorption cross sections: Spin and regge poles.Physical Review D, 111(12):124041, 2025

    Mohamed Ould El Hadj. Black hole absorption cross sections: Spin and regge poles.Physical Review D, 111(12):124041, 2025. doi: 10.1103/vj91-h7wd

    work page doi:10.1103/vj91-h7wd 2025

  42. [42]

    Luiz C. S. Leite, Carolina L. Benone, and Luís C. B. Crispino. Scalar absorption by charged rotating black holes.Physical Review D, 96(4):044043, 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96. 044043

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96 2017

  43. [43]

    Caio F. B. Macedo and Luís C. B. Crispino. Absorption of planar massless scalar waves by bardeen regular black holes.Physical Review D, 90(6):064001, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD. 90.064001. 28

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2014

  44. [44]

    E. S. de Oliveira. Scalar absorption cross section of rotating black holes with tidal charge. Physical Review D, 104(12):124008, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.124008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.124008 2021

  45. [45]

    Absorption cross section of regular black holes in scalar-tensor conformal gravity.Physical Review D, 105(4):044031, 2022

    Yang Li and Yan-Gang Miao. Absorption cross section of regular black holes in scalar-tensor conformal gravity.Physical Review D, 105(4):044031, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105. 044031

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105 2022

  46. [46]

    Marco A. A. De Paula, Luiz C. S. Leite, Sam R. Dolan, and Luís C. B. Crispino. Absorption and unbounded superradiance in a static regular black hole spacetime.Physical Review D, 109(6):064053, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.064053

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.064053 2024

  47. [47]

    Scattering of massless scalar field by charged dila- tonic black holes.The European Physical Journal C, 80:654, 2020

    Yang Huang and Hongsheng Zhang. Scattering of massless scalar field by charged dila- tonic black holes.The European Physical Journal C, 80:654, 2020. doi: 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-020-8228-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2020

  48. [48]

    Absorption and scattering of massless scalar waves by frolov black holes.Physical Review D, 113:084031, 2026

    Jining Tang, Yang Huang, and Hongsheng Zhang. Absorption and scattering of massless scalar waves by frolov black holes.Physical Review D, 113:084031, 2026. doi: 10.1103/ 641v-2931

    2026

  49. [49]

    de Felice and G

    F. de Felice and G. Preti. On the meaning of the separation constant in the kerr metric. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 16(9):2929–2935, 1999

    1999

  50. [50]

    E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence. Metric of a rotating, charged mass.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 6(6):918–919, 1965. doi: 10.1063/1.1704351

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1704351 1965

  51. [51]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko. Detection of gravitational waves from black holes: Is there a window for alternative theories?Physics Letters B, 756:350–353, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.044 2016

  52. [52]

    Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory.Physical Review Letters, 69(7):1006–1009, 1992

    Ashoke Sen. Rotating charged black hole solution in heterotic string theory.Physical Review Letters, 69(7):1006–1009, 1992. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.1006 1992

  53. [53]

    Sarah Vigeland, Nicolas Yunes, and Leo C. Stein. Bumpy black holes in alternate theories of gravity.Physical Review D, 83(10):104027, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.104027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.104027 2011

  54. [54]

    Nicolas Yunes and Leo C. Stein. Non-spinning black holes in alternative theories of gravity. Physical Review D, 83(10):104002, 2011. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.104002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.104002 2011

  55. [55]

    Dynamical Chern–Simons modified gravity

    Nicolas Yunes and Frans Pretorius. Dynamical Chern–Simons modified gravity. i. spinning black holes in the slow-rotation approximation.Physical Review D, 79(8):084043, 2009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084043

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.084043 2009

  56. [56]

    A. N. Aliev and A. E. Gümrükçüoğlu. Charged rotating black holes on a 3-Brane.Physical Review D, 71(10):104027, 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.104027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.104027 2005

  57. [57]

    Will and Jr

    Clifford M. Will and Jr. Nordtvedt, Kenneth. Conservation laws and preferred frames in relativistic gravity. i. preferred-frame theories and an extended ppn formalism.The Astrophysical Journal, 177:757–774, 1972. 29

    1972

  58. [58]

    Clifford M. Will. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment.Living Reviews in Relativity, 17:4, 2014. doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 2014

  59. [59]

    Will.Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics

    Clifford M. Will.Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 edition, 2018

    2018

  60. [60]

    Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1957

    Carson Flammer.Spheroidal Wave Functions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1957. 30

    1957