Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantum Advantage with Faulty Oracle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.04931 v1 pith:PIMGNVCV submitted 2024-11-07 quant-ph

Quantum Advantage with Faulty Oracle

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumoraclemodelnoisequeryadvantagealgorithmsfaulty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper investigates the impact of noise in the quantum query model, a fundamental framework for quantum algorithms. We focus on the scenario where the oracle is subject to non-unitary (or irreversible) noise, specifically under the \textit{faulty oracle} model, where the oracle fails with a constant probability and acts as identity. Regev and Schiff (ICALP'08) showed that quantum advantage is lost for the search problem under this noise model. Our main result shows that every quantum query algorithm can be made robust in this noise model with a roughly quadratic blow-up in query complexity, thereby preserving quantum speedup for all problems where the quantum advantage is super-cubic. This is the first non-trivial robustification of quantum query algorithms against an oracle that is noisy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. High-rate qLDPC processors

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0

    Non-abelian "mitten" qLDPC codes achieve 20% encoding rate with distances 10-24 on 150-975 qubits, and simulations indicate fault-tolerant processors sustaining ~10^10 logical operations at 0.1% physical error rate.