Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Multi-Metric Adaptive Experimental Design Under a Fixed Budget with Validation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.03062 v2 pith:PJV3JXNW submitted 2025-06-03 cs.LG stat.ML

Multi-Metric Adaptive Experimental Design Under a Fixed Budget with Validation

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords adaptivetreatmentexperimentalexperimentsgeneralizesheterogeneousmulti-metricphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A/B tests in online experiments face statistical power challenges when testing multiple candidates simultaneously, while adaptive experimental designs (AED) alone fall short in inferring experiment statistics such as the average treatment effect, especially with many metrics (e.g., revenue, safety) and heterogeneous variances. This paper proposes a fixed-budget multi-metric AED framework with a two-phase structure: an adaptive exploration phase to identify the best treatment, and a validation phase with an A/B test to verify the treatment's quality and infer statistics. We propose SHRVar, which generalizes sequential halving (SH) with a novel relative-variance-based sampling and an elimination strategy built on reward z values. It achieves a provable error probability that decreases exponentially, where the exponent H3 generalizes the complexity measure for SH and SHVar with homogeneous and heterogeneous variances, respectively. Numerical experiments demonstrate its performance and robustness.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.