Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 41 references

Phase Stable Integrated Delay Line Asymmetric Mach Zehnder Interferometers Enabled by High Efficiency 3 dB Couplers for Chip Scale QKD

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A silicon nitride asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer delivers 500 ps delays with visibility above 0.99 for chip-scale QKD receivers.

desk verdict Simulation-only design of a Si3N4 aMZI delay line for QKD with flat group delay in idealized EME models, but no tolerance analysis or measurements. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.21542 v1 pith:PKR6DDKV submitted 2026-06-19 physics.optics quant-ph

Mahsa. Ghezelbash , Abdollah Eslami Majd This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords siliconnitrideasymmetricMach-Zehnderinterferometerquantumkeydistributionintegratedphotonicsdelayline3dBcouplertime-binQKDreceiver
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a compact Si3N4/SiO2 integrated asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer that generates precise temporal delays for quantum key distribution receivers. It optimizes a 3 dB directional coupler for accurate 50:50 splitting at 1550 nm and uses 1 um by 0.4 um waveguides to achieve a 500 ps delay line with nearly constant group delay across the C-band. Simulations show sub-10 ps group delay variation, smooth linear phase response, insertion loss below 0.5 dB, and interference visibility above 0.99. These features support estimated quantum bit error rates below 0.5 percent at gigahertz rates and compatibility with wavelength division multiplexed systems. A sympathetic reader would care because the design offers a low-loss, dispersion-controlled path to miniaturizing QKD hardware.

What carries the argument

The 3 dB directional coupler whose coupling length is estimated from the effective index difference between even and odd supermodes and refined by three-dimensional eigenmode expansion simulations, paired with single-mode Si3N4 waveguides of 1 um x 0.4 um cross section.

What would settle it

Fabricate the device and measure the actual interference visibility at 1550 nm; visibility below 0.99 would falsify the performance claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

An optimized Si3N4/SiO2 aMZI architecture with high-efficiency 3 dB couplers provides a 500 ps optical delay corresponding to a 2 GHz free spectral range. The structure maintains nearly constant group delay with sub-10 ps variation over 190-200 THz, a smooth near-linear phase response, and stable 3 dB power splitting with insertion loss below 0.5 dB. This enables interference visibility above 0.99 and an estimated QBER below 0.5 percent for gigahertz-rate time-bin QKD while remaining compatible with WDM architectures.

Load-bearing premise

The 3D EME simulations and effective index calculations accurately capture the behavior of the actual fabricated device.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The aMZI supports gigahertz-rate time-bin QKD with QBER below 0.5 percent.
  • Wideband linear phase response allows compatibility with wavelength division multiplexed QKD systems.
  • Insertion loss below 0.5 dB and stable splitting across the C-band enable low-loss integrated receivers.
  • The 500 ps delay with sub-10 ps variation provides spectrally stable operation suitable for scalable chip-scale quantum photonic receivers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same waveguide platform could support multiple aMZIs on one chip for parallel QKD channels.
  • The design approach may extend to other quantum protocols that require precise, stable timing references.
  • Actual fabricated devices could be tested for tolerance to process variations by comparing measured visibility against the simulated 0.99 target.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a simulated design for a compact Si3N4/SiO2 integrated asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer (aMZI) using optimized 3 dB directional couplers for precise temporal delay generation in chip-scale QKD receivers. Based on effective-index calculations and 3D eigenmode expansion (EME) simulations of 1 µm × 0.4 µm single-mode waveguides, it reports a 500 ps delay line (2 GHz FSR) with stable 50:50 splitting (<0.5 dB insertion loss), sub-10 ps group-delay variation over 190–200 THz, near-linear phase response, interference visibility >0.99, and estimated QBER <0.5 %, concluding that the structure provides a low-loss, dispersion-controlled solution suitable for scalable quantum photonic receivers and WDM QKD.

Significance. If the simulated performance translates to fabricated devices, the design would address a practical need for compact, low-dispersion delay lines in gigahertz-rate time-bin QKD receivers on a standard low-loss photonic platform, with potential for WDM compatibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / simulation results] Abstract and simulation results: The headline claims (visibility >0.99, QBER <0.5 %, suitability for scalable chip-scale receivers) rest entirely on idealized 3D EME simulations of group-delay flatness and coupler balance with no reported Monte-Carlo tolerance analysis or sensitivity study to fabrication variations in waveguide width, height, or etch depth. These variations directly affect the effective-index difference, coupling length, and resulting phase stability, making the mapping from simulation to device performance untested and load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No experimental validation, measured insertion loss, phase data, or comparison against fabricated reference devices is provided, so the assertion that the aMZI is “suitable for scalable chip-scale quantum photonic receivers” cannot be assessed beyond the idealized model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our simulation-based design manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / simulation results] Abstract and simulation results: The headline claims (visibility >0.99, QBER <0.5 %, suitability for scalable chip-scale receivers) rest entirely on idealized 3D EME simulations of group-delay flatness and coupler balance with no reported Monte-Carlo tolerance analysis or sensitivity study to fabrication variations in waveguide width, height, or etch depth. These variations directly affect the effective-index difference, coupling length, and resulting phase stability, making the mapping from simulation to device performance untested and load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of a Monte-Carlo tolerance or sensitivity analysis leaves the robustness against fabrication variations unquantified. In the revised manuscript we will add a sensitivity study that varies waveguide width (±10 nm), height (±5 nm), and etch depth around the nominal 1 µm × 0.4 µm cross-section and reports the resulting spreads in group-delay variation, coupler imbalance, and visibility. This will be presented alongside the idealized EME results to clarify the design margins. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No experimental validation, measured insertion loss, phase data, or comparison against fabricated reference devices is provided, so the assertion that the aMZI is “suitable for scalable chip-scale quantum photonic receivers” cannot be assessed beyond the idealized model.

    Authors: The manuscript is explicitly a design and simulation study whose purpose is to propose and optimize the aMZI geometry using effective-index and 3D EME methods. Experimental fabrication, loss measurements, and phase characterization lie outside its scope; we have revised the abstract and conclusions to state that the simulated metrics indicate suitability for subsequent fabrication and testing rather than claiming demonstrated device performance. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Experimental validation and measured data cannot be supplied because the work is a simulation-only design study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; performance metrics are direct outputs of standard EME and effective-index simulations

full rationale

The derivation chain begins with standard waveguide cross-section selection (1 µm × 0.4 µm) yielding group index ≈2, followed by effective-index estimation of coupling length that is then refined via independent 3D EME simulations. Spectral flatness, group-delay variation (<10 ps), and phase linearity are computed outputs of those simulations; visibility >0.99 and QBER <0.5 % are then inferred from the simulated phase stability using the conventional relation between visibility and error rate. No parameter is fitted to a target result, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and no quantity is redefined in terms of itself. The workflow is therefore self-contained against external simulation tools and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design rests on standard assumptions in integrated photonics simulation and waveguide theory with no new entities postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • waveguide cross-section = 1 um x 0.4 um
    1 um x 0.4 um chosen to achieve group index close to 2 for delay engineering
  • coupling length
    Initially estimated from effective index difference then refined by EME simulation
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Effective index difference between even and odd supermodes determines the coupling length for 50:50 splitting
    Used to initially estimate coupler length before EME refinement
  • domain assumption Group index remains close to 2 across the C-band for the chosen waveguide geometry
    Enables accurate delay engineering for 500 ps

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase Stable Integrated Delay Line Asymmetric Mach Zehnder Interferometers Enabled by High Efficiency 3 dB Couplers for Chip Scale QKD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PKR6DDKV

@misc{pith2026260621542,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase Stable Integrated Delay Line Asymmetric Mach Zehnder Interferometers Enabled by High Efficiency 3 dB Couplers for Chip Scale QKD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PKR6DDKV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.21542}
}
read the original abstract

Precise temporal delay generation is a key requirement for asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometers (aMZIs) used in high-speed quantum key distribution (QKD) receivers. In this work, a compact integrated aMZI architecture based on a silicon nitride on silicon dioxide (Si3N4/SiO2) photonic platform is presented. A 3-dB directional coupler enabling accurate 50:50 power splitting at the 1550 nm telecommunication wavelength is designed and optimized. The coupling length is initially estimated from the effective index difference between the even and odd supermodes and subsequently refined using three-dimensional eigenmode expansion (EME) simulations. The optimized structure employs single-mode Si3N4 waveguides with a cross section of 1 um x 0.4 um, providing a group index close to 2 and enabling accurate delay engineering. Spectral analysis demonstrates stable 3-dB power splitting across the C-band with insertion loss below 0.5 dB and negligible power imbalance, indicating high transmission efficiency and structural symmetry. An integrated Si3N4 aMZI delay line providing a 500 ps optical delay, corresponding to a 2 GHz free spectral range (FSR), is further demonstrated. Simulations show nearly constant group delay across the 190-200 THz frequency range with sub-10 ps variation and a smooth, near-linear phase response. These characteristics enable interference visibility above 0.99, corresponding to an estimated quantum bit error rate (QBER) below 0.5 percent for gigahertz-rate time-bin QKD systems. The wideband linear phase behavior also indicates compatibility with wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) QKD architectures. The results confirm that the proposed Si3N4 integrated aMZI provides a low-loss, dispersion-controlled, and spectrally stable delay solution suitable for scalable chip-scale quantum photonic receivers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21542 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Design and geometric configuration of the integrated Si3N4/SiO2directional coupler. (1) Top-view schematic of the 2×2 directional coupler, highlighting the symmetric evanescent coupling region with a gap (𝑔) and interaction length (𝐿𝑐 ). Light launched into Input Port 1 is distributed between the Bar (Port 2) and Cross (Port 3) ports through supermode interference. (2) Cross-sectional view of the waveguide structure… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comprehensive spectral performance of the 𝑆𝑖3𝑁4directional coupler. (a) Spectral power splitting ratio for the bar and cross ports. (b) Loss characteristics, including insertion loss and power imbalance, confirming high transmission efficiency. (c) Broadband phase response of the output ports The primary achievement of this architecture lies in the synergistic optimization of broadband power-splitting and phase￾corr… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Longitudinal field intensity evolution along the Si3N4directional coupler simulated via the EME method. The heatmap illustrates the gradual evanescent coupling of optical power from the input (upper) waveguide to the adjacent (lower) waveguide. The dashed vertical line indicates the calculated coupling length 𝐿50 = 6.61 𝜇mfor a symmetric 3 dB power split, while 𝐿100 = 13.22 𝜇mmarks the point of complete power transf… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum cryptography

    N. Gisin, G. Goire Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum cryptography.”

  2. [2]

    The security of practical quantum key distribution,

    V. Scarani, H. Bechmann -Pasquinucci, N. J. Cerf, M. Dušek, N. Lütkenhaus, and M. Peev, “The security of practical quantum key distribution,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1301 –1350, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1301 2009

  3. [3]

    Secure quantum key dis- tribution with realistic devices,

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H. -K. Lo, and J. -W. Pan, “Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 92, no. 2, p. 025002, May 2020, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.025002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 2020

  4. [4]

    Distribution of Time -Bin Entangled Qubits over 50 km of Optical Fiber,

    I. Marcikic, H. de Riedmatten, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, M. Legré, and N. Gisin, “Distribution of Time -Bin Entangled Qubits over 50 km of Optical Fiber,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 93, no. 18, p. 180502, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.180502 2004

  5. [5]

    Low -loss, dual - polarization asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer chips for quantum key distribution,

    M. Ren, L. Zhou, and Z. Yuan, “Low -loss, dual - polarization asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer chips for quantum key distribution,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 66, no. 8, p. 180503, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11432-022-3641-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11432-022-3641-x 2023

  6. [6]

    Chip -based quantum key distribution,

    P. Sibson et al. , “Chip -based quantum key distribution,” Nat. Commun. , vol. 8, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1038/ncomms13984

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms13984 2017

  7. [7]

    Real-time operation of a multi-rate, multi-protocol quantum key distribution transmitter,

    I. De Marco et al., “Real-time operation of a multi-rate, multi-protocol quantum key distribution transmitter,” Optica, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 911, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.423517

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.423517 2021

  8. [8]

    Advances in Chip-Based Quantum Key Distribution,

    Q. Liu et al., “Advances in Chip-Based Quantum Key Distribution,” Oct. 01, 2022, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/e24101334

    work page doi:10.3390/e24101334 2022

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Integrated photonic quantum technologies,

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, “Integrated photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 273–284, May 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Real - time free spectral range measurement based on a correlated resonance -tracking technology,

    C. Feng, X. Wang, B. Miao, Z. Gu, and J. Li, “Real - time free spectral range measurement based on a correlated resonance -tracking technology,” Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 19, p. 30604, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1364/OE.500573

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Ultra-compact and robust mode division multiplexer based on a subwavelength grating structure,

    Z. Liu, F. Xia, P. Wang, R. Yan, L. Chen, and M. Yuan, “Ultra-compact and robust mode division multiplexer based on a subwavelength grating structure,” Optics Continuum, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 840, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1364/OPTCON.589039

    2026 doi

  4. [12]

    Maintenance -free operation of WDM quantum key distribution system through a field fiber 15 over 30 days,

    K. Yoshino, T. Ochi, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, and A. Tajima, “Maintenance -free operation of WDM quantum key distribution system through a field fiber 15 over 30 days,” Opt. Express, vol. 21, no. 25, p. 31395, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1364/OE.21.031395

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    Integrated silicon photonics for high -speed quantum key distribution,

    P. Sibson, J. E. Kennard, S. Stanisic, C. Erven, J. L. O’Brien, and M. G. Thompson, “Integrated silicon photonics for high -speed quantum key distribution,” Optica, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 172, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1364/optica.4.000172

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Elsevier,

    Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides . Elsevier,

  7. [15]

    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-470951-5.X5001-X

    doi

  8. [17]

    Asymmetric, non -uniform 3 -dB directional coupler with 300-nm bandwidth and a small footprint,

    H. Nikbakht et al. , “Asymmetric, non -uniform 3 -dB directional coupler with 300-nm bandwidth and a small footprint,” Opt. Lett., vol. 48, no. 2, p. 207, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1364/OL.476537

    2023 doi

  9. [18]

    Design of a large bandwidth 2 × 2 interferometric switching cell based on a sub-wavelength grating,

    G. Brunetti, G. Marocco, A. Di Benedetto, A. Giorgio, M. N. Armenise, and C. Ciminelli, “Design of a large bandwidth 2 × 2 interferometric switching cell based on a sub-wavelength grating,” Journal of Optics, vol. 23, no. 8, p. 085801, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1088/2040 - 8986/ac0a8c

    2021 doi

  10. [20]

    Development of high quality silicon nitride chips for integrated nonlinear photonics,

    Houssein el Dirani, “Development of high quality silicon nitride chips for integrated nonlinear photonics,” Université de Lyon, 2019

    2019

  11. [21]

    A photonic integrated quantum secure communication system,

    T. K. Paraïso et al. , “A photonic integrated quantum secure communication system,” Nat. Photonics , vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 850 –856, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00873-0

    2021 doi

  12. [22]

    H. A. . Haus, Waves and fields in optoelectronics . Prentice-Hall, 1984

    1984

  13. [23]

    Silicon nitride Mach -Zehnder interferometer for on -chip quantum random number generation,

    A. Prokhodtsov et al., “Silicon nitride Mach -Zehnder interferometer for on -chip quantum random number generation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , vol. 1695, no. 1, p. 012118, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742 - 6596/1695/1/012118

    2020 doi

  14. [24]

    New CMOS -compatible platforms based on silicon nitride and Hydex for nonlinear optics,

    D. J. Moss, R. Morandotti, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “New CMOS -compatible platforms based on silicon nitride and Hydex for nonlinear optics,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 597 –607, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.183

    2013 doi

  15. [25]

    Modelling, characterization, and applications of silicon on insulator loop terminated asymmetric Mach Zehnder interferometer,

    R. S. El Shamy, A. E. Afifi, M. M. Badr, and M. A. Swillam, “Modelling, characterization, and applications of silicon on insulator loop terminated asymmetric Mach Zehnder interferometer,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 3598, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598- 022-07449-0

    2022 doi

  16. [26]

    Chrostowski and M

    L. Chrostowski and M. Hochberg, Silicon Photonics Design. Cambridge University Press, 2015. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316084168

    2015 doi

  17. [27]

    Universal relations for coupling of optical powerbetweenmicroresonators and dielectric waveguides,

    A. Yariv, “Universal relations for coupling of optical powerbetweenmicroresonators and dielectric waveguides,” Electron. Lett., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 321 – 322, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1049/el:20000340

    doi

  18. [28]

    Theory of Dielectric Waveguides,

    H. Kogelnik, “Theory of Dielectric Waveguides,” 1975, pp. 13–81. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-43208-2_2

    1975 doi

  19. [29]

    A. W. Snyder and J. D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1984. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2813-1

    1984 doi

  20. [30]

    Silicon Nitride in Silicon Photonics,

    D. J. Blumenthal, R. Heideman, D. Geuzebroek, A. Leinse, and C. Roeloffzen, “Silicon Nitride in Silicon Photonics,” Dec. 01, 2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2018.2861576

    2018 doi

  21. [31]

    Silicon nitride passive and active photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects,

    C. Xiang, W. Jin, and J. E. Bowers, “Silicon nitride passive and active photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects,” Photonics Res., vol. 10, no. 6, p. A82, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.452936

    2022 doi

  22. [32]

    Ultra -low loss optical delay lines based on silicon nitride SWG technology,

    M. Tosi, M. C. Bustillos, H. Sun, L. A. Bulus -Rossini, J. Azaña, and P. A. Costanzo -Caso, “Ultra -low loss optical delay lines based on silicon nitride SWG technology,” Opt. Express, vol. 33, no. 16, p. 33351, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1364/OE.561965

    2025 doi

  23. [33]

    Ultra-low-loss optical delay line on a silicon chip,

    H. Lee, T. Chen, J. Li, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultra-low-loss optical delay line on a silicon chip,” Nat. Commun., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 867, May 2012, doi: 10.1038/ncomms1876

    2012 doi

  24. [34]

    Metropolitan Quantum Key Distribution with Silicon Photonics,

    D. Bunandar et al. , “Metropolitan Quantum Key Distribution with Silicon Photonics,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 021009, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021009

    2018 doi

  25. [35]

    TriPleX: a versatile dielectric photonic platform,

    K. Wörhoff, R. G. Heideman, A. Leinse, and M. Hoekman, “TriPleX: a versatile dielectric photonic platform,” Advanced Optical Technologies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 189 –207, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1515/aot -2015- 0016

    2015 doi

  26. [36]

    Integrated Optical Tunable Delay Line and Microwave Photonic Beamforming Chip: A Review,

    S. Shi et al., “Integrated Optical Tunable Delay Line and Microwave Photonic Beamforming Chip: A Review,” Laser Photon. Rev., vol. 19, no. 7, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1002/lpor.202400663

    2025 doi

  27. [37]

    Stable quantum key distribution using a silicon photonic transceiver,

    W. Geng, C. Zhang, Y. Zheng, J. He, C. Zhou, and Y. Kong, “Stable quantum key distribution using a silicon photonic transceiver,” Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 20, p. 29045, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1364/OE.27.029045

    2019 doi

  28. [38]

    Stability and convergence of modal approximations in coupled thermoelastic systems: Theory and simulation,

    I. Essadeq, S. Nafiri, S. Benjelloun, and A. E. Fettouh, “Stability and convergence of modal approximations in coupled thermoelastic systems: Theory and simulation,” Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 0 –0, 2026, doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2026070

    2026 doi

  29. [39]

    Broadband Silicon -On- Insulator directional couplers using a combination of straight and curved waveguide sections,

    G. F. R. Chen, J. R. Ong, T. Y. L. Ang, S. T. Lim, C. E. Png, and D. T. H. Tan, “Broadband Silicon -On- Insulator directional couplers using a combination of straight and curved waveguide sections,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7246, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1038/s41598-017- 07618-6

    2017 doi

  30. [40]

    Broadband Directional Coupler Based on Deformed Circular Waveguide for High -Power Application,

    M. Wang, X. Liao, P. Liu, Z. Li, and W. Li, “Broadband Directional Coupler Based on Deformed Circular Waveguide for High -Power Application,” Electronics (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 13, p. 2652, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3390/electronics14132652

    2025 doi

  31. [41]

    Broadband integrated directional 16 coupler for heralded single -photon characterization,

    F. Castro -Simanca, F. A. Domínguez -Serna, M. Gómez-Robles, R. Salas-Montiel, W. De La Cruz, and K. Garay -Palmett, “Broadband integrated directional 16 coupler for heralded single -photon characterization,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B , vol. 42, no. 11, p. B5...

    2025 doi

  32. [42]

    Supermode -based second harmonic generation in a nonlinear interferometer,

    D. Barral et al. , “Supermode -based second harmonic generation in a nonlinear interferometer,” Opt. Express, vol. 29, no. 23, p. 37175, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1364/OE.435281

    2021 doi

  33. [43]

    Advances in Chip -Scale Quantum Photonic Technologies,

    L. Lu, X. Zheng, Y. Lu, S. Zhu, and X. S. Ma, “Advances in Chip -Scale Quantum Photonic Technologies,” Dec. 01, 2021, John Wiley and Sons Inc. doi: 10.1002/qute.202100068

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.